LUKE ARRON GRAY SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 New York, NY LUKE ARRON GRAY SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT | 2010-2011

2 AFTER BEFORE  Overview  Structural Bracing  Electrical connection to CHP  Matrix Scheduling  BIM and Facility Management Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations

4  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing  Structural Loads  Computer Model   Location : New York City, NY Conclusion and Recommendations  Function : Office building and theatre  Electrical Connection to CHP   Size : 54,640 Square Feet Electrical Loads   Stories : 6 levels Electrical Equipment   Construction Schedule : August 2008- July 2010 Conclusion and Recommendations  Project Delivery : Fast track with CM At Risk  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  PROJECT TEAM : Create Matrix Schedule  Contractor : SKANSKA Conclusion and Recommendations Architect : MA Architects  BIM and Facility Integration Structural : Robert Silman Assoc.  Conclusion and Recommendations MEP : FMC Associates

4  Project Overview STRUCTURAL SYSTEM:  Structural Lateral Bracing 10” DEEP TWO -WAY FLAT PLATE FLOOR SLAB  Structural Loads COLUMNS 24’ x 24’  Computer Model  Conclusion and Recommendations BUILDING ENCLOSURE:  Electrical Connection to CHP GRANITE BASE  Electrical Loads MASONRY BRICK WITH CMU BACKUP  Electrical Equipment GLASS CURTAIN WALL  Conclusion and Recommendations TERACCOTA CROWN  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:  Create Matrix Schedule 208Y/120V, 3-PHASE  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration MECHANICAL SYSTEM:  Conclusion and Recommendations HW/CW SUPPLIED BY CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT

4  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing  Structural Loads  Computer Model  Conclusion and Recommendations  Electrical Connection to CHP  Electrical Loads  Electrical Equipment  Conclusion and Recommendations  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  Create Matrix Schedule  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations

4  Project Overview BACKGROUND :  GOALS Structural Lateral Bracing  Original building 33,000 SF since1918   Increase productivity on site by reducing site congestion Structural Loads  Volume of the theater to remain   Use the light wt. bracing for temporary shoring of the concrete Computer Model  slab Conclusion and Recommendations PROBLEM :  Electrical Connection to CHP  The original two story k-bracing increased site congestion  Electrical Loads  The original two story k-bracing was only used temporary  Electrical Equipment bracing  Conclusion and Recommendations  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  Create Matrix Schedule  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations

4  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing  WIND LOADS: Structural Loads  F=q z GC f A f (lb)(N)=0.0171ksf Computer Model  Conclusion and Recommendations SELF WEIGHT:  Electrical Connection to CHP Type M mortar three coarses thick brick=2klf  Electrical Loads  Electrical Equipment CONTROLLING LOAD COMBINATION:  Conclusion and Recommendations D 3 =1.2DL+1.6W  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  Create Matrix Schedule   Structural  Computer  Results Conclusion and Recommendations  Loads Model BIM and Facility Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations

4  Project Overview MOMENT CAPACITY OF MASONRY WALL:  Structural Lateral Bracing  0.88 kip*ft/ft Structural Loads  Computer Model MOMENT WITHOUT BRACING:  Conclusion and Recommendations 3.91 kip*ft/ft REVIT STRUCTURES  Electrical Connection to CHP • Architecture  • Structural Modeling Electrical Loads MOMENT OF MASONRY WITH BRACING:  Electrical Equipment 0.8kip*ft/ft  Conclusion and Recommendations  DEFLECTION: Matrix Schedule  L/240=0.85in RAM Structural RAM ELEMENTS Create Zones System • Design masonry, wood,  CFMF/LGMS Analysis and • Structural Analysis and Create Matrix Schedule Design Toolkit Design MODEL’S MAXIMUM DEFLECTION:  Conclusion and Recommendations 0.33in  BIM and Facility Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations  Structural  Computer  Results Loads Model

4  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing MATERIAL TAKEOFF WITH RAM ELEMENTS  Structural Loads  L 3x3x3/16  Computer Model  L 5x5x5/16   MC 6x12 Conclusion and Recommendations  W6x9  Electrical Connection to CHP  Electrical Loads  COST Electrical Equipment  $32,000 Conclusion and Recommendations  Matrix Schedule SCHEDULE  Create Zones  Original 18.9 days  Create Matrix Schedule  Alternative 25.1 days  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration  Structural   Computer  Results Conclusion and Recommendations Loads Model

4  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing  Structural Loads ADVANTAGES:  Computer Model  Decreased site congestion  Conclusion and Recommendations  Decreased required shoring  Electrical Connection to CHP  Electrical Loads DISADVANTAGE:  Electrical Equipment  Increased steel installation time  Conclusion and Recommendations  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  Create Matrix Schedule  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations  Structural  Computer  Results Loads Model

4  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing  Structural Loads  Computer Model  Conclusion and Recommendations  Electrical Connection to CHP  Electrical Loads  Electrical Equipment  Conclusion and Recommendations  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  Create Matrix Schedule  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations

4  Project Overview  BACKGROUND : Structural Lateral Bracing   Three steam turbines producing a total of 13.4 MW Structural Loads   Emergency electrical power to 18 University’s buildings Computer Model   Connected to 40 cw/hw Universit’s buildings Conclusion and Recommendations  Currently Project X is connected to CHP’s Plant cw/hw piping  Electrical Connection to CHP  Electrical Loads  PROBLEM : Electrical Equipment   Project X is not connected to CHP electrical supply Conclusion and Recommendations  Rising electricity costs  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones GOALS  Create Matrix Schedule  Reduce peak demand electrical loads  Conclusion and Recommendations  Identify financial incentives in New York  BIM and Facility Integration  Conclusion and Recommendations

4  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing  Structural Loads  Computer Model  Conclusion and Recommendations ELECTRICAL LOADS:  Electrical Connection to CHP  Electrical Loads  Equest  Electrical Equipment  Takes into account cw/hw chp plant  Conclusion and Recommendations  Summer peak electrical load 330 kW  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  Create Matrix Schedule  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration   Results Conclusion and Recommendations  Electrical  Equipment Loads

4 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT:  Project Overview  Structural Lateral Bracing  Woodward SPM-D21  Structural Loads  Woodward 2301D Load sharing and speed control for  Computer Model generator  Conclusion and Recommendations  GE 100kVA transformer  Electrical Connection to CHP  ∆ 13.8kVA to 208Y/120  Electrical Loads  Circuit breakers, conductors, conduit  Electrical Equipment  Conclusion and Recommendations  Matrix Schedule  Create Zones  Create Matrix Schedule  Conclusion and Recommendations  BIM and Facility Integration   Results Conclusion and Recommendations  Electrical  Equipment Loads

4  Project Overview  Demand & System Structural Lateral Bracing SYSTEM COST  Structural Loads Year Incentives Cost Payback  $25,000  Computer Model 1 $8,167.05 24617 -$16,449.95  Conclusion and Recommendations INCENTIVES: 2 $14,684.10 24617 -$9,932.90  Electrical Connection to CHP  Con Edison’s Commercial System Relief Program 3 $21,201.15 24617 -$3,415.85  Electrical Loads  Program activated by Con Edison during: PAYBACK: 4 $27,718.21 24617 $3,101.21  Electrical Equipment  4 YEARS  Summer peak days  5 $34,235.26 24617 $9,618.26 Conclusion  System critical situation 6 $40,752.31 24617 $16,135.31  Matrix Schedule  Annual Savings 7 $47,269.36 24617 $22,652.36 Create Zones  Peak Demand $6,517.05 Create Matrix Schedule 8 $53,786.41 24617 $29,169.41  Conclusion and Recommendations Con Edison Commercial System Relief Program $1,650.00 9 $60,303.46 24617 $35,686.46  BIM and Facility Integration Total $8,167.05 10 $66,820.52 24617 $42,203.52  Conclusion and Recommendations 11 $73,337.57 24617 $48,720.57 12 $79,854.62 24617 $55,237.62  Results  Electrical  Equipment Loads