normal conducting magnets for rcs
play

Normal Conducting Magnets for RCS Holger Witte, Scott Berg, Paul - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Normal Conducting Magnets for RCS Holger Witte, Scott Berg, Paul Kovach, Mike Anerella Brookhaven National Laboratory Mauricio de Lima Lopes Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 5 December 2014 1 Design Concepts Dipole Requirements


  1. Normal Conducting Magnets for RCS Holger Witte, Scott Berg, Paul Kovach, Mike Anerella Brookhaven National Laboratory Mauricio de Lima Lopes Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 5 December 2014 1

  2. Design Concepts • Dipole Requirements – Good field region: 60x10 mm 2 – Aperture: 60x25 mm 2 – Ramp rate: 1 kHz – B > 1.5T • Aims – Minimize losses – (First pass on engineering) • Approach – Materials: intelligent combination of materials – Geometry excitation coil: minimize eddy current losses 5 December 2014 2

  3. Geometry Evolution New Old 150 3% SiFe Better suppression of eddy currents 6.5% SiFe Minimized yoke volume Coil 5 December 2014 3

  4. Materials - Core Losses 5 December 2014 4

  5. Lamination Thickness 5 December 2014 5

  6. Power Dissipation Yoke Average power dissipation: 1.57 kW/m 80 W/kg 20 W/kg 6.5%SiFe 3%SiFe 5 December 2014 6

  7. Old Geometry Field lines not parallel to current sheets: high current density in corners of current sheets 5 December 2014 7

  8. New Geometry Coil loss: 250 W/m Field lines parallel to current sheet (reduction of eddy current losses by 30%) 5 December 2014 8

  9. Power Loss Contributions Ring: 2.2 km 5 December 2014 9

  10. Field Quality Effect of eddy currents and hysteresis: Progress on the Dipole Magnet for a Rapid Cycling Synchrotron. TUPRO115, IPAC14. 5 December 2014 10

  11. Specs Machine Design 375-750 GeV Total Integrated Dipole Length 2200 m Beam repetition rate 15 Hz Yoke material 6.5%SiFe Pole material 3% SiFe Gap 25 mm Good field region (h x v) 60x10 mm^2 Peak field Bmax 1.75 T Field quality at Bmax 0.001 Ramp rate (equivalent frequency) 1000 Hz Power Loss Yoke (at 1.5T) 3.45 MW Power Loss Coil (at 1.5T) 0.55 MW Total Power Loss (at 1.5T) 4 MW Stored energy 4200 J/m Current per bus bar (4 bus bars) 15600 A*turns Average peak current density cable 16 A/mm^2 DC resistance single cable 1.77E-05 Ohm/m Voltage drop coil DC at 20 kA 0.353669 V/m Voltage required to drive current 866 V/m (max dI/dt = 98017690 A/s) L (four PS per magnet) 8.84 uH 5 December 2014 11

  12. Quadrupole • Required gradient: 3% SiFe about 30 T/m 6.5% SiFe Coil • Good field region – 60x10mm 2 • Frequency: 1 kHz • Pole: ‘ideal shape’ • Same design principles 5 December 2014 12

  13. Power Loss Quad Ring, 28 T/m: 1.16 MW 5 December 2014 13

  14. Field Quality 5 December 2014 14

  15. Conclusion • Concepts for normal conducting magnets – Combine strength of two materials – Eddy current heating well understood • Performance – Dipole field up to 1.75T – Gradient: 28.5 T/m • Power losses – Acceptable losses at 1000Hz • Future work – Minimize total loss (yoke + excitation coil) – Power Supply 5 December 2014 15

  16. Acknowledgements • The authors would like to acknowledge fruitful discussion and support from – Carsten Bach, Vacuumschmelze – Hironori Ninomiya, JFE Steel Corporation – Rob Riley, Fermilab – Don Summers, University of Mississippi – John Zweibohmer, Fermilab 5 December 2014 16

  17. Additional Slides 5 December 2014 17

  18. Superconducting Option • Wall plug power superconducting version? – Not easy to answer – not enough data • How good does a SC dipole have to be? • Break even for SC version: 0.9 W/m – Normal conducting loss: 550 kW (2.2 km) – P 300K = 250 W/m – P 4K : 0.9 W/m (Carnot efficiency 280) • Heat losses – Power leads: P 4K = 3-5 W (20 kA lead, CERN/NHMFL) • Need 8 for 2 m long magnet to keep voltage reasonable – Power loss conductor 5 December 2014 18

  19. Magnetic Energy Distribution Total: 4200 J/m (1.5T) Percentage of magnetic energy in blue area: 85% 92% 96% of magnetic energy are not in vicinity of coils 5 December 2014 19

  20. Excitation: Voltage Source Excitation voltage Current (integrated J) 5 December 2014 20

  21. Current Density across sheets 5 December 2014 21

  22. Power Supply • Required: 8m long dipoles • Challenge: voltage • Minimize inductance: 4 PS per dipole 5 December 2014 22

  23. FEA: Eddy Current Simulation • Technique developed ~10a ago • Pulsed high field magnets (60-100T) – Normal conducting solenoids – 10 ms pulse – Operate at 77K – DOI:10.1109/TASC.200 5.864485 5 December 2014 23

  24. FEA: Eddy Current Simulation • Technique developed ~10a ago • Pulsed high field magnets (60-100T) – Normal conducting solenoids – 10 ms pulse – Operate at 77K – DOI:10.1109/TASC.200 5.864485 • Verified experimentally Herlach et al. DOI:10.1109/TASC.2005.864269 5 December 2014 24

Recommend


More recommend