persuasive performance feedback the effect of framing on
play

Persuasive Performance Feedback: The Effect of Framing on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AMIA 2013 Persuasive Performance Feedback: The Effect of Framing on Self-Efficacy Eun Kyoung Choe, University of Washington, USA Bongshin Lee / Microsoft Research, USA Sean Munson, Wanda Pratt, Julie A. Kientz / University of Washington, USA Eun


  1. AMIA 2013 Persuasive Performance Feedback: The Effect of Framing on Self-Efficacy Eun Kyoung Choe, University of Washington, USA Bongshin Lee / Microsoft Research, USA Sean Munson, Wanda Pratt, Julie A. Kientz / University of Washington, USA Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 1

  2. Self-monitoring technology Activity Fitbit Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 2

  3. Self-monitoring technology Sleep Zeo Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 3

  4. Self-monitoring technology Activity & Sleep Lark Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 4

  5. Self-monitoring technology Activity & Sleep BodyMedia Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 5

  6. Self-monitoring technology Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 6

  7. Feedback design is underexplored Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 7

  8. Example—fitbit’s step count “Get 268 steps more to hit your daily goal” Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 8

  9. Inspiration Framing Effects [Tversky & Kahneman, 1981] half empty? half full? Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 9

  10. Odds of a grueling operation “90 out of 100 patients are alive after five years” “10 out of 100 patients are dead after five years” [Marteau, 1989] Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 10

  11. Power of positive valence framing ✔ “90 out of 100 patients are “90 out of 100 patients are alive after five years” alive after five years” “10 out of 100 patients are dead after five years” [Marteau, 1989] Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 11

  12. Goal Persuasive performance feedback to nudge people toward healthier behaviors [Thaler & Sunstein, Nudge, 2008] Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 12

  13. Hypothetical scenario 4:30 PM, weekday 10,000 steps Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 13

  14. Achieved steps I’ve walked 2,500 steps! 2,500 steps 10,000 steps Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 14

  15. Remaining steps 7,500 more steps to take! 7,500 steps 10,000 steps Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 15

  16. Three types of framing Valence of Performance Presentation Type Data Unit Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 16

  17. Three types of framing Valence of Performance achieved vs. remaining 2,500 steps achieved 7,500 steps remaining Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 17

  18. Three types of framing Valence of Performance Presentation Type text-only vs. text with visual 2,500 steps achieved Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 18

  19. Three types of framing Valence of Performance Presentation Type Data Unit raw vs. percentage 2,500 steps achieved 25% achieved Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 19

  20. Distance to the goal Low achievement vs. High achievement 25% 75% Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 20

  21. Feedback manipulation Between-subjects Factors (2x2x2) Within-subjects Factor (x2) Distance to the goal Valence Presentation Data Unit Low achievement (25%) High achievement (75%) Condition 2,500 steps achieved 7,500 steps achieved Raw 1 Text-only Condition Percentage 25% achieved 75% achieved 2 Achieved Condition Raw 3 Text with visual Condition Percentage 4 Condition Raw 7,500 steps remaining 2,500 steps remaining 5 Text-only Condition 75% remaining 25% remaining Percentage 6 Remaining Condition Raw 7 Text with visual Condition Percentage 8 Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 21

  22. Dependent measures Self-efficacy (per feed (per feedback) back) [Bandura, 1990] Rate how confident you are that you can achieve your daily goal as of now ( 4:30 PM, weekday ). 0 = Certain I cannot meet my goal 10 = Certain I can meet my goal Interest level in taking 10,000 steps every day (per subject) (per subject) 0 = Not at all interested 10 = Very interested Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 22

  23. Study procedure Filtering Q1-1 Interest level Q Filtering Q2 Self-efficacy Q1 Feedback A Self-efficacy Q2 Feedback B Filtering Q1-2 Demographic Q Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 23

  24. Results Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 24

  25. Participants (N = 400) Convenience sampling (N = 511) • Recruited from researchers’ social network (e.g., post on facebook, email) • Skewed toward highly educated, motivated, technical population Removed 111 participants • Did not understand the feedback correctly (70 participants) • Outside of U.S. (25 participants) • Did not pay attention to the survey (9 participants) • iPhone/iPad user (7 participants) Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 25

  26. Participants (N = 400) Gender ¡Ra)o ¡ Pedometer ¡Use ¡ Female No Yes Male 47% 57% 43% 53% Participants’ ages ranged from 19 to 68 (M = 32.7) Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 26

  27. Main effect of valence framing p = .04 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 27

  28. Main effect of valence framing Achieved framing Remaining framing 2,500 steps achieved 7,500 steps remaining 25% achieved 75% remaining … ¡ … ¡ Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 28

  29. Main effect of presentation type p = .007 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 29

  30. Main effect of presentation type Text-only Text with visual 2,500 steps achieved 25% achieved 7,500 steps remaining 75% remaining … ¡ … ¡ Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 30

  31. Interaction effect: Data Unit x Distance to the goal p = .002 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 31

  32. Interaction effect: Data Unit x Distance to the goal p = .02 Certain I can meet my goal Unsure if I can meet my goal Certain I cannot meet my goal 25% 75% Distance to the Goal Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 32

  33. Interaction effect: Data Unit x Distance to the goal 2,500 steps achieved 25% achieved This effect was not observed for the distance to the goal at 75% level Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 33

  34. Discussion Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 34

  35. Discussion Give feeling of bigger achievement for higher self-efficacy Highlight what people achieved Data unit can contribute to this High-interest sampling bias supports our findings further Less likely to observe framing effects in intrinsically motivated people Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 35

  36. Future Work Embedding persuasive performance feedback in real-world situations and testing through deployment studies Testing at more extreme cases toward the both ends of the goal (e.g., 5%, 95%) Using judgmental / exaggerated visuals for stronger framing effect Sedentary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Active Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 36

  37. Contributions Feedback design matters—context dependent Leverage framing effect Empirical guidance to create influential, persuasive feedback Many application domains Health communication campaign Self-monitoring technology interface design Privacy… Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 37

  38. Thank you! Eun Kyoung Choe (eunky@uw.edu) Eun Kyoung Choe | AMIA 2013 38

Recommend


More recommend