On the stability of protoplanetary disks Niklas Ehlert Supervisors: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on the stability of protoplanetary disks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On the stability of protoplanetary disks Niklas Ehlert Supervisors: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

When the world was still flat - On the stability of protoplanetary disks Niklas Ehlert Supervisors: Hubert Klahr (MPIA) and Jrgen Schaffner-Bielich Astrocoffee FIAS, Frankfurt, January 23, 2018 Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO) Source:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

“When the world was still flat…“ - On the stability of protoplanetary disks

Niklas Ehlert

Supervisors: Hubert Klahr (MPIA) and Jürgen Schaffner-Bielich Astrocoffee FIAS, Frankfurt, January 23, 2018

Credit:ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4yirtvUurA (January 5, 2018, 22:20 h)

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 3 Credit: NASA Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO) Credit: NASA Johnson Space Center Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

size: ~ ⋅ 1013 mass: ~ ⋅ 1040

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Topics

Content-wise: Protoplanetary disks

  • properties
  • evolution

Method-wise: Linear Stability Analysis

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Assumptions

  • 𝑁𝑒𝑗𝑡𝑙 ≪ 𝑁∗
  • scale height ℎ satisfies ℎ

𝑠 ≪ 1

  • neglect self-gravity

𝑁𝑒𝑗𝑡𝑙 𝑁∗

<

1 2 ℎ 𝑠 (Toomre criterion)

  • “passive disks” → heated by central star

→ slow accretion rates (𝑁 ≤ 2 ⋅ 10−8 𝑁𝑡𝑣𝑜

𝑧𝑠 )

→ late times in disk evolution

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Disk evolution

  • angular momentum must be transported:

→ winds → viscosity 𝜉

  • Navier-Stokes equation yields:
  • Shakura & Sunyaev (1973)
  • Lynden-Bell & Pringle (1974)

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 6

𝜖Σ 𝜖𝑢 = 3 𝑠 𝜖 𝜖𝑠 𝑠

1 2 𝜖

𝜖𝑠 (𝜉Σ𝑠1/2)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Disk evolution equation

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 7

𝜖Σ 𝜖𝑢 = 3 𝑠 𝜖 𝜖𝑠 𝑠

1 2 𝜖

𝜖𝑠 (𝜉Σ𝑠1/2)

Diffusive form: 𝜖𝑔 𝜖𝑢 = 𝐸 𝜖2𝑔 𝜖𝑌2

𝑌 = 2𝑠1/2 𝑔 =

3 2 Σ𝑌 = 3Σ𝑠1/2

𝐸 = 12𝜉 𝑌2 = 3𝜉 𝑠

Diffusion time scale: Δ𝑌 2

𝐸

⇒ viscous time scale: 𝜐𝜉 ≈ 𝑠2

𝜉

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Viscosity?

  • 𝛽-prescription:
  • Molecular collisions: 𝜉𝑛~𝜇𝑑𝑡 =

𝑑𝑡 𝑜𝜏

⇒ 𝜐𝜉 = 𝑠2 𝜉𝑛 ≈ 3 ⋅ 1013𝑧𝑠

  • Reynolds number: 𝑆𝑓 =

𝑉𝑀 𝜉𝑛 = 𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝜉𝑛 ~1010 ≫ 1

⇒ highly turbulent IF there is an instability

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 8

𝜉 = 𝛽𝑑𝑡ℎ

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Rayleigh criterion

A non-self-gravitating, non-magnetized disk flow is linearly stable to axisymmetric perturbations if 𝑒𝑚

𝑒𝑠 = 𝑒 𝑒𝑠 𝑠2Ω > 0

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 9

Ω ∝ 𝑠−3/2

⇒ no turbulence?!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Magnetorotational Instability

  • Chandrasekhar 1961, Balbus & Hawley 1991
  • Modified stability condition: 𝑙𝑤𝐵 2 +

𝑒Ω2 𝑒ln 𝑠 > 0

January 23, 2018 10

[1]

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Dead zones

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 11

[1]

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Hydrodynamical Instabilities

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 12

Gravitational Instability Vertical Shear Instability Subcritical Baroclinic Instability

Goldreich- Schubert-Fricke Instability Critical Layer Instability Convective Overstability Streaming Instability?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Convective Overstability

  • neglect vertical structure:

𝜍0 = 𝜍 0 ⋅ 𝑆 𝑆0

𝛾𝑟

, 𝑑𝑡

2 = 𝑑 𝑡 2 ⋅

𝑆 𝑆0

𝛾𝑞

, 𝑞 = 𝑑𝑡

2𝜍

  • Consider thermal relaxation: 𝑇 = 𝑞

𝑈 𝑈−𝑈 𝜐

𝜐 → 0: locally isothermal limit 𝜐 → ∞: adiabatic limit

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Worst slide in this talk…

𝜖𝑢 (𝜍0 + 𝜍′) + 𝜍0 + 𝜍′ 𝜖𝑦 𝑣′ + 𝑣′ 𝜖𝑦 (𝜍0 + 𝜍′) = 0 𝜖𝑢 𝑣′ + 𝑣′ 𝜖𝑦 𝑣′ + 1 𝜍0 + 𝜍′ 𝜖𝑦 (𝑞0 + 𝑞′) + 𝜖𝑦 Φ = 0 𝜖𝑢 𝑞0 + 𝑞′ + 𝑣′ 𝜖𝑦 (𝑞0 + 𝑞′) + 𝛿 𝑞0 + 𝑞′ 𝜖𝑦 𝑣′ = 0

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 14

𝜖𝑢 𝜍′ + 𝜍0 𝜖𝑦 𝑣′ + 𝑣′ 𝜖𝑦 𝜍0 = 0 𝜖𝑢 𝑣′ + 𝜖𝑦𝑞′ 𝜍0 − 𝜍′ 𝜍0

2 𝜖𝑦 𝑞0 = 0

𝜖𝑢 𝑞′ + 𝑣′ 𝜖𝑦 𝑞0 + 𝛿 𝑞0 𝜖𝑦 𝑣′ = 0

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dispersion relation

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Eigenvectors

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 16

𝒘 = 𝜍′, 𝑣𝑠

′ , 𝑣𝜚 ′ , 𝑣𝑨 ′ , 𝑞′ 𝑈 𝑁 𝜕 ⋅ 𝒘 = 0

[3]

  • verstable epicycle

growth rate

slide-17
SLIDE 17

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Numerical Simulations

  • test non-linear instabilities
  • PLUTO code (Mignone et al.):

– discretization, static or adaptive mesh – finite volume or finite difference approach – 1D, 2D or 3D simulations

  • shows vortex formation and growth

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)

Summary

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 19

…hydrodynamic instabilities operate ... Pp-disks are turbulent. MRI creates turbulence, but… … there are dead zones, where… … under baroclinic conditions and finite cooling times to create vortices.

Credit: N. Raettig

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Next talk in about 6 months…

Thank you and stay tuned!

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)

Summary

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 21

…hydrodynamic instabilities operate ... Pp-disks are turbulent. MRI creates turbulence, but… … there are dead zones, where… … under baroclinic conditions and finite cooling times to create vortices.

Credit: N. Raettig

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Sources

[1] Philip J. Armitage: „Astrophysics of Planet Formation“, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 2013 [2] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ commons/d/d4/Johannes_Kepler_1610.jpg (January 6, 2018, 19:05 h) [3] Lyra W., 2014, ApJ, 789, 77

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Backup

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

January 23, 2018 Niklas Ehlert 24