Office of Child Nutrition Financial Updates
West Virginia Office of Child Nutrition Federal Funding Trend Analysis 160 Millions 151.8 146.7 139.3 140 130.6 117.3 120 114.0 103.1 100 95.7 93.7 88.3 85.4 82.4 80.8 78.9 80 75.3 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Projected Total Total Child Nutrition… 2
Federal Funding • Breakdown of FY2018 Projected Total Funding National School Lunch/Breakfast/Snack 131,895,385 Child & Adult Care Food Program 15,616,793 Summer Food Service Program 1,954,064 Fresh Fruit & Vegetable Program 2,095,225 Other Grants (Equipment, Farm 2 School, etc.) 213,153 Total 151,774,620 3
NSLP vs. CACFP • NSLP • Snack only • Area and non area eligible snacks • CACFP • Snack and Supper • ONLY Area eligible (50% or more needy) • Reimbursements • .88 for area eligible snacks • Non area eligible snacks are claimed based on free/reduced applications • Supper reimbursement is 3.23 4
CACFP RECORDING • CACFP Programs used by LEA’s include after school at -risk snack and suppers. • CACFP and NSLP are separate Programs and have separate projects in WVEIS that should be used for revenue and expenditures. • The CACFP Project is 88Y5X. • All CACFP revenues and expenditures should be recorded to this project. 5
CACFP RECORDING • In the event CACFP Food Expenditures/labor are not separated from NSLP Expenditures when originally recorded, and are recorded to the NSLP Project (88Y1X), expenditures should be transferred from the NSLP Project to the CACFP project. • The amount of the transfer can be equal to the amount of the CACFP reimbursement revenue recording in 88Y5X. • This will allow the project to be zero out without having a sponsor contribution. • If you prefer to calculate an actual amount for food, non-food and labor expenses, and record a sponsor contribution in the CACFP project, that is also acceptable 6
Participation VS. Needy % 80.00 73.60 67.50 67.38 70.00 66.83 66.93 66.62 66.75 66.36 65.75 64.93 64.94 63.93 61.85 61.18 66.35 60.75 62.73 60.00 55.64 60.03 53.88 53.59 59.55 53.46 52.83 52.78 52.37 52.55 58.22 52.27 51.53 49.62 47.58 50.00 41.23 37.77 40.00 35.99 30.24 30.00 30.13 30.17 29.86 29.77 29.32 28.21 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 SY 2004 SY 2005 SY 2006 SY 2007 SY 2008 SY 2009 SY 2010 SY 2011 SY 2012 SY 2013 SY 2014 SY 2015 SY 2016 SY 2017 SY2018 Breakfast Participation Percentage Needy Lunch Participation 7
Sponsor Contribution 70,000,000 68,076,611 68,000,000 65,970,729 66,000,000 65,008,392 63,567,290 64,000,000 62,000,000 61,182,131 60,871,954 60,000,000 57,999,036 58,000,000 56,000,000 54,000,000 52,000,000 SY 2011 SY 2012 SY 2013 SY 2014 SY 2015 SY 2016 SY 2017 Sponsor Contribution 8
Food Service Cost Trend 100,000,000 93,722,719 91,881,759 91,700,764 89,504,360 89,346,004 87,929,951 90,000,000 85,482,096 81,209,870 81,119,207 80,936,237 80,000,000 72,371,089 71,236,479 66,658,629 70,000,000 61,006,292 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 16,805,297 15,387,342 14,766,696 15,295,481 14,589,565 13,421,295 13,291,278 10,000,000 - SY 2011 SY 2012 SY 2013 SY 2014 SY 2015 SY 2016 SY 2017 Food/Milk Costs Labor Costs Non-Food Costs 9
Federal Reimbursement and Local Collection Trend 140,000,000 122,431,332 120,000,000 114,376,567 102,565,970 100,000,000 90,755,682 87,285,791 79,424,881 80,000,000 72,516,994 60,000,000 40,000,000 24,277,525 23,465,485 18,751,983 16,438,605 15,700,577 20,000,000 15,009,439 12,031,765 - SY 2011 SY 2012 SY 2013 SY 2014 SY 2015 SY 2016 SY 2017 Federal Reimbursements Local Collections 10
Breakfast Participation • Innovative Breakfast Strategies • Grab and Go Breakfast • Breakfast in the Classroom • Breakfast after 1 st Period 11
Breakfast/Lunch Participation • Top 10 Highest Meal Participation Rates. • WV Average: Breakfast 53.88% Lunch 66.35% Breakfast Lunch 1. Mercer 88.41% 1. Wirt 82.12% 2. Mason 81.34% 2. McDowell 81.47% 3. Wirt 80.41% 3. Calhoun 80.96% 4. Lincoln 73.09% 4. Tyler 80.15% 5. Gilmer 72.57% 5. Hardy 79.43 6. Lewis 71.27% 6. Pleasants 79.34% 7. McDowell 70.50% 7. Grant 79.30% 8. Grant 69.76% 8. Ritchie 79.00% 9. Fayette 69.63% 9. Summers 78.98% 10. Clay 69.53% 10. Gilmer 78.58% 12
CEP Statistics 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 # of counties with at least 1 CEP Eligible School 54 52 54 54 55 55 # of counties participating in CEP 35 39 40 46 47 50 # of counties implementing CEP countywide 11 14 17 19 29 33 # of Schools Participating 283 335 374 429 458 517 Total # of Schools 688 681 686 685 665 # of students impacted 90,000 >110,000 128,041 145,702 166,202 194,499 13
SY 2019 CEP Counties Hancock Brooke Ohio Marshall Monongalia Wetzel Marion Morgan Pleas- Berkeley Tyler ants Preston Jeff- Mineral Taylor erson Dodd- Harrison Hampshire ridge Barbour Wood Ritchie Grant Tucker Wirt Hardy Lewis Cal- Gilmer houn Jackson Upshur Randolph Mason Roane Braxton Pendleton Webster Putnam Clay Cabell County Wide Kanawha Nicholas Pocahontas Lincoln Wayne Select Schools Boone Fayette Greenbrier Mingo Logan Eligible CEP school(s) but Raleigh Sum- Wyoming electing not to participate mers Monroe McDowell Mercer 14
Questions?? Tony Crago Keri Kennedy acrago@k12.wv.us keri.kennedy@k12.wv.us 304-558-3396 304-558-3396 Travis Legg tlegg@k12.wv.us 304-558-3396 15
Recommend
More recommend
