Per erfo formance rmance-Based Based Proj ojec ect t Se Sele lection ction AMPO Annual Conference September 27, 2018
Go Goals ls of of th the e Regionally-balanced Process ocess Transparent Objective Data-driven decisions
Peer Agenc ncies es Dev evelopmen elopmen Criteri eria a and Process esses es HB HB-20 (State e TPB t Perfo formanc rmance e Priori rities ties and Measures) ures) Direct ction ion FAST Act TAC Review ew Selection lection (Feder eral al and Perfo formanc rmance e Process ess Feedback back Measures) ures)
Ali lignment ent wi with h Nationa nal l Goals ls Frei eight t Move oveme ment t Infra rast structu ructure e Enviro ironme mental tal Reduc uced ed Pro roje ject t Project ject Call Criter teria Safet ety Cong onges esti tion Reduc ucti tion Syste tem m Reliabi iability lity and Econo onomic mic Condi onditi tion Sustai tainability ability Deliv liver ery y Dela lays Vitality tality Pro roje ject Readin adines ess ● ● ● Cong onges esti tion and Mobility obility ● Multimo ltimodal dal Eleme ements ts Safety ty Tra ravel el Time me Savin ings gs Regio ional l Impac act Econo onomic mic Develo elopme pment Social ial and d Envir ironmen mental tal Impact acts Fundin ding Match Plannin ing Proc rocess ss Syste tem m Pres eser ervatio ation
Ali lignment ent wi with h Long-Rang nge e Pla lan Enviro ironme ment Safet ety y and Syste tem m Land d Use and ity Effic icie iency y and Noise oise and d Air ir Qual alit ity y Cos ost t Pro roje ject Mobility obility and Project ject Call Criter teria Conn onnec ectiv ivit gy Social ial Equit uity Econo onomy my Secur urit ity Pres eser ervatio ation Tra ransp sporta rtati tion Perfo rforma mance Nei eigh ghbo borhood d and Ener ergy Effec ecti tive Dela lay Acces ess Char aract acter er ● ● Pro roje ject Readin adines ess ● ● ● ● Cong onges esti tion and Mobility obility ● ● ● ● ● ● Multimo ltimodal dal Eleme ements ts ● Safet ety ● ● ● ● ● ● Tra ravel el Time me Savin ings gs ● Regio ional l Impac act ● Econo onomic mic Develo elopme pment Social ial and d Envir ironmen mental tal ● ● ● Impact acts ● ● Fundin ding Match ● Plannin ing g Pro roces ess ● Syste tem m Pres eser ervatio ation
Project ect Selec lectio tion n Project Readiness Proce cess ss Planning Factors Cost/Benefit Analysis Project Score
Project ect Selecti lection on Project Readiness Proce cess ss Planning Factors Cost/Benefit Analysis Project Score
Project ect Selec lectio tion n Project Readiness Proce cess ss Planning Factors Cost/Benefit Analysis Project Score
Scori ring ng Cate tego gorie ries Transit Roadway ITS-Operations Active Transportation TDM Other
Pla lann nning ng Fact ctors rs
Pla lann nning ng Fact ctor Sco cori ring ng
Project ect Selec lectio tion n Project Readiness Proce cess ss Planning Factors Cost/Benefit Analysis Project Score
Cost st/Benefi /Benefit t Roadway ITS/Operations Transit Active Transportation Other Analy lysis sis fo for r Project ect Sco cori ring ng Performance Measure Planning Factors (50%) Cost/Benefit Analysis (50%)
Cost st/Benefi /Benefit t Purpose: pose: Ana nalys lysis is fo for r • Sor ort t Projec ojects ts Project ect • Base se on on Data ta Sco cori ring ng Regional and local Land Use and Transportation growth estimates Projects included in 2040 Plan Crash statistics for the CAMPO region Crash reduction effectiveness measures Not ot int ntende ended d to o reflect flect ful ull-scal scale e Co Cost st/Benefit Benefit of projects ojects
• Travel el Time me Roadwa way Data from regional model, test with/without project Cate tegor gory y CBA spreadsheet – convert time saving to $Value • Sa Safet ety Need Effectiveness of project Cost Combine • Each h 50% o % of CB CBA score e or 25% o % of ov over erall ll score
Nee eed Safe fety ty Crash rating for facility type (lookup) Rate by County, by facility class, and urban/rural Crash Rate per VMT Bastrop Burnet Caldwell Hays Travis Williamson Rural Interstate/Freeway N/A N/A 0.0009 N/A N/A N/A Principal Arterial 0.0010 0.0007 0.0008 0.0012 0.0006 0.0008 Min. Arterial, Maj. Collector 0.0014 0.0010 0.0022 0.0017 0.0020 0.0015 Urban Interstate/Freeway 0.0013 N/A N/A 0.0003 0.0009 0.0008 Principal Arterial 0.0019 0.0037 0.0021 0.0018 0.0021 0.0018 Min. Arterial, Maj. Collector 0.0032 0.0025 0.0054 0.0034 0.0029 0.0024 Source: CRIS data, TxDOT published VMT 2016
Effec ecti tivenes veness Safe fety ty Estimate for reduction in crash rates due to project design Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) lookup table Examples
Combine Safety: Need Effectiveness Cost Combine
Tool for Oper erati ations ons Bene nefit fit Cost t Ana nalys ysis is (TO TOPS PS- BC) ITS/Oper /Operations tions T ravel Time Savings Improved T ravel Time Reliability Cate tego gory y Crash Reduction Fuel Consumption Savings Proj ojec ects ts rank nked ed by y reduct ductio ion n in in vehicle icle mil iles es traveled veled T rans ra nsit and scored ored Ridership estimates, mode splits by TAZ Cate tegor ory y VMT savings, etc. +Suffici ficient docum cumen entat ation ion, , plan, , pil ilot ot consid siderat eration ion FHWA Tool for Operations Benefit Cost Analysis (TOPS-BC)
Act ctive ve Tra rans nspo porta rtation tion Proje jects cts impa pacti ting ng number ers s of T Traffic c Area ea Cate tego gory y Zones es TAZ is a proxy for density and mix of uses Buffer project limits, count TAZs Document • Highe her num umber er of T TAZ AZs affec ected ed res esul ult t in hi highe her r normali lize zed d score
Project ect Selec lectio tion n Project Readiness Proce cess ss Planning Factors Cost/Benefit Analysis Project Score
Sco cori ring ng Proce cess ss
App pprova val l Publi lic c Input Proce cess ss TAC TPB
Qu Quest estions? ions? Ryan Collins Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization ryan.collins@campotexas.org David d Paine ne Freese and Nichols david.paine@freese.com
Recommend
More recommend
