operations and analysis Evolution of management of MICE project: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

K. Long, 13 November, 2013 Management of the MICE construction effort and interface to operations and analysis

Evolution of management of MICE project: • MICE construction project: – Host laboratory: • Substantial construction project across two sites (RAL & DL): – Project Engineer; full time job; • Substantial planning/management/reporting job: – Project Manager; full time job • MICE International Project Office: – Updated to address needs of the construction project • MICE experiment: operations and analysis – MICE Experiment Management Office: • Opportunity: – Construction project the responsibility of the MIPO, experimental collaboration “freed up” to ensure proper development of experimental/scientific side of project • MEMO organogram: – Being discussed within the collaboration; work in progress » Reviewed by MICE Executive Board at its last meeting (08Nov13)

Organogram of construction project: Draft: 02/2013 Rev. E MICE International Project Team RAL PPD Director MICE Collaboration D. Wark A. Blondel (Spokesperson) MICE International Project Of fi ce MICE Project Manager Collaboration Interface A. Nichols MICE-UK PI US MAP Dir Beam Line Experimental K. Long M. Palmer Integration Scientist Integration Scientist UK Reporting US Reporting Line Line MICE-UK Capital MICE-International MICE-US Construction MICE-UK US MAP Project Project Project PMO PMO R. Preece Contributions A. Bross Mechanical RF Integration Electrical Magnets Integration Focus Coil Detector Liquid Hydrogen Magnetic Responsibility Delivery Shielding Consultation Component RF Power Integration

MIPO; MEMO; interface:

Evolution: • Collaboration charter: – Drafted 2003 – MIPO/MEMO invented recently • Not reflected in Charter – MICE CB has asked MICE EB to instigate a review

MICE the enabler: IDS-NF/2012 4.0 2500 1.0 IDS$ NF' IDS - NF Proton Driver: Neutrino L = 2000 km 2000 0.8 Linac option Beam Ring option 500 MeV Muon Decay Efficiency 1500 0.6 Ring Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Events ê Ê Phase Rotation Ê 1000 0.4 464 m Ê 500 0.2 Buncher Ê Cooling Target Ê 0 0 Ê Ê 0 2 4 6 8 E n H GeV L To Accel. From Acceleration Linac to 0.8 GeV 0.8–2.8 GeV RLA From Cooling 2.8–10 GeV RLA To Decay Ring • Also: – Route to multi-TeV lepton-antilepton collissions Coloma,'Huber,'Kopp,'Winter' arXiv:1209.5973 '

MICE the enabler: IDS-NF/2012 4.0 20 1.0 Proton Driver: NuMAX NuMAX� Neutrino Linac option Beam Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê 0.8 15 Ring option Muon Decay L = 1290 km 125 MeV Ring Efficiency 0.6 10 Phase Rotation Events ê 0.4 464 m 5 Buncher 0.2 Cooling Target 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 E n H GeV L To Accel. From Acceleration Linac to 0.8 GeV 0.8–2.8 GeV RLA From Cooling 2.8–10 GeV RLA To Decay Ring • Also: – Route to multi-TeV lepton-antilepton collissions arXiv:1301.7727-

IDS-NF/2012 4.0 MICE the enabler: Proton Driver: Neutrino Linac option Beam Ring option Muon Decay Ring Phase Rotation 464 m Buncher Cooling Target To Accel. From Acceleration Linac to 0.8 GeV 0.8–2.8 GeV RLA From Cooling 2.8–10 GeV RLA To Decay Ring • Timely implementation of MICE important to the field!

Preface to budget/schedule presentations from UK and US PIs: • US leveling; based on budget assumptions presented to the RLSR Panel in May13: – Changes delivery dates for some components; – Includes contingency and appropriate float; • More robust going forward: – Principal issue: » Impact and management of R&D risks • UK analysis of spend profile which will include explicitly called out working margin and contingency: – Document(s) [cost, schedule, risk] in preparation: • Requires another iteration to take into account full outcome of US levelling; – Principal issue: » Management of contingency • So, cost/schedule analysis still “a work in progress”: – But, more advanced on both sides than in May13; – Now seek to rebaseline full project (Step IV; Step V or VI) by ~March 2014