NOW WHAT? YINGJIE LIU , INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNER, SAN JOSE STATE UNVERSITY PATRICK DEMPSEY , INSTRUCTIONAL TEACHING SPECIALIST SUPERVISOR, JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CAREY BUSINESS SCHOOL
FACULTY & INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS
WHAT IS YOUR Role
HOW DO YOU QM
102 QM TRAINING CALIFORNIASTATEUNIVERSITYSYSTEM FACULTY APPQMR / IYOC / interest / readiness / challenges / support / standards
1 2+ NUMBER OF QM TRAININGS COMPLETED How interested are you in 82% 62% redesigning your course with QM standards? VERY OR EXTREMELY How ready are you to 54% 80% redesign your course with QM standards?
WHAT WOULD BE THE BIGGEST challenge IMPLEMENTING QM STANDARDS IN YOUR COURSE?
What would be the biggest challenge implementing QM into your course? HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO SEEK SUPPORT REDESIGNING YOUR COURSE? VERY OR EXTREMELY 1 40% 72% 90% 2+ 60% 1 2 +
1 2+ importance 5 support 7 INTRODUCTION 62% 80% INTEREST 4 9 OBJECTIVES 3 V / E 6 ASSESSMENTS 8 54% 82% READINESS 8 MATERIALS 1 5 CHALLENGE / RESPONSE ACTIVITIES 2 3 INTERACTION 9 1 TECHNOLOGY 6 4 SUPPORT 7 40% 72% 60% 90% TIME SUPPORT TIME SUPPORT 2 1 2+ ACCESSIBILITY
EXPOSURE QM Technical INTEREST & READINESS i CHALLENGES ! SUPPORT ?
FACULTY INSTRUCTIONALDESIGNER INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN CONTENT CONTENT TECHNOLOGY DESIGN INSTRUCTIONALDESIGNER FACULTY TECHNOLOGY DESIGN CONTENT TECHNOLOGY DESIGN
faculty buy-in for instructional design / PERCEPTIONS / CHALLENGES / STRATEGIES 112 / RESPONSIBILITIES INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS
ONE-ON-ONE CONSULTATIONS ONE-ON-ONE CONSULTATIONS TROUBLESHOOTING JUST-IN-TIME TRAINING 55% 59% 83% VERY/EXTREMELY
RESPONSIBILITES MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF TRAINING TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF COURSES DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FREQUENCY OF TRAINING MANAGING LMS INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PERCEPTIONS ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES α =.05
RESPONSIBILITES MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF TRAINING TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF COURSES DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FREQUENCY OF TRAINING MANAGING LMS INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PERCEPTIONS accessibility ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES α =.05
RESPONSIBILITES MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FREQUENCY OF TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING PERCEPTIONS ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY ASSURANCE α =.05
RESPONSIBILITES MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF TRAINING TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF COURSES DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FREQUENCY OF TRAINING MANAGING LMS INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PERCEPTIONS ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES α =.05
RESPONSIBILITES MANAGING PROJECTS CONSULTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF TRAINING TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF COURSES DESIGNING NEW ONLINE COURSES LEVEL OF FACULTY ENGAGEMENT MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FREQUENCY OF TRAINING MANAGING LMS INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT TRANSITIONING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING EVALUATING ONLINE COURSES ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION DEVELOP PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING PERCEPTIONS technical ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING PRODUCING MULTIMEDIA ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES DELIVERYING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE DELIVERTYING PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING DESIGNING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES EVALUATING FACE-TO-FACE COURSES α =.05
RESPONSIBILITES CONSULTING WITH FACULTY TROUBLESHOOTING WITH FACULTY QUALITY OF COURSES MEETING ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FREQUENCY OF TRAINING INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT RESOURCES ABILITY TO DESIGN TRAINING ABILITY TO OFFER TRAINING DEVELOPING TECHNICAL TRAINING ABILITY TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONSULTATION PERCEPTIONS ABILITY TO OFFER TIMELY TRAINING ABILITY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES ABILITY TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE QUALITY INSURANCE α =.05
FACULTY INSTRUCTIONALDESIGNER INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN CONTENT CONTENT TECHNOLOGY DESIGN INSTRUCTIONALDESIGNER FACULTY TECHNOLOGY DESIGN CONTENT TECHNOLOGY DESIGN
INSTRUCTIONALDESIGN FACULTY CONTENT DESIGN TECHNOLOGY
takeaways T IR C S T training interest and readiness challenges support technical
QM DENVER How faculty experiences as online students affect course design choices. revealed.us
Next QM Research Webinar April 26, 2018, 1-2 p.m. Eastern CHLOE 2: Tour of the Report on the 2nd QM-Eduventures Changing Landscape of Online Education Survey
Recommend
More recommend