lookup
play

LookUp Enabling Pedestrian Safety Services via Shoe Sensing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LookUp Enabling Pedestrian Safety Services via Shoe Sensing Shubham Jain In the last decade, more than 47,000 people died while Pedestrians account for 15% of all traffic fatalities! walking on American streets! Existing Awareness Cues TIME


  1. LookUp Enabling Pedestrian Safety Services via Shoe Sensing Shubham Jain

  2. In the last decade, more than 47,000 people died while Pedestrians account for 15% of all traffic fatalities! walking on American streets!

  3. Existing Awareness Cues TIME Magazine, February ‘14 New York City Existing technology-based pedestrian safety solutions WalkSafe: The Benefits of Dense Stereo for Pedestrian Detection A pedestrian safety app for mobile phone users who (Keller et al) walk and talk while crossing roads (Wang et al)

  4. Detects when a pedestrian is entering the roadway What if your phone could sense when you are entering the street, and warn you if you are distracted..

  5. Sensing Ground Features that Separate Street and Sidewalk

  6. GPS Trace ~35 meters GPS accuracy is not enough for street-sidewalk distinction! Actual Path Walked

  7. Shoe-mounted Inertial Sensing Accelerometer Gyroscope Magnetometer Bluetooth

  8. Ground Profiling via Shoe Mounted Inertial Sensors

  9. Measuring changes in foot inclination G z (-0.9g) G z (-1g) G z (-0.7g) 10 ° G x (0g) 30 ° G x (0.1g) G x (0.3g) G [0.1g, 0g, -0.9g] G [0.3g, 0g, -0.7g] G [0g, 0g, -1g] Accelerometer based Angle (Pitch) Angular Velocity Gyroscope based

  10. Complementary Filter Calculating pitch by combining accelerometer and gyroscope measurements Low Pass Filter Accelerometer Pitch (α) High Pass Filter Gyroscope Complementary Filter

  11. Phases Of A Walking Cycle

  12. Transition Patterns

  13. Sidewalk - Street Transition via a Curb

  14. Evaluating our system in the real world

  15. Manhattan Visual Rundown Typical Curb Typical Ramp Crowded Environment Sidewalk obstacles

  16. Dataset Statistics Number of participants: 22 Test locations: New York City and Turin Total distance covered: 112.5 miles Number of crossings: 1670 Total walking duration: ~ 80 hours

  17. Detection Latency

  18. Ground Truth Window True Positive : Detection that occurs inside the window False Positive: Detection that occurs outside the window

  19. Locations for Detections

  20. System Performance

  21. Conclusion  We have devised a sensing technique that profiles ground gradient via shoe-mounted inertial sensors.  We use these ground profiles to detect events when a pedestrian transitions from sidewalk to street via a ramp or curb.  The transition detection approach relies on consistent sidewalk designs. It does not work well in suburban environments where the presence of sidewalks is not consistent.  We observed that the performance could be sensitive to sensor mounting and can be improved with robust mounting designs.  The proposed approach also relies on the instrumentation and power in shoes.  In the future, we intend to build a reliable pedestrian to driver communication scheme.

  22. … Thank You!

  23. Sensor Accuracy Analysis

Recommend


More recommend