PARCC RESULTS: YEAR THREE Measuring College and Career Readiness MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2017
OVERVIEW LAL 2017 RESULTS The first three slides show the 2017 PARCC Language Arts Literacy results as compared with New Jersey students, and all states across the country that took the PARCC. The first two slides, grouped 3-5 and 6-8, are the 2017 results. Cohort Analysis The third slide is the color-coded cohort analysis (how the same group of students did from year to year). 2
2017 MOUNTAINSIDE, NEW JERSEY, & PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES ELA GRADES 3-5 Not ot Parti tially ly Appro roaching Meetin ting g Exc xceeding Highest Meet eting (Lev evel el Expec ectat ations Expec ectat ations Expec ectat ations Score ore (Lev evel el 1 1) Meetin ting 2 g 2) (Lev evel el 3 3) (Lev evel el 4 4) (Lev evel el 5) 5) 650--699 650 700--724 700 24 725--74 725 749 750-789 750 790 790 & & above Grade 3 e 3-- --MSD SD 1.2% 16.5% 29.4% 47. 7.1% 5.9% 52.9% Grade 3 NJ 13.5% 15.9% 23% 41.3% 41 6.2% 44.9% Grade 3 PARCC 18.6% 18.4% 23.3% 35.5% 4.2% 39.7% Grade 4 e 4-- --MDS DS 3% 4.5% 24.2% 56.1% 12.1% 68.2% Grade 4 NJ 7. 7.7% 12.8% 23.7% 40.5% 15.3% 55.9% Grade 4 PARCC 12.8% 18.2% 26.4% 33.7% 8.9% 42.6% Grade 5 e 5-- --MSD 3.2% 6.3% 20% 62.1% 8.4% 70. 70.5% 5% Grade 5 NJ 6.8% 12.2% 22.1% 48.2% 10.7% 59% 59% Grade 5 PARCC 11.9% 18.5% 25.9% 38.4% 5.3% 43. 43.7% 7% 3
2017 MOUNTAINSIDE, NEW JERSEY, & PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES ELA GRADES 6-8 Not Ye Yet Partia ially lly Appr pproa oaching Meet eting Exceed eeding Dis Distric ict % % Meet eting Meet eting Expec ectations Expec ectations Expec ectation >= >= Leve evel 4 4 (Level evel 1) 1) (Level evel 2 2) (Level evel 3 3) (Level evel 4 4) (Level evel 5 5) Grade 6 e 6-- --MSD SD 1.4% 4.2% 25.4% 50.7% 18.3% 69% Grade 6 NJ 6.5% 14.6% 25.6% 41 41% 12.3% 53.4% Grade 6 PARCC 10.6% 20.9% 28.5% 33.5% 6.5% 40% Grade 7 e 7-- --MSD SD 1.1% 2.2% 17. 7.4% 46.7% 32.6% 79.3% Grade 7 NJ 8.9% 11.4% 20.5% 35.4% 23.8% 59.2% Grade 7 PARCC 14.3% 16.6% 24.3% 30.8% 14% 44.8% Grade 8 e 8-- --MSD SD 3.2% 1.6% 21% 58.1% 16.1% 74 74.2% Grade 8 NJ 9% 11.6% 20.3% 40.5% 18.6% 59.1% Grade 8 PARCC 15.3% 17. 7.7% 23.9% 33.5% 9.6% 43.1% 4
PARCC ELA COHORT ANALYSIS EL ELA 20 2015 15 2016 2017 17 # of s of students Grade 3 Levels 1 & 2 (18 students) 26.5% Levels 1 & 2 (15 students) 17.7% Levels 1 & 2 (22 students) 23.4% Level 3 (19 students) 27.9% Level 3 (25 students) 29.4% Level 3 (17 students) 18.1% Levels 4 & 5 (31 students) 45.6% Levels 4 & 5 (45 students) 53% Levels 4 & 5 (55 students) 58.5% 68 94 85 Grade 4 Levels 1 & 2 (7 students) 9.6% Levels 1 & 2 (9 students) 9.1% Levels 1 & 2 (5 students) 7.5% Level 3 (17 students) 23.3% Level 3 (29 students) 29.6% Level 3 (16 students) 24.2% Levels 4 & 5 (49 students) 67.1% Levels 4 & 5 (60 students) 61.2% Levels 4 & 5 (45 students) 68.2% 73 98 66 Grade 5 Levels 1 & 2 (6 students) 6.7% Levels 1 & 2 (5 students) 7.1% Levels 1 & 2 (9 students) 9.5% Level 3 (23 students) 25.6% Level 3 (17 students) 24.3% Level 3 (19 students) 20% ’15 ’1 ’16 ’1 ‘17 ‘1 Levels 4 & 5 (61 students) 67.8% Levels 4 & 5 (48 students) 68.6% Levels 4 & 5 (67 students) 70.5% 90 70 95 Grade 6 Levels 1 & 2 (6 students) 9.5% Levels 1 & 2 (8 students) 8.6% Levels 1 & 2 (4 students) 5.6% Level 3 (21 students) 33.3% Level 3 (25 students) 26.9% Level 3 (18 students) 25.4% Levels 4 & 5 (36 students) 57.2% Levels 4 & 5 (60 students) 64.5% Levels 4 & 5 (49 students) 69% 63 93 71 Grade 7 Levels 1 & 2 (9 students) 9.7% Levels 1 & 2 (6 students) 10.2% Levels 1 & 2 (3 students) 3.3% Level 3 (18 students) 19.4% Level 3 (11 students) 18.6% Level 3 (16 students) 17.4% Levels 4 & 5 (66 students) 70.9% Levels 4 & 5 (42 students) 71.2% Levels 4 & 5 (73 students) 79.3% 93 59 92 Grade 8 Levels 1 & 2 (9 students) 10.6% Levels 1 & 2 (15 students) 15.9% Levels 1 & 2 (3 students) 4.8% Level 3 (28 students) 32.9% Level 3 (20 students) 21.3% Level 3 (13 students) 21% Levels 4 & 5 (48 students) 56.5% Levels 4 & 5 (59 students) 62.8% Levels 4 & 5 (46 students) 74.2% 85 5 62 94
LAL COHORT ANALYSIS Overall our Language Arts program (primarily Teachers College Readers and Writers ) has improved students’ reading and writing skills over the last three years Every cohort improved from 2016 to 2017 PROGRAM ANALYSIS The next two slides look at different groups (highest and lowest performers) over three years 6
ELA DISTRICT % < = LEVEL 2 (STUDENTS WHO SCORED 1/2) 201 015 201 016 2017 17 ELA 3 23.4 % (22 students) 26.5% (18 students) 17.7% (15 students) ELA 4 9.6% (7 students) 9.1% (9 students) 7.5% (5 students) ELA 5 6.7% (6 students) 7.1% (5 students) 9.5% (9 students) ELA 6 9.5% (6 students) 8.6% (8 students) 5.6% (4 students) ELA 7 9.7% (9 students) 10.2% (6 students) 3.3% (3 students) ELA 8 10.6% (9 students) 15.9% (15 students) 4.8% (3 students) 7
ELA DISTRICT PERCENTAGES >= 4 (STUDENTS WHO SCORED 4/5) 201 015 201 016 2017 17 ELA 3 58.5% (94 students) 45.6% (68 students) 53% (85 students) ELA 4 67.1% (73 students) 61.2% (67 students) 68.2% (66 students) ELA 5 67.8 % (90 students) 68.6% (70 students) 70.5% (95 students) 2015 2016 2017 ELA 6 57.2% (63 students) 64.5% (93 students) 69% (71 students) ELA 7 70.9% (93 students) 71.1% (59 students) 79.3% (92 students) ELA 8 56.5% (85 students) 62.8% (94 students) 74.2% (62 students) 8
ANALYSIS OF LAL PROGRAM Overall there has been improvement across all grade levels Reduction in students scoring 1 or 2 and an increase in students scoring 4 or 5 Program Needs – Some grade levels consistently performing better than others 3 rd Grade Program – First time taking the test Typical trend across state and country General LAL Recommendations Continue with Teachers College Readers & Writers Program K-2 should review 3 rd grade PARCC results so they can strengthen students’ skills before they enter 3 rd grade Infuse “close reading” at all grade levels Infuse more analytical writing across the curriculum at all grade levels 9
GRADES 6-8 LANGUAGE ARTS 2017-2018 – A CLOSER LOOK – TWO MAJOR AREAS Re Reading - (Literar ary A Anal alysis, , Infor ormat ation onal al text, V , Vocab abular ary i in context) Writi ting – (Written Express ssion, Convent entions ns) Need fo for I Increase sed I Instr tructi tion i in: Readi ding Voca cabu bulary (gra rade des 4 4-8) ) Writing g Expression a and Conventions ( (gr grades 3 3) Note: As s students p ts progress t s through t the g grade l levels, s, w writi ting becom omes a a strength. ( . (Con onvention ons, as , as as assessed o on PA PARCC, are n not ot an a area o of w f weakness fo ss for middle s school s stu tudents. s.) Close R Read ading strat ategies incor orpor orat ated i in a all s subject a areas as Crit itic ical t to develo lopin ing m g meanin ing in g in context Drawing i inference an and an anal alyzing c complex x text xts s - requires abilit ility t to determine m mean aning in context xt 10
MATH PARCC RESULTS The next three slides show the 2017 PARCC Math results as compared with New Jersey students, and all states across the country that took the PARCC. The first two slides, grouped 3-5 and 6-8, are the 2017 results. Please note the 7 th and 8 th grade reflect only the general math results The third slide reflects the 7 th and 8 th grade students who took Algebra and Geometry Cohort Analysis The fourth slide is the color-coded cohort analysis (how the same group of students did from year to year). 11
2017 MOUNTAINSIDE, NEW JERSEY, & PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES MATH GRADES 3-5 Not Ye Yet Partia ially lly Appr pproa oaching Meet eting Exceed eeding Dis Distric ict % % Meet eting Meet eting Expec ectations Expec ectations Expec ectation >= >= Leve evel 4 4 (Level evel 1) 1) (Level evel 2 2) (Level evel 3 3) (Level evel 4 4) (Level evel 5 5) Grade 3 e 3 1.2% 9.4% 25.9% 48.2% 15.3% 63.5% Grade 3 NJ 7. 7.8% 14.6% 25.1% 38.7% 13.7% 52.5% Grade 3 PARCC 12.9% 18.4% 26.1% 32.5% 10% 42.5% Grade 4 e 4 1.5% 7. 7.6% 25.8% 53% 12.1% 65.2% Grade 4 NJ 8.1% 17. 7.5% 27. 7.1% 40.6% 6.7% 47. 7.3% Grade 4 PARCC 13.9% 22.9% 27. 7.5% 31.7% 4.2% 35.8% Grade 5 e 5 4.2% 8.4% 13.7% 54.7% 18.9% 73.7% Grade 5 NJ 6.5% 17. 7.8% 29.6% 37. 7.3% 8.9% 46.2% 12 Grade 5 PARC 12% 23.7% 29.6% 29.2% 5.5% 34.7%
Recommend
More recommend
