non integrability and the bound on chaos in topological
play

(Non)integrability and the bound on chaos in topological black hole - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

(Non)integrability and the bound on chaos in topological black hole geometries Mihailo ubrovi Institute of Physics Belgrade Gravity and String Theory III, Zlatibor, Serbia, 2018. Outline Integrability in nature and in string theory


  1. (Non)integrability and the bound on chaos in topological black hole geometries Mihailo Čubrović Institute of Physics Belgrade Gravity and String Theory III, Zlatibor, Serbia, 2018.

  2. Outline ● Integrability in nature and in string theory ● Topological black holes ● (Non)integrability – analytical and numerical ● Bound on chaos?

  3. Outline ● Integrability in nature and in string theory ● Topological black holes ● (Non)integrability – analytical and numerical ● Bound on chaos?

  4. Integrability ● Everybody knows: an N degree-of-freedom integrable system has N independent integrals of motion ● In detail: several different definitions ● Not only a mathematical curiosity: crucial for deeper understanding ● Quantum integrability – even tougher problem ● In this talk classical only!

  5. Kolmogorov-Arnol'd-Moser A. N. Kolmogorov V. I. Arnol'd ● KAM theory – geometry of the phase space ● Action-angle variables and invariant tori Actions=integrals Coordinates & of motion Angles periodic momenta Canonical transformation ( p,q ) ( I , ϕ) : I = const. , ϕ∼ sin ω t ● No algorithmic way to find action-angle variables

  6. Kolmogorov-Arnol'd-Moser ● Integrable: phase space foliated by tori Periodic motion on the torus (here rotation; libration also possible) ϵ ● Nonintegrable with perturbation : progressive destruction of invariant tori but some still remain until we ϵ crit reach ϵ≈ϵ crit ϵ>ϵ crit ϵ<ϵ crit

  7. Kolmogorov-Arnol'd-Moser ● Some orbits stable for all times, but some others can be arbitrarily chaotic ● Effective Langevin equation for actions in the vicinity of a torus: I =−ϵ ∂ K 1 /∂ ϕ→⟨ ˙ ˙ I ⟩=ϵ F 1 ( I )η( t ) ● How relevant this "Arnol'd diffusion" is depends on timescales: 10 t 0 10 10 years t diff ∼ 10 - solar system 9 t 0 10days - confined plasmas t diff ∼ 10

  8. Differential Galois theory ● Galois theory in an algebraic field with a differential operator (Leibniz rule) ● Consider functions from a differential field F with constant subfield C and simple extension E

  9. Differential Galois theory ● Galois theory in an algebraic field with a differential operator (Leibniz rule) ● Consider functions from a differential field F with constant subfield C and simple extension E ● Can an ODE be integrated by quadratures? <-> is there such an E that it has the same C as F but is closed to inverses of differential operations? ● Extends the intuition that integrals of rational functions are polynomials possibly multipled by logs ● Can be implemented algorithmically with some limitations – Kovacic algorithm

  10. The foundation – Liouville theorem ● Is a Hamiltonian H on the phase space M integrable? ● Find an invariant submanifold P. ● Project the Hamiltonian EOMs X on P: X ∣ P ● Find variational equations in a tangen plane to P δ X ∣ P ● Now H is integrable if the largest connected subgroup of the Galois group is Abelian

  11. Integrability in string theory ● Relevant for quantization, integrability in gauge theories (including but not limited to AdS/CFT) ● Particles (geodesics) and strings: Arutyunov, Nekrasov, Tseytlin, Lunin... 2000s, 2010s ● D-brane stacks: one or two parallel stacks integrable (Chervonyi&Lunin 2014), base needs to be of the form: 2 + dr 2 2 = dr 1 2 + r 1 2 d Ω d 1 2 + r 2 2 d Ω d 2 2 ds b ● Stepanchuk&Tseytlin 2013: integrability established for (and for flat space); brane configurations that q AdS p × S interpolate between them nonintegrable

  12. Integrability in string theory ● Simple geometries explored by Basu & Pando Zayas (2010s) ● Planar and AdS Schwarzschild, planar and AdS RN (nonextremal), (Sasaki-Einstein manifold), q AdS p × SE AdS soliton nonintegrable ● Extremal black holes should be integrable if the bound on chaos conjecture is to be believed: bound proportional to temperature, no chaos around T=0 horizon

  13. Outline ● Integrability in nature and in string theory ● Topological black holes ● (Non)integrability – analytical and numerical ● Bound on chaos?

  14. Construction from AdS ● Old story, apparently not very popular these days ● Event horizon – surface of higher genus ● M. Banados, R. B. Mann, S. Holst, P. Peldan and others

  15. Construction from AdS ● Old story, apparently not very popular these days ● Event horizon – surface of higher genus ● M. Banados, R. B. Mann, S. Holst, P. Peldan and others ● Start from and identify the points in the AdS N + 1 R M Minkowski subspace ( ) connected by some M ≤ N discrete subgroup of the SO(M-1,1) isometry ● To avoid the closed timelike curves first restrict to the subspace – gives a compact subspace 2 − x i x i = R + 2 / L 2 > 0 x 0 of negative curvature: 2 = d ϕ 1 2 + sinh 2 ϕ 1 d ϕ 2 2 + sinh 2 ϕ 1 sinh 2 ϕ 2 d ϕ 3 2 +… ds M

  16. Constructiong from AdS ● To avoid the closed timelike curves restrict to the subspace ( ) – gives a compact AdS N + 1 M ≤ N subspace of negative curvature: 2 = d ϕ 1 2 + sinh 2 ϕ 1 d ϕ 2 2 + sinh 2 ϕ 1 sinh 2 ϕ 2 d ϕ 3 2 +… ds M ● The remaining coordinates define a BH horizon by a change of variables: ( x M , x M + 1 , … x N + 1 )→( t , R, θ 1, θ 2, …θ N − M − 1 ) ● The metric: 2 ( L t ) ( d θ 1 2 ( d ϕ 1 2 4 R + 2 + dr 2 +… ) + L 2 +… ) 2 =− fdt 2 + sinh 2 ϕ 1 d ϕ 2 2 + sinh 2 θ 1 d θ 2 f + r ds 2 cosh R + ● BH can be charged by picking the appropriate f ( r )

  17. Higher genus horizons ● Identify now the points related by an isometry from 2 → dH g 2 SO(M-1,1): - surface of genus g ∈ N ds M 2 = d ϕ 1 ● Toric BH (g=1): 2 + d ϕ 2 2 + d ϕ 3 2 +… ds M 2 = d ϕ 1 ● Spherical BH (g=0): 2 + sin 2 ϕ 1 d ϕ 2 2 + sin 2 ϕ 1 sin 2 ϕ 2 d ϕ 3 2 +… ds M ● The metric: 2 ( L t ) ( d θ 1 2 4 R + 2 + dr 2 + L 2 +… ) 2 =− fdt 2 dH g 2 + sinh 2 θ 1 d θ 2 ds f + r 2 cosh R + ● Solution of Einstein equations in the vacuum for negative constant dilaton

  18. Identification of points 2 = d ϕ 1 ● Toric BH (g=1): - infinite 2 + d ϕ 2 2 + d ϕ 3 2 +… ds M hyperplane if no identification is made ● Requirements: sum of angles to avoid conical ≥ 2 π singularities; 4g sides needed: for g=1 -> square -> wrapping (identification) yields a torus

  19. Identification of points 2 = d ϕ 1 ● Toric BH (g=1): - infinite 2 + d ϕ 2 2 + d ϕ 3 2 +… ds M hyperplane if no identification is made ● Requirements: sum of angles to avoid conical ≥ 2 π singularities; 4g sides needed: for g=1 -> square -> wrapping (identification) yields a torus 2 = d ϕ 1 ● Hyperbolic BH: 2 + sinh 2 ϕ 1 d ϕ 2 2 + sinh 2 ϕ 1 sinh 2 ϕ 2 d ϕ 3 2 +… ds M ● Again need sum of angles and 4g sides but sums ≥ 2 π of angles on a pseudosphere have a lesser sum than on a plane -> minimal g=2

  20. Topological BH formation ● Collapes of presureless dust – but need to start from the AdS space with identifications (Mann&Smith 1997)

  21. Topological BH formation ● Collapes of presureless dust – but need to start from the AdS space with identifications (Mann&Smith 1997) ● Cosmological C-metric – dynamical, more realistic (Mann 1997, Kaloper 1997)

  22. Topological BH formation ● Collapes of presureless dust – but need to start from the AdS space with identifications (Mann&Smith 1997) ● Cosmological C-metric – dynamical, more realistic (Mann 1997, Kaloper 1997) ● BH with fermionic hair (possible in AdS) with a Berry phase (Čubrović 2018) – purely formal but can be related to cond-mat systems N x √ h ( ¯ Ψ − Ψ + ) i ϕΓ ϕ N + 1 x √ − g ¯ 2 Ψ + − ¯ S Ψ = ∫ d a − m ) Ψ+ ∮ d Ψ ( D a Γ Ψ − e Surface term Feed this into introduces T ab =⟨ ¯ Ψ D a Γ b Ψ⟩ the Einstein Berry phase equations ● Backreaction by fermions introduces topological horizon

  23. Outline ● Integrability in nature and in string theory ● Topological black holes ● (Non)integrability – analytical and numerical ● Bound on chaos?

  24. Closed string in TBH background 0 ● Polyakov action: 1 μ ∂ b X μ ∂ b X 2 πα ' ∫ d τ d σ ( η ab G μ ν ∂ a X ν +ϵ ab B μ ν ∂ a X μ ) S = ● Gauge -> Virasoro constraints: h ab =η ab μ ∂ b X ν = 0, μ ∂ b X ν = 0 η ab G μ ν ∂ a X ϵ ab ∂ a X

  25. Closed string in TBH background 0 ● Polyakov action: 1 μ ∂ b X μ ∂ b X 2 πα ' ∫ d τ d σ ( η ab G μ ν ∂ a X ν +ϵ ab B μ ν ∂ a X μ ) S = ● Gauge -> Virasoro constraints: h ab =η ab μ ∂ b X ν = 0, μ ∂ b X ν = 0 η ab G μ ν ∂ a X ϵ ab ∂ a X ● Ansatz: - point-like dynamics ~ just chaos, no turbulence -> τ nontrivial dependence only on R ( τ) , T ( τ) Θ 1 (τ) Φ 1 ( τ) - three DOF -> + either or

Recommend


More recommend