Materials and Structures: Recent Research and Innovations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Materials and Structures: Recent Research and Innovations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Materials and Structures: Recent Research and Innovations P.N.Balaguru National Science Foundation Rutgers University Hotel Caesar Park, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil August 2-6, 2004 Historical Time Line Stone (Caves); Cut Stones without
Historical Time Line
- Stone (Caves); Cut
Stones without and with mortar
- Bricks; Lime; Portland
Cement
- Timber
- Cast-Iron…….Steel
( ductility )
- High Strength
Composites
Requirements
- Strength
- Stiffness
- Constructability
- Durability
- Cost
New Construction; Rehabilitation
- Earthquakes
- Blast resistance
- Repair: compatibility, specific strength
- Structures less than 75 years old
- Historical structures
Lessons Learned
- Clay bricks are more durable; some structure
are 800 years old
- Concrete is the most versatile construction
material
- Structural Components should be in
compression
- Steel corrodes
Research at NSF
- Infrastructure materials
- Division of Materials
Research
- Division of
manufacturing
Active Research
- Understanding and mitigation of
corrosion
- Improving the durability of concrete
- Enhancing the properties of concrete
- Self healing concrete
- Cement particles as sensors
- High strength composites
Emerging Materials
- High strength
composites
- Alloys
- Titanium
- Highbred
combinations
High Strength Composites Fiber Reinforced Polymers(FRP)
- Fibers: carbon, glass
- Matrix: organic polymers
- Applications: aerospace, ship building,
automobiles, rail cars, infrastructures
FRP
- High Strength
- Low unit weight
- High specific strength
- Corrosion resistance
- Used for more than 40
years
Major Disadvantage
- Resistance to high temperature (fire)
- Loss of life in crash landing
- Vehicle fire
- Fire hazard in transportation structures,
31% as compared to 37% flooding and 8% earthquake
- Restricted use in buildings
- Tunnels
Features of the Inorganic Matrix
- Polysialate (“Geopolymer”)
- Aluminosilicate
- Water-based, non-toxic, durable
- Curing temperature: 20, 80, 150°C
- Resists temperatures up to 1000°C
- Protects carbon from oxidation
Variables
- Fibers; aramid, basalt, carbon, AR glass, E glass,
S glass, high modulus carbon, silicon carbide, steel
- Micro and short fibers, rovings, fabrics, hybrids
Common Tow Reinforcements
Common Fabric Reinforcements
Carbon Fabric with Glass Mat
Main Thrust Areas
- Mechanical properties of composites
- Comparison with other inorganic matrix
composites
- Durability
- Protective and graffiti resistant coatings
- Strengthening; bricks, concrete, reinforced
concrete
- Sandwich panels
Composite Plates
- Hand impregnation
- Room temperature (20°C) or 150 C curing
- Vacuum Bagging under 3 MPa pressure
- Post curing for 3 days
- Room temp. curing reduces degradation of
glass under alkali environment
Typical Hybrid Samples
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Strain (%) Flexural Stress (MPa)
3 Layers 2 Layers 1 Layer Glass 3k Unidirectional Carbon
3k Unidirectional Carbon
Matrix (Resin) Hybrid
- Organic resins – high strength,
commercially available products
- Inorganic (Geopolymer) – high temperature
resistance, non-toxic
Hybrid Configurations
- Organic core
- Glass and carbon
- Vinyl ester and epoxy
- Skin
- Glass or carbon
- Inorganic matrix
Core: Strength Skin: Fire protection
Typical Resin Hybrid Samples
Comparison of Polysialate and Other Inorganic Composites
- Carbon/Carbon composites
- Ceramic matrix composites
- Carbon/Polysialate
composites
Stress vs. Strain Relationships of Bi- directional Composites in Tension
Tensile Strength of Bi-directional Composites
Durability Tests: As Coating Material
- WET-DRY EXPOSURE
(0, 50, and 100 cycles)
- SCALING EXPOSURE
(50cycles) Samples Reinforced with:
- 2 and 4% discrete carbon fibers
- 1, 2, and 3 carbon tows
- 1 and 2 layers of carbon fabric
Peak Load of Samples after Wet-dry Exposure
1 2 3 4 5 6 CON 2%FIB 4%FIB 1TOW 2TOW 3TOW 1LAY
Peak Load (kN)
0 cycles 50cycles 100 cycles
Peak Load of Samples after Scaling Exposure
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
CON00 2FIB00 4FIB00 1TOW00 2TOW00 3TOW00 1LAY00 2LAY00 Peak Load (kN) 0 cycles 50cycles
Sandwich Panels
- Balsa wood core
- Lightweight organic
- Lightweight Inorganic
- Cement based
Typical Sample Prior to Test
- Balsa wood core with
inorganic carbon fiber facings
- Smooth & glossy
- Sample dimensions:
– 4 inches wide – 4 inches long – ¼” inch thick
Sample After Fire Testing
- Facings visibly
charred from intense heat
- Rough surface with
minor cracking
- Sample dimensions
change, including weight
Comparison of Strengths
Test vs analytical results
Lightweight Sandwich Panels
- Core features:
- Inorganic matrix + ceramic spheres
- Density: 0.6 to 0.7 g/cm3
- Compressive strength: 5.12 MPa
- Carbon fabric laminated onto facings
Typical Section of Sandwich Slab (Panel)
Lightweight ceramic core Carbon facings on both tension and compression sides
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
P/P PM/P PM/PM 1C/P 2C/P 1C/PM 3T/PM 2C/PM 4T/PM 3T/3T 1C/1C 2C/1C 2C/2C
Load (N)
X/Y: Tension/Compression Side P: Plain PM: Primer C: Carbon Fabric T: Carbon Tows
Flexural Strength of Slabs With Different Reinforcement
Beam Test Setup Beam Test Setup
1600 mm 240 mm 240 mm 560 mm 560 mm
P/2 P/2
26mm 2#3 bars 2#2 bars 160mm 108mm 110mm 57mm
Load Load-
- Deflection Curve
Deflection Curve
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 5 10 15 20 25
Deflection (mm)
4O-1 3O-2 2O-1 5IO-2 4IO-2 3IO-2 2IO-1 PC
Crack Patterns: All Specimens
PC 2IO-1 3IO-1
4IO-2 5IO-2
2O-1 3O-2 4O-1
Challenges: Material Science
- Particle dispersion
- Pot life
- Reduction of shrinkage
- Increase of strain capacity
Collaboration
- University of Alabama
- University of Rhode
Island
- University of South
Florida
- Curtin University
- National University of
Singapore
- University of British
Columbia
- Dan-Kook University
Further Research and Applications
- Restoration of historical
buildings
- Earthquake resistant
structures
- Blast and Fire
Resistance, incorporation of Sensors, Special coatings
Emerging Areas
- Self healing Concrete
- Concrete structural
components with no cracks
- Smart Concrete
- Cement particles as
sensors
- Low carbon dioxide
emission
- Concrete with more
strain capacity
Functionally Graded Materials
- Strength and
stiffness
- Durability
- Thermal and noise
insulation
- Blast protection
- Act as sensors
- Healing materials
High strength Composites
- Strengthening of
buildings and bridges
- Chimneys and
storage containers
- Plain and reinforced
concrete
- Masonry structures
- Timber
- Steel
High Strength Composites
- New fibers: carbon
with 640 GPa modulus,
- Basalt, high
strength steel,
- rganic
- New matrices: fire
resistance
- Hybrids: titanium+
carbon+ fire resistant matrix
Feedback
- Questions ?
- Comments ?