monotone paths in dense edge ordered graphs
play

Monotone Paths in Dense Edge-Ordered Graphs Kevin G. Milans ( - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Monotone Paths in Dense Edge-Ordered Graphs Kevin G. Milans ( milans@math.wvu.edu ) West Virginia University AMS Spring Southeastern Sectional Meeting University of Georgia Athens, GA March 5, 2016 Monotone paths Let G be a graph whose


  1. Monotone Paths in Dense Edge-Ordered Graphs Kevin G. Milans ( milans@math.wvu.edu ) West Virginia University AMS Spring Southeastern Sectional Meeting University of Georgia Athens, GA March 5, 2016

  2. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ .

  3. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6

  4. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order.

  5. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order.

  6. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order. ◮ The altitude of G , denoted f ( G ), is the maximum integer k such that every edge-ordering of G has a monotone path of length k .

  7. Monotone paths ◮ Let G be a graph whose edges are ordered according to a labeling ϕ . 1 2 4 3 5 6 ◮ A monotone path traverses edges in increasing order. ◮ The altitude of G , denoted f ( G ), is the maximum integer k such that every edge-ordering of G has a monotone path of length k . ◮ [Chv´ atal–Koml´ os (1971)] What is f ( K n )?

  8. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4

  9. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4 ◮ R¨ odl: Graham–Kleitman and design theory give f ( K n ) ≤ ( 2 3 + o (1)) n

  10. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4 ◮ R¨ odl: Graham–Kleitman and design theory give f ( K n ) ≤ ( 2 3 + o (1)) n ◮ Alspach–Heinrich–Graham (unpublished): f ( K n ) ≤ ( 7 12 + o (1)) n

  11. Prior work Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 2 ≤ f ( K n ) ≤ 3 n 4 ◮ R¨ odl: Graham–Kleitman and design theory give f ( K n ) ≤ ( 2 3 + o (1)) n ◮ Alspach–Heinrich–Graham (unpublished): f ( K n ) ≤ ( 7 12 + o (1)) n Theorem (Calderbank–Chung–Sturtevant (1984)) f ( K n ) ≤ ( 1 2 + o (1)) n

  12. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } .

  13. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } .

  14. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } . ◮ Mynhardt–Burger–Clark–Falvai–Henderson (2005): the max. altitude of a 3-regular graph is 4, achieved by the flower snarks.

  15. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } . ◮ Mynhardt–Burger–Clark–Falvai–Henderson (2005): the max. altitude of a 3-regular graph is 4, achieved by the flower snarks. Theorem (De Silva–Molla–Pfender–Retter–Tait (2015+)) ◮ f ( Q n ) ≥ n / lg n

  16. Prior work II ◮ Roditty–Shoham–Yuster (2001): the max. altitude of a planar graph is in { 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 } . ◮ Alon (2003): the max. altitude of a k -regular graph is in { k , k + 1 } . ◮ Mynhardt–Burger–Clark–Falvai–Henderson (2005): the max. altitude of a 3-regular graph is 4, achieved by the flower snarks. Theorem (De Silva–Molla–Pfender–Retter–Tait (2015+)) ◮ f ( Q n ) ≥ n / lg n ◮ If p ( n ) = ω (log n / √ n ) , then f ( G ( n , p )) ≥ (1 − o (1)) √ n with probability tending to 1 .

  17. Random edge-orderings Theorem (Lavrov–Loh (2015+)) ◮ With probability tending to 1 , a random edge-labeling of K n has a monotone path of length 0 . 85 n.

  18. Random edge-orderings Theorem (Lavrov–Loh (2015+)) ◮ With probability tending to 1 , a random edge-labeling of K n has a monotone path of length 0 . 85 n. ◮ With probability at least 1 / e − o (1) , a random edge-labeling of K n has a Hamiltonian monotone path.

  19. Random edge-orderings Theorem (Lavrov–Loh (2015+)) ◮ With probability tending to 1 , a random edge-labeling of K n has a monotone path of length 0 . 85 n. ◮ With probability at least 1 / e − o (1) , a random edge-labeling of K n has a Hamiltonian monotone path. Conjecture (Lavrov–Loh) With high probability, a random edge-labeling of K n has a Hamiltonian monotone path.

  20. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2

  21. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2 Theorem (R¨ odl (1973)) √ If G has average degree d, then f ( G ) ≥ (1 − o (1)) d.

  22. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2 Theorem (R¨ odl (1973)) √ If G has average degree d, then f ( G ) ≥ (1 − o (1)) d. Theorem Let G be an n-vertex graph, and let s = Cn 1 / 3 (lg n ) 2 / 3 . If G has average degree d, then 4 s 2 � � � � � � f ( G ) ≥ d 1 − 2 1 − 1 1 − . 4 s d − 2 d s

  23. Our result Theorem (Graham–Kleitman (1973)) � n − 3 4 − 1 f ( K n ) ≥ 2 Theorem (R¨ odl (1973)) √ If G has average degree d, then f ( G ) ≥ (1 − o (1)) d. Theorem Let G be an n-vertex graph, and let s = Cn 1 / 3 (lg n ) 2 / 3 . If G has average degree d, then 4 s 2 � � � � � � f ( G ) ≥ d 1 − 2 1 − 1 1 − . 4 s d − 2 d s Corollary f ( K n ) ≥ ( 1 20 − o (1))( n / lg n ) 2 / 3

  24. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n .

  25. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1

  26. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G .

  27. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G .

  28. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top.

  29. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  30. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  31. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  32. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 35 14 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  33. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 35 46 14 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 4 15 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

  34. The height table ◮ Let G be a graph with vertices w 1 , . . . , w n . w 2 w 1 5 11 13 13 7 12 12 2 9 w 3 w 6 6 16 24 35 46 56 14 14 3 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 5 w 6 10 8 8 4 15 15 w 4 w 5 1 ◮ The height table A has a column for each vertex in G . ◮ Fill in the cells row by row, from bottom to top. ◮ Next entry in column i is the edge incident to w i with largest label not already appearing in A .

Recommend


More recommend