metastable and glassy ionic conductors magic
play

Metastable and glassy ionic conductors MAGIC Nancy Dudney, ORNL A. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Metastable and glassy ionic conductors MAGIC Nancy Dudney, ORNL A. Westover, A. Kercher, S. Kalnaus, G. Veith, M. Palmer ORNL V. Lacivita, G. Ceder LBNL W. West JPL S. Wang, W. Tenhaeff Univ. Rochester J. Christensen, B.


  1. Metastable and glassy ionic conductors “MAGIC” Nancy Dudney, ORNL A. Westover, A. Kercher, S. Kalnaus, G. Veith, M. Palmer – ORNL V. Lacivita, G. Ceder – LBNL W. West – JPL S. Wang, W. Tenhaeff – Univ. Rochester J. Christensen, B. Kozinsky, M. Kornbluth, J. Mailoa, G. Bucci – Bosch Project Vision Examine our hypothesis Find a “MAGIC” glass electrolyte with Do thin-film, glassy, metastable electrolytes • the stability of Lipon and inhibit formation of Li filaments that limit • higher conductivity and performance of ceramic electrolytes? • practical alternative to sputtering Total project cost: $3.75M Length 27 mo.

  2. The Concept ‣ Synthesize a conductive N-stabilized glassy electrolyte as nanopowders Plasma torch glassy Conventional Advanced nano powders sputtered film ~1µm manufacturing of membranes 20µm nucleate Li 3 P O 4  LiSiPON amorphous Si N x “ MAGIC” gas quench S y Support with B polymer mesh also LLZO, LATP Models and films to down select * Handle safely.

  3. The Team Bosch (Cambridge) LBNL Jet Propulsion Lab What compositions What is the role of N? Engineer one-step to remain glassy from a stable Li interface! ORNL melt  quench? Make it, test it! Univ. of Rochester Bosch (Sunnyvale) Polymer mesh can How do dendrites support thin glass. form, propagate? 2

  4. Project Objectives 9 th Q end 10 th Q 5 full cells of 5 cm 2 , ‣ 1. MAGIC electrolyte  efficient Li cycling, high rate, high capacity 0.3 mAh/cm 2 ‣ 2. Plasma torch processing  stable, conductive MAGIC powders 1 mA/cm 2 , 100 cycles ‣ 3. Mechanical properties of MAGIC  high K 1C by indentation 30% degrade ‣ 4. Hypothesis test. Will glasses be best at high current? 2 MPa-m 1/2 , K 1c 200 MPa, flex $10/m 2 10 -4 10 Ionic Conductivity (S/cm) -5 10 -6 10 -7 10 1.0 -8 10 -9 10 Li 4 P 2 O 7 full cells -10 10 Li 4 SiO 4 thin films 0.1 Li 2 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3 N 0.18 -11 10 Li 2.8 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3.2 N 0.22 -12 10 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 -1 ) 1000/T (K June 7, 2019 MAGIC metastable and glassy ionic conductors IONICS review 2019 Nancy Dudney 3

  5. Results (using sputtered MAGIC thin films) What about Li shorts? MAGIC thin films by Theory of glass sputtering structure and transport  No shorts to 10mA/cm 2  Understand structure, and Li +  Li dendrites form at artificial mobility boundary, not through  Kinetic passivation at Li  Edges and grain boundaries  non uniform current  New targets, – long life, – reproducible, – lower cost JACS 2018 140 11029; Chem Mater, 2018 30, 7077 ACS EnergyLetters, 4 (2019) 651 June 7, 2019 Insert Presentation Name 4

  6. Results (for Induction Plasma Torch prepared MAGIC nanopowders) MAGIC nano-powders and membranes – Theory of melt/quench of glass limited to Si rich, need more N With 525-625 ° C anneal: • Partial crystallization • No loss of N or Li ! 10 -4 Ionic Conductivity (S/cm) 10 -5 800 ° C 10 -6 10 -7 10 -8 350 ° C 10 -9 Li 2 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3 N 0.18 cold pressed Structure for 200 atoms, 3x to average Li 2.8 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3.2 N 0.22 cold pressed 10 -10 Li 2.8 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3.2 N 0.22 hot pressed Mean square displacement ( D ) for Li motion 10 -11 Li 2 Si 0.7 P 0.3 O 3 N 0.18 sintered  Ortho Li 3 PO 4 crystallizes with slow quench 10 -12 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5  Pyro and meta phosphate share corners, LiSiPON 1000/T (K -1 ) form glasses MAGIC metastable and glassy ionic conductors IONICS review 2019 Nancy Dudney June 7, 2019 5 e

  7. Challenges and Potential Technical Partnerships ‣ Need more control of gases through induction plasma torch. (tool design Tekna or other) ‣ How to consolidate glass powders so no boundaries? (glass processing Saint Gobain) ‣ Both sputtering and plasma torch are expensive, but will come down tuned Expense Sputter IPT for for Ar ($$ being 1-10 $/m 2 ) thin film powder  Precursors / targets $$  $ $ Process – Watt : Watt $$ $$ Yield when optimized 10  90% 15  85% Direct film on cathode 0 0 Self-support sheet 0 ($ TBD) nucleate  Watt for watt, both processes ≈ rate gas quench  Material loss needs to be eliminated  Then both viable price at scale - if Find MAGIC composition that is ductile. electrolyte is very thin.

  8. T2M 9 th Q end 10 th Q 5 full cells of ‣ Final goals – by end of project 5 cm 2 , 0.3 mAh/cm 2 – Larger cells (with sputtered MAGIC) 1 mA/cm 2 , – Mechanical and thermal properties for full composition range 100 cycles ‣ Beyond – Nano-powders* promising, further pre-pilot work needed <30% degrade 2 MPa-m 1/2 , K 1c – Modified plasma torch  complete range, LiPON to LiSiON 200 MPa, flex – Larger lot of powder  Li + conductive $10/m 2 – Explore advanced manufacturing • *provisional patent Large scale sputtering is a viable option. Images from ORNL brochure Powders of oxynitride glass provide alternative processing. Will a dense, sintered glass membrane effectively resist Li filaments and dendrites? June 7, 2019 MAGIC metastable and glassy ionic conductors IONICS review 2019 Nancy Dudney 7

Recommend


More recommend