Minnesota Department of Public Safety Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Kevin C Leuer, Director Preparedness Branch May 3, 2011 1
Comment Overview Implementation of NUREG 0654 Supplement 3. Hostile Action Based (HAB) planning and response. New regulation impacts. Implementation of new requirements. 2
NUREG 0654 Supplement 3 Site specific implementation of staged evacuation requirements. One size does not fit all. Predetermined PARs. Coordination between on and off-site for PARs. 3
HAB Planning and Response Synchronization of security response and off-site radiological response plans is needed for an effective hostile action based response. Plant security response plans must be integrated with the rest of the response. 4
HAB Planning Assumptions Prepare for design basis events or beyond design basis events? With a radioactive release or without? 5
Regulation Impacts Hostile Action Response Many new players becoming involved. Need federal agency participation in planning and response. REP Program Manual Changes New exercise cycle but unknown exercise criterion frequency demonstration requirements. Unknown HAB demonstration requirements. HSEEP implementation requirements. 6
Regulation Impacts Response Impact Response to a crisis at the site while responding to the radiological emergency. Jurisdiction Impacts New law enforcement agency impacts. New fire and EMS agency impacts. Tribal jurisdiction impacts. 7
Rule Implementation Site specific implementation plan. Priority on hostile action response implementation. Consideration for states with multiple sites. Consideration of budget cycles. CY 2015 completion date. 8
Thank You for the opportunity to present today Kevin C Leuer, Director Preparedness Branch kevin.leuer@state.mn.us 9
Recommend
More recommend