older adults with cancer and multimorbidity exploring the
play

Older Adults with Cancer and Multimorbidity: Exploring the Interface - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Older Adults with Cancer and Multimorbidity: Exploring the Interface between Geriatric Oncology and Palliative Care Ron Maggiore, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Hematology University of Rochester October 18, 2019 Review of


  1. Older Adults with Cancer and Multimorbidity: Exploring the Interface between Geriatric Oncology and Palliative Care Ron Maggiore, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Hematology University of Rochester October 18, 2019

  2. Review of Pre-Talk Survey Results • TBD

  3. Review of Pre-Talk Survey Results • TBD

  4. Drawing from Real-Life Experience • 74-year-old woman with stage IV (M1a) NSCLC on pembrolizumab therapy >1 year, stable disease; dermatitis, well managed on topical therapies • Severe COPD, oxygen-dependent, sees pulmonology and family medicine for medical management • Hospitalized in 2018 x2, recommended nocturnal BiPAP; patient does not use consistently at home • Re-hospitalized May 2019, June 2019 x2, July 2019, August 2019, and Sept 2019 for hypercapneic respiratory failure /COPD exacerbations • Saw patient in early August before next hospitalization and broached hospice and advance-care planning; already had a MOLST on file indicating DNR/DNI preference

  5. Overview • By 2030, approximately 2/3 of all cancer patients diagnosed in the U.S. will be >=65 years • More than half of these patients will have at least 1 other health issue (comorbidity) that could affect cancer treatment decision- making and ultimately prognosis and advanced-care planning • At least 2/3 of these patients will have 2 or more competing health conditions • Sometimes cancer is not the predominant issue in terms of what is impacting the patient’s health status or health -related quality of life at present Williams GR et al. JGO 2016

  6. What is Multimorbidity? • Multiple coexisting health conditions beyond an index condition (i.e., cancer) • Severity of These Illnesses? • Functional Limitations? • Geriatric Syndromes? Williams GR et al. JGO 2016

  7. Multimorbidity: More than just number and severity of concurrent illnesses? • Perhaps! • Does adding functional impairments and geriatric syndromes impact health outcomes in older adults the same as or more so than number of medical conditions?

  8. Importance of Multimorbidity • Impacts mortality, which has strongest implications for cancer screening and treatments, particularly in the early-stage setting • Impacts chemo-related toxicity risk but may be more so via functional impairment • May bias physician referral patterns for specific cancers and their treatments • Creates barriers to clinical trial eligibility, enrollment, and retention Williams GR et al. JGO 2016

  9. Multimorbidity: Incorporating Functional Limitations and Geriatric Syndromes • Functional Limitations: Limited strength, limited upper body mobility, limited lower body mobility, IADL impairment, BADL impairment • Geriatric Syndromes: – visual impairment, hearing impairment, depression, cognitive impairment, persistent lightheadedness/dizziness, severe pain Koroukian SM et al. JGIM 2016

  10. Multimorbidity: Incorporating Functional Limitations and Geriatric Syndromes • In looking at 10 medical conditions, the combinations of age, functional limitations, and geriatric syndromes were better at stratifying those with worse self-rated health and mortality at 2 years in those age ≥50 years from study start – Worse self- reported health @ 2 years: age ≥68.5 years, difficulty walking several blocks, reporting fair/poor health – Worse mortality @ 2 years: age ≥80.5 years, impairments in both BADLs and IADLs Koroukian SM et al. JGIM 2016

  11. Health Care Costs and Multimorbidity: Veteran Affairs Health Care Study • Large cross-sectional study of medical expenditures per patient over 1 year (2009-2010), including rx drug costs • Almost half (47%) of all VA costs were attributable to “high cost” patients (top 5%). Inpatient care =50% • These patients had 3+ comorbidities (77%); 5+ (41%) Zulman DM et al BMJ Open 2015

  12. Health Care Costs and Multimorbidity: Veteran Affairs Health Care Study • Certain conditions alone drove costs: cancer, schizophrenia • High burden of MH issues and run with cardiovascular, endocrine (DM), and musculoskeletal conditions • More conditions, more visits to: hospital, primary care, ER, specialty care Zulman DM et al BMJ Open 2015

  13. A Different Approach to Care Models? • Patient Health Value (PHV) model for high-cost/high-risk groups of patients • 3 identified at UCLA: dementia, CKD, and cancer • Multidisciplinary teams created to address spending and care pathways to improve evidence-based care and minimize hospital and other service utilization • Was able to show thus far decrease in LOS and hospitalizations for dementia and CKD patient subgroups • Expand to other chronic serious illnesses? Gupta R et al. Acad Med 2019

  14. Importance of Interactions among Age, Cancer Symptoms, and Hospitalization • An unplanned hospitalization for patients with advanced cancer can signal a worse prognosis and may be an entrée to palliative care discussions/consultations (but very few are) – Usually for cancer-related symptoms such as pain (66% in the Univ. of Wisconsin study; 58% in the Dana-Farber/BWH study). • Age ≥70 years in addition to documentation of prior oncologist recommending hospice, and 3 rd line or beyond cancer treatment were risk factors for potentially avoidable hospitalizations in patients with GI cancers (mostly pancreatic) Rocque GB et al. JOP 2013; Brooks GA et al. JCO 2014; Daly B et al. JOP 2016; Rocque GB et al J Pain Symptom Manage 2015; DiMartino LD et al HealthC (Amst) 2019

  15. Importance of Interactions among Age, Cancer Symptoms, and Hospitalization • Comorbidity increases risk for ICU death in patients with advanced cancer, especially those with prior hospitalizations. • May bias physician referral patterns for specific cancers and their treatments • Triggered (inpatient) palliative care consultations (TPCC) may be difficult to implement and may not increase hospice enrollment (Wisconsin and UNC studies) Rocque GB et al. JOP 2013; Brooks GA et al. JCO 2014; Daly B et al. JOP 2016; Rocque GB et al J Pain Symptom Manage 2015; DiMartino LD et al HealthC (Amst) 2019

  16. Hospitalization for Patients with Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Palliative Care? • Two cross-sections of patients hospitalized at a university oncology unit (2000 & 2010; Wisconsin) • Mean age=60 years (range, 27-88) • 89% had advanced-stage disease • GI>lung>breast cancers • 66% admitted for cancer-related symptoms: Rocque GB et al. JOP 2013

  17. Hospitalization for Patients with Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Palliative Care? • Two cross-sections of patients hospitalized at a university oncology unit (2000 & 2010; Wisconsin) • Mean age=60 years (range, 27-88) • 89% had advanced-stage disease • GI>lung>breast cancers • 66% admitted for cancer-related symptoms: Rocque GB et al. JOP 2013

  18. Hospitalization for Patients with Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Palliative Care? • https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DV9NS29 Rocque GB et al. JOP 2013

  19. Hospitalization for Patients with Cancer: A Missed Opportunity for Palliative Care? • Median survival after discharge date: Median OS: 4.7 months • 2000 cohort: 4.7 months • 2010 cohort: 3.4 months Median OS: 3.4 months Rocque GB et al. JOP 2013

  20. Going One Step Further: Assessing Risks for Re-Hospitalization • A study at MGH targeted adults with advanced cancer receiving palliative-intent chemotherapy over an approx. 3- month period and followed for re-hospitalization for up to 1 year • Patients were given a symptom burden questionnaire during the index hospitalization (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised; ESAS-r) • N=200 Johnson PC et al. JOP 2019

  21. Going One Step Further: Assessing Risks for Re-Hospitalization • Over half had a re-admission during follow-up (58.5%) • Mean time to first re-hospitalization was 1.93 months (SD +/- 2.07 months) • Mean age: 64 years • Most common cancer site: GI (43%); followed by lung and GU • Mean Charlson CI score: 0.85 • Impaired mobility: 31% • Reason for re-hospitalization: – infectious (26%); cancer symptoms (19%) Johnson PC et al. JOP 2019

  22. Going One Step Further: Assessing Risks for Re-Hospitalization • Characterizing the Potentially Avoidable Re-admissions (PARs) identified by the study team: – Lack of timely outpatient follow-up – Premature discharge from prior hospitalization • Both speak to: What systems are in place regarding oncology- oriented transitions of care ? • Predictors of PARs: Lack of spouse (= proxy for lack of social support? ), higher symptom burden scores during index hospitalization Johnson PC et al. JOP 2019

  23. Terminal ICU Admissions for Oncology Patients • 1-year study at university hospital (University of Chicago) • N=72 (mean age: 62 years; range, 58-74) • Only 25% had advance directives documented • 50% classified as potentially avoidable • Predictors: – Poorer Performance Status – Non-Independent Living Situation Prior to Terminal Admission – Relatively More Recent Cancer Diagnosis – Cancer Symptoms as Reason for Hospitalization – Multimorbidity (CCI) – Prior Hospitalizations in past year Daly B et al. JOP 2016

  24. Cancer Diagnosis and Geriatric Syndromes Mohile SG et al JCO 2011

  25. Cancer Diagnosis and Geriatric Syndromes ctn’d . Mohile SG et al. JCO 2011

Recommend


More recommend