objectives
play

Objectives Compare quarantines and certification programs to- - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Objectives Compare quarantines and certification programs to- Create a HARMONIZED GRAPE QUARANTINE PEST LIST in Pacific Northwest; Develop a standardized REGIONAL GRAPEVINE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM; Revise state rules and implement by


  1. Objectives • Compare quarantines and certification programs to- • Create a HARMONIZED GRAPE QUARANTINE PEST LIST in Pacific Northwest; • Develop a standardized REGIONAL GRAPEVINE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM; • Revise state rules and implement by June 2019 Goal: free movement of certified grapevine planting stocks in PNW, minimized pest risks in vineyards, work toward a national standard.

  2. Team Work with Stakeholders ID, OR, and WA  State regulators  Nurseries  Wine industries  Subject matter specialists  OSU  WSU  Cornell University  FPS  CPC-NW  Extension and outreach specialists  Inputs from other Depts. of Agriculture  CA  NY

  3. Pest vs Quarantine Pest Pest: “Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products [FAO, IPPC].” Quarantine pest: “A pest of potential economic importance to the area endangered thereby and not yet present there, or present but not widely distributed and being officially controlled [FAO, IPPC].”

  4. External vs Internal Quarantine State External Internal ID X X OR X X WA X  ID/OR would take action if Q pest found in state  Proposed change to WA quarantine would clarify that it applies within the state: Q pest = action  Example: Phylloxera. How is it handled? Xylella?

  5. Requirements ID Certified planting materials, Phytosanitary certificate, & Pre- notification OR Certified planting materials, or inspected & tested, Phytosanitary certificate, & Pre-notification WA Certified planting materials, Phytosanitary certificate, & Pre- notification Additional Q Requirements- WA/OR  Oregon requires freedom from soil-  Field grown vines are prohibited, require special permit from WA, other states  Both require hot water dip, treatment for Vine Mealybug, phylloxera (or Methyl Bromide fumigation)  Oregon requires testing for Xylella  Defines sampling dates (within 60 days of shipment)

  6. Proposed Quarantine Changes ID: Only certified planting materials- no change WA: Only certified planting materials- no change OR: Will phase in requirement for only certified materials by January 1, 2023. Currently, the only states with a grapevine certification program that meets WA quarantine are: Oregon, California & Canada. Clean Plant Center NW (Prosser) or FPS (UC Davis) are the approved G1 sources

  7. Oregon: Proposed Changes General requirements • Grape cuttings/rooted plants produced in soil-less media must be treated with an approved insecticide effective against vine mealybug and any pests that may be present on the roots prior to shipment. • Field-grown plants must be bareroot (no soil), subject to one of the following treatments and stored so as to prevent reinfestation. • Hot water treatment • Fumigation

  8. Proposed Quarantine Changes Washington: Xylella Survey • WA is conducting ongoing survey for Xylella, and now has 14 counties recognized as pest free areas. • Oregon will accept grapevines that originate from WA based on our official survey without further testing requirements

  9. Quarantine Pest List harmonization  ID: add Grapevine red blotch virus and European grapevine moth  OR: add Grapevine virus B  WA: add European grapevine moth, Glassywinged sharpshooter and Grapevine red blotch virus  How widespread is Grapevine red blotch virus? Survey needed……

  10. Grapevine Registration and Certification Programs in PNW Washington Idaho Oregon Started in 1968 • Does not have • Started in 1970 • Last revision 2014 certification • Last revision 1999 • 5 nurseries program • 16 nurseries • Standards OR WA Approved registered plants X X Unique number assigned to registered plant X Site approval X X Monitoring and inspection X X Periodic testing for pathogens X X Certification tags X X

  11. Certification Generation Summary G1 Foundation G2 Mother G3 Increase G4 Nursery 100% tested > <Monitored, Tested, Rogued > Inspected “Start Clean, Stay Clean”

  12. Grapevine Registration and Certification Standards support export To facilitate export to Canada/Mexico  Reviewed how NAPPO RSPM 35 can impact certification programs  Made changes to the standards, to meet RSPM 35 requirements  In communication with federal agencies to provide updates on our certification programs to facilitate export

  13. Basics of Harmonized Planting Stock Certification  Virus-tested G1 foundation Source (NCPN)  Limited generations- Now G1 / G2 / G3 / G4  Replacing ‘Foundation, Registered & Certified’  Held in a way to prevent re-infection  Isolation from non-certified plants,  Exclusion of virus vectors (nematodes, mealybugs, aphids, pollen)  Visual Inspections (testing of symptoms to confirm status)  Identity Preservation to G1 source plant  Add Mandatory rotational testing of G2

  14. Is visual inspection enough? Where we’ve been Where we’re going  Required testing of G2/G3-  Visual Inspection to  PCR, ELISA, HTS determine presence of  On a rotation of 4 or 5 virus/disease years,  Unreliable, snapshot in time  To catch sourcing  Doesn’t catch latent viruses mistakes, and audit nurseries for compliance

  15. do we speak the same language? Where we’ve been Where we’re going  Rule language says  Adopt standardized ‘Foundation’, ‘registered’, Generation language ‘certified’, ‘nuclear’, ‘elite’, developed in national model ‘pre-elite’…… a litany of words standards- to identify plant  G1, G2, G3, G4 generations/how they are held, produced

  16. Major Proposed Changes  Updated based on State Level Model Regulatory Standards  Common definitions  Specific requirements for registered blocks • Field condition • Containers • Enhance Tissue culture requirements • Specific requirements for registered plants • Tracking number assigned to each registered plant • Certified stock shall be inspected and tested • Nursery maintains records identifying the G1 source of all registered plants (G2 or G3)

  17. Common misconceptions- Is the nursery certified, or are the plants? “People think that the nurseries • “while people say they understand are certified, not the planting the clean plant process, and where material.”- most nurseries sell to get clean plants, they BOTH. fundamentally don't.” • People think that the nurseries are • Example: Out of 36 blocks, all certified, not the planting claiming to be planted with material. certified vines…. • When cross-referenced with the supplying nursery, 32 of those 36 were NOT actually certified vines. http://blog.agratech.com

  18. Common misconceptions- Certified for what, and when? • What pathogens were • the definition of what included in the cert process? ‘certified’ means is also confusing for buyers. It is often seen as a guarantee of cleanliness when really it is a guarantee of the certification process the plant has gone through. • Can it be traced to G1? • Was it held in isolation since then? morivines.com

  19. Common misconceptions- Does Tissue Culture = Virus-free plants? • NO! Tissue culture production is confused with clean planting stock, when it may or may not have started with a virus free G1 source plant. Image(s) • ASK the TC nursery if their TC lines are part of an official state certification program in WA, OR or CA.

Recommend


More recommend