model review
play

Model Review May 11, 2016 1 Agenda Overview of model files - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jun 19, 2023 •91 likes •656 views

Model Review May 11, 2016 1 Agenda Overview of model files provided for review Calibration Results Technical Team Review Process External Peer Review Process Next Steps Public Input 2 Overview of Model Files (Provided

  1. Model Review May 11, 2016 1

  2. Agenda  Overview of model files provided for review  Calibration Results  Technical Team Review Process  External Peer Review Process  Next Steps  Public Input 2

  3. Overview of Model Files (Provided on 05/02/16)  Groundwater Model  Modflow Command line version  Groundwater Vistas version  GIS Files  Calibration geodatabase  Well package geodatabase  Responses to Technical Team Comments (submitted from October 2015 to January 2016)  Calibration Maps, Tables and Graphs  HSPF Files (if external hard drive provided) 3

  4. Groundwater Model  Modflow command line version  GVistas version 4

  5. GIS Files  Calibration geodatabase  Well package geodatabase 5

  6. Calibration Results  Entire Model Domain  North Florida Water Supply Planning Area  Keystone Heights 6

  7. Entire Model Domain 7

  8. SAS Water Levels 8

  9. SAS Water Level Residuals 9

  10. UFA Water Levels 10

  11. UFA Water Level Residuals 11

  12. LFA Water Levels 12

  13. LFA Water Level Residuals 13

  14. SAS/UFA Water Level Difference 14

  15. SAS/UFA Water Level Difference Residual 15

  16. UFA/LFA Water Level Difference 16

  17. UFA/LFA Water Level Difference Residual 17

  18. UFA Potentometric Map 2010 2009 May/June Average 18

  19. Springs (Individual Vents) 19

  20. Springs (Large spring groups) 20

  21. Springs 2001 21

  22. Springs 2009 (Target flow is in question) 22

  23. Baseflows GAGE Baseflow2001 Baseflow2009 BF01 BF09 2176500 PART PART 34.82047 33.9238 2197500 Zero weight Zero weight 5100.717 5380.907 2197830 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 189.41 275.06 2198000 Zero weight Zero weight 261.5639 408.5153 2198100 PART PART 8.033171 10.10993 2198500 Zero weight Zero weight 5453.015 7258.601 2198690 PART PART 8.706037 39.95236 2201230 Zero weight Zero weight 541.6235 1185.906 2202040 Zero weight PART 699.9122 1287.685 2202190 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 1109.71 1679.86 2202500 Zero weight Zero weight 854.4814 1662.142 2202600 PART HSPF/low weight 22.37391 122.3639 2203000 PART PART 123.3907 256.9959 2203518 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 656.16 945.54 2215000 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 1292.374 2142.927 2215100 PART PART 60.95845 132.4766 2215260 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 2127.45 3040.97 2215500 HSPF HSPF 2333.293 3423.662 2215900 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 172.22 284.54 2216180 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 26.63283 63.35481 2223500 Zero weight Zero weight 1853.359 2828.815 2224500 Zero weight HSPF 1624.587 3231.738 2224940 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 5033.36 7796.27 2225000 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 5012.24 7943.75 2225270 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 241.5 355.82 2225500 Zero weight Zero weight 415.1159 685.1783 2226000 HSPF HSPF 5724.65 8618.454 2226100 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 147.62 175.11 2226362 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 340.93 521.9 2227270 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 96.52 241.12 2227500 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 93.17 501.58 2228000 PART PART 587.4256 1298.087 2228500 PART PART 10.83654 75.97353 2229000 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 4.5 49.54 2229250 PART Zero weight 3.970942 79.51 23 2230500 HSPF/low weight HSPF/low weight 66.16 114.29

  24. Cumulative Baseflows 24

  25. Cumulative Baseflow Residuals 2001 25

  26. Cumulative Baseflow Residuals 2009 (Less Confidence with the target baseflows) 26

  27. Calibration Statistics Target Wells North Florida WSP All Target Wells (# of WL Data > 1) Area Proposed Statistical Criterion Target 2001 2009 2001 2009 2001 2009 -5 feet < Residual < 5 feet 80% 76% 79% 79% 80% 82% 83% -2.5 feet < Residual < 2.5 feet 50% 49% 53% 52% 54% 60% 59% Mean Error 0.2 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.5 0.1 Absolute Mean Error 3.5 3.2 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.7 Root Mean Square of Error 4.9 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.1 3.7 Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 27

  28. North Florida Water Supply Planning Area 28

  29. SAS Water Level Residuals 29

  30. UFA Water Level Residuals 30

  31. LFA Water Level Residuals 31

  32. SAS/UFA WL Difference 2001 32

  33. SAS/UFA WL Difference 2009 33

  34. UFA/LFA WL Difference 2001 34

  35. UFA/LFA WL Difference 2009 35

  36. Keystone Heights 2001 36

  37. Keystone Heights 2009 37

  38. Keystone Height Lake Seepage Leakage to the UFA Lake Simulated Literature Lake Magnolia 19 - 36 in/yr 16 - 113 in/yr Lake Lowry 40 - 44 in/yr 28 - 89 in/yr Lake Geneva 6 - 9 in/yr 7 - 13 in/yr Lake Brooklyn 56 - 94 in/yr 36 - 100 in/yr 38

  39. Water Budget 2009 39

  40. Recharge Maps 40

  41. Flooding 2009 41

  42. Aquifer Parameters 42

  43. SAS Ks 43

  44. Layer 2 ICU where exists 44

  45. UFA Ts 45

  46. Layer 4 MCU where exists 46

  47. Layer 5 LFA where exists 47

  48. Final Technical Team Review Process 48

  49. Files Delivered on 05/02/16  Modflow files  Groundwater Vistas file  Geodatabase including Calibration Targets  Tables, Graphs and Maps for Calibration Results  A document including brief description of model files  Responses to initial technical team comments  HSPF Files 49

  50. Expected Timeline for Technical Team Review Technical Team Review 5/2/2016 - 7/1/2016 6/1/2016 - Planning Level Model Updates 7/29/2016 Model Files Preparation for 4/18/2016 - 5/2/2016 Review Technical Team Meeting 5/11/2016 Model Calibration Completed Initial Comments Final Comments 4/18/2016 5/27/2016 7/1/2016 Model Delivery Technical Team Meeting Technical Team Meeting 5/2/2016 6/1/2016 7/6/2016 2016 Apr May Jun Jul Today 50

  51. External Peer Review Process  Develop selection criteria  Develop a list of potential candidates  Tech Team provide suggestions for consideration by 5/18/2016  Develop a short list  6 for MODFLOW (3 primary, 3 substitute if needed)  3 for HSPF (1 primary, 2 substitute if needed)  Select top 3 candidates for MODFLOW model and 1 candidate for HSPF models  Contact the candidates for availability 51

  52. Selection Criteria General Criteria  Free of conflicts of interest  Not member of the model development team  Not member of the technical review team  Well qualified by virtue of education and work experience  Responsive and able to meet deadlines Specific Criteria  Experience in constructing and calibrating a regional-scale groundwater flow model  Educational background in engineering, geology, hydrology, or other related earth science Specialized expertise or experience in one or more of the following is beneficial  Development of models with an emphasis on surface-water/groundwater interactions  Developing groundwater flow models for Floridan Aquifer system  Analysis or modeling of near-surface hydrological processes  Experience in calibrating regional groundwater models using PEST  Experience in peer review of regional groundwater flow models using MODFLOW code 52

  53. Next Steps  Technical Team Review  Model Scenarios  External Peer Review 53

  54. Upcoming Meetings  Technical Team Meetings  June 01, 2016  July 06, 2016 (could be a joint meeting w/ Steering team) 54

  55. Public Input 55

Recommend

EUROPEAN GAS TARGET MODEL REVIEW AND UPDATE European Gas Target Model review and update January

EUROPEAN GAS TARGET MODEL REVIEW AND UPDATE European Gas Target Model review and update January

EUROPEAN GAS TARGET MODEL REVIEW AND UPDATE European Gas Target Model review and update January 2015 Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators Trg Republike 3 Ljubljana - Slovenia European Gas Target Model Review and update Table

777 views • 45 slides
Merced Water Resources Model (MercedWRM) Application to GSP Development May 29,2018 Meeting

Merced Water Resources Model (MercedWRM) Application to GSP Development May 29,2018 Meeting

Merced Water Resources Model (MercedWRM) Application to GSP Development May 29,2018 Meeting Agenda Introductions Review of Model Input Data Review of Model Calibration Review of Model Baseline Discussion on Model Applications

963 views • 51 slides
CAD' Model' Red-B Sketch'Model'Review'' Product Questions ! How can we make MagneGlasses a more

CAD' Model' Red-B Sketch'Model'Review'' Product Questions ! How can we make MagneGlasses a more

MagneGlasses Temple-free Eyewear CAD' Model' Red-B Sketch'Model'Review'' Product Questions ! How can we make MagneGlasses a more comfortable user experience compared to current glasses? % Red-B Sketch'Model'Review'' Product Questions ! How can

479 views • 12 slides
23/05/18 Agenda Season Review Financial Review The Model Questions Alex

23/05/18 Agenda Season Review Financial Review The Model Questions Alex

Supporters Trust Open Meeting 23/05/18 Agenda Season Review Financial Review The Model Questions Alex Tunbridge Chief Executive Agenda Club Update First Team Retail Match Day Ticketing GDPR Academy

658 views • 39 slides
CTL Chapter 6 Part 2 Overview Review CTL Model Checking CTL model Checking algorithms

CTL Chapter 6 Part 2 Overview Review CTL Model Checking CTL model Checking algorithms

CTL Chapter 6 Part 2 Overview Review CTL Model Checking CTL model Checking algorithms for ( U ) Counter Examples and witnesses Symbolic Model Checking (Thursday) Binary Decision Trees

740 views • 40 slides
Model Users Group Meeting TMIP Peer Review NCSITE June 9,2004 Rhett Fussell, PE Model Research

Model Users Group Meeting TMIP Peer Review NCSITE June 9,2004 Rhett Fussell, PE Model Research

Model Users Group Meeting TMIP Peer Review NCSITE June 9,2004 Rhett Fussell, PE Model Research &amp; Development Team TMIP Peer Review, How Were You? , The Mystery of TPBs Modeling Efforts! Purpose of the Review Discussion Points of

322 views • 20 slides
Information Retrieval Tutorial 4: Vector Space Model Professor: Michel Schellekens TA: Ang Gao

Information Retrieval Tutorial 4: Vector Space Model Professor: Michel Schellekens TA: Ang Gao

Review Information Retrieval Tutorial 4: Vector Space Model Professor: Michel Schellekens TA: Ang Gao University College Cork 2012-11-15 Vector Space Model 1 / 21 Review Outline Review 1 Vector Space Model 2 / 21 Review Simple

1.13k views • 83 slides
AIP Plexos Market Simulation Model Validation Project Workshop 1 Proposed Model Review

AIP Plexos Market Simulation Model Validation Project Workshop 1 Proposed Model Review

AIP Plexos Market Simulation Model Validation Project Workshop 1 Proposed Model Review Process Mike Wilks, Principal Consultant, Markets &amp; Regulation 18 January 2007, Davenport Hotel, Dublin Experience you can trust. Presentation

447 views • 18 slides
COAA Best Practices Conference XIX Canadian Model Best Practice Review May 18, 2011 Workshop

COAA Best Practices Conference XIX Canadian Model Best Practice Review May 18, 2011 Workshop

Canadian Model Best Practice Review COAA Best Practices Conference XIX Canadian Model Best Practice Review May 18, 2011 Workshop Ground rules Please: put your cell phone on silent or vibrate, avoid side conversations, and keep

398 views • 39 slides
Review of the Relational Model 5DV120 Database System Principles Ume a University

Review of the Relational Model 5DV120 Database System Principles Ume a University

Review of the Relational Model 5DV120 Database System Principles Ume a University Department of Computing Science Stephen J. Hegner hegner@cs.umu.se http://www.cs.umu.se/~hegner Review of the Relational Model 20130410 Slide 1 of 22

333 views • 22 slides
More ASP.NET Page model, Session State, Data Binding Today ASP.NET review Page model

More ASP.NET Page model, Session State, Data Binding Today ASP.NET review Page model

More ASP.NET Page model, Session State, Data Binding Today ASP.NET review Page model Session State Data Binding and List-Bound controls Shopping Cart Demo Review: Example Web Form &lt;%@ Page language=&quot;c#&quot;

367 views • 10 slides
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland

Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland

Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment Systems November 2014 1 Approved New All-Payer Model Maryland is implementing a new All-Payer Model for

307 views • 11 slides
Graphical models Review P [( x y z ) ( y u ) ( z w ) ( z

Graphical models Review P [( x y z ) ( y u ) ( z w ) ( z

Graphical models Review P [( x y z ) ( y u ) ( z w ) ( z u v )] Dynamic programming on graphs ! variable elimination example ! Graphical model = graph + model ! e.g., Bayes net: DAG + CPTs !

469 views • 33 slides
Future Danube Model H2020|Insurance model review meeting, London Martin Drews Kai Schrter, Max

Future Danube Model H2020|Insurance model review meeting, London Martin Drews Kai Schrter, Max

Future Danube Model H2020|Insurance model review meeting, London Martin Drews Kai Schrter, Max Steinhausen, Stefan Ldtke, Viktor Rzer, Heidi Kreibich Michel Wortmann, Fred Hattermann November, 13, 2018 H2020 Insurance project

706 views • 44 slides
Review:$$ Model$Selec5on$ Training$vs.$Test$errors$ Polynomial$regression$

Review:$$ Model$Selec5on$ Training$vs.$Test$errors$ Polynomial$regression$

Review:$$ Model$Selec5on$ Training$vs.$Test$errors$ Polynomial$regression$ Model$complexity:$Degree$of$polynomial$ Is$larger$always$be^er?$ Test$ Error$ Train$ Model$complexity$ Model$Selec5on$Criterion$

404 views • 14 slides
Computer Architecture Review CS 562 1 The von Neumann Model John von Neumann (1946)

Computer Architecture Review CS 562 1 The von Neumann Model John von Neumann (1946)

Computer Architecture Review CS 562 1 The von Neumann Model John von Neumann (1946) proposed that a fundamental model of a computer should include 5 primary components : Memory Processing Unit Input Device(s) Output

451 views • 16 slides
Caches Samira Khan March 23, 2017 Agenda Review from last lecture Data flow model

Caches Samira Khan March 23, 2017 Agenda Review from last lecture Data flow model

Caches Samira Khan March 23, 2017 Agenda Review from last lecture Data flow model Memory hierarchy More Caches The Dataflow Model (of a Computer) Von Neumann model: An instruction is fetched and executed in control flow

729 views • 41 slides
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland

Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland

Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment Systems January 2015 1 Outline of Presentation Introductions Overview of New Maryland All-Payer Model and

463 views • 18 slides
Review of Model Existence Theorem MAT309, Fall 2019 Completeness Theorem. If | = , then

Review of Model Existence Theorem MAT309, Fall 2019 Completeness Theorem. If | = , then

Review of Model Existence Theorem MAT309, Fall 2019 Completeness Theorem. If | = , then . Follows from: Model Existence Theorem. Every consistent set of sentences has a model. (If , then there exists a model A | =

402 views • 36 slides
HEZ Summit November 3, 2016 Background: HSCRC and the All-Payer Model Unique New Model:

HEZ Summit November 3, 2016 Background: HSCRC and the All-Payer Model Unique New Model:

Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) and the All-Payer Model HEZ Summit November 3, 2016 Background: HSCRC and the All-Payer Model Unique New Model: Marylands All -Payer Model Maryland is implementing an All-Payer Model for

774 views • 20 slides
A REVIEW OF THE CPA MODEL CONDITIONS FOR THE HIRING OF PLANT Outline 1. Introduction 2.

A REVIEW OF THE CPA MODEL CONDITIONS FOR THE HIRING OF PLANT Outline 1. Introduction 2.

A REVIEW OF THE CPA MODEL CONDITIONS FOR THE HIRING OF PLANT Outline 1. Introduction 2. Understanding the CPA Conditions -The Consumer Conditions -The Model Conditions 3. Formation of contracts and inclusion/exclusion of CPA conditions

1.05k views • 66 slides
TOBACCO CESSATION: A REVIEW Discuss the 5 As model for treating tobacco use and OF

TOBACCO CESSATION: A REVIEW Discuss the 5 As model for treating tobacco use and OF

9/29/2016 Objectives TOBACCO CESSATION: A REVIEW Discuss the 5 As model for treating tobacco use and OF CURRENT PRACTICES AND AN dependence. Given a patient case, identify a patients readiness to UPDATE TO E CIGARETTES quit

294 views • 7 slides
Sketch Model Review Pink B 10/4/18 10/4/18 2.009 Pink Team

Sketch Model Review Pink B 10/4/18 10/4/18 2.009 Pink Team

Sketch Model Review Pink B 10/4/18 10/4/18 2.009 Pink Team 2.009 Pink Team Adaptable assited walking For legs/ankle injuries Combines crutches and a knee scooter

367 views • 8 slides
Pricing Methodology for Model Years 1 &amp; 2 Technical Review Webinar Center for Medicare

Pricing Methodology for Model Years 1 &amp; 2 Technical Review Webinar Center for Medicare

Pricing Methodology for Model Years 1 &amp; 2 Technical Review Webinar Center for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Innovation (CMS Innovation Center) May 17, 2018 Webinar Outline Target Price Overview Risk Adjustment Model Hospital

1.04k views • 89 slides

More recommend