palliative care for patients with
play

palliative care for patients with heart failure? Martin Denvir, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

When is the right time to consider palliative care for patients with heart failure? Martin Denvir, Consultant Cardiologist, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh When is the right time to consider palliative care for patients with heart failure? 1.


  1. When is the right time to consider palliative care for patients with heart failure? Martin Denvir, Consultant Cardiologist, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

  2. When is the right time to consider palliative care for patients with heart failure? 1. When can we identify people who need supportive and palliative care (SPC)? 2. Can we accurately identify people with CHF who need SPC? 3. Do we have the organisational structure that can achieve this?

  3. Background Identifying when to initiate palliative care in heart failure is difficult due to - 1. the uncertainty of the syndrome 2. cardiologists and palliative care teams don’t always recognise the benefit of the other Should be initiated at earliest convenient time to allow patients and relatives time to discuss their needs

  4. illness Trajectory Source: End of Life Care in Heart Failure: a framework for implementation DoH 2010

  5. illness trajectory & Mode of Death Mozaffarian, et al Circulation. Source: End of Life Care in Heart Failure: a framework 2007; 116: 392-398 for implementation DoH 2010

  6. Key Opportunities 1. Diagnosis 2. Hospital admission 3. Recognised deterioration in symptoms and in clinical factors known to affect prognosis

  7. Key Opportunities 1. Diagnosis – e.g. initiation of beta blockers 2. Hospital admission – e.g. CHF, ICD implant 3. Recognised deterioration in symptoms and clinical factors known to affect prognosis - prognostic models

  8. 1. Diagnosis : Risk of death US CARVEDILOL CIBIS II MERIT-HF COPERNICUS (n=1094) (n=2647) (n=3991) (n=2289) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Mortality 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Risk Risk Risk Risk  34 %  65 %  34 %  35 % 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 P =.006 P =.0001 P <.0001 P <.00013 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Time (y)

  9. 1. Diagnosis : Risk of death • Post – MI • EF<30% MADIT II trial, NEJM 2002

  10. Cardiac prognostic models CHF prognostic models/scores Ambulatory vs Hospitalised Seattle Risk Model ADHERE CHARM EFFECT MUSIC GISSI-HF ACTION-HF HFSS (advanced)

  11. Cardiac prognostic models Cardiac prognostic models/scores Ambulatory vs Hospitalised

  12. Palliative Care : Models Need & Prognosis Gold Standards Framework (Need & Prognosis) General criteria vs Disease specific - CHF Weight Loss NYHA 3-4 Low albumin Difficult symptoms Karnofsky score Repeated admissions General decline Surprise question* Co-morbidity * Would you be surprised if this patient died within the next 6-12 months? Haga et al, Heart 2011

  13. How can we identify people accurately? Palliative Care Model vs Prognostic model (GSF) vs (Seattle) 138 patients with NYHA class 3-4 symptoms Enrolled in Hart Failure Nurse Service (HFNS) Seattle score and GSF score (interview with SHFN) Followed up for 12 months Haga et al, Heart 2011

  14. Results Palliative Care Model vs Prognostic model RESULTS 31% (43) died PPV NPV Accuracy GSF 33% 5% 41% Seattle 83% 71% 72% Haga et al, Heart 2011

  15. Can we identify end of life in CHF accurately? Palliative Care Model vs Prognostic model CONCLUSIONS Neither predicts death with high degree of accuracy GSF highlights needs Seattle highlights adverse risk profile Complementary Haga et al, Heart 2011

  16. Simple Prognostic Model Prognostic models – simple (n=1328) Variable Parameter HR 95% CI Score E Elderly 70+ years 1.5 1.2-1.9 1 Di Diabetic Yes 1.6 1.3-1.9 1 N NYHA Class III or IV 1.5 1.3-1.8 1 B B-Blocker Not on B-Blockers 1.4 1.2-1.7 1 U Under weight <70 kg 1.4 1.2-1.7 1 R Renal dysfunction Creatinine ≥120 µmol/L 1.4 1.1-1.6 1 1-2 admissions 4.3 3.4-5.4 2 Growing No of CHF GH Hospitalisation in last 12 3 or more admissions 10.8 8.6-13.6 3 months Iqbal et al, 2011

  17. Simple Prognostic Model Prognostic models - EDiNBURGh Validation Cohort Derivation Cohort 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 n=1328 n=248 0.00 0.00 0 5 10 15 0 100 200 300 400 Time (months) Time (days) Score 0-1 Score 5-6 Score 0-1 Score 5-6 Score 2-4 Score 7-9 Score 2-4 Score 7-9 Iqbal et al, 2011

  18. Simple Prognostic Model Prognosis and Needs Variable Parameter HR 95% CI Score E Elderly 70+ years 1.5 1.2-1.9 1 Di Diabetic Yes 1.6 1.3-1.9 1 N NYHA Class III or IV 1.5 1.3-1.8 1 B B-Blocker Not on B-Blockers 1.4 1.2-1.7 1 U Under weight <70 kg 1.4 1.2-1.7 1 R Renal dysfunction Creatinine ≥120 µmol/L 1.4 1.1-1.6 1 1-2 admissions 4.3 3.4-5.4 2 Growing No of CHF GH Hospitalisation in last 12 3 or more admissions 10.8 8.6-13.6 3 months Iqbal et al, 2011

  19. Death and Dying Extra supportive care Palliative Care process Source: End of Life Care in Heart Failure: a framework for implementation DoH 2010

  20. Organisational structure HEART FAILURE NURSE GP PALLIATIVE CARE NURSE CARDIOLOGIST Source: End of Life Care in Heart Failure: a framework for implementation DoH 2010

  21. When is the right time to consider palliative care for patients with heart failure? 1. When can we identify people who need supportive and palliative care (SPC) ? diagnosis, hospital admission, ICD implant, worsening prognosis/increasing need for care & support 2. Can we accurately identify people with CHF who need SPC ? Yes, we can use a range of prognostic tools to guide us recognising that they identify a group at increased risk of death with increased needs 3. Do we have the organisational structure that can achieve this ? Yes, but we need to develop these through education, training and implementation of agreed approaches to care

Recommend


More recommend