neutralino dark matter in the bmssm
play

Neutralino Dark Matter in the BMSSM Nicols Bernal CFTP - IST, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 30, 2022 •134 likes •1.26k views

Neutralino Dark Matter in the BMSSM Nicols Bernal CFTP - IST, Lisbon June 3 rd 2010 JCAP 03(2010)007 NB, A. Goudelis JHEP 08(2009)053 NB, K. Blum, M. Losada, Y. Nir Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection

  1. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Outline Motivation 1 The BMSSM 2 Dark Matter 3 Correlated stop-slepton masses Light stops, heavy sleptons Dark Matter Direct Detection 4 Dark Matter Indirect Detection 5 γ -rays Positrons Antiprotons Summary 6

  2. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Corrections to the MSSM Assume that there is New Physics beyond the MSSM at a scale M , much above the electroweak scale m Z and the scale of the SUSY breaking terms m susy . ǫ ∼ m susy ∼ m Z M ≪ 1 M The corrections to the MSSM can be parametrized by operators suppressed by inverse powers of M ; i.e. by powers of ǫ .

  3. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Corrections to the MSSM Assume that there is New Physics beyond the MSSM at a scale M , much above the electroweak scale m Z and the scale of the SUSY breaking terms m susy . ǫ ∼ m susy ∼ m Z M ≪ 1 M The corrections to the MSSM can be parametrized by operators suppressed by inverse powers of M ; i.e. by powers of ǫ . ➜ There can be significant e ff ects from non-renormalizable terms on the same order as the one-loop terms. We focus on an e ff ective action analysis to the Higgs sector as an approach to consider the e ff ects of New Physics Beyond the MSSM. Brignole, Casas, Espinosa, Navarro, 03 Dine, Seiberg, Thomas, 07

  4. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Non-renormalizable operators Remember the ordinary MSSM superpotential: � d 2 θ µ H u H d W MSSM ⊃

  5. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Non-renormalizable operators Remember the ordinary MSSM superpotential: � d 2 θ µ H u H d W MSSM ⊃ There are only 2 operators at order 1 M : 1 � d 2 θ ( H u H d ) 2 O 1 = M 1 � d 2 θ Z ( H u H d ) 2 O 2 = M Z ≡ θ 2 m susy : spurion field O 1 : is a dimension 5 SUSY operator O 2 : parametrizes SUSY breaking ➜ Both operators can lead to CP violation

  6. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary BMSSM Higgs potential Corrections to the MSSM Higgs potential + ǫ 2 ( H u H d ) 2 + h.c. � u H u + H † � H † δ L = 2 ǫ 1 H u H d d H d + ǫ 1 � 2( H u H d )( ˜ H u ˜ H d ) + 2( ˜ H u H d )( H u ˜ H d ) µ ∗ � + ( H u ˜ H d )( H u ˜ H d ) + ( ˜ H u H d )( ˜ H u H d ) + h.c. where ǫ 1 ≡ µ ∗ λ 1 ǫ 2 ≡ − m susy λ 2 M M

  7. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary BMSSM Higgs potential Corrections to the MSSM Higgs potential + ǫ 2 ( H u H d ) 2 + h.c. � u H u + H † � H † δ L = 2 ǫ 1 H u H d d H d + ǫ 1 � 2( H u H d )( ˜ H u ˜ H d ) + 2( ˜ H u H d )( H u ˜ H d ) µ ∗ � + ( H u ˜ H d )( H u ˜ H d ) + ( ˜ H u H d )( ˜ H u H d ) + h.c. where ǫ 1 ≡ µ ∗ λ 1 ǫ 2 ≡ − m susy λ 2 M M New contributions for Higgs boson masses

  8. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary BMSSM Higgs potential Corrections to the MSSM Higgs potential + ǫ 2 ( H u H d ) 2 + h.c. � u H u + H † � H † δ L = 2 ǫ 1 H u H d d H d + ǫ 1 � 2( H u H d )( ˜ H u ˜ H d ) + 2( ˜ H u H d )( H u ˜ H d ) µ ∗ � + ( H u ˜ H d )( H u ˜ H d ) + ( ˜ H u H d )( ˜ H u H d ) + h.c. where ǫ 1 ≡ µ ∗ λ 1 ǫ 2 ≡ − m susy λ 2 M M New contributions for Higgs boson masses New contributions for higgsino ( χ 0 and χ ± ) masses

  9. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary BMSSM Higgs potential Corrections to the MSSM Higgs potential + ǫ 2 ( H u H d ) 2 + h.c. � u H u + H † � H † δ L = 2 ǫ 1 H u H d d H d + ǫ 1 � 2( H u H d )( ˜ H u ˜ H d ) + 2( ˜ H u H d )( H u ˜ H d ) µ ∗ � + ( H u ˜ H d )( H u ˜ H d ) + ( ˜ H u H d )( ˜ H u H d ) + h.c. where ǫ 1 ≡ µ ∗ λ 1 ǫ 2 ≡ − m susy λ 2 M M New contributions for Higgs boson masses New contributions for higgsino ( χ 0 and χ ± ) masses New contributions for Higgs-higgsino couplings

  10. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary BMSSM Higgs potential Corrections to the MSSM Higgs potential + ǫ 2 ( H u H d ) 2 + h.c. � u H u + H † � H † δ L = 2 ǫ 1 H u H d d H d + ǫ 1 � 2( H u H d )( ˜ H u ˜ H d ) + 2( ˜ H u H d )( H u ˜ H d ) µ ∗ � + ( H u ˜ H d )( H u ˜ H d ) + ( ˜ H u H d )( ˜ H u H d ) + h.c. where ǫ 1 ≡ µ ∗ λ 1 ǫ 2 ≡ − m susy λ 2 M M New contributions for Higgs boson masses New contributions for higgsino ( χ 0 and χ ± ) masses New contributions for Higgs-higgsino couplings Vacuum stability: | ǫ 1 | � 0 . 1, | ǫ 2 | � 0 . 05 see Blum, Delaunay, Hochberg, 09

  11. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Higgs spectrum We consider the case where the NR operators can still be treated as perturbations: � 2 + δ ˜ � M 2 m tree t m 2 h + δ ǫ m 2 � (114 GeV) 2 h ≃ h h   2 ǫ 1 ( m 2 A + m 2 Z ) s 2 β + ǫ 2 ( m 2 A − m 2 Z ) c 2      2 β  δ ǫ m 2 2 v 2   ǫ 2 − 2 ǫ 1 s 2 β − =     h   �   Z ) 2 + 4 m 2  ( m 2 A − m 2 A m 2 Z s 2      2 β δ ǫ m 2 ∼ few dozens of GeVs! h The δ ǫ m 2 h relaxes the constraint in a significant way: for ǫ 1 � − 0 . 1 and tan β � 5, light and unmixed stops allowed!

  12. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Higgs spectrum We consider the case where the NR operators can still be treated as perturbations: � 2 + δ ˜ � M 2 m tree t m 2 h + δ ǫ m 2 � (114 GeV) 2 h ≃ h h   2 ǫ 1 ( m 2 A + m 2 Z ) s 2 β + ǫ 2 ( m 2 A − m 2 Z ) c 2      2 β  δ ǫ m 2 2 v 2   ǫ 2 − 2 ǫ 1 s 2 β − =     h   �   Z ) 2 + 4 m 2  ( m 2 A − m 2 A m 2 Z s 2      2 β δ ǫ m 2 ∼ few dozens of GeVs! h The δ ǫ m 2 h relaxes the constraint in a significant way: for ǫ 1 � − 0 . 1 and tan β � 5, light and unmixed stops allowed! ➜ The SUSY little hierarchy problem can be avoided

  13. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Higgs spectrum We consider the case where the NR operators can still be treated as perturbations: � 2 + δ ˜ � M 2 m tree t m 2 h + δ ǫ m 2 � (114 GeV) 2 h ≃ h h   2 ǫ 1 ( m 2 A + m 2 Z ) s 2 β + ǫ 2 ( m 2 A − m 2 Z ) c 2      2 β  δ ǫ m 2 2 v 2   ǫ 2 − 2 ǫ 1 s 2 β − =     h   �   Z ) 2 + 4 m 2  ( m 2 A − m 2 A m 2 Z s 2      2 β δ ǫ m 2 ∼ few dozens of GeVs! h The δ ǫ m 2 h relaxes the constraint in a significant way: for ǫ 1 � − 0 . 1 and tan β � 5, light and unmixed stops allowed! ➜ The SUSY little hierarchy problem can be avoided Other Higgs masses also receive corrections...

  14. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Higgs spectrum 140 ǫ 1 = 0 140 ǫ 2 = 0 ǫ 1 = 0 . 05 = 0 . 03 ǫ 2 = 0 . 05 m h 0 (GeV) m h 0 (GeV) ǫ ǫ 1 = 0, 1-loop 1 120 120 = 0 . 01 ǫ 1 0 = ǫ 2 ǫ 1 = 0, 2-loop 100 100 gray area: gray area: LEP Higgs mass bound LEP Higgs mass bound 80 80 ǫ 1 = 0, tree level − 3 − 2 − 1 0 1 2 3 − 3 − 2 − 1 0 1 2 3 A t /m 0 A t /m 0 By Berg, Edsjö, Gondolo, Lundström and Sjörs, 09’ The δ ǫ m 2 h relaxes the constraint in a significant way: for ǫ 1 � − 0 . 1 and tan β � 5, light and unmixed stops allowed! ➜ The SUSY little hierarchy problem can be avoided Other Higgs masses also receive corrections...

  15. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Higgsinos  0 0 0 0     M 1 0 − m Z s W c β m Z s W s β      0 0 0 0   4 ǫ 1 m 2   0 M 2 m Z c W c β − m Z c W s β       W M χ 0 =    +      s 2  µ ∗ g 2   0 0 s 2 β − m Z s W c β m Z c W c β 0 − µ          β     m Z s W s β − m Z c W s β − µ 0    c 2  0 0 s 2 β   β The lightest neutralino χ 0 1 is a natural candidate for cold dark matter! The NR operators also modify the chargino mass matrix Higgs-higgsino-higgsino & Higgs-Higgs-higgsino-higgsino couplings (DM annihilation cross sections) Berg, Edsjö, Gondolo, Lundström, Sjörs, ‘09; NB, Blum, Losada, Nir, ‘09

  16. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Higgsinos  0 0 0 0     M 1 0 − m Z s W c β m Z s W s β      0 0 0 0   4 ǫ 1 m 2   0 M 2 m Z c W c β − m Z c W s β       W M χ 0 =   +       s 2  µ ∗ g 2   0 0 s 2 β − m Z s W c β m Z c W c β 0 − µ          β     m Z s W s β − m Z c W s β − µ 0    c 2  0 0 s 2 β   β The lightest neutralino χ 0 1 is a natural candidate for cold dark matter! The NR operators also modify the chargino mass matrix Higgs-higgsino-higgsino & Higgs-Higgs-higgsino-higgsino couplings (DM annihilation cross sections) Berg, Edsjö, Gondolo, Lundström, Sjörs, ‘09; NB, Blum, Losada, Nir, ‘09 ➜ Spectrum, dark matter relic density and DM detection rates are calculated using modified versions of SuSpect and micrOMEGAs

  17. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Outline Motivation 1 The BMSSM 2 Dark Matter 3 Correlated stop-slepton masses Light stops, heavy sleptons Dark Matter Direct Detection 4 Dark Matter Indirect Detection 5 γ -rays Positrons Antiprotons Summary 6

  18. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses: mSUGRA-like The mSUGRA model is specified by 5 parameters: tan β : ratio of the Higgs vevs m 1 / 2 : common mass for the gauginos (bino, wino and gluino) m 0 : universal scalar mass (sfermions and Higgs bosons) A 0 : universal trilinear coupling sign µ : sign of the µ parameter In mSUGRA scenarios usually the lightest neutralino is the LSP Because of the LEP constraint over the Higgs mass, the bulk region (i.e. low m 0 and low m 1 / 2 ) is ruled out.

  19. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 mSUGRA 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP τ LEP 500 WMAP Higgs m 1/2 [GeV] 400 100 300 95 200 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV]

  20. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 mSUGRA 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP τ LEP 500 WMAP Higgs m 1/2 [GeV] 400 100 300 95 200 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] Regions excluded: ˜ τ LSP

  21. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 mSUGRA 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP τ LEP 500 WMAP Higgs m 1/2 [GeV] 400 100 300 95 200 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] τ LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜

  22. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 mSUGRA 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP τ LEP 500 WMAP Higgs m 1/2 [GeV] 400 100 300 95 200 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] τ LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜ Bulk region: LSP is mainly bino-like. DM relic density too high

  23. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 mSUGRA 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP τ LEP 500 WMAP Higgs m 1/2 [GeV] 400 100 300 95 200 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] τ LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜ Bulk region: LSP is mainly bino-like. DM relic density too high Regions fulfilling WMAP measurements: ✔ Coannihilation with ˜ τ

  24. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 mSUGRA 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP τ LEP 500 WMAP Higgs m 1/2 [GeV] 400 100 300 95 200 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] τ LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜ Bulk region: LSP is mainly bino-like. DM relic density too high Regions fulfilling WMAP measurements: ✔ Coannihilation with ˜ τ ✔ Higgs- and Z -poles: m h ∼ m Z ∼ 2 m χ s -channel exchange

  25. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 mSUGRA 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP τ LEP 500 WMAP Higgs m 1/2 [GeV] 400 100 300 95 200 90 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] τ LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜ Bulk region: LSP is mainly bino-like. DM relic density too high Regions fulfilling WMAP measurements: ✔ Coannihilation with ˜ τ ✔ Higgs- and Z -poles: m h ∼ m Z ∼ 2 m χ s -channel exchange ✘ However m h � 105 GeV: The whole region is excluded!

  26. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 ǫ 1 = − 0 . 1, ǫ 2 = 0 mSUGRA BMSSM mSUGRA-like 600 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP ∼ LSP τ τ LEP LEP 500 500 WMAP WMAP Higgs Higgs 158 m 1/2 [GeV] m 1/2 [GeV] 400 400 100 300 300 156 95 200 200 90 154 100 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] m 0 [GeV] It should not be taken as an extended mSUGRA, but just as a framework specified at low energy.

  27. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 ǫ 1 = − 0 . 1, ǫ 2 = 0 mSUGRA BMSSM mSUGRA-like 600 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP ∼ LSP τ τ LEP LEP 500 500 WMAP WMAP Higgs Higgs 158 m 1/2 [GeV] m 1/2 [GeV] 400 400 100 300 300 156 95 200 200 90 154 100 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] m 0 [GeV] It should not be taken as an extended mSUGRA, but just as a framework specified at low energy. ✔ Important uplift of the Higgs mass → ‘bulk region’ re-opened

  28. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 ǫ 1 = − 0 . 1, ǫ 2 = 0 mSUGRA BMSSM mSUGRA-like 600 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP ∼ LSP τ τ LEP LEP 500 500 WMAP WMAP Higgs Higgs 158 m 1/2 [GeV] m 1/2 [GeV] 400 400 100 300 300 156 95 200 200 90 154 100 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] m 0 [GeV] It should not be taken as an extended mSUGRA, but just as a framework specified at low energy. ✔ Important uplift of the Higgs mass → ‘bulk region’ re-opened New region fulfilling DM constraint: Higgs-funnel

  29. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses Let’s take: A 0 = 0 GeV, µ > 0 and tan β = 3 ǫ 1 = − 0 . 1, ǫ 2 = 0 mSUGRA BMSSM mSUGRA-like 600 600 tan β =3, ε 1 = ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 104 ∼ LSP ∼ LSP τ τ LEP LEP 500 500 WMAP WMAP Higgs Higgs 158 m 1/2 [GeV] m 1/2 [GeV] 400 400 100 300 300 156 95 200 200 90 154 100 100 100 200 300 400 500 600 100 200 300 400 500 600 m 0 [GeV] m 0 [GeV] It should not be taken as an extended mSUGRA, but just as a framework specified at low energy. ✔ Important uplift of the Higgs mass → ‘bulk region’ re-opened New region fulfilling DM constraint: Higgs-funnel χ 0 1 bino-like: marginal impact on m χ and ann. cross section

  30. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons Now we consider a low-energy scenario giving rise to light stops tan β : ratio of the Higgs vevs µ : higgsino mass parameter m A : pseudoscalar Higgs mass parameter X t : trilinear coupling for stops, X t = A t − µ/ tan β M 2 : wino mass parameter, M 1 ∼ 1 2 M 2 m U : stop right mass parameter m Q : 3 rd generation squarks left mass parameter f : mass for sleptons, 1 st and 2 nd gen. squarks and ˜ m ˜ b R m U = 210 GeV, X t = 0 GeV, m Q = m ˜ f = m A = 500 GeV

  31. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons Now we consider a low-energy scenario giving rise to light stops tan β : ratio of the Higgs vevs µ : higgsino mass parameter m A : pseudoscalar Higgs mass parameter X t : trilinear coupling for stops, X t = A t − µ/ tan β M 2 : wino mass parameter, M 1 ∼ 1 2 M 2 m U : stop right mass parameter m Q : 3 rd generation squarks left mass parameter f : mass for sleptons, 1 st and 2 nd gen. squarks and ˜ m ˜ b R m U = 210 GeV, X t = 0 GeV, m Q = m ˜ f = m A = 500 GeV m ˜ t 1 � 150 GeV , 370 GeV � m ˜ t 2 � 400 GeV A scenario with light unmixed stops is ruled out in the MSSM

  32. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV]

  33. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] Regions excluded: ˜ t LSP

  34. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] t LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜

  35. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] t LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜ Regions fulfilling WMAP measurements: ✔ Coannihilation with ˜ t : χ ˜ t → Wb , tg ˜ t ˜ t → gg

  36. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] t LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜ Regions fulfilling WMAP measurements: ✔ Coannihilation with ˜ t : χ ˜ t → Wb , tg ˜ t ˜ t → gg ✔ Higgs- and Z -poles: m h ∼ m Z ∼ 2 m χ s -channel exchange

  37. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] t LSP and χ ± searches at LEP Regions excluded: ˜ Regions fulfilling WMAP measurements: ✔ Coannihilation with ˜ t : χ ˜ t → Wb , tg ˜ t ˜ t → gg ✔ Higgs- and Z -poles: m h ∼ m Z ∼ 2 m χ s -channel exchange ✘ However m h � 85 GeV: The whole region is excluded!

  38. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] ✔ important uplift of the Higgs mass: m h ∼ 122 GeV

  39. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] ✔ important uplift of the Higgs mass: m h ∼ 122 GeV ✘ NR operators destabilize scalar potential: vacuum metastable

  40. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] ✔ important uplift of the Higgs mass: m h ∼ 122 GeV ✘ NR operators destabilize scalar potential: vacuum metastable new region fulfilling DM constraint: Higgs-funnel

  41. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] ✔ important uplift of the Higgs mass: m h ∼ 122 GeV ✘ NR operators destabilize scalar potential: vacuum metastable new region fulfilling DM constraint: Higgs-funnel sizable impact on m χ and ann. cross section when χ 0 1 is higgsino-like

  42. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Outline Motivation 1 The BMSSM 2 Dark Matter 3 Correlated stop-slepton masses Light stops, heavy sleptons Dark Matter Direct Detection 4 Dark Matter Indirect Detection 5 γ -rays Positrons Antiprotons Summary 6

  43. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter direct detection Direct detection experiments are designed to detect dark matter particles by their elastic collision with target nuclei , placed in a detector on the Earth. XENON Exposures: ε = 30, 300, 3000 kg · year Xenon1T and 11 days, 4 months or 3 years

  44. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter direct detection Direct detection experiments are designed to detect dark matter particles by their elastic collision Xenon discriminates signal from background with target nuclei , placed in a detector on the by simultaneous measurements of: Earth. scintillation ionization XENON The collaboration expects to have a negligible background. ➜ 7 energy bins between [4 , 30] keV Detectability definition: � 2 � − N bkg N tot 7 χ 2 = � i i N tot i i = 1 Exposures: ε = 30, 300, 3000 kg · year Xenon1T and 11 days, 4 months or 3 years

  45. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter direct detection Recoil rates Direct detection experiments are designed to detect � v esc = σ χ − p · ρ 0 dN f ( v ) dark matter particles by their elastic collision F ( E r ) 2 dv 2 M 2 dE r v with target nuclei , placed in a detector on the r m χ v min ( E r ) Earth. m χ m N Reduced mass M r = m χ + m N XENON N : number of scatterings (s − 1 kg − 1 ) E r : nuclear recoil energy ∼ few keV m χ : WIMP mass σ χ − p : WIMP-proton scattering cross-section ➜ Assume pure spin-independent coupling 0 . 38 GeV cm − 3 ρ 0 : local WIMP density F : nuclear form factor Woods-Saxon f ( v ): WIMP local vel. distribution M.B. 1 v � e − ( v − 1 . 05 v 0 ) 2 / v 2 f ( v ) = √ π 0 1 . 05 v 2 0 Exposures: ε = 30, 300, 3000 kg · year � − e − ( v + 1 . 05 v 0 ) 2 / v 2 Xenon1T and 11 days, 4 months or 3 years 0

  46. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL

  47. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 values ( m 0 → increase squark masses, m 1 / 2 → increase LSP mass)

  48. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 values For low m 1 / 2 , LSP tends to be a higgsino-bino mixed state ( C χχ h )

  49. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 values For low m 1 / 2 , LSP tends to be a higgsino-bino mixed state ( C χχ h ) Detection maximised for low tan β , C χχ h ∝ sin 2 β ( | µ | ≫ M 1 )

  50. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 values For low m 1 / 2 , LSP tends to be a higgsino-bino mixed state ( C χχ h ) Detection maximised for low tan β , C χχ h ∝ sin 2 β ( | µ | ≫ M 1 ) ✔ Sizable amount of the parameter space can be probed

  51. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA BMSSM mSUGRA-like tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 1000 1000 900 900 WMAP ∼ LSP τ 800 800 LEP ε =3000 700 700 m 1/2 [GeV] m 1/2 [GeV] ε =300 600 600 ε =30 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 100 300 500 700 900 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 values For low m 1 / 2 , LSP tends to be a higgsino-bino mixed state ( C χχ h ) Detection maximised for low tan β , C χχ h ∝ sin 2 β ( | µ | ≫ M 1 ) ✔ Sizable amount of the parameter space can be probed ➜ NR operators → deterioration of the detection: m h ✔ But without NR operators, the parameter space was excluded!

  52. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL

  53. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ✘ Partially ruled out by first results from Xenon100!

  54. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ✘ Partially ruled out by first results from Xenon100! Detection prospects maximised for low µ and / or M 1 : light LSP

  55. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ✘ Partially ruled out by first results from Xenon100! Detection prospects maximised for low µ and / or M 1 : light LSP Scattering cross section enhanced near µ ∼ M 1 ( C χχ h , C χχ H )

  56. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 500 400 µ [GeV] 300 200 100 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ✘ Partially ruled out by first results from Xenon100! Detection prospects maximised for low µ and / or M 1 : light LSP Scattering cross section enhanced near µ ∼ M 1 ( C χχ h , C χχ H ) Neither Z - nor h -funnel enhance SI direct detection Spin-dependent detection sensible to the Z -peak (non-universality)

  57. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 400 400 µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ✘ Partially ruled out by first results from Xenon100! Detection prospects maximised for low µ and / or M 1 : light LSP Scattering cross section enhanced near µ ∼ M 1 ( C χχ h , C χχ H ) Neither Z - nor h -funnel enhance SI direct detection ➜ NR operators deteriorates DD: increase m h and suppression C χχ h

  58. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 400 400 µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ✘ Partially ruled out by first results from Xenon100! Detection prospects maximised for low µ and / or M 1 : light LSP Scattering cross section enhanced near µ ∼ M 1 ( C χχ h , C χχ H ) Neither Z - nor h -funnel enhance SI direct detection ➜ NR operators deteriorates DD: increase m h and suppression C χχ h ✔ BMSSM satisfies all DD measurements!

  59. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Outline Motivation 1 The BMSSM 2 Dark Matter 3 Correlated stop-slepton masses Light stops, heavy sleptons Dark Matter Direct Detection 4 Dark Matter Indirect Detection 5 γ -rays Positrons Antiprotons Summary 6

  60. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter indirect detection ( γ -rays) We study the ability of Fermi to identify Gamma-rays generated in DM annihilation in the galactic center χ → b ¯ χ ¯ b , WW · · · → γ + . . .

  61. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter indirect detection ( γ -rays) We study the ability of Fermi to identify Gamma-rays generated in DM annihilation in the galactic center χ → b ¯ χ ¯ b , WW · · · → γ + . . .

  62. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter indirect detection ( γ -rays) We study the ability of Fermi to identify Gamma-rays generated in DM annihilation in the galactic center χ → b ¯ χ ¯ b , WW · · · → γ + . . .

  63. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter indirect detection ( γ -rays) We study the ability of Fermi to identify Gamma-rays generated in DM annihilation in the galactic center χ → b ¯ χ ¯ b , WW · · · → γ + . . . Fermi telescope (Launched ‘08)

  64. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter indirect detection ( γ -rays) Di ff erential event rate We study the ability of Fermi to identify Gamma-rays generated in dN i 1 � γ DM annihilation in the galactic center � ρ ( r ) 2 dl Φ γ ( E γ , ψ ) = � σ i v � dE γ 8 π m χ 2 los i χ → b ¯ χ ¯ b , WW · · · → γ + . . . dN dE : spectrum of secondary particles E γ : gamma energy � σ v � : averaged annihilation cross-section by velocity ρ ( r ): dark matter halo profile 5-years data acquisition, ∆Ω = 3 · 10 − 5 sr Background: HESS measurements (Di ff use Galactic emision and Sagittarius A ∗ ) Fermi telescope (Launched ‘08)

  65. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter indirect detection ( γ -rays) Di ff erential event rate We study the ability of Fermi to identify Gamma-rays generated in dN i � DM annihilation in the galactic center 1 � γ ρ ( r ) 2 dl Φ γ ( E γ , ψ ) = � σ i v � 8 π m χ 2 dE γ los i χ → b ¯ χ ¯ b , WW · · · → γ + . . . dN dE : spectrum of secondary particles E γ : gamma energy � σ v � : averaged annihilation cross-section by velocity ρ ( r ): dark matter halo profile 10 1 E γ · dN γ /dE γ 0.1 WW ZZ bb ττ 0.01 m χ = 100 GeV uu dd Fermi telescope (Launched ‘08) 0.001 1 10 100 E γ (GeV)

  66. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Dark matter indirect detection ( γ -rays) Di ff erential event rate We study the ability of Fermi to identify Gamma-rays generated in dN i DM annihilation in the galactic center 1 � � γ ρ ( r ) 2 dl Φ γ ( E γ , ψ ) = � σ i v � 8 π m χ 2 dE γ los i χ → b ¯ χ ¯ b , WW · · · → γ + . . . dN dE : spectrum of secondary particles E γ : gamma energy � σ v � : averaged annihilation cross-section by velocity ρ ( r ): dark matter halo profile 3 halo profiles: Einasto, NFW and NFW c (adiabatic Fermi telescope (Launched ‘08) compression due to baryons)

  67. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL

  68. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2

  69. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 Thresholds: χχ → W + W − , χχ → t ¯ t

  70. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 Thresholds: χχ → W + W − , χχ → t ¯ t Detection maximised for high tan β χχ → b ¯ b and ττ ∝ tan β and 1 / cos β

  71. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 Thresholds: χχ → W + W − , χχ → t ¯ t Detection maximised for high tan β χχ → b ¯ b and ττ ∝ tan β and 1 / cos β For large tan β thresholds weaken

  72. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 1000 900 800 700 m 1/2 [GeV] 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 Thresholds: χχ → W + W − , χχ → t ¯ t Detection maximised for high tan β χχ → b ¯ b and ττ ∝ tan β and 1 / cos β For large tan β thresholds weaken Only scenarios with highly cusped inner regions could be probed

  73. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Correlated stop-slepton masses mSUGRA BMSSM mSUGRA-like tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 1000 1000 900 900 WMAP ∼ LSP τ 800 800 LEP 700 700 NFW c m 1/2 [GeV] m 1/2 [GeV] 600 600 500 500 400 400 300 300 200 200 100 100 100 300 500 700 900 100 300 500 700 900 m 0 [GeV] m 0 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL Detection prospects maximised for low m 0 and m 1 / 2 Thresholds: χχ → W + W − , χχ → t ¯ t Detection maximised for high tan β χχ → b ¯ b and ττ ∝ tan β and 1 / cos β For large tan β thresholds weaken Only scenarios with highly cusped inner regions could be probed NR operators: Higgs pole ‘invisible’ ( v → 0)

  74. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability NFW c µ [GeV] µ [GeV] NFW Einasto 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL

  75. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability NFW c µ [GeV] µ [GeV] NFW Einasto 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ( χχ Z and χχ ± W ∓ couplings) Detection enhanced for M 1 ≫ µ

  76. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability NFW c µ [GeV] µ [GeV] NFW Einasto 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ( χχ Z and χχ ± W ∓ couplings) Detection enhanced for M 1 ≫ µ � σ v � enhanced for high tan β ( χχ → b ¯ b , WW )

  77. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability NFW c µ [GeV] µ [GeV] NFW Einasto 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ( χχ Z and χχ ± W ∓ couplings) Detection enhanced for M 1 ≫ µ � σ v � enhanced for high tan β ( χχ → b ¯ b , WW ) h -funnel could not be tested (no s -wave contribution)

  78. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 WMAP ∼ t 1 LSP LEP 400 400 V. stability NFW c µ [GeV] µ [GeV] NFW Einasto 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] Exclusion lines: ability to test and exclude at 95% CL ( χχ Z and χχ ± W ∓ couplings) Detection enhanced for M 1 ≫ µ � σ v � enhanced for high tan β ( χχ → b ¯ b , WW ) h -funnel could not be tested (no s -wave contribution) NFW and Einasto could test some regions, but not relevant

  79. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Antimatter ( e + and ¯ p ) propagation picture provided by M. Cirelli ➜ Di ff usion equation solved in the Di ff usive zone Baltz & Edsjö ’98; Lavalle, Pochon, Salati & Taillet ’06 ∂ f ∂ t = K ( E ) ∇ 2 f + Q inj + ∂ � b ( E ) f � − 2 h δ ( z ) Γ ann f − ∂ � V c f � ∂ E ∂ z di ff usion source energy loss spallation convective wind

  80. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons - Positrons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 400 400 µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV]

  81. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons - Positrons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 400 400 µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] ➜ Perspectives for the oncoming AMS-02 satellite background: Fermi & PAMELA measurements. PAMELA’s ‘heritage’: A quite large background that is di ffi cult to overcome.

  82. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons - Positrons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 400 400 µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] ➜ Perspectives for the oncoming AMS-02 satellite background: Fermi & PAMELA measurements. PAMELA’s ‘heritage’: A quite large background that is di ffi cult to overcome. ✘ PAMELA excess buries all signals

  83. Motivation The BMSSM Dark Matter Direct Detection Indirect Detection Summary Light stops, heavy sleptons - Positrons MSSM BMSSM tan β =3, ε 1 =0, ε 2 =0 tan β =3, ε 1 =-0.1, ε 2 =0 500 500 400 400 µ [GeV] µ [GeV] 300 300 200 200 100 100 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 M 1 [GeV] M 1 [GeV] ➜ Perspectives for the oncoming AMS-02 satellite background: Fermi & PAMELA measurements. PAMELA’s ‘heritage’: A quite large background that is di ffi cult to overcome. ✘ PAMELA excess buries all signals Some small hope in the region where the LSP carries a significant higgsino component, due to the rise in the coupling with Z’s

Recommend

Neutralino dark dark matter annihilation matter annihilation Neutralino in the first stars

Neutralino dark dark matter annihilation matter annihilation Neutralino in the first stars

Neutralino dark dark matter annihilation matter annihilation Neutralino in the first stars stars in the first (Divertissement in D # major for stars & DM in the early Universe) Fabio Iocco Institut de Physique Theorique, CEA/Saclay

390 views • 19 slides
Neutralino Dark Matter and polarization: a way to distinguish SUSY-GUT from CMSSM Lorenzo

Neutralino Dark Matter and polarization: a way to distinguish SUSY-GUT from CMSSM Lorenzo

ILC Physics in Florence Neutralino Dark Matter and polarization: a way to distinguish SUSY-GUT from CMSSM Lorenzo Calibbi Universidad de Valencia Firenze, 12/09/2007 First part: SUSY-GUTs, SUSY see-saw and Neutralino DM based on L.C., Y.

700 views • 36 slides
Measuring a Light (Dark Matter) Neutralino Mass at the ILC Herbi Dreiner Universit at Bonn

Measuring a Light (Dark Matter) Neutralino Mass at the ILC Herbi Dreiner Universit at Bonn

PHENO SYMPOSIUM, Madison, WI, May, 10 th , 2010 Measuring a Light (Dark Matter) Neutralino Mass at the ILC Herbi Dreiner Universit at Bonn & SCIPP, University of California, Santa Cruz . MSSM Neutralino Mixing W 3 , MSSM

461 views • 19 slides
SUSY dark matter : sneutrino or neutralino G. Blanger LAPTH Outline - SUSY DM - Light

SUSY dark matter : sneutrino or neutralino G. Blanger LAPTH Outline - SUSY DM - Light

SUSY dark matter : sneutrino or neutralino G. Blanger LAPTH Outline - SUSY DM - Light sneutrino scenario and its signatures - Neutralino vs sneutrino GB, M. Kakizaki, S. Kraml, E.K. Park, A. Pukhov in progress Introduction

1.09k views • 26 slides
Low mass dark matter Christopher M c Cabe Effective Theories and Dark Matter, Mainz 19 th

Low mass dark matter Christopher M c Cabe Effective Theories and Dark Matter, Mainz 19 th

Low mass dark matter Christopher M c Cabe Effective Theories and Dark Matter, Mainz 19 th March 2015 1. General considerations 2. A peculiar neutralino model Results from: Boehm, Dolan, CM, Increasing N eff with particles in thermal

484 views • 32 slides
Neutralino Dark Matter and Bayesian Statistics Leszek Roszkowski AstroParticle Theory and

Neutralino Dark Matter and Bayesian Statistics Leszek Roszkowski AstroParticle Theory and

Neutralino Dark Matter and Bayesian Statistics Leszek Roszkowski AstroParticle Theory and Cosmology Group Sheffield, England with Roberto Ruiz de Austri and Roberto Trotta hep-ph/0602028 JHEP06, hep-ph/0611173 JHEP07 arXiv:0705.2012

1.44k views • 127 slides
Neutralino Dark matter detection in the MSSM and NMSSM David G. Cerdeo D.G.C., C. Muoz, JHEP

Neutralino Dark matter detection in the MSSM and NMSSM David G. Cerdeo D.G.C., C. Muoz, JHEP

Neutralino Dark matter detection in the MSSM and NMSSM David G. Cerdeo D.G.C., C. Muoz, JHEP 10 (2004) 015 S. Baek, D.G.C., Y.G. Kim, P . Ko, C. Muoz, arXiv:hep-ph/0505019 D.G.C., C. Hugonie, D. Lpez-Fogliani, C. Muoz, A.M. Teixeira,

1.43k views • 107 slides
B-L Neutralino Dark Matter Roger Hernandez-Pinto in collaboration with A. Perez-Lorenzana

B-L Neutralino Dark Matter Roger Hernandez-Pinto in collaboration with A. Perez-Lorenzana

B-L Neutralino Dark Matter Roger Hernandez-Pinto in collaboration with A. Perez-Lorenzana Outline Beyond SM Neutrinos and Cosmology Neutrino mass in SM extensions B-L Model The supersymmetric B-L model RGE Neutrinos

463 views • 24 slides
Neutralino WIMP dark matter Varun Vaidya Dept. of Physics, CMU Los Alamos Natl. Lab Based on

Neutralino WIMP dark matter Varun Vaidya Dept. of Physics, CMU Los Alamos Natl. Lab Based on

Neutralino WIMP dark matter Varun Vaidya Dept. of Physics, CMU Los Alamos Natl. Lab Based on the work with M. Baumgart and I.Z. Rothstein, (PRL:114 (2015) 211301), M. Baumgart, I.Z. Rothstein, V.V (JHEP:1504(2015) 106), M. Baumgart, I.Z.

562 views • 35 slides
Credit: ESO/G Credit: ESA/Hubble DARK MATTER Dark Matter 10 x Luminous Matter Dark Matter

Credit: ESO/G Credit: ESA/Hubble DARK MATTER Dark Matter 10 x Luminous Matter Dark Matter

Credit: ESO/G Credit: ESA/Hubble DARK MATTER Dark Matter 10 x Luminous Matter Dark Matter Halo Credit: ESO/L Calada What is this Dark Matter? We do not know Weakly Interacting Massive Particles W I M P s Credit: S.

686 views • 21 slides
Dark matter and its implications at the LHC Conclusions . Numerical Calculation Motivation MC

Dark matter and its implications at the LHC Conclusions . Numerical Calculation Motivation MC

. . . . . . . . . Dark matter Sep 8, 2012 Dark matter implications at the LHC Zhao-Huan YU (IHEP) Sep 8, 2012 Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS Work in progress with Xiao-Jun BI, Qi-Shu YAN and Peng-Fei YIN Dark matter and its

340 views • 21 slides
Searching for the Dark Matter Wind: a Novel Approach to Dark Matter Detection Jocelyn Monroe, MIT

Searching for the Dark Matter Wind: a Novel Approach to Dark Matter Detection Jocelyn Monroe, MIT

Searching for the Dark Matter Wind: a Novel Approach to Dark Matter Detection Jocelyn Monroe, MIT Imperial College HEP Seminar November 8, 2007 Outline The Dark Matter Wind Dark Matter Search Strategy Directionality Where We Are Now: DMTPC

628 views • 59 slides
QUANTUM MATERIALS & DARK MATTER DETECTION MOTIVATION NEW DIRECTIONS IN DARK MATTER THEORY

QUANTUM MATERIALS & DARK MATTER DETECTION MOTIVATION NEW DIRECTIONS IN DARK MATTER THEORY

K. ZUREK Leveraging the many faces (and phases) of matter QUANTUM MATERIALS & DARK MATTER DETECTION MOTIVATION NEW DIRECTIONS IN DARK MATTER THEORY Old paradigm: weak scale dark matter (with relic density fixed by freeze-out)

644 views • 29 slides
DARK MATTER IN DSPH Paolo Salucci (& G. Gilmore) SISSA (Oxford) Outline of the Review Dark

DARK MATTER IN DSPH Paolo Salucci (& G. Gilmore) SISSA (Oxford) Outline of the Review Dark

DARK MATTER IN DSPH Paolo Salucci (& G. Gilmore) SISSA (Oxford) Outline of the Review Dark Matter is main protagonist in the Universe The concept of Dark Matter in virialized objects Dark Matter in Spirals, Ellipticals, dSphs Dark and

551 views • 28 slides
Alternatives to Dark Energy and Dark Matter and their implications Evidence for Dark Energy and

Alternatives to Dark Energy and Dark Matter and their implications Evidence for Dark Energy and

Alternatives to Dark Energy and Dark Matter and their implications Evidence for Dark Energy and Dark Matter Modified Gravity Models and their observational implications Orfeu Bertolami Instituto Superior Tcnico Departamento de Fsica

610 views • 46 slides
If Axions Make Up 20% of the Dark Matter and WIMPs Make Up 80% of the Dark Matter, How Would We

If Axions Make Up 20% of the Dark Matter and WIMPs Make Up 80% of the Dark Matter, How Would We

If Axions Make Up 20% of the Dark Matter and WIMPs Make Up 80% of the Dark Matter, How Would We Know? Andrea Andazzi (Laquila), Ignacio Izaguirre (MPP), Bithika Jain (Sryacuse), Hyungjin Kim (KAIST), Dustin Lorshbough (UT), Daniel

521 views • 14 slides
Beyond Dark Matter and Dark Energy Sean Carroll Beyond Dark Matter and Dark Energy Sean Carroll,

Beyond Dark Matter and Dark Energy Sean Carroll Beyond Dark Matter and Dark Energy Sean Carroll,

Beyond Dark Matter and Dark Energy Sean Carroll Beyond Dark Matter and Dark Energy Sean Carroll, Caltech 70% dark energy We think that 95% of the universe is dark. But what if gravity is tricking us? 5% ordinary 25% dark matter matter

632 views • 47 slides
Dark matter ManojKaplinghat under our UniversityofCalifornia,Irvine feet and in

Dark matter ManojKaplinghat under our UniversityofCalifornia,Irvine feet and in

Dark matter ManojKaplinghat under our UniversityofCalifornia,Irvine feet and in the sky Searching for Dark Matter Particles on Earth and in Space photo by Art Rosch Tuesday, June 26, 2012 dark matter searches are

575 views • 38 slides
DARK MATTER "Hubble Maps the Cosmic Web of "Clumpy" Dark Matter in 3-D" (Press

DARK MATTER "Hubble Maps the Cosmic Web of "Clumpy" Dark Matter in 3-D" (Press

1 WOLFGANG KLASSEN DARK MATTER "Hubble Maps the Cosmic Web of "Clumpy" Dark Matter in 3-D" (Press release). NASA. 7 January 2007. 2 DARK MATTER CONTENTS 1. Relating Mass and Light Gravitational lensing Tulley-Fisher

371 views • 25 slides
Earth-Scattering of Dark Matter: from sub-GeV Dark Matter to WIMPzillas Bradley J. Kavanagh

Earth-Scattering of Dark Matter: from sub-GeV Dark Matter to WIMPzillas Bradley J. Kavanagh

Earth-Scattering of Dark Matter: from sub-GeV Dark Matter to WIMPzillas Bradley J. Kavanagh LPTHE - Paris VI Based (partly) on arXiv:1611.05453 with Riccardo Catena and Chris Kouvaris AmsterDark@GRAPPA - 24th May 2017

939 views • 52 slides
SuperWIMP Dark Matter Takeo Moroi (Tokyo) 1. Introduction Popular candidate of dark matter:

SuperWIMP Dark Matter Takeo Moroi (Tokyo) 1. Introduction Popular candidate of dark matter:

SuperWIMP Dark Matter Takeo Moroi (Tokyo) 1. Introduction Popular candidate of dark matter: thermal relic of a WIMP Important alternative: SuperWIMP dark matter [Feng, Rajaraman & Takayama] SuperWIMP: super-weakly interacting massive

384 views • 17 slides
Dark Matter and Structure Formation Hai-Bo Yu University of California, Riverside TAUP , 2019

Dark Matter and Structure Formation Hai-Bo Yu University of California, Riverside TAUP , 2019

Dark Matter and Structure Formation Hai-Bo Yu University of California, Riverside TAUP , 2019 TOYAMA, JAPAN September 10, 2019 Dark Matter 27% 5% 68% Dark Matter Halos: Hosting Galaxies Aquarius Project, Springel+(2008) Dark matter is

604 views • 28 slides
Interplay of dark matter and collider physics G. Blanger LAPTH- Annecy Plan Dark matter

Interplay of dark matter and collider physics G. Blanger LAPTH- Annecy Plan Dark matter

Interplay of dark matter and collider physics G. Blanger LAPTH- Annecy Plan Dark matter Prospects for DM production at LHC Determination of DM properties at LHC Dark matter: a WIMP? Strong evidence that DM dominates over

463 views • 33 slides
Dynamical Dark Matter A New Framework for Dark-Matter Physics Brooks Thomas (University of

Dynamical Dark Matter A New Framework for Dark-Matter Physics Brooks Thomas (University of

Dynamical Dark Matter A New Framework for Dark-Matter Physics Brooks Thomas (University of Hawaii) Based on work done in collaboration with Keith Dienes [arXiv:1106.4546, arXiv:1107.0721, arXiv:1110.xxxx] A New Framework for Dark Matter

421 views • 15 slides

More recommend