Name Group Presentation - Negotiation Case Analysis Description - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

9/8/2018 4189-16302 Name Group Presentation - Negotiation Case Analysis Description Rubric for evaluation of group presentation of a negotiation case analysis. Rubric Detail Levels of Achievement Good. Nope. Almost. (Partially Yep. Wow. Criteria (Exceeds (Unsatisfactory) Satisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Exceptional) Expectations) Analysis 0 % 75 % 85 % 95 % 100 % Weight Presentation Team connects one or Team Analysis goes Insightful and 50.00% describes or two points in the accurately beyond the deep analysis of presents the facts negotiation case with connects key most obvious the case that of the concepts from class. concepts aspects of the uncovers and negotiation, but Some concepts are from the negotiation. evaluates fails to connect applied incorrectly, or course to the Team not only elements not the case with team is unable to appropriate connects key obvious on the particular explain how the points in the concepts to surface. Makes negotiation concept applies to the case study. the case but use of case to concepts from case. Or the team The case evaluates make an class. makes very few provides whether interesting and connections (fewer useful particular unique point that than 3) between the examples of strategies goes beyond case and the class. several worked well or what we have points from poorly in this discussed in class. context. class. https://courseware.ku.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_26411_1&course_id=_290378_1 1/3

9/8/2018 4189-16302 Levels of Achievement Good. Nope. Almost. (Partially Yep. Wow. Criteria (Exceeds (Unsatisfactory) Satisfactory) (Satisfactory) (Exceptional) Expectations) Originality 0 % 75 % 85 % 95 % 100 % Same source Same source material Clip available Original Original material Weight material and very with some analysis on YouTube material. (Clip (not a clip 25.00% similar analysis available on with a title may be already available on YouTube/Internet, but that includes available on designated as a YouTube/internet. some signi�cant "negotiation" YouTube etc negotiation on (NOTE: If the di�erences between but no but not tagged YouTube), that is presentation is internet version and analysis as a made even more simply a copy of presentation in class. included on negotiation original through an available YouTube clip and does the team's project, the group version. not include creative use or will receive a negotiation editing of it. failing grade for analysis.) the entire project.) Presentation 0 % 75 % 85 % 95 % 100 % Group was Presentation seemed Presentation Team worked Exceptionally Weight woefully unrehearsed or clearly well together creative and 25.00% unprepared for information was not delivered the to present the memorable the presentation, clearly presented. Or information. information in delivery of the or failed to give one or more team Each team a clear and information. the presentation members did not member had entertaining Team worked altogether. participate in the a role. way. Every together very presentation. team member well, playing o� participated each other rather and the than simply presentation passing the was well- presentation rehearsed. from one person to the next. View Associated Items https://courseware.ku.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_26411_1&course_id=_290378_1 2/3

9/8/2018 4189-16302 Print Close Window https://courseware.ku.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_26411_1&course_id=_290378_1 3/3