national transit database biennial state programs meeting
play

National Transit Database Biennial State Programs Meeting August - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

National Transit Database Biennial State Programs Meeting August 2017 Maggie Schilling Program Manager, National Transit Database Federal Transit Administration Reporting Requirements Each transit operator that benefits from 5307 or 5311


  1. National Transit Database – Biennial State Programs Meeting August 2017 Maggie Schilling Program Manager, National Transit Database Federal Transit Administration

  2. Reporting Requirements Each transit operator that benefits from 5307 or 5311 grants must submit an annual report containing information on capital investment, operations, and service provided with the funds received, including: – Total annual revenue – Sources of revenue – Total annual operating costs – Total annual capital costs – Fleet size and type, and related facilities – Revenue vehicle miles “Cutaway” small bus – Ridership 2

  3. FY 2016 Rural Data Most Rural Transit Providers 181 rural transit providers Georgia 85 – 50 States & 4 US Territories North Carolina 83 • 1,192 rural general public subrecipients California 81 – 127 Tribes (Tribal Transit Program) Kansas 79 288 urban providers of rural service Michigan 72 – 222 providers receiving both 5307 and New York 60 5311 funds Nebraska 57 – 80 Intercity Bus providers Wisconsin 55 Texas 47 Indiana 45 Source: 2016 Agency Information 3

  4. Counties Served by 5311 Reporters • 80% of US counties have transit service States with 100% Served States with 50% or less Served Counties Counties Served Percent Alaska 18 West Virginia 25 of 55 45.50% Connecticut 8 Utah 13 of 29 44.83% Maine 16 Massachusetts 6 of 14 42.86% Vermont 14 Pennsylvania 28 of 67 41.79% Tennessee 95 Rhode Island 2 of 5 40.00% Iowa 99 Ohio 34 of 88 38.64% North Dakota 53 Delaware 1 of 3 33.33% Guam 19 Puerto Rico 4 of 78 5.13% American Samoa 3 Northern Marianas 1 Source: 2016 Recipient Counties and Admin.

  5. Rural Service ‐ 2016 • 165.5 million Unlinked Passenger Trips (UPT) – 1.6% of the National total – 3.0% of the National Non ‐ Rail Total • 573.0 million Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) – 12.1% of the National Total – 16.0% of the National Non ‐ Rail Total • 32.3 million Vehicle Revenue Hours (VRH) – 10.4% of the National Total – 12.5% of the National Non ‐ Rail Total Source: 2016 NTD Federal Funding Allocation – rural numbers include rural service reported in the urban module

  6. Growth In Rural Transit ‐ Ridership 200,000,000 • Data on rural 180,000,000 service provided by 160,000,000 urban reporters 140,000,000 120,000,000 started in 2010 100,000,000 • Data on rural 80,000,000 60,000,000 service started in 40,000,000 2007 20,000,000 ‐ 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Rural Providers Urban ‐ Rural

  7. Vehicles by Year Built 3500 • 1946 oldest vehicle (a ferryboat) 3000 • 1967 oldest bus 2500 • 1997 oldest automobile 2000 • 74% built after 2007 1500 • 37% built after 2011 1000 500 0 1946 1963 1967 1981 1982 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: 2016 Revenue Vehicle Inventory

  8. Fleet Size 120 • 25,552 vehicles • 148 (12%) with just one or two vehicles 100 • Largest has 872 vehicles 80 60 40 20 0 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 100 103 106 109 112 115 Source: 2016 Revenue Vehicle Inventory

  9. Ridership – Top States State UPT* Colorado 15.3 California 7.2 Michigan 6.7 Washington 6.3 Tennessee 4.8 North Carolina 4.5 Iowa 4.4 Illinois 4.3 Minnesota 3.9 New York 3.6 * In millions Source: 2016 NTD Rural Only Federal Funding Allocation

  10. Ridership – Top 10 (By Subrecipient) Subrecipient State UPT Roaring Fork Transportation Authority CO 4.8 Town of Mountain Village CO 2.8 Pigeon Forge Fun Time Trolleys TN 2.8 Mayor and City Council Town of Ocean City MD 2.6 Park City Municipal Corporation UT 1.9 AppalCart NC 1.8 Summit County CO 1.8 City of Macomb IL 1.6 OATS, Inc. MO 1.5 Martha’s Vineyard Transit Authority MA 1.4 * In millions Source: 2016 NTD Federal Funding Allocation

  11. 2016 Rural Transit Funding – Capital and Operating Contract Fares Revenues 6% 8% Federal 43% Other 3% State 18% Local 22% Source: 2016 Revenue Sources

  12. 2016 Rural Transit Operating Funding Sources Fares 7% Contract Revenues Federal 10% Other 39% 3% State 18% Local 23% Source: 2016 Revenue Sources

  13. 2016 Rural Transit Capital Funding Sources Other Contract Revenues 1% 1% State 16% Local 17% Federal 65% Source: 2016 Revenue Sources

  14. 5311 Funds Reported $700 5% avg. annual growth $600 $86 $79 $70 $500 $62 $60 $400 $300 $510 $501 $470 $431 $430 $200 $100 $0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 14 Source: 2016 Revenue Sources

  15. Rural vs. Urban Cost Effectiveness • Bus Operating $ per Vehicle Revenue Mile – Urban = $11.25/mile – Rural = $3.88/mile • Demand Response $ per ride (UPT) – Urban = $35.96/ride – Rural = $16.67/ride Source: 2016 Federal Funding Allocation

  16. Rural Bus Operating Costs Urban Average ‐ $11.25 $10.00 $8.00 Operating Cost per Mile ($) $6.00 Average is $3.88 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Thousands of Vehicle Revenue Miles Source: 2016 Federal Funding Allocation (Rural and Tribes)

  17. Rural DR Operating Costs 100 90 80 70 Operating Cost per Trip ($) 60 50 Urban Average - $35.96 40 30 Average is $16.67 20 10 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Thousands of Passenger Trips Source: 2016 Federal Funding Allocation (Rural and Tribes)

  18. Rural Safety Data Rural Injuries Rural Fatalities 350 18 16 300 14 250 12 200 10 8 150 6 100 4 50 2 0 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: 2016 Safety Data

  19. New Asset Reporting Requirements

  20. TAM Purpose • Monitor and manage public transportation capital assets to: – Enhance safety, – Reduce maintenance costs, – increase reliability, and – Improve performance • Objective is to reach and maintain a state of good repair (SGR) – Condition in which a capital asset operates at a full level of performance.

  21. TAM Phase ‐ In Schedule Submit Narrative NTD Fiscal Report Report on Report Report Year Report Internal Meeting Condition Condition to be Set Internal Targets to Targets to Data on Data on Submitted Targets NTD NTD Vehicles Facilities Required Not Not January 2017 Optional Not Required (For FY17) Required Required Required RY 2017 Optional Not Required Optional Optional (For FY18) Required RY 2018 Required Not Required Required 1/4 Required (For FY19) Required RY 2019 Required Required Required 2/4 Required (For FY20) Required RY 2020 Required Required Required 3/4 Required (For FY21)

  22. TAM Inventory • More inclusive than the inventory reported to the NTD • Inventory of all assets used to provide service – Provider owned, jointly ‐ procured, owned by third party • Except equipment with acquisition cost < $50,000 (service vehicles excluded) • Condition assessment of inventoried assets for which provider has capital responsibility

  23. TAM NTD Annual Reporting Requirements 1. Annual performance targets (A ‐ 90) • Performance targets for next fiscal year – (e.g., targets submitted in RY 2018 report for RY 2019) 2. Inventory and Condition data Facilities ( A ‐ 15) • • Revenue vehicles (A ‐ 30) • Service vehicles (A ‐ 35) • Track (A ‐ 20) 3. Narrative report of progress by end of report year • Change in condition • Progress toward meeting targets set in last year’s report

  24. What is reportable? Asset Type Inventory Required Condition Assessment Required Passenger Facility All If you have full or partial capital replacement responsibility Administrative/ If you have full or partial If you have full or partial capital Maintenance Facilities capital replacement replacement responsibility responsibility Track/Guideway All If you have full or partial capital replacement responsibility Revenue Vehicles All If you have full or partial capital replacement responsibility Service Vehicles If you fund its replacement If you have full or partial capital replacement responsibility

  25. TAM Performance Measures Vehicles Equipment Percentage of vehicles that have met or exceeded their (Non ‐ Revenue Service Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) Vehicles) Rolling Stock Percentage of revenue vehicles within a particular asset (Revenue Vehicles) class that have met or exceeded their ULB Infrastructure Not Applicable for State Reporters Rail Guideway, Tracks, Percentage of track segments with performance Signals, Systems restrictions by class Facilities Facilities Within Asset Percentage of facilities with a condition rating below 3.0 on Class the FTA Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM) scale (1=Poor to 5=Excellent)

  26. Useful Life Benchmark (ULB) • Definition – Expected lifecycle or the acceptable period of use in service for an asset as determined by transit provider OR – Default benchmark provided by FTA • Key Considerations – ULB takes into account a provider’s unique operating environment (e.g., geography, service frequency, climate) – ULB ≠ Useful life for FTA grant programs

  27. TAM Group Plan Reporting • A sponsor can develop a group TAM plan for at least one Tier II provider • Sponsor • A State, designated recipient, or direct recipient Tier II Provider • • Operates < 101 VOMS across fixed ‐ route modes or in any one non ‐ fixed route mode AND Does not operate rail •

Recommend


More recommend