materials and structures recent research and innovations
play

Materials and Structures: Recent Research and Innovations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Materials and Structures: Recent Research and Innovations P.N.Balaguru National Science Foundation Rutgers University Hotel Caesar Park, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil August 2-6, 2004 Historical Time Line Stone (Caves); Cut Stones without


  1. Materials and Structures: Recent Research and Innovations P.N.Balaguru National Science Foundation Rutgers University Hotel Caesar Park, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil August 2-6, 2004

  2. Historical Time Line • Stone (Caves); Cut Stones without and with mortar • Bricks; Lime; Portland Cement • Timber • Cast-Iron…….Steel ( ductility ) • High Strength Composites

  3. Requirements • Strength • Stiffness • Constructability • Durability • Cost

  4. New Construction; Rehabilitation • Earthquakes • Blast resistance • Repair: compatibility, specific strength • Structures less than 75 years old • Historical structures

  5. Lessons Learned • Clay bricks are more durable; some structure are 800 years old • Concrete is the most versatile construction material • Structural Components should be in compression • Steel corrodes

  6. Research at NSF • Infrastructure materials • Division of Materials Research • Division of manufacturing

  7. Active Research • Understanding and mitigation of corrosion • Improving the durability of concrete • Enhancing the properties of concrete • Self healing concrete • Cement particles as sensors • High strength composites

  8. Emerging Materials • High strength composites • Alloys • Titanium • Highbred combinations

  9. High Strength Composites Fiber Reinforced Polymers(FRP) • Fibers: carbon, glass • Matrix: organic polymers • Applications: aerospace, ship building, automobiles, rail cars, infrastructures

  10. FRP • High Strength • Low unit weight • High specific strength • Corrosion resistance • Used for more than 40 years

  11. Major Disadvantage • Resistance to high temperature (fire) • Loss of life in crash landing • Vehicle fire • Fire hazard in transportation structures, 31% as compared to 37% flooding and 8% earthquake • Restricted use in buildings • Tunnels

  12. Features of the Inorganic Matrix • Polysialate (“Geopolymer”) • Aluminosilicate • Water-based, non-toxic, durable • Curing temperature: 20, 80, 150°C • Resists temperatures up to 1000°C • Protects carbon from oxidation

  13. Variables • Fibers; aramid, basalt, carbon, AR glass, E glass, S glass, high modulus carbon, silicon carbide, steel • Micro and short fibers, rovings, fabrics, hybrids

  14. Common Tow Reinforcements

  15. Common Fabric Reinforcements

  16. Carbon Fabric with Glass Mat

  17. Main Thrust Areas • Mechanical properties of composites • Comparison with other inorganic matrix composites • Durability • Protective and graffiti resistant coatings • Strengthening; bricks, concrete, reinforced concrete • Sandwich panels

  18. Composite Plates • Hand impregnation • Room temperature (20 ° C) or 150 C curing • Vacuum Bagging under 3 MPa pressure • Post curing for 3 days • Room temp. curing reduces degradation of glass under alkali environment

  19. Typical Hybrid Samples

  20. 3k Unidirectional Carbon 500 450 2 Layers 3k Unidirectional Carbon 400 Flexural Stress (MPa) 350 300 250 3 Layers 200 150 1 Layer 100 50 Glass 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Strain (%)

  21. Matrix (Resin) Hybrid • Organic resins – high strength, commercially available products • Inorganic (Geopolymer) – high temperature resistance, non-toxic

  22. Hybrid Configurations • Organic core Core: Strength • Glass and carbon • Vinyl ester and epoxy • Skin Skin: Fire • Glass or carbon protection • Inorganic matrix

  23. Typical Resin Hybrid Samples

  24. Comparison of Polysialate and Other Inorganic Composites • Carbon/Carbon composites • Ceramic matrix composites • Carbon/Polysialate composites

  25. Stress vs. Strain Relationships of Bi- directional Composites in Tension

  26. Tensile Strength of Bi-directional Composites

  27. Durability Tests: As Coating Material • WET-DRY EXPOSURE (0, 50, and 100 cycles) • SCALING EXPOSURE (50cycles) Samples Reinforced with: • 2 and 4% discrete carbon fibers • 1, 2, and 3 carbon tows • 1 and 2 layers of carbon fabric

  28. Peak Load of Samples after Wet-dry Exposure 6 0 cycles 50cycles 100 cycles 5 Peak Load (kN) 4 3 2 1 0 CON 2%FIB 4%FIB 1TOW 2TOW 3TOW 1LAY

  29. Peak Load of Samples after Scaling Exposure 5 0 cycles 50cycles 4.5 4 Peak Load (kN) 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 CON00 2FIB00 4FIB00 1TOW00 2TOW00 3TOW00 1LAY00 2LAY00

  30. Sandwich Panels • Balsa wood core • Lightweight organic • Lightweight Inorganic • Cement based

  31. Typical Sample Prior to Test • Balsa wood core with inorganic carbon fiber facings • Smooth & glossy • Sample dimensions: – 4 inches wide – 4 inches long – ¼” inch thick

  32. Sample After Fire Testing • Facings visibly charred from intense heat • Rough surface with minor cracking • Sample dimensions change, including weight

  33. Comparison of Strengths Test vs analytical results

  34. Lightweight Sandwich Panels • Core features: - Inorganic matrix + ceramic spheres - Density: 0.6 to 0.7 g/cm 3 - Compressive strength: 5.12 MPa • Carbon fabric laminated onto facings

  35. Typical Section of Sandwich Slab (Panel) Lightweight ceramic core Carbon facings on both tension and compression sides

  36. Flexural Strength of Slabs With Different Reinforcement 2500 X/Y: Tension/Compression Side P: Plain PM: Primer 2000 C: Carbon Fabric T: Carbon Tows 1500 Load (N) 1000 500 0 P/P PM/P PM/PM 1C/P 2C/P 1C/PM 3T/PM 2C/PM 4T/PM 3T/3T 1C/1C 2C/1C 2C/2C

  37. Beam Test Setup Beam Test Setup P/2 P/2 2#2 bars 108mm 160mm 2#3 240 240 bars 560 mm 560 mm mm mm 1600 mm 57mm 26mm 110mm

  38. Load- -Deflection Curve Deflection Curve Load 80 5IO-2 70 4IO-2 4O-1 60 3IO-2 50 3O-2 2IO-1 40 2O-1 30 PC 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Deflection (mm)

  39. Crack Patterns: All Specimens PC 2IO-1 3IO-1 4IO-2 5IO-2 2O-1 3O-2 4O-1

  40. Challenges: Material Science • Particle dispersion • Pot life • Reduction of shrinkage • Increase of strain capacity

  41. Collaboration • University of Alabama • University of Rhode Island • University of South Florida • Curtin University • National University of Singapore • University of British Columbia • Dan-Kook University

  42. Further Research and Applications • Restoration of historical buildings • Earthquake resistant structures • Blast and Fire Resistance, incorporation of Sensors, Special coatings

  43. Emerging Areas • Self healing Concrete • Concrete structural components with no cracks • Smart Concrete • Cement particles as sensors • Low carbon dioxide emission • Concrete with more strain capacity

  44. Functionally Graded Materials • Strength and stiffness • Durability • Thermal and noise insulation • Blast protection • Act as sensors • Healing materials

  45. High strength Composites • Strengthening of buildings and bridges • Chimneys and storage containers • Plain and reinforced concrete • Masonry structures • Timber • Steel

  46. High Strength Composites • New fibers: carbon with 640 GPa modulus, • Basalt, high strength steel, organic • New matrices: fire resistance • Hybrids: titanium+ carbon+ fire resistant matrix

  47. Feedback • Questions ? • Comments ?

Recommend


More recommend