p10511 miniaturization of xerography
play

P10511: Miniaturization of Xerography Derek Meinke (ME, PM) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P10511: Miniaturization of Xerography Derek Meinke (ME, PM) Matthew Liff (ME) Tony Zhang (EE) Zaw Htoo (ISE) Agenda Project Description Final Design Concept System Architecture Project Development Current State of Design


  1. P10511: Miniaturization of Xerography Derek Meinke (ME, PM) Matthew Liff (ME) Tony Zhang (EE) Zaw Htoo (ISE)

  2. Agenda • Project Description • Final Design Concept • System Architecture • Project Development • Current State of Design • Summary of Test Results • Conclusions • Questions

  3. Project Description • The scope of P10511 is to create a test fixture that will allow the use of various charging devices along with multiple diameters of photoreceptors. • Test affect of charge uniformity with various device configurations and input parameters. • Obtain device characteristics using I-V curve.

  4. Project Description Engineering Specifications 14% 13% 12% 11% 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0%

  5. Final Design Concept Photoreceptor (84mm) Charger Mount Erase Mount Coronode/Grid/Plate Power Supplies Threaded rod end for ESV easy changeability

  6. Final Design Concept

  7. System Architecture

  8. Project Development Process Define Needs and Concept Generation Detailed Design Specifications and Selection -Concept Generation and -Part Drawings -Define Customer Needs sketches -Bill of Materials -Develop Eng. Specifications -Concept Screening and -Calculations -Perform QFD Analysis selection MSD 1 MSD 1 MSD 1 Weeks 6 - 10 Weeks 1 - 2 Weeks 3 - 5 Building Testing -Material Acquisition -Uniformity Plots -Part Machining -I-V Curves -Design Adjustments -LabVIEW Optimization -Wiring Connections -Part Modifications MSD 2 MSD 2 Weeks 1-8 Weeks 9-10

  9. Current State of Project • Testing is complete – Smooth uniformity plot – I-V Curves with slope of around 0.6 • Photoreceptor sizes – Only tested 84mm and 30mm diameters (largest and smallest) – The 60mm and 40mm diameters are unavailable • Budget – $548.21 was used of $2000.00 available – Includes extra material for PR endcaps – Donated equipment cost was tracked but not purchased on budget

  10. Summary of Results Uniformity Test IV Test Grid Voltage: -655V Grid Voltage: -655V ESV Readings/PR Rotation: 1 Voltage Step: 20V ESV Readings/PR Length: 50 Speed of PR: 0.1 Intercept: -722.6 Slope: -0.6 Average Reading: 497.16V Range of Uniformity: 92.28V

  11. Summary of Results Uniformity Test -665V Applied Slope of Mean of Mean of Average Range of Voltage Speed (m/s) Sample Voltage Uniformity Across Voltage (V) Uniformity (V) Range (V) P/R IV Test -665V Applied 1 -481.68 56.64 -0.03 Voltage Voltage Theoretical 2 -497.16 92.28 0.03 Slope Increment Sample Intercept Intercept 0.1 3 -473.48 68.84 0.06 -466.08 119.11 (uA/V-m) (V) (V) Error (%) 4 -454.52 160.10 0.06 2.06 1 -678.7 -0.66 5 -423.56 217.70 -0.02 6.47 1 -435.14 59.57 0.01 2 -708 -0.64 2 -477.66 47.36 0.03 5.71 3 -703 -0.64 0.2 3 -478.72 86.91 0.20 -470.15 81.34 0.89 4 -659.1 -0.66 4 -460.20 156.70 -0.04 2.78 5 -683.5 -0.64 5 -499.04 56.15 0.10 10 34.29 6 -893 -0.47 1 -380.51 68.84 0.22 1.65 7 -654 -0.66 2 -437.29 203.60 0.42 4.21 8 -693 -0.62 0.3 3 -393.18 162.50 0.18 -407.51 132.38 34.36 9 -893.5 -0.51 4 -424.68 64.45 0.10 4.26 10 -693.3 0.62 5 -401.90 162.50 0.12 2.71 11 -683 -0.61 1 -285.13 105.90 0.31 2.71 1 -683 -0.64 2 -312.54 147.40 0.40 8.66 0.5 3 -225.82 96.67 -0.11 -261.91 120.86 2 -722.6 -0.6 4 -257.52 167.40 0.49 20 2.06 3 -678.7 -0.63 5 -228.54 86.91 0.12 5.73 4 -703.1 -0.64 1 -153.06 239.20 -0.59 7.92 5 -717.7 -0.6 2 -152.50 264.10 -0.54 1 3 -140.68 279.70 -0.65 -140.02 229.44 4 -126.10 182.60 -0.39 5 -127.74 181.60 -0.36

  12. Conclusions • Design Modifications – Charger mount slots were opened on PR end for increased charger range of motion – Original retaining mechanism for PR compression spring used c-clip; changed to threaded rod with nut for assembly considerations – Cut down spring by 3 loops for lower compression force and easier assembly – Shaft mounts now use gussets over flimsy L-brackets for alignment – Individually sized endcaps vs. v-flange design – Dovetail design optimized for machinability • Improvement ideas – Lengthen charger mounting assembly for less interference – Implement third shaft mount on free end to eliminate cantilever design – Alligator clips with higher breakdown threshold – Make charger slide plastic to eliminate arcing problems

  13. Further Questions?

Recommend


More recommend