new results on charmonium like states at belle
play

New Results on Charmonium like states at Belle Kavita Lalwani (for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New Results on Charmonium like states at Belle Kavita Lalwani (for the Belle Collaboration) Department of Physics 1 MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Outline Introduction Experimental Facility: Belle at KEKB New Results on Charmonium Like States


  1. New Results on Charmonium like states at Belle Kavita Lalwani (for the Belle Collaboration) Department of Physics 1 MNIT Jaipur, INDIA

  2. Outline  Introduction  Experimental Facility: Belle at KEKB  New Results on Charmonium Like States arXiv:1805.02308v1 [hep-ex] Accepted by PRD  Search for  1 𝑇 , 2 𝑇  𝑎 𝑑 − and e + e -  𝑎 𝑑 + 𝑎 𝑑 + 𝑎 𝑑 − at 𝑡 = 10.52, 10.58 and 10.867 GeV  Measurements of the absolute branching fractions of PRD 97, 012005 (2018) 𝐶 +  𝑌 𝑑𝑑 𝐿 + at Belle  Observation of  𝑑 (2930) 0 and Updated Measurements EPJ C 78, 252 (2018) of 𝐶 −  𝐿 −  𝑑 +  c - at Belle  Angular Analysis of the e + e -  𝐸 ( ∗ )± 𝐸 ( ∗ ) ∓ process near PRD 97, 012002 (2018) open charm threshold using initial-state radiation K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018) 2

  3. Introduction: Charmonium & Charmonium like States  cc bound states can be described using potential models.  All predicted states below the 𝐸𝐸 threshold have been found.  Properties are in agreement with predictions.  Several unpredicted states have been reported above 𝐸𝐸 threshold.  To understand their nature, it is necessary to study their production processes along with their decay channels. K. Chilikin (LPI RAS), Charm-2018 3 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  4. Belle Experiment at KEKB KEKB Accelerator Belle Detector ( at  (4S)) 4 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  5. 5 Search for  𝟐𝑻 , 𝟑𝑻  𝒂 𝒅 − and e + e -  𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 − at 𝒕 = 10.52, 10.58 and 10.867 GeV at Belle (arXiv:1805.02308v1 [hep-ex] Accepted by PRD) 5 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  6. Analysis of  𝟐𝑻 , 𝟑𝑻  𝒂 𝒅 − and e + e -  𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 − Previous Experiments Experiments Publications . PRL 498 100, 142001 (2008) + (4430) Belle observed charged charmonium-like states Z c in π + ψ(2S) decay mode PRD 78, 072004 (2008) J P = 1 + + (4430), for Z c + (4250) (  π +  c1 (1P)) + (4050) and Z c2 Belle observed Z c1 + (3900), Z c + (4200) Z c PRL 110, 252001 (2013) + (3900) PR D 90, 112009 (2014) BESIII and Belle experiments confirmed state Z c PRL 110, 252002 (2013) PRL 112, 222002 (2014) PRD 90, 112009 (2014) + (4200) in π + J/ψ through PWA analysis Belle confirmed Z c PRL 119, 072001 (2017) LHCb confirmed the existence of a Z + (4430) P R L 112, 222002 (2014) PRD 91, 508 112007 (2015) + (4050) in π + ψ(2S) Belle observed Z c Non-conventional q states • Theory: tetraquarks, molecules, hybrid etc. More experimental information is needed. For e + e -  Z c + Z c - , electromagnetic form factor (F) (PLB 764, 174 (2017) - ~1/s 3 ( Z c state is tetraquark structure) PRD 91, 114025 (2015)) + F Zc Zc - ~1/s ( Z c is a system of two tightly bound diquarks) + F Zc Zc s is center of mass energy • Aim is to observe Z c signals and determine the cross section dependence on the s, it will help to understand the nature of Z c . 6 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  7. Analysis of  𝟐𝑻 , 𝟑𝑻  𝒂 𝒅 − and e + e -  𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 − arXiv:1805.02308v1 [hep-ex] Accepted by PRD Analysis Method Data Sample 5.74 fb -1 at  (1S) peak • Z c1 decays into  + J/ψ,  +  c1 ,  +  (2S). 24.91 fb -1 at  (2S) peak Z c2 is simulated with inclusive decays. (e + e -  𝑣𝑣 89.5 fb -1 at 𝑡 = 10.52 GeV, / 𝑒𝑒 /s 𝑡 /c 𝑑 ) 711fb -1 at 𝑡 = 10.58 GeV (  (4S) peak) • After requiring Z c2 signal regions, we will extract 121.4 fb -1 at 𝑡 = 10.867GeV (  (5S) peak) the signal events by fitting the invariant mass spectra of Z c1 . Decay Modes Z c1  + J/ψ Z c1  +  c1 Z c1  + ψ (2S) 7 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  8. Analysis of  𝟐𝑻 , 𝟑𝑻  𝒂 𝒅 − and e + e -  𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 − arXiv:1805.02308v1 [hep-ex] Accepted by PRD Invariant Mass of Z c (  + J/  ) MC Simulation  (1S)→Z c (3900)+Z c (3900)  (1S)→Z c (4200)+Z c (4200)  (1S)→Z c (3900)+Z c (4200) π + J/ ψ(→ l+l-) π + J/ ψ(→ l+l-) π + J/ ψ(→ l+l-)  =24.1%  =24.4%  =24.7% data Unbined fit yield: 50.9± 42.4 events. Unbined fit yield: 3.0±10.1 events Unbined fit yield: 0.9 ± 4.3 events. Nup (90%C.L.) is 113.4. Nup (90%C.L.) is 21.2 Nup (90%C.L.) is 9.0. Significance is 1.19 σ. Significance is 0.28 σ Significance is 0.20 σ. Solid curve (blue color): best fit Dotted lines: background No evident signal for Z c states is observed. Shaded area: normalized J/  mass side band events 8 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  9. Analysis of  𝟐𝑻 , 𝟑𝑻  𝒂 𝒅 − and e + e -  𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 − arXiv:1805.02308v1 [hep-ex] Accepted by PRD Invariant Mass of Z c  +  c1 Invariant Mass of Z c  +  (2S) Solid curve (blue color): best fit No evident signal for Z c states is observed. Dotted lines: background, Shaded area (Magenta color): normalized  +  c1 ,  +  (2S) mass side band events 9 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  10. Measurement of the Branching Fraction and Cross section arXiv:1805.02308v1 [hep-ex] Accepted by PRD  ( 𝒇 + 𝒇 −  𝒂 𝒅 − )  B.F. ( 𝒂 𝒅 +  + 𝒅𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 ) B.F. (  (1S, 2S)  𝒂 𝒅 − )  B.F. ( 𝒂 𝒅 +  + 𝒅𝒅 + 𝒂 𝒅 ) + signal yields 𝑶 𝒈𝒋𝒖 : number of fitted 𝒂 𝒅 𝑶 𝒈𝒋𝒖 ×| 𝟐−  | 𝟑 𝑶 𝒈𝒋𝒖 𝑶  ( 𝟐𝐓 , 𝟑𝐓 ) : total number of  (1S, 2S) events = 𝑴 ×  × 𝟐 +  𝑱𝑻𝑺 × 𝑪 𝒆𝒇𝒅𝒃𝒛 = 𝑶  ( 𝟐𝐓 , 𝟑𝐓 ) ×  × 𝑪 𝒆𝒇𝒅𝒃𝒛 ε is the corresponding selection Efficiency L is the integrated luminosity Bdecay = B(J/ψ  ℓ+ℓ−) 𝟐 +  𝑱𝑻𝑺 radiative correction factor |1−  | 2 is the vacuum polarization factor. • No clear signals are observed in the studied modes. • Determined 90% C.L. upper limits on the B.F. & cross section. 10 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  11. 11 Measurements of the absolute branching fractions of 𝑪 +  𝒀 𝒅𝒅 𝑳 + at Belle PRD 97, 012005 (2018) K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018) 11

  12. Analysis of 𝑪 +  𝒀 𝒅𝒅 𝑳 +  The X(3872) is not explained by the Quark Model. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 240 (2005)  As its mass is very close to combined mass of charmed mesons D 0 and 𝐸 ∗ 0 . 𝑲 𝑸𝑫 = 𝟐 ++ is determined by LHCb PRL 110, 222001 (2013) ∗ 0 molecular state. X(3872) seems to be D 0 𝐸  The large cross section observed by CDF experiment contradicts to pure molecular interpretation. PRL 98, 132002 (2007)  X (3872) seems to be an admixture of D 0 𝐸 ∗ 0 molecular state and a pure  𝑑 1 (2P) state. Phys. 2013, 903D01 (2013)  To understand the nature of X(3872), a measurement of the absolute branching fraction B.F. (B +  X (3872) K + ) is required. 12 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

  13. Missing Mass Distributions of 𝑳 + in 𝑪 +  𝒀 𝒅𝒅 𝑳 + PRD 97, 012005 (2018) Data Sample: 772  10 6 B 𝐶 pairs at  (4S) resonance Reconstruction Method Signal Reconstruct Reconstruct Tag Do not see Enhancement near 3545MeV/c 2 is not significant. hadronic decay Missing mass is used to reconstruct the 𝑌 𝑑𝑑 mass ∗ ∗ ∗ ) 2 /c 𝑁 𝑛𝑗𝑡𝑡 ( ℎ ) = ( 𝑞 𝑓 + 𝑓 − − 𝑞 𝑢𝑏𝑕 − 𝑞 ℎ ∗ are four momenta of electron ∗ ∗ 𝑞 𝑓 + 𝑓 − , 𝑞 𝑢𝑏𝑕 and 𝑞 ℎ -positron initial state, B tag and kaon, respectively. Vertical solid lines: nominal mass of X cc included in the fit. Vertical dashed lines: nominal mass of 𝑌 𝑑𝑑 :  c , J/  ,  c0 ,  c1 ,  c (2S),  (2S),  (3770), X(3872), X(3915) X cc not included in fit. Solid line (blue color): total fit results. We do not observe significant signal for X(3872) Dashed and dotted lines are X cc contributions and background contributions, respectively 13

  14. Measurement of Branching Fraction of 𝑪 +  𝒀 𝒅𝒅 𝑳 + 𝑂 𝑡𝑗𝑕 𝑌 𝑑𝑑 :  c , J/  ,  c0 ,  c1 ,  c (2S),  (2S),  (3770), X(3872), X(3915) B.F. = 2 𝑂 𝐶 ±  𝑂 𝐶 ± = 𝑂  (4 𝑇 ) B.F. (  (4S)  𝐶 + 𝐶 − ) BaBar results Belle results PRL 96, 052002 (2006) PRD 97, 012005 (2018) • B.F. (B +  X(3872) K + ) < 2.6 × 10 −4 is more stringent than determined by BABAR (3.2 × 10 −4 ). • B.F. (B +  X(3915) K + ) < 2.8 × 10 −4 for the first time. (upper limit with 90 % CL) • B.F. (B +   c K + ) = (12.0  0.8  0.7)  10 -4 B.F.( B +   c (2S) K + ) = (4.8  1.1  0.3)  10 -4 (First Significant Measurement) 14 K. Lalwani, MNIT Jaipur, INDIA Meson-2018, Krakow, Poland (June 7 – June 12, 2018)

Recommend


More recommend