overview
play

Overview Motivation Introduction of the RDM method Recent results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Reduced Density Matrix Method: Application Of T 2 N -representability Condition and Development of Highly Accurate Solver Maho Nakata , Bastiaan J. Braams, Katsuki Fujisawa, Mituhiro Fukuda, Jerome K. Percus, Makoto Yamashita, Zhengji


  1. The Reduced Density Matrix Method: Application Of T 2 ′ N -representability Condition and Development of Highly Accurate Solver Maho Nakata † , Bastiaan J. Braams, Katsuki Fujisawa, Mituhiro Fukuda, Jerome K. Percus, Makoto Yamashita, Zhengji Zhao maho@riken.jp † RIKEN ACCC, Emory Univ., Chuo Univ., Tokyo Tech Institute, New York Univ., Lawrence Berlekey National Lab. Odyssey 2008 2008/6/1-6/6

  2. Overview • Motivation • Introduction of the RDM method • Recent results • Summary and future direction

  3. Motivation:theoretical chemistry

  4. Motivation:theoretical chemistry Goals: prediction and design of chemical reaction • What happens if we mix substance A and B? • CO 2 conversion. • Drug design. etc...

  5. Basic equation: Schr¨ odinger equation

  6. Basic equation: Schr¨ odinger equation (electronic) Hamiltonian H N ( − � 2 Ze 2 ) e 2 ∑ ∑ ∇ 2 H = j − + 2 m e 4 πǫ 0 r j 4 πǫ 0 r ij j = 1 i > j

  7. Basic equation: Schr¨ odinger equation (electronic) Hamiltonian H N ( − � 2 Ze 2 ) e 2 ∑ ∑ ∇ 2 H = j − + 2 m e 4 πǫ 0 r j 4 πǫ 0 r ij j = 1 i > j Schr¨ odinger equation

  8. Basic equation: Schr¨ odinger equation (electronic) Hamiltonian H N ( − � 2 Ze 2 ) e 2 ∑ ∑ ∇ 2 H = j − + 2 m e 4 πǫ 0 r j 4 πǫ 0 r ij j = 1 i > j Schr¨ odinger equation H Ψ (1 , 2 , · · · N ) = E Ψ (1 , 2 , · · · N )

  9. Basic equation: Schr¨ odinger equation (electronic) Hamiltonian H N ( − � 2 Ze 2 ) e 2 ∑ ∑ ∇ 2 H = j − + 2 m e 4 πǫ 0 r j 4 πǫ 0 r ij j = 1 i > j Schr¨ odinger equation H Ψ (1 , 2 , · · · N ) = E Ψ (1 , 2 , · · · N ) Pauli principle: antisymmetric wavefunctionis Ψ ( · · · , i , · · · , j , · · · ) = − Ψ ( · · · , j , · · · , i , · · · )

  10. Solving Schr¨ odinger equation is difficult We know the basic equation but...

  11. Solving Schr¨ odinger equation is difficult We know the basic equation but... The general theory of quantum mechanics is now almost com- plete. · · · the whole of chemistry are thus completely known, and the difficultly is only that the exact application of these laws leads to equations much too complected to be soluble. [Dirac 1929] “Quantum Mechanics of Many-Electron Systems.”

  12. Simpler quantum mechanical method

  13. Simpler quantum mechanical method A success story: The Density Functional Theory: [Hoheberg-Kohn 1964] [Kohn-Sham 1965] Ground state electronic density ρ ( r ) ⇓ external potential v ( r ) ⇓ Hamiltonian H ⇓ Schr¨ odinger equation Very difficult functional F [ ρ ( r )] . Practically this is semi-empirical theory.

  14. Preferable methods for chemistry

  15. Preferable methods for chemistry • From the first principle.

  16. Preferable methods for chemistry • From the first principle. • Separability or nearsightedness: split a whole system into subsystems.

  17. Preferable methods for chemistry • From the first principle. • Separability or nearsightedness: split a whole system into subsystems. • Language: better understanding of chemistry and physics.

  18. Preferable methods for chemistry • From the first principle. • Separability or nearsightedness: split a whole system into subsystems. • Language: better understanding of chemistry and physics. • Low scaling cost.

  19. Preferable methods for chemistry • From the first principle. • Separability or nearsightedness: split a whole system into subsystems. • Language: better understanding of chemistry and physics. • Low scaling cost. ✞ ☎ The RDM method! ✝ ✆

  20. The RDM method

  21. The RDM method The second-order reduced density matrix: [Husimi 1940], [L¨ owdin 1954], [Mayer 1955], [Coulson 1960], [Nakatsuji 1976] ( N ) ∫ Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) = Ψ ∗ (123 · · · N ) Ψ (1 ′ 2 ′ 3 · · · N ) d µ 3 ··· N 2

  22. The RDM method The second-order reduced density matrix: [Husimi 1940], [L¨ owdin 1954], [Mayer 1955], [Coulson 1960], [Nakatsuji 1976] ( N ) ∫ Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) = Ψ ∗ (123 · · · N ) Ψ (1 ′ 2 ′ 3 · · · N ) d µ 3 ··· N 2 Can we construct simpler quantum chemical method using Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) as a basic variable?

  23. The RDM method The second-order reduced density matrix: [Husimi 1940], [L¨ owdin 1954], [Mayer 1955], [Coulson 1960], [Nakatsuji 1976] ( N ) ∫ Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) = Ψ ∗ (123 · · · N ) Ψ (1 ′ 2 ′ 3 · · · N ) d µ 3 ··· N 2 Can we construct simpler quantum chemical method using Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) as a basic variable? ☛ ✟ Yes ✡ ✠

  24. Scaling Method # of variable (discritized) Exact? Ψ N , ( r !) Yes Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) 4 , ( r 4 ) Yes

  25. Scaling Method # of variable (discritized) Exact? Ψ N , ( r !) Yes Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) 4 , ( r 4 ) Yes Good scaling

  26. Scaling Method # of variable (discritized) Exact? Ψ N , ( r !) Yes Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) 4 , ( r 4 ) Yes Good scaling Equivalent to Schr¨ odinger eq.

  27. The RDM method

  28. The RDM method The Hamiltonian contains only 1 and 2-particle interaction. i a j + 1 ∑ ∑ j a † w i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 a † i 1 a † v i H = i 2 a j 2 a j 1 2 ij i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2

  29. The RDM method The Hamiltonian contains only 1 and 2-particle interaction. i a j + 1 ∑ ∑ j a † w i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 a † i 1 a † v i H = i 2 a j 2 a j 1 2 ij i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 The total energy E becomes, i a j | Ψ � + 1 ∑ ∑ j � Ψ | a † w i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 � Ψ | a † i 1 a † v i E = i 2 a j 2 a j 1 | Ψ � 2 ij i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 ∑ ∑ w i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 Γ i 1 i 2 v i j γ i = j + j 1 j 2 . ij i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2

  30. The RDM method

  31. The RDM method Here we defined the second-order reduced density matrix Γ i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 (2-RDM) j 1 j 2 = 1 Γ i 1 i 2 2 � Ψ | a † i 1 a † i 2 a j 2 a j 1 | Ψ � ,

  32. The RDM method Here we defined the second-order reduced density matrix Γ i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 (2-RDM) j 1 j 2 = 1 Γ i 1 i 2 2 � Ψ | a † i 1 a † i 2 a j 2 a j 1 | Ψ � , and the first-order reduced density matrix γ i j (1-RDM) j = � Ψ | a † γ i i a j | Ψ � .

  33. The ground state/ N -representability condition

  34. The ground state/ N -representability condition The ground state energy and 2-RDM can be obtained....[Rosina 1968]

  35. The ground state/ N -representability condition The ground state energy and 2-RDM can be obtained....[Rosina 1968] E g = min Ψ � Ψ | H | Ψ �       ∑ ∑  w i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 Γ i 1 i 2  v i j γ i   = min j +   j 1 j 2 γ, Γ      ij i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 

  36. The ground state/ N -representability condition The ground state energy and 2-RDM can be obtained....[Rosina 1968] E g = min Ψ � Ψ | H | Ψ �       ∑ ∑  w i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 Γ i 1 i 2  v i j γ i   = min j +   j 1 j 2 γ, Γ      ij i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2  [Mayers 1955], [Tredgold 1957]: Lower than the exact one

  37. The ground state/ N -representability condition The ground state energy and 2-RDM can be obtained....[Rosina 1968] E g = min Ψ � Ψ | H | Ψ �       ∑ ∑  w i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2 Γ i 1 i 2  v i j γ i   = min j +   j 1 j 2 γ, Γ      ij i 1 i 2 j 1 j 2  [Mayers 1955], [Tredgold 1957]: Lower than the exact one N -representability condition [Coleman 1963] Γ (12 | 1 ′ 2 ′ ) → Ψ (123 · · · N ) γ (1 | 1 ′ ) → Ψ (123 · · · N )

  38. N -representability condition

  39. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?”

  40. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?” QMA-complete

  41. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?” QMA-complete ⇒ NP-hard [Deza 1997] [Liu et al. 2007]

  42. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?” QMA-complete ⇒ NP-hard [Deza 1997] [Liu et al. 2007] • Approximation is essential

  43. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?” QMA-complete ⇒ NP-hard [Deza 1997] [Liu et al. 2007] • Approximation is essential • P , Q -condition [Coleman 1963]

  44. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?” QMA-complete ⇒ NP-hard [Deza 1997] [Liu et al. 2007] • Approximation is essential • P , Q -condition [Coleman 1963] • G -condition [Garrod et al. 1964]

  45. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?” QMA-complete ⇒ NP-hard [Deza 1997] [Liu et al. 2007] • Approximation is essential • P , Q -condition [Coleman 1963] • G -condition [Garrod et al. 1964] • T 1 , T 2 -condition [Zhao et al. 2004], [Erdahl 1978]

  46. N -representability condition • “Is a given 2-RDM N -representable?” QMA-complete ⇒ NP-hard [Deza 1997] [Liu et al. 2007] • Approximation is essential • P , Q -condition [Coleman 1963] • G -condition [Garrod et al. 1964] • T 1 , T 2 -condition [Zhao et al. 2004], [Erdahl 1978] • Quite good for atoms and molecules [Garrod et al 1975, 1976], [Nakata et al. 2001, 2002], [Zhao et al. 2004] [Mazziotti 2004]

  47. 。 N -representability condition

Recommend


More recommend