mpac presentation to the
play

MPAC Presentation to the Federation of Ontario Cottagers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MPAC Presentation to the Federation of Ontario Cottagers Associations Larry Hummel, B.A., M.I.M.A., FRICS MPACs Chief Assessor October 26, 2012 What you will learn 2012 Assessment Update Trends and Analysis Residential


  1. MPAC Presentation to the Federation of Ontario Cottagers’ Associations Larry Hummel, B.A., M.I.M.A., FRICS MPAC’s Chief Assessor October 26, 2012

  2. What you will learn… • 2012 Assessment Update • Trends and Analysis – Residential • Trends and Analysis – Waterfront • AboutMyProperty TM • Value Review Process

  3. Four-year Assessment Cycle Update Year Valuation Date Taxation Year(s) 2005 January 1, 2005 2006, 2007, 2008 2008 January 1, 2008 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 2012 January 1, 2012 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016

  4. Assessed Value of Your Property Property Classification Residential Assessed Value as of January 1, 2012 $ 600,000 Assessed Value as of January 1, 2008 $ 500,000 Over 4 Years Your Property’s Value Changed By $ 100,000 2013 Tax Year $525,000 2014 Tax Year $550,000 2015 Tax Year $575,000 2016 Tax Year $600,000

  5. Assessed Value of Your Property Property Classification Residential Assessed Value as of January 1, 2012 $ 500,000 Assessed Value as of January 1, 2008 $ 600,000 Over 4 Years Your Property’s Value Changed By $ -100,000 2013 Tax Year $500,000 2014 Tax Year $500,000 2015 Tax Year $500,000 2016 Tax Year $500,000

  6. Trends and Analysis Residential

  7. Residential Tax Class Growth By Zone 40% 35% 30% % Change 25% 22.5 20% 22.3 Prov. 21.8 AVG. 15% Central South 18% South West 10% 11.7 9.34 North Central 5% 7.3 North East GTA 0% South GTA Central North Central East West North South

  8. 2012 Assessment Update

  9. Toronto 2012 Assessment Update

  10. GTA 2012 Assessment Update

  11. Ottawa 2012 Assessment Update

  12. Residential – Western Ontario Cities 2012 Assessment Update

  13. Residential – Other Ontario Cities 2012 Assessment Update

  14. Waterfront – Muskoka/Parry Sound/ Haliburton/ Kawartha Lakes * For illustration purposes only

  15. Market Area – Peterborough County & City of Kawartha Lakes * For illustration purposes only 2012 Assessment Update

  16. Market Area – Haliburton County * For illustration purposes only 2012 Assessment Update

  17. Market Area – Muskoka/Parry Sound (Large Lakes) * For illustration purposes only 2012 Assessment Update

  18. Market Area – Muskoka/Parry Sound (Small Lakes) * For illustration purposes only 2012 Assessment Update

  19. Market Area – Muskoka/Parry Sound (Georgian Bay) * For illustration purposes only 2012 Assessment Update

  20. District of Muskoka 2008 CVA to 2012 CVA 9 7.99 8 7 Percentage Shift 6 Region AVG. 5 4.64 5.2% 4 2.9 3 1.93 2 1 0 Single Family Semi Detached Single Seasonal on Residential Family/Water Water

  21. Georgian Bay 2008 CVA to 2012 CVA 30 24.29 25 Percentage Shift 20 Region AVG. 16.36 15 17.1% 9.3 10 5 0 Single Family Single Family/Water Seasonal on Water Residential

  22. County of Simcoe 2008 CVA to 2012 CVA 12 11.29 11.38 11.02 10 Region AVG. Percentage Shift 7.61 8.7% 8 6 4 2 0 Single Family Semi Detached Single Seasonal on Residential Family/Water Water

  23. County of Haliburton 2008 CVA to 2012 CVA 12 10.03 10 Percentage Shift 8 6 Region AVG. 4 3.34 4.3% 1.77 1.64 2 0 Single Family Semi Detached Single Seasonal on Residential Family/Water Water

  24. Kawartha Lakes 2008 CVA to 2012 CVA 8 6.8 7 Region 6 AVG. Percentage Shift 4.67 5.8% 5 3.6 3.83 4 3 2 1 0 Single Family Semi Detached Single Seasonal on Residential Family/Water Water

  25. County of Peterborough 2008 CVA to 2012 CVA 14 11.75 12 Region 9.94 10 AVG. Percentage Shift 8.71 10.5% 8 6.91 6 4 2 0 Single Family Semi Detached Single Seasonal on Residential Family/Water Water

  26. Why Waterfront Values Increased at a lower rate from 2008 to 2012? • Declining water levels on lakes • Economic downturn = less discretionary income • Rising fuel costs • Recreational accommodation values may have reached a peak • Demographic shift

  27. AboutMyProperty ™ www.aboutmyproperty.ca

  28. AboutMyProperty™ • Web-based, self service application available at no charge to property owners • Username and password provided on the Property Assessment Notice • Access to detailed property assessment information • Includes options to select properties of interest from an interactive map

  29. *Not for distribution

  30. Value Review Process

  31. Request for Reconsideration (RfR)  If you feel your assessed value as of the legislated valuation date or property classification is not correct, we will review it free of charge  Beginning in 2009, RfR is the mandatory first step for properties in the:  Residential Property Class  Farm Property Class  Managed Forest Property Class  RfR not mandatory for business classes, may file RfR or directly file an Appeal with the Assessment Review Board (ARB)  Deadline to file a RfR is April 1, 2013

  32. RfR Process 1) MPAC reviews the RfR and supporting documentation provided by the property taxpayer 2) During the review, we may determine that an adjustment is warranted or that the property assessment accurately reflects a January 1, 2012 current value 3) Once completed, MPAC mails a results letter to advise the property taxpayer about the outcome of their RfR 4) If the property taxpayer is not satisfied with the outcome, they have the option to file an appeal with the Assessment Review Board within 90 days from the date appearing on the results letter from MPAC

  33. Assessment Review Board (ARB)  At an ARB hearing, the onus is on MPAC to prove the accuracy of the assessed value  ARB must apply two tests on an appeal: • Determine the current value of the property (accuracy) • Have reference to similar lands in the vicinity and adjust the assessment to make it equitable only if comparison results in reduction (equity)

  34. Thank You Questions?

Recommend


More recommend