Pe r mitting of Solar Pr oje c ts in Ve r mont Pre se nte d b y Je a nnie Olive r, Spe c ia l Co unse l, De pa rtme nt o f Pub lic Se rvic e
AGE NDA 10 minute o ve rvie w inc luding : I ntro duc tio n: wha t is Se c tio n 248? Se c tio n 248 Crite ria g e ne ra lly. Se c tio n 248 Pro c e sse s – the full pro c e ss, the e xpe dite d pro c e ss, a nd e ve rything in b e twe e n. Oppo rtunity fo r Que stio ns
I ntro duc tio n Wha t is Se c tio n 248? Requires energy, gas, telecom, and water developers to obtain a Certificate of Public Good (CPG) from the Public Service Board Board considers 10 statutory criteria, including environmental criteria from Act 250 plus issues like need, reliability, economic benefit, and the general public good Different pathways for different size and type of projects http://www.leg.state.vt.us/statutes/fullsection.cfm?Title=30&Chapter=005&Section=00248
I ntro duc tio n Pa rtie s in the § 248 Pro c e ss Pub lic Se rvic e Bo a rd: De c isio n Ma ke r I nte rve no rs Sta tuto ry pa rtie s Applic a nt I nte rve ntio n a s o f Pe rmissive De pa rtme nt ANR Rig ht I nte rve ntio n 30 V.S.A. §§ 2(a )(7) a nd 2(b ) 30 V.S.A. § 248(a )(4)(E ) PSB Rule 2.209(A) PSB Rule 2.209(B) E .g ., Munic ipa l le g isla tive Sta te E .g ., Adjo ining Sta te Pub lic b o dy a nd Pla nning e nviro nme nta l la nd o wne rs I nte re st Co mmissio n – Ac t 56 inte re sts * So me a mb ig uity re g a rd ing sta tus o f Munic ipa l Munic ipa l pub lic Priva te inte re sts inte re st Pa rtic ipa tio n – sta tuto ry vs. inte rve ntio n a s o f rig ht
I ntro duc tio n T he Pub lic I nte re st Bo a rd : 30 V.S.A. § 248(a )(2) – Ca n’ t b e g in site pre pa ra tio n fo r o r c o nstruc tio n o f a n e le c tric g e ne ra tio n fa c ility within the Sta te “unle ss the Pub lic Se rvic e Bo a rd first finds tha t the sa me will pro mo te the g e ne ra l g o o d o f the Sta te a nd issue s a c e rtific a te to tha t e ffe c t.” De pa rtme nt: 30 V.S.A. § 2(b ): “the De pa rtme nt sha ll re pre se nt the inte re sts o f the pe o ple o f the Sta te , unle ss o the rwise spe c ifie d b y la w.” Ba la nc ing e xe rc ise b a se d o n the a pplic a b le 248 c rite ria .
I ntro duc tio n T he Pub lic I nte re st I de a lly, the pub lic inte re st in 248 pro c e e ding s wo uld lo o k so me thing like this: Munic ipa l Re g io na l Ra te pa ye rs De ve lo pe rs E nviro nme nta l Adjo ining la ndo wne rs
248 Crite ria Se c tio n 248 Crite ria Ge ne ra lly T he Bo a rd c o nside rs 10 sta tuto ry c rite ria se t o ut a t Se c tio n 248(b ), inc luding : mo st o f the e nviro nme nta l c rite ria fro m Ac t 250 (248(b )(5)), o rde rly de ve lo pme nt (248(b )(1)), ne e d (248(b )(2)), syste m sta b ility a nd re lia b ility (248(b )(3)), e c o no mic b e ne fits (248(b )(4)).
248 Crite ria So me § 248 Crite ria Ma y Be Wa ive d fo r Sma lle r Pro je c ts Ne t Me te ring : 30 V.S.A. § 219a (c ) g ive s the Bo a rd a utho rity to e na c t rule s o r o rde rs wa iving § 248 c rite ria . PSB Rule 5.108 se ts o ut the c rite ria whic h a re no t c o nditio na lly wa ive d: Syste m sta b ility a nd re lia b ility; o rde rly de ve lo pme nt; e nviro nme nta l c o nside ra tio ns; o utsta nding re so urc e wa te rs. Re ne wa b le E ne rg y Pla nts up to 2.2 MW 30 V.S.A. § 8007(b ) g ive s the Bo a rd a utho rity to e na c t rule s o r o rde rs wa iving § 248 c rite ria . Se e Orde r o f 8/ 31/ 2010 Co nditio na l wa ive r o f ne e d; wa te r c o nse rva tio n; suffic ie nc y o f wa te r a nd b urde n o n e xisting wa te r supply, e duc a tio na l se rvic e s; c o mplia nc e with E le c tric E ne rg y Pla n a nd L e a st Co st Inte g ra te d Re so urc e Pla n. E c o no mic b e ne fit c o nditio na lly wa ive d fo r sta nda rd o ffe r pro je c ts o nly.
248 Crite ria Orde rly De ve lo pme nt § 248(b )(1) Due c o nside ra tio n g ive n to the re c o mme nda tio ns o f the munic ipa l a nd re g io na l pla nning c o mmissio ns; munic ipa l le g isla tive b o die s; a nd la nd c o nse rva tio n me a sure s c o nta ine d within the pla n o f a n a ffe c te d munic ipa lity. Cha lle ng e s: T ime limita tio ns fo r ma king re c o mme nda tio ns. T o wn pla ns o fte n a spira tio na l, no t spe c ific . No t lo c a l zo ning re g ula tio ns a nd b yla ws.
248 Crite ria Orde rly De ve lo pme nt Ac t 56 Se c tio n 26c inse rte d § 248(b )(1)(B) Re q uire s so la r fa c ilitie s to c o mply with the sc re e ning re q uire me nts o f a munic ipa l b yla w a do pte d unde r 24 V.S.A. § 4414(15) o r a munic ipa l o rdina nc e a do pte d unde r 24 V.S.A. § 2291(28), unle ss the Bo a rd finds tha t suc h c o mplia nc e wo uld pro hib it o r ha ve the e ffe c t o f pro hib iting the insta lla tio n o f suc h a fa c ility o r ha ve the e ffe c t o f inte rfe ring with the fa c ility’ s inte nde d use .
248 Crite ria Ae sthe tic s § 248(b )(5) a nd 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a )(8) Ne t Me te ring : PSB Rule 5.109 “Will no t ha ve a n undue a dve rse e ffe c t o n the sc e nic o r na tura l b e a uty o f the a re a , a e sthe tic s, histo ric site s o r ra re a nd irre pla c e a b le na tura l a re a s.”
248 Crite ria Ae sthe tic s Bo a rd ha s a do pte d the Que c he e a na lysis: Adve rse ? K e y c o nc e pt: Out o f c ha ra c te r with its surro unding s. Unduly a dve rse ? T hre e fa c to rs: Vio la te s c le a r, writte n, c o mmunity sta nda rd inte nde d to pre se rve the a e sthe tic s o r sc e nic b e a uty o f the a re a . Ge ne ra lly a va ila b le mitig a ting ste ps whic h a re a so na b le pe rso n wo uld ta ke to impro ve the ha rmo ny o f the pro je c t with its surro unding s. Sho c king a nd o ffe nsive to the a ve ra g e pe rso n. Sig nific a ntly info rme d b y the o ve ra ll so c ie ta l b e ne fits o f the pro je c t.
248 Crite ria Syste m Sta b ility a nd Re lia b ility § 248(b )(3) “Will no t a dve rse ly a ffe c t syste m sta b ility a nd re lia b ility.” Ne t Me te ring : PSB Rule 5.100 Appe ndix A se ts o ut re q uire me nts fo r syste ms up to 150 kW. Othe r pro je c ts: PSB Rule 5.500 I nte rc o nne c tio n Pro c e dure s Cha lle ng e : se e ing a numb e r o f pro po se d pro je c ts tha t will c re a te vo lta g e flic ke r.
248 Pro c e sse s Ove rvie w o f the 248 Pro c e sse s L e a st Pro c e ss Mo st Pro c e ss Ne t Me te ring Ne t Me te ring Ne t Me te ring Re ne wa b le s o nly o nly o nly F ull 248 248(j) up to 2.2 Pro c e ss 15 kw 150 kW 500 kW MW Re g istra tio n Applic a tio n Pe titio n
248 Pro c e sse s Ne t Me te ring Pro c e sse s Syste ms ≤ 15 kW sola r : Re g istra tio n F o rm to PSB, PSD, a nd utility o nly. 10 da y c o mme nt pe rio d. I f no c o nc e rns ra ise d, CPG is de e me d issue d o n 11 th da y. Rule 5.110(A) Syste ms ≤ 150 kW Applic a tio n F o rm to PSB, PSD, a nd utility. I f fa c ility is no t o n e xisting struc ture , the n a c o py must g o to ANR, lo c a l pla nning c o mmissio n, munic ipa l le g isla tive b o dy, a ll a djo ining la nd o wne rs. 10 da y c o mme nt pe rio d fo r fa c ilitie s o n e xisting struc ture s; 30 da ys fo r g ro und mo unte d fa c ilitie s. Sub je c t to minimum se t b a c k re q uire me nts: 40 fe e t fro m munic ipa l hig hwa y, 25 fe e t fro m pro pe rty b o unda ry. §248(s). Rule 5.110(B).
248 Pro c e sse s Ne t Me te ring Pro c e sse s Syste ms up to 500 kW (up to 5 MW in spe c ia l c a se s). 45 da y pre -filing no tic e pe rio d to PSB, PSD, ANR, a djo ining pro pe rty o wne rs, utility, munic ipa l le g isla tive b o die s, munic ipa l a nd re g io na l pla nning c o mmissio n. F ile pe titio n, inc luding e xhib its a nd te stimo ny with c o py to PSD, ANR, utility, a nd lo c a l a nd re g io na l pla nning c o mmissio n. No tic e o f filing to munic ipa l le g isla tive b o dy a nd a djo ining pro pe rty o wne rs. 21 da y c o mme nt pe rio d. Sub je c t to minimum se t b a c k re q uire me nts: 100 fe e t fro m munic ipa l hig hwa y, 50 fe e t fro m pro pe rty b o unda ry. §248(s). Rule 5.110(C). Syste ms > 500 kW sub je c t to re g ula r 248 pro c e sse s
248 Pro c e sse s § 248(j) Pro je c ts o f L imite d Size a nd Sc o pe E xpe dite d re vie w o f c e rta in pro je c ts o f limite d size & sc o pe tha t do no t ra ise sig nific a nt issue s w/ r/ t § 248 c rite ria Bo a rd ma y issue Orde r witho ut ho lding pub lic o r e vide ntia ry he a ring s, b ut Bo a rd will first issue no tic e o f the pro po se d pro je c t a nd CPG to a numb e r o f sta te a g e nc ie s a nd to the munic ipa l a nd re g io na l pla nning c o mmissio ns a nd munic ipa l le g isla tive b o dy (e ntitie s liste d a t § 248(a )(4)(C)). 28 da y c o mme nt pe rio d fro m da te o f Bo a rd’ s no tic e .
Recommend
More recommend