overview
play

Overview P EGASUS : ultra-low A ST designed to study stability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I NITIAL O PERATION OF THE U PGRADED P EGASUS ST E XPERIMENT Raymond.J. Fonck University of Wisconsin-Madison for the P EGASUS team: D. Battaglia M. Bongard S. Burke N. Eideitis B. Ford G. Garstka M. Kozar B. Lewicki E. Unterberg G. Winz


  1. I NITIAL O PERATION OF THE U PGRADED P EGASUS ST E XPERIMENT Raymond.J. Fonck University of Wisconsin-Madison for the P EGASUS team: D. Battaglia M. Bongard S. Burke N. Eideitis B. Ford G. Garstka M. Kozar B. Lewicki E. Unterberg G. Winz presented to the 10th International ST Workshop Kyoto, Japan Sept. 29- Oct. 1, 2004 P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  2. Overview • P EGASUS : ultra-low A ST designed to study stability limits as A → 1 and Ip/I TF >1 • High β t and Ip=I TF achieved ohmically • Low-order tearing modes and ideal kinks limited access to higher Ip/I TF • Path to high Ip/I TF and β via suppression of instabilities • After fire: Lab rebuilt with significant upgrades • Advancing the experiment mission by improving plasma control P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  3. Mission: Explore plasma limits as A → 1 Pegasus is an extremely low-aspect ratio facility exploring quasi-spherical high-pressure plasmas with the goal of minimizing the central column while maintaining good confinement and stability Original Pegasus Goals: • Stability and confinement at high Ip/I TF I p /I tf = figure of merit for access to low-A physics - Extension of tokamak studies 100 TS-3,4 Spheromaks • Limits on β t and Ip/I TF (kink) as A → 1 q ψ =6 - Overlap between the tokamak and the spheromak 10 P EGASUS CDX-U, Ip/ITF NSTX, HIT, TST-M, MAST Globus-M, 1 ETE } Planned Future Emphases: START MEDUSA 0.1 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 “tokamak-spheromak Aspect Ratio • Support ST program movement to next overlap region” stages - EBW tests for heating & CD (w/PPPL) - Noninductive startup tests - Novel divertor design tests (w/UT) - CT fueling tests (w/UCD) - Diagnostics - High-pressure gas puff for deep fueling P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  4. P EGASUS is University-Scale, Mid-Sized ST Centerstack: Equilibrium Field Exposing Ohmic Heating Solenoid (NHMFL) Coils Experimental Parameters Parameter Achieved Phase II Goals A 1.15-1.3 1.12-1.3 R (m) 0.2-0.38 0.2-0.45 I p (MA) 0.16 0.30 Vacuum I N (MA/m-T) 6-8 15-20 Vessel RB t (T-m) 0.03 0.1 κ 1.4 − 3.7 1.4 − 3.7 τ shot (s) 0.02 0.05 RF Heating n e (10 19 m -3 ) 10 1-5 Antenna β t (%) 20 > 40 P HHFW (MW) 0.2 1.0 Toroidal Field Coils Plasma Ohmic Trim Coils Limiters P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  5. A < 1.3 → Ready Ohmic Access to High β t • β t up to 25% and I N up to 6.5 achieved ohmically • Low field → high I N and β t 30 = Pegasus data 5 . 3 β N = 6 = 25 β N 20 Conventional Tokamaks t (%) 15 START β 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 I N = I p /(aB t ) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  6. Toroidal field utilization exhibits a “soft limit” around unity • Maximum I p I TF • Soft limit due to two factors: - Large, internal 2/1, 3/2 tearing modes degrade plasma - Low shear over most of plasma, high resistivity - Reduced Volt-sec as TF decreases 0.16 I p =I tf Plasma Current (MA) 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 TF Rod Current (MA) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  7. Two factors contributed to the I p /I TF 1 soft limit Large resistive MHD instabilities degrade plasma as TF ↓ • low B t and fast dI p /dt → early appearance of low-order q=m/n - fixed sine-wave loop voltage ��� � ��� • high resistivity early Ip ��� � ��� Gauss • ultra-low A → low central shear kA �� � δ B �� ⇒ Result: rapid growth of tearing �� �� �� modes and large saturated island widths � �� ����� - Most common modes: m/n=2/1, 3/2 ���� Frequency (Hz) - Leads to decreased C E , I p 3/2 ���� • I p /I TF 1 ⇒ q 0 1.5 - 2 2/1 ���� ���� 2/1 � ����� ����� ����� ����� ����� ����� Reduced effective Volt-seconds as TF ↓ Time (s) • reduced toroidal field → delayed startup • delayed startup + fixed sine V loop waveform → reduced effective V-s P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  8. Measured q-profile indicates low central shear Tangential PHC SXR image • 2D soft x-ray camera gives q-profile Center column - Images soft x-rays - Constant-intensity surfaces determined - Mapped into flux space - G-S equation with SXR constraints - Iterate solution until convergence • Measured q-profile ⇒ low central shear ⇒ Image Contours: Measured Reconstructed 12 ⇒ ����������������� q 8 ��� q 4 ψ N 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ψ N P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  9. MHD affected by q-profile tailoring and TF strength • q-profile tailoring increases plasma performance - Discharge tailoring → plasmas with reduced MHD activity, increase W and Ip - Increased shear, increased q 0 ⇒ delay tearing onset - MHD amplitude decreases with increasing shear • Increased toroidal field strength also reduces MHD activity - Along Ip=Itf contour: δ B ↑ as TF ↓ - At high TF effect of MHD minimal - CE = 0.4 - At lower TF MHD amplitude increases - CE increases - Stored energy decreases ⇒ Access higher Ip/I TF , β t via increased q 0 , T e , shear � Mode Amplitude δ B/B (x10 -3 ) � � Pegasus Data � � � � � � ������������������������������������ P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  10. High q 95 external kink limit observed • High Ip plasmas often disrupt 8 0.16 • q 95 = 5 observed 7 0.12 preceding disruption Plasma - � i =0.5 at this time MA q 95 6 0.08 Current • DCON analysis ⇒ unstable 0.04 5 to n=1 external kink - m=5 most unstable mode 0.00 4 0.012 0.016 0.020 0.024 • Consistent with theory expectation 8 MHD 100 Amplitude 1.0 Poloidal mode eigenfunctions Free- 6 via DCON m=5 Boundary T/s Energy 0.8 AU (DCON) 4 Real u1 0.6 10 2 0.4 0 0.2 m=4 0.02 0 0.021 0.022 0.023 m=3 m=2 m=1 0.0 Time (s) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment ψ N University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  11. Planned path to access to high I p /I tf , β t operation • Suppression of large internal MHD modes - Vary q ( ψ ) - Lower η before q ( ψ ) approaches low-order rational mode surfaces • Expand access to external kink modes studies - Plasma time evolution, shape - Edge conditions and edge currents • Access to very high β t regime for stability analysis - OH access and HHFW heating availability P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  12. New tools to access Ip > Itf • Suppress tearing modes early in discharge evolution = Transiently manipulate q during discharge: - Increased TF at startup => high Itf, low inductance TF bundle - Variable Ip and R 0 control => coil-current-waveform control = Reduce resistivity before low-order rationals appear - Maximize J => Vloop control, position & shape control - Increase ohmic flux => new ohmic power supply - Use HHFW system => position control, Vloop control • Explore edge kink boundary at high field utilization - Manipulate edge shear => divertor coils for separatrix & PF shape control - Decrease edge currents => loop voltage control - Manipulate plasma shape => shape control - Manipulate current profile => Vloop control, position control P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  13. Overview of P EGASUS Phase II Rebuild • Power Systems Entirely Replaced - PWM controlled H-Bridges allow for complete waveform control - Coil currents increased significantly - 6 MJ of electrolytic capacitors installed outside of experimental building - New power buses installed • Low-inductance Toroidal Field Centerstack Installed - Provides increased, time-variable TF • Lab Infrastructure Improved or Replaced - Shielded conduits and cable trays installed - New grounding system installed - Control and Safety systems upgraded - Bakeable gas system - Upgraded AC, air, and water services installed - Passive Stray field “flux catcher” installed for public safety P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  14. Phase I laboratory layout (2002) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  15. Laboratory before rebuild (October 2002) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  16. Rebuilt laboratory (June 2004) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

Recommend


More recommend