NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE November 20, 2019 Audio recordings are made - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE November 20, 2019 Audio recordings are made of this meeting

ITEM 1 REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 18 TH MEETING MINUTES NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 20, 2019

ITEM 2 REVIEW OF MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORTS NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 20, 2019

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 MSP OPERATIONS 0 NOV-15 31,896 32,356 Operations 33,366 JAN-16 31,597 30,020 MAR-16 34,966 33,293 SEPTEMBER 2019 MAY-16 34,331 36,750 JUL-16 37,880 37,887 SEP-16 34,052 34,906 NOV-16 32,102 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) Nighttime Operations 33,103 JAN-17 31,868 1,975 29,825 MAR-17 36,235 33,971 MAY-17 35,407 36,292 JUL-17 37,665 38,511 SEP-17 33,313 35,027 NOV-17 32,268 33,098 JAN-18 30,703 30,000 Operations 34,775 MAR-18 35,397 32,810 MAY-18 34,672 35,994 OCTOBER 2019 JUL-18 36,785 38,124 SEP-18 33,162 34,578 NOV-18 31,299 31,781 JAN-19 30,743 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) Nighttime Operations 27,944 MAR-19 35,312 2,221 32,968 MAY-19 33,998 35,404 JUL-19 37,132 37,757 SEP-19 33,366 34,775

MSP OPERATIONS 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 500 0 NOV-15 1,632 1,840 Operations 33,366 JAN-16 1,871 1,804 MAR-16 2,124 1,874 SEPTEMBER 2019 MAY-16 1,870 2,421 JUL-16 2,977 2,629 SEP-16 1,755 1,817 NOV-16 1,787 2,152 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) Nighttime Operations JAN-17 1,910 1,639 1,975 MAR-17 2,441 2,143 MAY-17 2,019 2,264 JUL-17 2,346 2,213 ARR SEP-17 1,551 1,807 DEP NOV-17 1,789 2,119 JAN-18 1,865 2,072 Operations 34,775 MAR-18 2,381 2,191 MAY-18 2,009 2,208 JUL-18 2,465 OCTOBER 2019 2,512 SEP-18 1,781 1,800 NOV-18 2,071 2,122 JAN-19 2,126 (10:30 PM – 6:00 AM) 2,276 Nighttime Operations MAR-19 2,877 2,221 2,665 MAY-19 2,377 2,718 JUL-19 2,980 2,774 SEP-19 1,975 2,221

RUNWAY USE SEPTEMBER 2019 OCTOBER 2019 NORTH FLOWS SOUTH FLOWS MIXED FLOWS NORTH FLOWS SOUTH FLOWS MIXED FLOWS 24% 55% 15% 40% 37% 16% 2018 JAN – OCT 2019 JAN – OCT NORTH FLOWS SOUTH FLOWS MIXED FLOWS NORTH FLOWS SOUTH FLOWS MIXED FLOWS 34.2% 46% 11.8% 34.9% 45% 13.7% North Flow South Flow Mixed Flow

SEP – OCT RUNWAY USE 68,141 OPERATIONS IN SEPT – OCT PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3 PRIORITY 4 36% 19% 0% 46% 34,090 ARRIVALS PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3 PRIORITY 4 48% 3% 0% 49% 34,051 DEPARTURES PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3 PRIORITY 4 23% 35% 0% 42%

MSP OPERATIONS CARRIER JET FLEET MIX NARROWBODY RJ WIDEBODY 80% 70% 2019, 59% 2018, 57% 60% 50% 40% 2018, 40% 30% 2019, 38% 20% 10% 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 ***2019: JAN – OCT ONLY***

10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 MSP COMPLAINTS 5,000 Operations per Complaint COMPLAINTS 0 20,376 NOV ‐ 15 6,955 1.6 5,913 JAN ‐ 16 5,547 7,594 MAR ‐ 16 13,196 10,040 SEPTEMBER 2019 MAY ‐ 16 11,063 New Locations 12,227 JUL ‐ 16 10,878 83 12,035 SEP ‐ 16 10,831 9,983 LOCATIONS NOV ‐ 16 7,241 Average 6,318 496 41 JAN ‐ 17 7,457 12,012 MAR ‐ 17 13,244 13,907 MAY ‐ 17 12,559 Median 14,617 3 JUL ‐ 17 16,295 16,727 SEP ‐ 17 15,282 10,844 Operations per Complaint NOV ‐ 17 COMPLAINTS 8,929 7,184 15,480 JAN ‐ 18 5,834 2.2 6,018 MAR ‐ 18 10,799 8,607 MAY ‐ 18 13,336 13,456 JUL ‐ 18 14,453 OCTOBER 2019 New Locations 16,643 18,513 SEP ‐ 18 23 13,137 NOV ‐ 18 9,508 9,220 LOCATIONS JAN ‐ 19 12,307 Average 6,972 321 48 MAR ‐ 19 13,111 15,473 MAY ‐ 19 17,745 18,693 JUL ‐ 19 16,082 Median 19,592 4 20,376 SEP ‐ 19 15,480

MSP COMPLAINTS SEPTEMBER 2019 OCTOBER 2019 COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS COMPLAINTS LOCATIONS 20,376 496 15,480 321 Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median Operations per Complaint New Locations Average Median 1.6 83 41 3 2.2 23 48 4 1000 900 800 700 600 SEP ‐ 18, 435 SEP ‐ 19, 496 500 400 OCT ‐ 19, 321 OCT ‐ 18, 298 300 NEW WEBSITE 200 100 0

TOP 10 LOCATIONS FILED 17,447 (49%) COMPLAINTS DURING SEPT & OCT 7 OF 10 LOCATIONS WERE IN THE TOP 10 FOR JUL – AUG DATA 420 (70%) LOCATIONS FILED 10 OR LESS COMPLAINTS

Count Above SOUND MONITORING Time Above NOV-15 484 H 41 M 447 H 00 M JAN-16 342 H 53 M 363 H 21 M MAR-16 520 H 10 M 506 H 10 M MAY-16 470 H 22 M TA 65 per operation N 65 per operation 499 H 53 M SEPTEMBER 2019 JUL-16 487 H 26 M 2.74 503 H 50 M 50 s SEP-16 500 H 41 M 543 H 51 M NOV-16 490 H 04 M 388 H 27 M JAN-17 363 H 58 M 391 H 31 M MAR-17 481 H 06 M 509 H 07 M 460 h 48 m 91,395 MAY-17 513 H 41 M TA 65 N 65 481 H 47 M JUL-17 454 H 29 M 506 H 47 M SEP-17 444 H 17 M 505 H 44 M Count Above NOV-17 437 H 46 M Time Above 365 H 26 M JAN-18 291 H 03 M 261 H 17 M MAR-18 425 H 09 M 381 H 17 M MAY-18 434 H 51 M TA 65 per operation N 65 per operation 477 H 41 M JUL-18 448 H 19 M OCTOBER 2019 472 H 04 M 2.84 54 s SEP-18 446 H 38 M 501 H 47 M NOV-18 402 H 58 M 394 H 40 M JAN-19 372 H 54 M 257 H 27 M MAR-19 408 H 08 M 478 H 27 M 526 h 24 m 98, 759 MAY-19 495 H 41 M TA 65 N 65 482 H 42 M JUL-19 475 H 51 M 506 H 16 M SEP-19 460 H 48 M 526 H 24 M

100,000 120,000 Count Above SOUND MONITORING Time Above 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 0 NOV-15 89,373 85,909 JAN-16 70,344 70,424 TA 65 per operation MAR-16 98,466 N 65 per operation SEPTEMBER 2019 94,149 MAY-16 91,967 2.74 50 s 98,244 JUL-16 99,132 101,693 SEP-16 96,602 101,946 NOV-16 92,096 77,125 JAN-17 74,224 75,454 460 h 48 m 91,395 MAR-17 93,252 TA 65 N 65 95,553 MAY-17 97,238 95,365 JUL-17 94,436 98,847 SEP-17 87,883 Count Above Time Above 95,472 NOV-17 83,362 73,949 JAN-18 61,097 57,731 MAR-18 86,128 76,429 TA 65 per operation N 65 per operation MAY-18 88,436 96,909 OCTOBER 2019 JUL-18 92,738 2.84 54 s 98,182 SEP-18 89,809 96,020 NOV-18 80,533 80,645 JAN-19 75,314 57,926 MAR-19 83,418 526 h 24 m 92,699 98, 759 TA 65 MAY-19 96,264 N 65 97,691 JUL-19 99,574 102,035 SEP-19 91,395 98,759

NOISE ABATEMENT SEPTEMBER 2019 OCTOBER 2019 Runway 17 99.5% Runway 17 99.1% Corridor 90.6% Corridor 90.4% Cross Day 25% Cross Day 20.7% Cross Night 66.2% Cross Night 44.1% RUS 54.1% Arrive – 41% Depart – 67% RUS 54.4% Arrive – 60% Depart – 48%

ITEM 3 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 20, 2019

ITEM 3 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Speaking at a Meeting • Please complete and submit a speaker card. • Each speaker will have one opportunity to speak and is allotted three (3) minutes. • When called upon to speak, speak clearly into the microphone, state your name and address. If you are affiliated with any organization, please state your affiliation. • Commenters shall address their comments to the NOC and not to the audience. • Use of profanity, personal attacks, or threats of violence will not be tolerated. NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 20, 2019

ITEM 4 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REQUEST NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 20, 2019

FAA Departure Procedure Adjustment Process Amending Instrument Departure Procedures Through Collaboration – A Process Approac h FAA conducts appropriate Based on FAA feedback, the airport Affected communities feasibility and safety assessment. operator develops more details about the work with the airport proposal and provide that to the FAA. operator to develop a 1. Parties need to determine and agree on who would bear the cost of proposal. development and implementation. 1. The proposal has to be ripe for evaluation. 2. Assessment may include a pilot 2. Should involve resident air carriers and other program that evaluates feasibility of commercial entities with a stake in the outcome. public acceptance of multiple, competing procedures. The proposal is subject to a high level FAA If new procedures are The airport operator determined appropriate for review focusing on feasibility and safety endorses and supports of operations. implementation, then they are the proposal taking into subject to environmental review account existing If the proposal consists of multiple approaches, with appropriate community infrastructure and please identify the order of preference. outreach prior to impacts. implementation.

Eagan City Council Letter “Use of Runway 17 for departures has increased dramatically since the implementation of CRO, including more frequent use of the south flow configuration. The Runway Use System (RUS) calls for Runway 12R and 12L as the first priority for departures. However, Runway 17 is the most frequently used runway for southerly departures in contradiction to the RUS.”

Eagan Request 1A – Direct departures with initial fixes of COULT or ZMBRO to use Runway 12R instead of Runway 17

Eagan Request 1A – Direct departures with initial fixes of COULT or ZMBRO to use Runway 12R instead of Runway 17

Eagan Request 1B – Vary the use of Runway 17 departure headings to limit the frequency of overflights in neighborhoods

Eagan City Council Letter “More frequent use of the 120, 140, and 155 ‐ degree departure headings off Runway 17 has caused a significant increase in the noise burden over residential areas of Eagan.”

Eagan Request 2A – Implement an eastbound turn restriction off Runway 17 similar to the westbound 2.5 ‐ mile river departure procedure

Eagan Request 2A – Implement an eastbound turn restriction off Runway 17 similar to the westbound 2.5 ‐ mile river departure procedure