PARCC and District Assessment Presentation Dr. Stacey Brown Ms. Sarah Pauch Mrs. Karen Tucker 2017-2018 School Year
PARCC ELA Grades 3-8
Grade 3 ELA ● Higher percentage of students who require additional services ● Mean scale score for Readington is 9 points higher than the state ● Students are supported with intervention, in-class support and pull-out ELA programs as needed ● The district revised the ELA curriculum which will be implemented in the 2018-19 school year and continues to purchase resources to support all learners
Grade 4 ELA ● This grade level is substantially smaller than others in the district and individual student scores will impact the overall achievement of the grade level more dramatically ● Historically this grade level has met expectations consistently ● Mean scale score for Readington is 10 points higher than the state ● The district will continue to monitor the progress of this cohort of students and support their instruction as needed in the areas indicated by our analysis of in-district assessments and standardized test scores
Grade 5 ELA ● This grade level has shown substantial growth this year ● The increase in scores can be attributed to the hard work and dedication of our teaching staff and students ● The implementation of new teaching techniques and a curricular revision took place during the 2017-18 school year
Grade 6 ELA ● 8% higher passing rate than the state ● 23% higher passing rate than the cross-state population ● Higher percentage of students who require additional services ● Students are supported with intervention, in-class support and pull-out ELA programs as needed ● A 6th grade honors program will launch in the 2018-19 school year to meet the needs of students who would benefit from an accelerated pace and a more in-depth exploration of content
Grade 7 ELA ● This grade level has shown substantial growth this year ● The increase in scores can be attributed to the teachers’ commitment to providing challenging, high quality instruction and the dedication of our students ● This group of students participated in the launch of the 7th grade honors program as well as a variety of scheduling changes that increased the amount of instructional time available
Grade 8 ELA ● This grade level has consistently performed well over time ● The staff continuously evaluates their teaching practices and adjusts them to meet the ever changing needs of their students ● The teachers of this grade level worked as a team within their content area and in cross-curricular groups to promote the generalization of literacy skills across a variety of academic settings
ELA PARCC Longitudinal Scores
ELA Longitudinal Scores
Running Records
Kindergarten December (Level B) June (Level D/E)
1st Grade September (Level D/E) June (Level J/K)
2nd Grade September (Level J/K) June (Level M/N)
3rd Grade September (Level M/N) June (Level P/Q)
4th Grade September (Level P/Q) June (Level S/T)
5th Grade September (Level S/T) June (Level V/W)
6th Grade September (Level V/W) June (Level Y)
Writing Benchmarks
Kindergarten
1st Grade
2nd Grade
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
PARCC Math Grades 3-8
Grade 3 Math ● Mean scale score decreased 5 points from last year ● 15% higher passing rate than the state ● Mean scale score for Readington is 9 points higher than the state ● This grade level included a higher percentage of students requiring additional services/intervention
Grade 4 Math ● 11% more students passing than the state ● 23% more students passing than cross-state population ● Mean scale score 7 points higher than the state ● This grade level is substantially smaller than others in the district and individual student scores will impact the overall achievement of the grade level more dramatically
Grade 5 Math ● 7% increase in students passing for 2017 ● 21% more students passing than the state ● Mean scale score 14 points higher than the state ● Percent passing and scale sore holding steady over time indicates the quality of the curriculum and its implementation
Grade 6 Math ● 16% higher passing rate than the state ● Mean scale score is 14 points higher than the state ● Percent passing and scale sore holding steady over time indicates the quality of the curriculum and its implementation
Grade 7 Math ● This data does not include the 15% of our honors students who took Algebra I ● When looking at seventh grade as a whole 58% of the students met or exceeded ● 7% more students passing than the state
Grade 8 Math ● This data does not include the 33% of our advanced students who took the Algebra I assessment and the 19% of the honors students who took the Algebra II assessment ● When looking at eighth grade as a whole 59% of the students met or exceeded expectations ● Mean scale score is 5 points higher than the state ● Students in grade level math are supported with Freckle, intervention, in-class support and pull out math programs
Algebra I ● Our Algebra I scores are a combination of seventh and eighth graders ● 47% higher passing rate than the state ● Mean scale score 26 points higher than the state
Algebra II ● 60% higher passing rate than the state ● Only 4 students did not pass as compared to 1 last year ● Mean scale score 45 points higher than the state
Math PARCC Longitudinal Scores
Math Longitudinal Scores
Math End of Year Assessment
End of Year Math Assessments
End of Year Math Assessment Grade Level: 66 students = 44% Advanced: 72 students = 48% Honors: 11 students = 7%
End of Year Math Assessment Grade Level: 69 students = 45% Advanced: 53 students = 35% Honors: 30 students = 20%
End of Year Math Assessment Grade Level: 57 students = 35% Advanced: 74 students = 46% Honors: 30 students = 19%
End of Year Math Assessment Grade Level: 67 students = 42% Advanced: 66 students = 41% Honors (Alg. I): 27 students = 17%
End of Year Math Assessment Grade Level: 85 students = 46% Advanced (Alg. I) : 64 students = 35% Honors (Alg. II): 35 students = 19%
Fact Fluency
Reflex Math Fact Fluency Increase in Fluency Grade % Fluent in June over the year First (+,-) 56% + 44% Second (+,-) 89% + 38% Third (x,÷) 90% + 68% Fourth (x,÷) 92% + 23% Fifth (x,÷) 98% + 4% Sixth (Intervention (x,÷) 88%
Science
NJSLA-Science ○ Fifth and Eighth grade students participated in the field test. ○ There will be no reportable results this year. ○ Next year will be our baseline data.
Alternate Assessment (DLM)
Alternate Assessment (DLM) 1 Third Grade student ● 2 Fourth Grade students ● 2 Fifth Grade students ● 4 Sixth Grade students ● 4 Seventh Grade students ● 1 Eighth Grade student ● All students assessed in English/Language Arts and Mathematics with Performance Categories of Emerging, Approaching the Target, At Target, and Advanced. Fifth and Eighth grade students are also assessed in Science.
DLM Achievement Levels Third Grade (1) Fourth Grade (2) Fifth Grade (2) ELA - At Target ELA ELA ○ ○ ○ Approaching - 1 Math - Advanced At Target - 2 □ ○ □ At Target - 1 Math □ ○ Math ○ At Target - 2 □ Approaching - 2 □ Science ○ At Target - 2 □
DLM Achievement Levels Sixth Grade (4) Seventh Grade (4) Eighth Grade (1) ELA ELA ELA ○ ○ ○ At Target - 3 Emerging - 2 At Target □ □ □ Advanced - 1 At Target - 1 □ □ Math ○ Math Advanced - 1 ○ □ Approaching □ Math ○ At Target - 3 □ Science ○ Advanced - 1 Approaching - 2 □ □ Approaching □ At Target - 1 □ Advanced - 1 □
Recommend
More recommend
