patent strategy 8
play

Patent Strategy 8 How to directly file national non-provisional - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 09, 2023 •38 likes •308 views

Patent Strategy 8 How to directly file national non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year RECAP: How to use a priority claim for adding subject matter to a patent application priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 12

  1. Patent Strategy 8 How to directly file national non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year

  2. RECAP: How to use a priority claim for adding subject matter to a patent application priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 12 months non-prov. priority claim official filing A search result 01.07.2015 prov. filing priority claim A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A 01.10.2015 + non-prov. B + PCT filing A C + B + C + D

  3. RECAP: How to further prosecute your non-provisional PCT patent application SG national phase (30 months from earliest 30/31 months from earliest priority date priority date) 01.04.2017/ 01.05.2017 01.10.2014 01.10.2015 US national phase earliest non-prov. National/ priority (30 months PCT filing Regional Phase from earliest Entry A priority date) + B + C EP regional + phase D (31 months from earliest priority date)

  4. RECAP: How to further prosecute your non-provisional PCT patent application SG national phase (30 months from earliest 30/31 months from earliest priority date priority date) 01.04.2017/ Instead of a non-provisional 01.05.2017 01.10.2014 01.10.2015 PCT filing, can we directly US national file into the individual phase earliest non-prov. National/ national phase countries? priority (30 months PCT filing Regional Phase from earliest Entry Ans: Yes you can! A priority date) + B + C EP regional + phase D (31 months from earliest priority date)

  5. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year Scenario 1: Simultaneous foreign national filings on the same day within the priority year window

  6. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 non-prov. filing official A search result 01.07.2015 prov. filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  7. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 + + C A + B D 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 non-prov. filing official A search result 01.07.2015 prov. filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  8. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. SG filing + + C A + B D 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 non-prov. filing official A search result 01.07.2015 prov. filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  9. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. filing official A search result 01.07.2015 prov. filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  10. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 01.10.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + A + B + C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  11. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 01.10.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + A + B + C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  12. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 01.10.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + A + B + C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A 01.10.2015 + B non-prov. + EP filing C + A + B + C D Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  13. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 01.10.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + A + B + C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A 01.10.2015 + B non-prov. + EP filing C + A + B + C D Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on the same day within the priority window

  14. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 01.10.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + A + B + C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A 01.10.2015 + B non-prov. + EP filing C + A + B + C D Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on 01.10.2015 the same day within the priority window non-prov. Filing in JP/KR/CN or other Paris + A + B + C D Convention contries

  15. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 01.10.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 01.10.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + A + B + C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A 01.10.2015 + B non-prov. + EP filing C + A + B + C D Scenario 1: Simultaneous national filings on 01.10.2015 the same day within the priority window non-prov. Filing in JP/KR/CN or other + A + B + C D contries, such as TW etc.

  16. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year Scenario 2: Staggered national filings not on the same day but still within the priority year time window

  17. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 29.09.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. filing official A search result 01.07.2015 prov. filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 2: Staggered national filings not on the same day but within the priority window

  18. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year 29.09.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 30.09.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + + A + B C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 2: Staggered national filings not on the same day but within the priority window

  19. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year GAP! 29.09.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 30.09.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + + A + B C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 2: Staggered national filings not on the same day but within the priority window

  20. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year priority claim 29.09.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 30.09.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + + A + B C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. filing A + B + C Scenario 2: Staggered national filings not on the same day but within the priority window

  21. How to directly file national foreign non-provisional patent applications after the end of the priority year priority claim 29.09.2015 non-prov. priority claim SG filing + + C A + B D priority claim 01.10.2014 ~ 06/2015 priority claim non-prov. 30.09.2015 filing official A search result non-prov. 01.07.2015 US filing prov. + + A + B C D filing A 01.09.2015 + B prov. 01.10.2015 filing A + non-prov. B + EP filing + A B + C + D C Scenario 2: Staggered national filings not on the same day but within the priority window

Recommend

Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in

Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in

Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in Patent Strategy 3? (as of February 2017) Again The Starting Point We have a typical product development circle: Idea Functional Model

406 views • 23 slides
Using Patent Data [to] Create Your Competitive Intelligence Strategy Mustafa AKIR, RTTP,

Using Patent Data [to] Create Your Competitive Intelligence Strategy Mustafa AKIR, RTTP,

Using Patent Data [to] Create Your Competitive Intelligence Strategy Mustafa AKIR, RTTP, EuKTS, QPIP Patent Attorney @ Sabanc University Co-founder @ Patent Effect @ IP Conference 2019 www.PatentEffect.com 17.10.19 Istanbul Using

455 views • 30 slides
Patent Strategy 6 We have shown you how to match a product development cycle into one single PCT

Patent Strategy 6 We have shown you how to match a product development cycle into one single PCT

Patent Strategy 6 We have shown you how to match a product development cycle into one single PCT patent application. In this lesson, we show you how to further prosecute this PCT patent application until grant. Again The Starting Point We have

173 views • 16 slides
Patent Strategy 7 We have shown you how to match a product development cycle into one single PCT

Patent Strategy 7 We have shown you how to match a product development cycle into one single PCT

Patent Strategy 7 We have shown you how to match a product development cycle into one single PCT patent application. In this lesson, we show you how to further prosecute each inventive concept of it to national grant. Again The Starting Point

390 views • 20 slides
Patent Research & Strategy Seminar Law 797 University of Illinois School of Law Fall 2011

Patent Research & Strategy Seminar Law 797 University of Illinois School of Law Fall 2011

Patent Research & Strategy Seminar Law 797 University of Illinois School of Law Fall 2011 Session ** November 8, 2011 Jay Kesan, Chirag Shah, Binal Patel, and Louis DiSanto I L L I N O I S C O L L E G E O F L A W Patent Research

318 views • 21 slides
5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law

5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law

5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law Evaluate aspects of the patent system Patent acquisition: role of private parties and government Patent Reform Patent scope First to file v.

281 views • 4 slides
N Destination i? 108 US 8,687,777 B1 Page 2 Related U.S. Application Data 5,572.581 A 1 1/1996

N Destination i? 108 US 8,687,777 B1 Page 2 Related U.S. Application Data 5,572.581 A 1 1/1996

US008687777B1 (12) United States Patent US 8,687,777 B1 (10) Patent No.: * Apr. 1, 2014 Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL (56) References Cited PRESENTATION AND SELECTION OF VR U.S. PATENT

2.01k views • 162 slides
c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US009521255Bl c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 13, 2016 (54) (56) References Cited SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR

1.55k views • 133 slides
Patent family - background Patent family - background Patent family - background 1883

Patent family - background Patent family - background Patent family - background 1883

The Derwent patent family The Derwent patent family and its application in and its application in Patent Statistical Analysis Patent Statistical Analysis WIPO-OECD Workshop on Statistics in the Patent Field, Geneva, Sept 18-19, 2003 Doina

114 views • 8 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008548135B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 1, 2013 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,335,276 A

599 views • 23 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008345835Bl c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 1, 2013 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,006,987 A

1.62k views • 135 slides
Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy gy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for

Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy gy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy gy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Proceedings TUES DAY, MAY 3, 2011 1pm Eastern |

694 views • 68 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

sta,_rt~) 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008054952B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 8, 2011 5,708,422 A * (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS

828 views • 51 slides
(12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45)

(12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45)

US008867708B1 (12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45) Date of Patent: 4,897,866 A 1/1990 Majmudar et a1. (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,006,987 A 4/1991 Harles PRESENTATION AND

542 views • 53 slides
US 8,903,073 B2 Page 3 8,041,575 B2 * 1012011 Agarwal et al . ............ 704/270.1 (56)

US 8,903,073 B2 Page 3 8,041,575 B2 * 1012011 Agarwal et al . ............ 704/270.1 (56)

1502,~-"-~ 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008903073B2 (12) United States Patent US 8,903,073 B2 (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Dec. 2, 2014 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR

1.59k views • 135 slides
lf r::::==1r _v;_,su_ph_one--,-----' ' c_l 108c 1047 106 102a 110 108n US

lf r::::==1r _v;_,su_ph_one--,-----' ' c_l 108c 1047 106 102a 110 108n US

~ 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008594280B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,594,280 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 26, 2013 5,416,831 A 5/1995 Chewning, III eta!. (54)

662 views • 39 slides
Patent Law Prof. Roger Ford January 27, 2016 Class 3 Disclosure: Enablement Recap Recap

Patent Law Prof. Roger Ford January 27, 2016 Class 3 Disclosure: Enablement Recap Recap

Patent Law Prof. Roger Ford January 27, 2016 Class 3 Disclosure: Enablement Recap Recap Mechanics and formalities of patent claims Claim strategy Claim-drafting exercise Todays agenda Todays agenda The patent

464 views • 32 slides
Patent Law Prof. Roger Ford September 11, 2017 Class 4 Disclosure: Enablement Recap Recap

Patent Law Prof. Roger Ford September 11, 2017 Class 4 Disclosure: Enablement Recap Recap

Patent Law Prof. Roger Ford September 11, 2017 Class 4 Disclosure: Enablement Recap Recap Mechanics and formalities of patent claims Claim strategy Claim-drafting exercise Todays agenda Todays agenda The patent

792 views • 41 slides
The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn Yeats Director, JC Biotechnology 6 July 2015 Our mission As the patent office for Europe, we support innovation, competitiveness and economic

625 views • 24 slides
Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF

Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF

Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF Patent Committee October 7, 2019 Introduction By: Brendan Nugent, Michael Buck IP A patent owner often enters patent litigation with the aim of

297 views • 8 slides
The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at

The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at

The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) routinely negotiate with the PTO over the patents scope. The written record of that negotiation is called

807 views • 46 slides
1 Today's European patent system The Union's patent package Legal instruments Unified

1 Today's European patent system The Union's patent package Legal instruments Unified

US Bar EPO Liaison Council 29th Annual Meeting Munich, 18 October 2013 2. Unitary patent protection and Unified Patent Court State of play October 2013 D522 International Legal Affairs European Patent Office, Munich Today's European

421 views • 6 slides
Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC ) An overview and a comparison to the

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC ) An overview and a comparison to the

Leifert & Steffan European and German Patent, Trademark & Design Attorneys Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC ) An overview and a comparison to the classical patent system in Europe 1 Leifert & Steffan

417 views • 20 slides
The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court Andrew Clay Partner Intellectual Property

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court Andrew Clay Partner Intellectual Property

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court Andrew Clay Partner Intellectual Property & Technology Practice 37 Offices in 18 Countries Major Changes Ahead For The European Patent System The way the Europeans do patents is very

1.22k views • 35 slides

More recommend