parallel patent proceedings after murata skyhawke and
play

Parallel Patent Proceedings After Murata, Skyhawke and Shaw: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 05, 2024 •328 likes •645 views

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Parallel Patent Proceedings After Murata, Skyhawke and Shaw: Navigating Claim Construction, Estoppel, RPI, Stays and More WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2017 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central

  1. Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Parallel Patent Proceedings After Murata, Skyhawke and Shaw: Navigating Claim Construction, Estoppel, RPI, Stays and More WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 4, 2017 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific 1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: Kenneth R. Adamo, Partner , Kirkland & Ellis , Chicago Honorable Faith Hochberg, New York Scott E. Kamholz, M.D., Ph.D., Partner , Foley Hoag , Washington, D.C. The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10 .

  2. Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-819-0113 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please 1-866-819-0113 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again. press the F11 key again.

  3. Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email that you will receive immediately following the program. that you will receive immediately following the program. For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926 For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 35. ext. 35.

  4. Parallel Patent Proceedings Parallel Patent Proceedings After Murata , Skyhawke After Murata , Skyhawke and Shaw : Navigating Claim and Shaw : Navigating Claim Construction, Estoppel, RPI, Construction, Estoppel, RPI, Stays and More Stays and More

  5. Kenneth R. Adamo Hon. Faith S. Hochberg Scott E. Kamholz, MD, PhD Partner U.S. District Judge (Ret.) Former PTAB APJ Kirkland & Ellis LLP Judge Hochberg ADR Partner, Foley Hoag LLP skamholz@foleyhoag.com kradamo@kirkland.com judgehochberg@judgehochberg.com 5

  6. 6

  7. CAFC DCt 54 mo CAFC IPR 40 mo Dist. Ct. Decision 36 mo PTAB IPR Decision 21 mo PTAB Hearing 18 mo PTAB Hearing 18 mo Petitioner Reply 16 mo PO Response 13 mo Markman order 12 mo IPR Institution 9 mo Markman briefing 8 mo POPR 6 mo IPR petition 3 mo 7 Complaint 0 mo

  8. CAFC DCt 54 mo CAFC IPR 50 mo Dist. Ct. Decision 36 mo PTAB IPR Decision 30 mo PTAB Hearing 27 mo PTAB Hearing 27 mo Petitioner Reply 25 mo PO Response 22 mo Markman order 12 mo IPR Institution 18 mo Markman briefing 8 mo POPR 15 mo IPR petition 12 mo 8 Complaint 0 mo

  9. * But see estoppel cases 9

  10. 10

  11. 11

  12. 12

  13. 13

  14. 14

  15. 15

  16. 16

  17. 17

  18. 18

  19. claim terms are generally given their claim terms are generally given their ordinary and customary meaning, as would be ordinary and customary meaning, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, in the understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, in the context of the entire disclosure context of the entire disclosure 19

  20. 20

  21. 21

  22. 22

  23. 23

  24. 24

  25. 25

  26. 26

  27. 27

  28. 28

  29. 29

  30. 30

Recommend

Relationship Between AIA Proceedings, Reexamination Proceedings, and Reissue Proceedings

Relationship Between AIA Proceedings, Reexamination Proceedings, and Reissue Proceedings

Relationship Between AIA Proceedings, Reexamination Proceedings, and Reissue Proceedings Administrative Patent Judges Sally Medley, and Joni Chang Patent Trial and Appeal Board Webinar Series (2 of 5) April 5, 2016 Boardside Chats Date Time

590 views • 18 slides
Navigating Administrative Law in Patent Appeals Involving Review Proceedings Identifying and

Navigating Administrative Law in Patent Appeals Involving Review Proceedings Identifying and

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Navigating Administrative Law in Patent Appeals Involving Review Proceedings Identifying and Preserving Administrative Errors in IPR Proceedings; Impact of Recent Court Decisions

654 views • 46 slides
Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy gy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for

Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy gy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Patent Reexamination: Effective Strategy gy for Litigating Infringement Claims Best Practices for Pursuing and Defending Parallel Proceedings TUES DAY, MAY 3, 2011 1pm Eastern |

694 views • 68 slides
Financial Institution D&O Litigation: Parallel Proceedings Representing D&Os Faced with

Financial Institution D&O Litigation: Parallel Proceedings Representing D&Os Faced with

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Financial Institution D&O Litigation: Parallel Proceedings Representing D&Os Faced with Multiple Agency Proceedings, Private Civil Litigation, and Criminal Actions WEDNES

666 views • 32 slides
Federal Circuit Addresses Recapture Rule May 21, 2012 in Patent Reissue Proceedings Practice

Federal Circuit Addresses Recapture Rule May 21, 2012 in Patent Reissue Proceedings Practice

Federal Circuit Addresses Recapture Rule May 21, 2012 in Patent Reissue Proceedings Practice Group: IP Procurement and By Mark R. Leslie and Christopher G. Wolfe Portfolio Management In its May 8 opinion In re Youman 1 , the U.S. Court of

221 views • 5 slides
Claim Construction During Reexamination with Parallel District Court Proceedings In re Suitco

Claim Construction During Reexamination with Parallel District Court Proceedings In re Suitco

Claim Construction During Reexamination with Parallel District Court Proceedings In re Suitco Surface Inc. 94 USPQ2d 1640 (Fed. Cir. 2010) Abraham J. Rosner Sughrue, Mion PLLC BACKGROUND During the course of infringement litigation, 3M filed

147 views • 11 slides
NPE Patent Litigation: Latest Developments Leveraging Alice, Federal Rules Amendments, and

NPE Patent Litigation: Latest Developments Leveraging Alice, Federal Rules Amendments, and

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A NPE Patent Litigation: Latest Developments Leveraging Alice, Federal Rules Amendments, and Patent Office Proceedings in Defending Infringement Disputes WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 2016

894 views • 71 slides
5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law

5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law

5/25/2011 Patent Reform Topics Law & economic model for understanding patent law Evaluate aspects of the patent system Patent acquisition: role of private parties and government Patent Reform Patent scope First to file v.

281 views • 4 slides
N Destination i? 108 US 8,687,777 B1 Page 2 Related U.S. Application Data 5,572.581 A 1 1/1996

N Destination i? 108 US 8,687,777 B1 Page 2 Related U.S. Application Data 5,572.581 A 1 1/1996

US008687777B1 (12) United States Patent US 8,687,777 B1 (10) Patent No.: * Apr. 1, 2014 Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL (56) References Cited PRESENTATION AND SELECTION OF VR U.S. PATENT

2.01k views • 162 slides
c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US009521255Bl c12) United States Patent US 9,521,255 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 13, 2016 (54) (56) References Cited SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR

1.55k views • 133 slides
Patent family - background Patent family - background Patent family - background 1883

Patent family - background Patent family - background Patent family - background 1883

The Derwent patent family The Derwent patent family and its application in and its application in Patent Statistical Analysis Patent Statistical Analysis WIPO-OECD Workshop on Statistics in the Patent Field, Geneva, Sept 18-19, 2003 Doina

114 views • 8 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008345835Bl c12) United States Patent US 8,345,835 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 1, 2013 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,006,987 A

1.62k views • 135 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent:

111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008548135B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,548,135 Bl (10) Patent No.: Lavian et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 1, 2013 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,335,276 A

599 views • 23 slides
c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent:

sta,_rt~) 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008054952B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,054,952 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 8, 2011 5,708,422 A * (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS

828 views • 51 slides
(12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45)

(12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45)

US008867708B1 (12) United States Patent US 8,867,708 B1 (10) Patent N0.: *oa. 21, 2014 Lavian et a]. (45) Date of Patent: 4,897,866 A 1/1990 Majmudar et a1. (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VISUAL 5,006,987 A 4/1991 Harles PRESENTATION AND

542 views • 53 slides
US 8,903,073 B2 Page 3 8,041,575 B2 * 1012011 Agarwal et al . ............ 704/270.1 (56)

US 8,903,073 B2 Page 3 8,041,575 B2 * 1012011 Agarwal et al . ............ 704/270.1 (56)

1502,~-"-~ 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008903073B2 (12) United States Patent US 8,903,073 B2 (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Dec. 2, 2014 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR

1.59k views • 135 slides
lf r::::==1r _v;_,su_ph_one--,-----' ' c_l 108c 1047 106 102a 110 108n US

lf r::::==1r _v;_,su_ph_one--,-----' ' c_l 108c 1047 106 102a 110 108n US

~ 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US008594280B 1 c12) United States Patent US 8,594,280 Bl (10) Patent No.: Or-Bach et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Nov. 26, 2013 5,416,831 A 5/1995 Chewning, III eta!. (54)

662 views • 39 slides
Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics for Licensees Post-AIA Structuring Contractual Protections and

Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics for Licensees Post-AIA Structuring Contractual Protections and

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics for Licensees Post-AIA Structuring Contractual Protections and Responding When Licensed Patents Are Challenged in Post-Grant Proceedings THURSDAY,

833 views • 46 slides
Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in

Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in

Patent Strategy 4 Where to file a first non-provisional patent application, as mentioned in Patent Strategy 3? (as of February 2017) Again The Starting Point We have a typical product development circle: Idea Functional Model

406 views • 23 slides
America Invents Act First Inventor to File, Derivation Proceedings and Post Grant Review After

America Invents Act First Inventor to File, Derivation Proceedings and Post Grant Review After

America Invents Act First Inventor to File, Derivation Proceedings and Post Grant Review After Patent Reform What You Need to Know Now Matthew Becker Gary Fedorochko Richard Stockton Neil Trueman OCTOBER 4, 2011 Your Speakers Matthew

591 views • 32 slides
A Language for the Compact Representation of Multiple Program Versions Proceedings of the 18 th

A Language for the Compact Representation of Multiple Program Versions Proceedings of the 18 th

A Language for the Compact Representation of Multiple Program Versions Proceedings of the 18 th International Workshop on Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing (2005) Sebastien Donadio 1,2 , James Brodman 4 , Thomas Roeder 5 , Kamen Yotov

667 views • 37 slides
The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn

The European Patent Office An introduction to the EPO and the European patent system Siobhn Yeats Director, JC Biotechnology 6 July 2015 Our mission As the patent office for Europe, we support innovation, competitiveness and economic

625 views • 24 slides
Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF

Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF

Calculating Damages for Patent Infringement in Different Jurisdictions Special Feature by AIPF Patent Committee October 7, 2019 Introduction By: Brendan Nugent, Michael Buck IP A patent owner often enters patent litigation with the aim of

297 views • 8 slides
The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at

The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at

The Integrated Patent Instrument Christopher C. Funk Abstract Inventors who apply for a patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) routinely negotiate with the PTO over the patents scope. The written record of that negotiation is called

807 views • 46 slides

More recommend