new approach to the presbyopia treatment
play

New Approach to the Presbyopia Treatment Introduction Tri-ED EDOF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New Approach to the Presbyopia Treatment Introduction Tri-ED EDOF Concepts Active Diffractive Optic Semi-Apodized Optic True TriFocality All in One Platform Technical Specifications First Clinical Results Competition Product Segmentation


  1. New Approach to the Presbyopia Treatment

  2. Introduction Tri-ED EDOF Concepts Active Diffractive Optic Semi-Apodized Optic True TriFocality All in One Platform Technical Specifications First Clinical Results Competition – Product Segmentation

  3. Introduction All-in-One Platform True Trifocality with EDOF Seamless Continuous Vision Balanced Near/Intermediate Addition Pupil-Independent Active Diffractive Optic Aspheric Optic Premium Material Square Edge Photo protection Plate Haptic - MICS Chromatic Aberration Control

  4. New! Full Diffractive Trifocal Optic Enhanced by Depth of Focus Vision* True Trifocal optic having superior MTF results at intermediate zones * Patent Pending New Design

  5. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept in Reviol Tri-ED Optic 1. Active Diffractive Optic 2. Semi-Apodization 3. True TriFocality

  6. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept The Reliable performance of Reviol Active-Diffractive IOL has been proven in over forty countries with thousand implantations Active Diffractive Optic Characteristic of Active Diffractive Optic Maximum Light Energy Transmission

  7. Active Diffractive Reviol Tri-ED Maximum Light Transmission Effective light transmission reach up 89.1%, It means light loss is 10.9% which is minimum value in the trifocal IOL market . Light Loss in Competitors 14.3% in Zeiss 15.0% in Physiol

  8. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept Semi-Apodized Trifocal Optic Benefits of Semi-Apodization Optimal Light Distribution

  9. Semi-Apodization Optimal Light Distribution Light is distributed through the focal area with excellent balance. Reviol Tri-ED light splitting structure of transmitted light in 6 mm aperture: 44% for Far 28% for Intermediate 28% for Near

  10. II. Optimum Light Distribution Comparative Test Results of transmitted light in 3mm Aperture Models Far Intermediate Near Reviol Tri-ED 46% 25% 29% AT LISA tri 50% 20% 30% Finevision 50% 17% 33%

  11. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept True Trifocality True trifocal? Appropriate Disparity between focus

  12. True Trifocality Appropriate Disparity Reviol Tri-ED is combined with 3.0D Near Addition and 1.5D Intermediate Addition. Opthalmic Optic General Information III Focal overlapping between light centralization in different points plays a negative role in image quality and photopic phenomena (glare/halo) problems*. *Petermeier K., Messias A., Gekeler F., Szurman P. Effect of +3.00 diopter and +4.00 diopter additions in multifocal intraocular lenses on defocus profiles, patient satisfaction and contrast sensitivity. J. Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37 (4): 720-6.

  13. True Trifocality and comfortable distance for the patients… Near/Intermediate Additions Trifocal IOL Near Addition Intermediate Addition Reviol Tri-ED 1.50D – 80 cm * 3.00D - 42 cm AT LISA tri 1.66D – 76 cm ** 3.33D - 40 cm Finevision 1.75D – 60 cm *** 3.50D - 36 cm * Data on file: First Clinical Findings. ** Comparison of a bifocal and a trifocal intraocular lens. E.Law R. Aggarwal H. Kasaby. Free Paper Session ESRCS 2014 London. *** Diffractive multifocal IOLs: a comparative study of Finevision versus ReSTOR 2.5 and 3.0D. K.Gundersen. Free Paper Session ESRCS 2014 London.

  14. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept Active Diffractive True Trifocality Optic Semi Apodization Enhanced Depth of See the MTF Results! Focus

  15. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept MTF is direct quantitative measurement of an optical system. Criteria has been determined by ISO Standard 11979. Typical Monofocal and Bifocal IOL graphs

  16. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept Reviol Tri-ED shows superior MTF values even between far-intermediate and intermediate-near area ensures seamless continuous vision at all distance!

  17. Enhanced Depth of Focus Concept Comparative MTF Results at 50 lp/mm Models Far Focus Intermediate Near Focus Focus Reviol Tri-ED 43 22 23 AT LISA tri 34 16 21 Finevision 36 17 20 The more resolution is The more patient is…

  18. Unique Design of Reviol Tri-ED Maximum Light Transfer Optimum Light Distribution Good Focal Disparity Seamless Superior MTF Continuous Results Vision

  19. Seamless Continuous Vision

  20. Reviol Tri-ED All-in-One Platform! Aspheric Optic All Square Efficient Photo Enhanced Edge Protection Chromatic Aberration Control

  21. Technical Features

  22. First Clinical Findings Clinical studies have been running on three different center. 26 patient had Tri-ED implantation so far Happy patients… Happy surgeons!

  23. First Clinical Findings Post-op Refraction Spherical Equivalent - 0.18 ± 0.38

  24. First Clinical Findings Visual Acuity UDVA (Uncorrected Far) -0.03 ± 0.07 UIVA (Uncorrected Intermediate) 0.16 ± 0.09 UVNA (Uncorrected Near) 0.06 ± 0.12 *LogMar Acuity

  25. First Clinical Findings Defocus Curve Distinctive intermediate acuity

  26. First Clinical Findings Good Contrast Sensitivity Results Contrast sensitivities are measured by CSV1000E, Vector Vision by glare and without glare. All eyes showed good results at 3, 6, 12 and 18 spatial frequency (cpd) Patient Satisfaction No moderate/severe glare halo problem reported. Over 95% of patients dont need glasses.

  27. Competition AT LISA Tri Trifocal & Bifocal Combination 1,66D intermediate - 3,66 near addition Pupil-independent Hydrophilic acrylic with hydrophobic surface Plate haptic 6.0 mm, 11.0 mm

  28. Competition

  29. Competition Finevision Convolution steps 1,75D intermediate - 3,50 near addition Pupil-independent Hydrophilic acrylic (Micro F 25%, Pod F 26&) Micro F 6,15mm – 10.75 mm Pod F 6.0 mm – 11.40 mm

  30. Competition

  31. Competition Specification Reviol Tri-ED AT LISA tri Finevision Trifocal + Bifocal Semi-apodized Trifocal Convolution Combination Pupil- Optic Trifocal (EDOF) Pupil- Pupil-Independent Independent Independent Hydrophilic acrylic Hydrophilic acrylic Hydrophilic acrylic Material (25%) with (25%) with (Micro F 25%, Pod F hydrophobic surface hydrophobic surface 26&) Intermediate & Near 1.5D – 3.0D 1,66D – 3,66D 1.75D – 3.50D Addition 0.0D – 32.0D with 10.0D – 35.0D with 0.0D – 32.0D with Diopter Range 0.5D increments 0.5D increments 0.5D increments

  32. Competition Spesification Reviol Tri-ED AT LISA tri Finevision Yes Yes Square Edge Yes Angulation 0⁰ 0⁰ 5⁰ Micro F Plate Haptic Plate Haptic 6,15mm – 10.75 mm Haptic 6.0mm – 11.0 mm 6.0mm – 11.0 mm Pod F (MICS) (MICS) 6.0 mm – 11.40 mm Light Filtration UV/Violet UV UV/Blue Light

  33. Take-Home Message EDOF vision - Excellent MTF Results • Highest value on light transmission • Balanced intermediate1,5D / near addition3.0D: 42 cm – 80 cm • Semi-Apodization – Light Distribution 44% F , 28% I and 28% N •

Recommend


More recommend