MM Roma 10 03 2015 Riunione 27 marzo, situazione ordini - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MM Roma 10 – 03 – 2015  Riunione 27 marzo,  situazione ordini incollatrice,  Situazione camera pulita,  delivery dei componenti,  tempi costruzione,  workflow (P.Bagnaia)  stato QAQC: leak test, limbo, controlli vari clean room, ….

Fabien Janneau, NSW week 10 March 2015

Frames – M0 Part Quantity Company Responsible Cost Delay (w) Status 27 x 1.3m (35.1m) Die: 3k € #1 (external+gas) Extal (IL) G. Ciapetti 15/03/15 Shipped (1) 36 x 2.2m (79.2m) Parts: 3.7 k € Die: 3 k € #2 (external drift + 174 x 1.25m (217.5m) Shipped (1) Extal (IL) G. Ciapetti Parts: 10.125 15/03/15 R/O) 72 x 1.5m (108m) k € 3 modules 105 x 1m (105m) Die: 1.225 k € In progress (2) #3 (mesh frame) 148 x 1.25m (185m) MIFA (NL) R. Hertenberger ? Parts: 2 k € 60 x 1.55m (93m) 69 x 1m (69m) #4 (R/O internal bars – Die: 2.525 k € In progress (3) 85 x 1.6m (136m) MIFA (NL) R. Hertenberger ? 60x10x1.5) Parts: 3.9 k € 50 x 2.1m (105m) #5 (Drift internal bars – - - - - - Include in #4 30x10x1.5) 315 x (1000x13mm) Delivered (4) Die: 1 k € #6 (gas gap frame) MIFA (NL) R. Hertenberger 25/02/15 175 x (700x13mm) Parts: 1.5 k € BB5 Mesh frame corners 160 (2 mod. +25% Freiburg University R. Hertenberger Raw material - In progress (SM1, SM2 and LM1) spare) Gas gap frame corners 192 (3 modules) Construction sites Construction sites - - - 8 k € + 8k € Cooling tubes 100m (2 modules) Buntmetall U. Landgraf Delivered (water-jet cut) Thermal insulator 108m ? U. Landgraf ? ? Offer ? Copper plates 256 ? U. Landgraf ? ? ? ? (1) Material: Aluminum 6063-T66 ; Finish: mill finish / Alodine (2) Material: Aluminum 6060-T5 ; Finish: Surtec 650 ; Geometry: straightness 0.6/1000mm, torsion 0.4/1000mm, tolerance measurement 5.06 +/-0.025 (3) Material: Aluminum 6060-T5 ; Finish: Surtec 650 ; Tolerance measurement 10 +/-0.05 (middle) +/-0.03 (edges) Geometry: - straightness and torsion 0.4/1000mm for 1 and 1.6m lengths - straightness and torsion 0.6/2000mm for length 2100mm (4) Material: Aluminum 6060-T5 ; Tolerance 13+/-0.1mm and 5.17 +/- 0.03 mm Geometry: - straightness 0.4/1000mm; torsion 0.2/1000mm - #1 and #2 (Extal) https://edh.cern.ch/Document/SupplyChain/DAI/5842339 - #3 and #4 (Mifa) https://edh.cern.ch/Document/SupplyChain/DAI/5861568 - #6 (Mifa) https://edh.cern.ch/Document/SupplyChain/DAI/5878986

Procurement schedule – production FDR Place orders Cost Delay (w) March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. R/O PCB >200 k € 8 Technical Open tender, close tender, place meeting the contract Drift PCB >200 k € 4 Resistive foils 4-5 Delivery Frames 10<>200 k € 4-5 Cooling 10<>200 k € 8-9 HC 10<>200 k € 3 ? Al. pin 10<>200 k € 8 Mesh high cost >200 k € 4 Mesh low cost 10<>200 k € 4 Market survey Price inquiry or tendering process Delivery

Maccarrone, NSW week 10 March 2015

S.Zimmermann, NSW week 10 March 2015 Timeline Jan 2015 June 2015 July 2014 Sept 2015 Jan 2016 Design Review: Green light for module-0 Module-0 Mod-0 Material orders Materials sTGC + MM series production FDR reception (*) sTGC Mod.0 sTGC Mod.0 construct construct IL, CA, CL, CN St. Petersburg MM Mod.0 MM Mod.0 construct construct IT,DE, Saclay MM Mod.1 CERN construct GR + JINR milestones Module-0 Test (Cosmics, (*) so far assumed without panning for review GIF++, Testbeam), Integration scope S. Zimmermann 10 Mar 2015 2

Required Reviews and Review Types Preliminary Design (PDR), Final Design (FDR) and Production Readiness Review (PRR) are part of the regular progress reporting to ATLAS, under control of TC and the Review office During intial ATLAS construction: additionally had production site visits/reviews which proved extremely useful S. Zimmermann 10 Mar 2015 3

Case of NSW MM/sTGC chamber construction Slightly different situation for MicroMegas and sTGC chamber construction – Design Review end of July 2014 somewhat between in a Preliminary Design and Final Design Review • FDR: Green light for module-0 • FDR: Green light to start procurement/tender process for mass prod. Materials • PDR: No full-size prototype had been built before r • PDR: MM p esented assembly procedure defined only “ on paper ” , not executed in a prototype – prove that it works pending • PDR: Several decision remained to be taken – MM: Mesh specification (pitch) – MM: Arrange resistive strips with an angle w.r.t. readout strips or not – MM: Resistive Foil technique – sputtering versus screen printing – Detailed Grounding scheme including mechanical elements – Details of mounting chambers to spacer frame – Details of electronics + service integration S. Zimmermann 10 Mar 2015 4

Post module-0 Next Review after module-0 completion must • Demonstrate that requirements in terms of mechanical precision have been achieved (measurement results) • Demonstrate that requirements in terms of operational behavior (HV current, noise, dead channels, … ) h a ve been met • Demonstrate all choices left open at the July 2014 Design Review have been settled ( NB: this does not rule out having different sites use different well defined methods, eg MM vacuum bad versus stiffback method) • Present and justify any changes to the construction procedure and manual since the July 2014 Design Review, and p r ove no further “ will be developed during construction ” points are left • Demonstrate material qualifications have been completed • Demonstrate QA/QC protocol including detailed (possible site specific) methods • Prove sufficient resources exist to complete production according to schedule, present detailed work flow and resource loaded schedule (hours per step, FTEs incl. names, work hours per week) • Provide information/show source of all materisls, provide delivery schedule, demonstrate logistics flow Somewhat made more complicated by module-0s not all completed at the same time … 10 Mar 2015 S. Zimmermann 5

MM Proposal (NSW management) 1. MM Mechanical Workshop after module-0 completion --- discuss construction experience, possible problems, agree (potential) changes to construction procedure w.r.t. PDR one, define definite and final procedures. MM construction groups. (end) June 2. Review (1 day meeting, presentation + prior 3. Site visits • documentation based, ATLAS Review panel) Review site specific construction • procedure Report on module-0 construction experience • Review site specific QA/QC • Present module-0 results, prove requirements are implementation met • Review resources (manpower), • Present/justify changes to (global) construction procedure resource loaded schedule • • INFN/DE: September Report final material choices, present material • qualification results Saclay: November/December • • Dubna/Thessaloniki: December, Present details on orders, chosen manufacturers, material delivery schedule including review of module-1 results • • Logisitics work flow from CERN to institutes Review committee consisting of MM • experts (other sites) + 1-2 external QA/QC database infrastructure members End July/Early September – before final material order 4. Schedule Review (overall MM construct.) – 0.5 day meeting, ATLAS Review panel Dec/Jan) S. Zimmermann 10 Mar 2015 6

MM Proposal -- Alternative 1. MM Mechanical Workshop after module-0 completion --- discuss construction experience, possible problems, agree (potential) changes to construction procedure w.r.t. PDR one, define definite and final procedures. MM construction groups. (end) June 2. Review (1 day meeting, presentation + prior 4. Site visits • documentation based, ATLAS Review panel) Review site specific construction • procedure Report on module-0 construction experience • Review site specific QA/QC • Present module-0 results, prove requirements are implementation met • • October 2015 to January 2016 Present/justify changes to (global) construction • procedure For Dubna/Thess including review • of module-1 results Report final material choices, present material • qualification results Review committee consisting of MM • experts (other sites) + 1-2 external Present details on orders, chosen manufacturers, material delivery schedule members • Logisitics work flow from CERN to institutes • QA/QC database infrastructure End July/Early September – before final material order 5. PRR (review manpower, resources, resource loaded schedule) Nov/Dec S. Zimmermann 10 Mar 2015 7