physics 116 lecture 17 refraction and lenses
play

Physics 116 Lecture 17 Refraction and lenses Oct 27, 2010 R. J. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Physics 116 Lecture 17 Refraction and lenses Oct 27, 2010 R. J. Wilkes Email: ph116@u.washington.edu Lecture Schedule (up to exam 2) Today 2 Simple case: Refraction at a plane surface Last time: Light bends at interface between


  1. Physics 116 Lecture 17 Refraction and lenses Oct 27, 2010 R. J. Wilkes Email: ph116@u.washington.edu

  2. Lecture Schedule (up to exam 2) Today 2

  3. Simple case: Refraction at a plane surface Last time: • � Light bends at interface between refractive indices – � bends more the larger the difference in refractive index – � can be effectively viewed as a “least time” behavior • � get from A to B faster if you spend less time in the slow medium – � Object at B appears to be at location B’ • � Fish in tank appears to be displaced • � Put your feet in the lake and they seem bent A Exact formula: n 1 sin � 1 = n 2 sin � 2 � 1 n 1 = 1.0 n 2 = 1.5 � 2 B’ B 3

  4. Reflections, and refractive optical illusion • � In a thick piece of glass ( n = 1.5), the light paths are as shown – � About 4% of light energy is reflected from the surface (mirrorlike) • � Same thing happens at back surface ( 4% of that gets re-reflected from the inside front surface, and ends up going out the far side also…) Apparent direction A to object n 1 = 1.5 n 2 = 1.0 n 0 = 1.0 incoming ray object appears displaced from object due to jog inside glass (100%) 96% 8% reflected in two reflections (front & back) 4% 92% transmitted 0.16% ~ 4% B 4

  5. FYI: Fermat’s principle here too Least-time principle applies to refraction also: Actual path is quickest path, taking into account changes in light speed! • � Fermat’s Least-Time principle – � Pierre de Fermat, French mathematician, 1601-1665 • � Best known for “Fermat’s Last Theorem” Has solutions (Pythagoras) But Never works, if N>2 • � Wrote a friend just before he died “ I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain” – but he never got to explain • � F’s Last Theorem was finally proven true in 1994 (by A. Wiles, Princeton U.) 5

  6. Underwater refraction: Total Internal Reflection • � Looking up toward air from under water, refraction bends light rays away from normal (going from higher to lower n) • � For large angle of incidence, angle of refraction becomes >90° ! – � thereafter, you get total internal reflection – � for glass, the critical internal angle is 42°, for water, it’s 49° – � a ray within the higher index medium cannot escape at greater incidence angles (look at sky from underwater…can’t see out!) Shallow-angle At critical angle, rays escape refracted ray hugs surface n 1 = 1.0 n 2 = 1.5 At steeper angles, 42° rays are 100% reflected – � Same principle is used to confine light within optical fibers 6

  7. Polarization by reflection • � David Brewster (1781-1868): ! I ! R n 1 Found that when ! T - ! R = 90deg reflected light is polarized parallel to surface n 2 (perpendicular to plane of incidence) 90deg By Snell's Law: ! T Brewster (polarizing) angle: e.g., air/glass has ! B = tan -1 (1.5)= 57deg Reason: – � incident light has E components parallel and perpendicular to plane of incidence – � reflected light can only have component perpendicular to plane of incidence for ! R = ! T + 90deg • � Parallel component would have to be along propagation direction = longitudinal wave!

  8. Refraction at curved surfaces: Lenses • � Lenses = medium with higher n than air, with curved surfaces Lens with curved surfaces front and back ( double-convex ) bends light twice , each time refracting incoming ray towards normal line. Snell’s law of refraction applies at each surface. (One curved/one flat surface = plano-convex; inward cuving = concave lens) • � Convex ( positive or converging ) lens: thicker at center than edges – � Positive lens (by convention, we say its focal length f is positive) focuses parallel incoming rays to a point at distance f behind it Focal length may be given in m or mm. Optometrists instead specify “refracting power” in diopters: higher power = shorter f F (in diopters) = 1/(f in meters) +1 diopter lens has f=1 m +2 diopter lens has f=1/2 m 8

  9. Diverging lenses • � Concave ( negative or diverging ) lens: thinner at center than edges – � Negative lens (we say its f is negative ) makes parallel incoming rays bend outwards, so it seems as if light were coming from a point in front of the lens (focal point) Converging (+) Diverging (-) Negative lens f Meniscus lenses • � Meniscus lens: has both sided curved in the same direction, but one surface is more sharply curved than the other – � Commonly used for eyeglasses – � Can be either positive or negative (thicker at center, or thinner) 9

  10. Ray tracing rules for lenses Ray tracing rules for a (simple, thin) lens are: 1) Rays arriving parallel to the axis emerge to pass through the back focal point 2) Rays passing through the front focal point emerge parallel to the axis 3) Rays through center of the lens are undeviated This lens setup could be used as a object 1 camera, or a slide projector 3 f o o 2 o Focal pt Focal pt image Object distance Image distance d O d I Rays from object tip re-converge at a point, forming a real, inverted, magnified image there

  11. When object is close to converging lens 1) Rays arriving parallel to the axis emerge to pass through the back focal point 2) Rays through center of the lens are undeviated 3) Rays do not re-converge – image is virtual Gazing through the lens toward object the object, we see rays 2 appearing to emerge from a virtual, erect, magnified image image 1 f o o o Focal pt Focal pt Object distance d O This lens setup could be used as a magnifying glass Image distance d I

  12. Diverging lens, distant object 1) Rays arriving parallel to the axis emerge as if they came from the focal point 2) Rays through center of the lens are undeviated 3) The intersection of these rays shows image location, orientation, and size image This lens could be used in object 1 eyeglasses for a nearsighted person 2 o o o Focal pt f Gazing through the lens toward Object distance the object, we see rays d O appearing to emerge from a virtual, erect, demagnified image Image distance that is closer than the object d I

  13. Diverging lens, nearby object 1) Rays arriving parallel to the axis emerge as if they came from the focal point 2) Rays through center of the lens are undeviated 3) The intersection of these rays shows image location, orientation, and size image object 1 2 o o o Focal pt f Object distance Very little difference – image just d O moves a bit closer to the lens Image distance d I

  14. Ray tracing applet – try it yourself http://silver.neep.wisc.edu/~shock/tools/ray.html (original source http://webphysics.davidson.edu/Applets/Optics4/Intro.html)

Recommend


More recommend