pa patients and and the their fam amily car aregivers wi
play

pa patients and and the their fam amily car aregivers wi with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Using case man management in n Prim rimary Car Care as as an an up upstr tream app approach to o con onnect t end end of of life pa patients and and the their fam amily car aregivers wi with th com ommunity-based supp


  1. Using case man management in n Prim rimary Car Care as as an an up upstr tream app approach to o con onnect t end end of of life pa patients and and the their fam amily car aregivers wi with th com ommunity-based supp upport: : A A real ealist review International Foundation for Integrated Care: IFIC Scotland Integrated Care Matters Webinar Series 3: Palliative and End of Life Care 10th December, 2018 G. Warner, L. Garland-Baird, K. Kumanan, T. Sampalli, E. Christian, C. Tschupruk, B. Lawson, R. Urquhart, F. Burge, R. Martin-Misener, L. Weeks, B. Pesut, G. Kephart, T. Packer

  2. Bac Background • The majority of Canadians prefer to die at home • Earlier initiation of Community- based Palliative Care (CBPC) is beneficial for patients & their families • Case management has potential to assist with identifying and accessing CBPC resources

  3. Pallia lliati tive approach in in Prim rimary ry Hea ealth lth Ca Care: e: Cu Curative e to pallia lliati tive Self-management Palliative approach to care Early Chronic Disease Management Decompensation Decline and last days Hope for cure Disease advancement Dependency and symptoms increase Death and bereavement experiencing life limiting illness Seniors at risk Complication indicators Home care PPS ESAS BC Palliative benefits Transition 1 Transition 2 Transition 3 Transition 4 Transition 5 Time of Diagnosis Time McGregor and Porterfield 2009

  4. Cas Case management (Nation onal Case se Mana nagement Network ork, 2009, 2012) Early assessment & planning for Communication with patient & family needs patients/families & other sectors

  5. Obj Objectiv ives of of review • To partner with family advisors & health-system knowledge users • Identify critical community supports in the last year of life • Synthesize & ”unpack” evidence on how case management can connect patients and families to community-based services & supports

  6. Realist Review Systematic Review Type of intervention Complex Simple, discrete Aim / Focus EXPLANATORY: how ‘x’ works, in what contexts, JUDGMENTAL: how much does x, y, z improve for whom? health? Rigor Very rigorous Very rigorous Relevant types of Includes a wide range of research and non RCTs ideal. Mostly quantitative research on evidence research (i.e., both qualitative, quantitative) effectiveness (e.g., controlled & uncontrolled studies, interrupted time series, …) Evidence source Peer reviewed literature, policy reviews, Peer reviewed literature, grey literature (finite stakeholder analysis, focus groups, grey literature set of data) Method Theory-driven synthesis: deconstructs Statistical synthesis: meta-analysis, summary of intervention into component theories. Context quantitative data data retained, basic theory is refined concerning applicability in context Usefulness How to make an intervention most useful Demonstrates which intervention has largest or smallest effect Pawson and Tilley, 2004

  7. Rea ealis ist revie iew ste teps Step 1: identifying the review question (clarify scope) Step 2: searching for relevant literature Step 3: quality appraisal Step 4: extracting and organizing the data (CMOs) Step 5: synthesis

  8. Ho How doe does a a realis list revie iew wor ork? • A realist review “unpacks” mechanisms in particular contexts & settings • CMOs are hypothesized program theories that are tested against the evidence • For our review: Synthesizing the research literature to map out program theories of how individual, organizational and health system contexts (C) catalyze the functions and competencies of case management (M) to improve access to community services, patient, family, and health system outcomes (O).

  9. Hy Hypothesiz ized CM CMO CONTEXT Policies, Resources, Public Awareness MECHANISMS Health, Social, Community services and supports Integrated care Case Management Functions Primary and Critical community Healthcare Competencies supports Patients and Families involved in the plan of care OUTCOMES Better End of Life Experiences

  10. Rea ealis ist revie iew meth thods • RAMESES protocol for realist reviews • Librarian assisted systematic searches then purposive search • Iterative consultations with knowledge users & family advisors • Articles screened by 3 reviewers then categorized by relevancy & outcomes • Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations/program theories

  11. Results • Screened 2389, extracted data on 161, based on relevancy 78 articles, also >500 from purposive search • Literature organized into preliminary context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) program theories • Most literature related to case- management mechanisms or adopting a palliative approach to care, very little on critical community supports

  12. Ide dentif ifyin ing Critic Critical l Co Communit ity Supp upports • Critical community supports were identified through research literature & consultation with family advisors: 1. Healthcare Professionals or assistants trained in end of life care 2. Someone trained in end of life care to help transit home after discharge 3. Co-ordination between services and supports. 4. Programs/resources to help families cope with stress and care for the patient 5. Extra physical and psychological support for patients who live alone

  13. Syn ynthesis • Evidence from our review focused on how case management functions can facilitate: • patient identification at EOL • creation of family centric plans • implementation of planned care • Supportive contexts included: • reducing communication barriers within/outside of PHC • enhancing PHC practice cultures that embrace community supports • PHC team members who value family centric care

  14. Program Theorie ies: CM CMOs • Chose six program theories (CMOs) • If PHC teams have training to facilitate EOL conversations with patients/families, it will lead to PHC teams: identifying patient & families nearing EOL, being involved in their plan of care, & result in continuity of patient/family care in the last year of life • If PHC settings are supported & resourced to adopt a Public Health approach to end of life care in the community, it would prompt PHC teams to: work with communities to develop partnerships with critical community supports, & engage with patient/family caregivers’ to determine their needs, plan “upstream” end of life strategies

  15. Next xt steps • Screening and extracting data from our purposive search • Refining program theories (CMOs) • Conducting additional consultations with advisors, knowledge users and team • Synthesizing findings and making recommendations

  16. Ack Acknowledgements • Canadian Institutes of Health: SPOR PIHCI Network Knowledge Synthesis grant • Nova Scotia Health Authority • Maritime SPOR Support Unit (MSSU)-Leah Boulos

  17. Qu Questio ions

  18. References • Abel, Julian, Allan Kellehear, and Aliki Karapliagou. "Palliative care — the new essentials." Annals of Palliative Medicine 7.2 (2018): S3-S14 • Dalkin , Sonia Michelle, et al. "What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation." Implementation Science 10.1 (2015): 49. • Lukersmith, S., Millington, M., & Salvador-Carulla, L. (2016). What is case management? A scoping and mapping review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16 (4), 1-13. • National Case Management Network (2009). Canadian Standards for Practice for Case Management. Retrieved from: http://www.ncmn.ca/ • National Case Management Network (2012). Canadian Core Competency Profile for case Management Providers. Retrieved from: http://www.ncmn.ca/

  19. Program Th Theorie ies (Dalkin, 2015) • Intervention resources are introduced in a context, in a way that enhances a change in reasoning that alters the behaviour of participants, which leads to outcomes. • The revised formula therefore reads: M (Resources) + C→M (Reasoning) = O

  20. M (Resources) + C→M (Reasoning) = O • M (Resources) PHC teams training to facilitate EOL conversations with patients/families • are added to a Context of a PHC team that is ready to make changes necessary e.g. allocate time for EOL conversations, engage families • M (Reasoning) PHC teams will be confident they can have EOL conversations with patients and families, • Leading to the Outcomes of improved patient and family engagement in planning for EOL and decreased family stress

Recommend


More recommend