local complete count
play

Local Complete Count Committees Census 2020 Count Everyone Once, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Local Governments & Local Complete Count Committees Census 2020 Count Everyone Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place The Census Mandated by the United State Constitution First Census was in 1790 Purpose of the Census


  1. Local Governments & Local Complete Count Committees

  2. Census 2020  Count Everyone Once, Only Once, and in the Right Place

  3. The Census  Mandated by the United State Constitution  First Census was in 1790  Purpose of the Census  Vast historical record  Reapportionment of congressional and state legislative districts  Planning decisions about community services  Business planning/expansion  $675 billion in federal funds are distributed each year to local, state, and tribal governments for schools, roads, healthcare  The census decides how the money is allocated

  4. Programs using Census Data Medicaid Head Start/Early Head Start   SNAP WIC   Medicare Part B Health Center Programs   Highway Planning and Construction Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment   Program Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers  Health Center Programs (Community,  Title 1 Grants to Local Education  Migrant, Homelessness, Public Agencies Housing) National School Lunch Program  Foster Care (Title IV-E)  S-CHIP  Low Income Home Energy Assistance  Program IDEA Grant 

  5. Federal Aid: Where does the money go?

  6. Challenges Facing Census 2020  Internet connectability  The 2020 census will be primarily held online  Perception and trust  Hard-to-count populations and hard-to-count areas  Hidden or overcrowded housing  Populations that speak little or no English  Off-campus apartments  New Immigrant populations  Those displaced by natural disasters  Children under 5  Gated Communities

  7. Hard-to- Count Areas

  8. Congressional District 1  21.6% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 18% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (135,262 people)  In 2017, 19.1% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  9. Congressional District 2  24.0% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 28% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (189,959 people)  In 2017, 30.9% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  10. Congressional District 3  21.0% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 9% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (64,563 people)  In 2017, 18.2% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  11. Congressional District 4  25.6% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 35% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (263,127 people)  One of the hardest to count in the country  In 2017, 15.4% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  12. Congressional District 5 26.2% of this population required an  in-person follow up Latest estimates show that about  41% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (309,354 people) One of the hardest to count in the  country In 2017, 18.2% of this district  reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  13. Congressional District 6  22.1% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 26% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (190,491 people)  In 2017, 7.2% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  14. Congressional District 7  24.4% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 31% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (244,737 people)  One of the hardest to count in the country  In 2017, 9.7% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  15. Congressional District 8  24.2% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 28% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (195,872 people)  One of the hardest to count in the country  In 2017, 27.2% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  16. Congressional District 9  18.7% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 6% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (46,439 people)  In 2017, 23.4% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  17. Congressional District 10  20.1% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 7% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (47,911 people)  In 2017, 21.6% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  18. Congressional District 11  21.7% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 19% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (139,052 people)  In 2017, 10.1% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  19. Congressional District 12  23.7% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 22% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (154,192 people)  In 2017, 27.9% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  20. Congressional District 13  24.8% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 33% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (237,832 people)  One of the hardest to count in the country  In 2017, 14.2% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  21. Congressional District 14  20.4% of this population required an in-person follow up  Latest estimates show that about 6% of the district’s population live in HTC neighborhoods (43,995 people)  In 2017, 20.9% of this district reported that they had no internet or dial-up only access

  22. Bartow County  101,734 people live in 37,120 households  81.2% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  18.9% of Bartow County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  23. Catoosa County  65,304 people live in 24,719 households  82.5% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  18.8% of Catoosa County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  24. Cherokee County  234,377 people live in 83,150 households  81.3% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  Approximately 3% of Cherokee County's current population lives in hard-to-count neighborhoods  7.9% of Cherokee County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  25. Cobb County  729,418 people live in 274,361 households  77.7% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  Approximately 22% of Cobb County's current population lives in hard-to-count neighborhoods  10.0% of Cobb County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  26. Dawson County  23,219 people live in 8,557 households  84.4% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  15.0% of Dawson County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  27. Douglas County  138,826 people live in 48,426 households  75.5% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  Approximately 36% of Douglas County's current population lives in hard-to-count neighborhoods  13.4% of Douglas County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  28. Floyd County  92,369 people live in 35,506 households  78.9% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  Approximately 13% of Floyd County's current population lives in hard-to- count neighborhoods  22.1% of Floyd County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  29. Gilmer County  29,359 people live in 11,468 households  76.4% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  26.5% of Gilmer County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  30. Gordon County  55,839 people live in 19,959 households  80.5% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  27.6% of Gordon County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  31. Haralson County  28,354 people live in 11,033 households  81.1% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  26.0% of Haralson County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  32. Miller County  5,705 people live in 2,326 households  79.8% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  53.7% of Miller County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

  33. Newton County  103,683 people live in 35,823 households  77.7% of the county's households mailed back their 2010 census questionnaire  Approximately 8% of Newton County's current population lives in hard-to- count neighborhoods  15.7% of Newton County's households had either no internet access or dial up-only

Recommend


More recommend