making teaching a shared
play

Making Teaching a Shared Brian Sato Office of the Vice Provost of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Making Teaching a Shared Brian Sato Office of the Vice Provost of Teaching and Learning Responsibility through Ray Vadnais Departmental Reports Office of Information Technology UCI Strategic Plan First in Class - Elevating the student


  1. Making Teaching a Shared Brian Sato Office of the Vice Provost of Teaching and Learning Responsibility through Ray Vadnais Departmental Reports Office of Information Technology

  2. UCI Strategic Plan First in Class - Elevating the student experience to prepare future leaders Recruit and retain all the most talented students regardless of • background Drive greater engagement, with particular attention to those with • students who are first-generation, underrepresented, international, undocumented, veterans, or parents Enhance academic advising for all students ... utilizing best practices • and developing cooperative plans for student success

  3. But success in STEM is not equal for all… GPA in other Grade in STEM Course A courses that quarter 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 Non-URM URM Non-URM URM UCI student population • 50% first-generation • 20% international • 40% low income • HSI and AANAPISI campus • 30% URM

  4. How can we change the culture surrounding teaching on an institutional level? Value of teaching Institution in merit/promotion Active learning Individual certification

  5. Anteater Learning Pavilion

  6. Data Analytics But how do we get this data into the hands of those working with our students?

  7. Improving access to student data • – Student affairs – Individual instructor

  8. Improving access to student data

  9. Improving access to student data

  10. Improving access to student data • – Student affairs – Individual instructor • Teaching and Learning Research Center – Discipline-based education researchers

  11. How can we change the culture surrounding teaching on an institutional level? Value of teaching Institution in merit/promotion ? School/Dept Active learning certification, Individual Compass reports

  12. Departmental Report – Spring 2019 • Provided to chairs/deans on an annual basis • Goals: – Automatically update depts on their undergraduate programs – Provide data to inform future decisions

  13. Departmental report development

  14. What is in the departmental report? • Demographics – Within major – Within school – Within UCI • Academic performance – Focus on first year, first quarter – Freshman experience courses • Faculty metadata – Trainings, advanced pedagogical methods, etc.

  15. Demographic Data (Over Time) All data is example data and not necessarily representative of a particular department, school or the University

  16. Retention of certain populations All data is example data and not necessarily representative of a particular department, school or the University

  17. First-Year Experience Courses All data is example data and not necessarily representative of a particular department, school or the University

  18. Faculty & Grad Student Data All data is example data and not necessarily representative of a particular department, school or the University (All names & numbers are faked on this mockup)

  19. Possible future additions • LMS data from Canvas • Engagement with learning technologies • Learning outcome data • Greater flexibility in courses displayed • Information on bottleneck courses and course repeats • Additional resources to help interpret & contextualize • Links to other Compass reports (grades, course- level info, etc.)

  20. Challenges • Data – Getting data – Understanding data – Communicating data – Contextualizing data • People – Identifying & talking to the right people

  21. Data Flow (In Progress)

  22. Focus Group Testing • Individual Associate Deans • Group chair meetings • Undergraduate Council • Academic advising directors • Committee for Teaching, Learning, and Student Experience

  23. Focus Group Testing • Cautiously optimistic – this data is brand new/foreign • Requests for tailoring to specific dept needs • Contextualize data for dept before release – Access to relevant resources for follow-up • Concern – Will the data be used against faculty/dept? – Use of data to justify inequality in success

  24. (Later) Discussion • What questions/comments would you have if presented to your departments?

  25. Acknowledgements Briandy Walden Michael Dennin Adrienne Williams Ryan Cherland Associate Director for Vice Provost for Teaching Director, Teaching and Assistant Vice Chancellor Student and Academic and Learning Learning Research for Institutional Research Services, OIT Center and Decision Support

Recommend


More recommend