AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT CLICK! FINANCIALS Ma May 20, 20 20, 2015 15
AGENDA • Bac ackground an and 1997 T Telec elecommunicatio ions S Stu tudy y (Bob Ma Mack ck) • Wh What h has c s changed? (B (Bob ob Ma Mack ck) • Sm Smar art meter er t tec echnolo logy ( (Joe e Tellez ellez) • Click! k! f finan ancials ials: C Cost allocatio ation (Bill B l Berry) y) • Moss A Adam ams, LLC revie iew ( (Julie D ie Des esim imone) e) • Clic lick!’ !’s reven enues es d do not c t cover er its its c costs ts (Bill ill B Ber erry) • Su Summary (Chris is R Robin inson) 2
Section on 1 Bob Mack Deputy Director for Government Affairs How w Click! go got its s start, a and nd ho how t the he 1997 telecom ommunications st study use used to o laun unch Click! c comp ompares t to o actua ual gr growt wth • Some objectives reached (competition, enhanced services). Others were not (# of cable customers, revenues, profits) • Always anticipated Click! would recover its costs, including Click!’s share of original capital investment
BACKGROUND • By By 1996, T TCI I was s the on only cable T TV provider, w with 3 h 36 c cha hannels • No o other v viable p provider of of In Internet or or T TV • No o viable p provider of of high gh-speed d data se service for or Tacom oma P Power’s (C (City Li Ligh ght) sy system c con ontrol ol 4
TACOMA’S IDENTIFIED NEEDS Cable T TV co competiti tion, with u upgr graded s syst ystem • Bro roader er a and greater er Intern ernet s service f e for • busines esses es a and r residen ences es (Frank Russel ell, et et al.) .) Taco coma ma Power ( (City ty Light) s syst ystem m • improveme ments ts and nd syst ystem co m cont ntrol, r reliability ty and e an effic icie iency Tw Two-way c communic icat atio ions w with P Powe wer • cust cu stome mers 5
1997 TELECOMMUNICATIONS STUDY Pr Prepared b by o outside team, with TPU TPU s staff • assi sista stanc nce Repo port i include ded: d: • Review of the telecommunications industry • Survey of other cities • Local communications business plan • “The Residential Market” - Market Data Research Corp. • “The Current Business Market” - Market data Research Corp. • “Future Market to Serve” - APEX Business Solutions • “Telecommunications and Economic Development” - Bruce • Mann and Sue Heath “Economic Development in the Greater Tacoma/Pierce County • Area” - APEX Business Solutions Project Team 6
CUSTOMER RESEARCH - 1996 Residential c cust ustom omer sur survey - 606 h house seholds 78% of Tacom oma househol eholds have c e cable T e TV • 44 44% wou ould ld p pic ick Click! C ! Cable T e TV – if if op options a and • prices es w were s e similar. Mor ore wou ould ld sw swit itch if if Click! C ! Cable T e TV had more • options ons a and l lower er pric ices Business a ss and Inter ernet S t Survey 200 businesse sses s surveyed d – 61% 1% u use e Internet net • (limited ed a acces ess) 18% 8% of ho households onl nline • 7
1997 PUB/COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Id Identified benefits t to o “C “City Li Light” System “co control a and nd out utage ge repor orting ng” • Performanc nce “ e “moni nitor oring ng and prevent ntive e • maintenan ance ce” Cost t estimate for the t he two items a above - $15 $15 • million on Inter eractive e “commu mmunicat cation l link t k to custome mers” • Bet etter er services es than n competitor ors • Hi High-spe speed, , low-cos ost I Inter erne net • Regiona onal econom onomic d devel elop opment nt • Additiona onal revenu enue t e to C City Light ht a and Ci City • 8
IDENTIFIED RISK FACTORS • “Fail t to gai gain market s share” • No Non-co comp mpetit itiv ive p product ct • “Constr truction a and O O&M costs sts substantia ially lly e exceed e estima mates” 9
ORGANIZATION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS UTILITY “The T Telecommunications P Pro roject … … shall be a an integra ral Light Division o opera rating respo ponsibi bility a y and f functi tion.” .” Cit ity L Lig ight o operates Clic lick! • ISPs Ps s solic icit ited t to p provid ide In Internet se servi vice • Financing After c consid idering ing b both b bond nd i issuanc nces a and Light ht D Divis isio ion n • investme ment nt, d determi minatio ion w n was t to f financ nce with L h Light ht Divis isio ion a n advanc nces “Expens nses” l ” list p present nted to C Counc ncil il inclu luded “ “Debt • Service ce” “Pro F For orma I Incom ome St e Statem emen ent” p proj ojec ected ed “ “Incom ome e • Availa ilable le f for P Plant nt S Servic ice, D Debt R Retir ireme ment nts” a ” at $1.4 millio llion f n for 1 1999-3rd y year o of o operatio ion ( n ($14 m millio llion i n in 2015) 10
CROSS-SUBSIDY ISSUES Proj oject “s t “shall b be e op opera erated ed in in a busin iness-like manner… er…” ” • (C (Cou ouncil p pres resenta tati tion) • Assum umed ed net et p prof ofit b by 1 1998 98 – 2nd y year o of o f oper eration If op oper erated ed “in “in a a busin iness lik like e ma manner, th the e sys ystem em • would g d generate sufficient re revenues t to make the system self elf susta tain ining.” (C (Cou ouncil p pres resenta tati tion) On Only ly “cu “custome mers wh who o choo oose t to o buy” ca y” cable le T TV “w “wou ould ld b be e • charged f for or th them. em. No o ta tax mon money w wou ould ld b be e used ed and you our elect electric r rates es w wou ould ld not t in increa ease b beca ecause of of th this is new ew sy syst stem…” (C (Cou ouncil p pres resenta tati tion) 11 11
ORIGINAL COST ESTIMATES • June ne 1 1996: : $45-55 m million • September 1 1997: : $96 million • Oct October 1 1997: : $99.4 .4 million 12
1997 PROJECTIONS VS. ACTUAL Few ewer er cable c e customer mers than projected ed ISP cust stom omers vs. s. proj ojected 30,000 50,000 25,000 45,000 40,000 20,000 35,000 30,000 15,000 25,000 20,000 10,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 - - Actual CATV Subscribers Projected CATV Subscribers Actual ISP Customers Projected ISP Customers Lower r revenues th than p projected Higher er programmi mming c costs $60 $70 $60 $50 $50 $40 ill Bill $40 Average Monthly B $30 ions $30 illio Mill $20 $20 $10 $10 $/ Av $- $0 Actual Revenue Projected Revenue Actual CATV Programming Cost Projected CATV Programming Cost 13 The projections are from an appendix to the 1997 financial statements The 1997 projection brought to current dollar values using core CPI from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
Section on 2 2 Bob Mack Wha What ha has c cha hang nged in n 20 y years? • Did not anticipate decline in cable TV use • Advent of broadband Internet, social media, mobile devices, over-the-top content amid rising cable costs have accelerated change • Hybrid business model prevents Click! bundling and benefitting from margin on broadband Internet
TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROWTH TRENDS 1998 TO 2016 Ca Cable T TV & & ISP Cust Customer Co Coun unts 30,000 25,000 Customer Counts 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Cable TV ISP 15 15
1998-2000: CABLE TV GROWTH MODE Clic lick! C Cab able TV V in introduced in in 1998 to s o stimulate co competiti tion, n, imp mprove ca cable & & teleco com m service ces s loc locally ally, an , and buil ild f fou oundatio ion for or smart g grid id • Decision made to employ hybrid business model: Click! Cable TV and private Internet – no bundling • Tacoma City Light believes cable to the home is the best way to establish the smart grid • ISPs begin offering Internet to stimulate competition locally • Roughly 36% of Americans report using the Internet in 1998 (Pew Research Center) • Nearly 70% of U.S. household subscribe to cable TV (Nielson) 16 16
2001-2003: INTERNET, ISP GROWTH MODE Bo Both Cl Click! Ca Cabl ble T TV and d ISP ISP c customer ba bases gro row a as I Intern ernet becomes es m mainstrea ream • August 2000 – 50% of people use Internet • Broadband begins in 2000 with 3% adoption • Dial-up access peaks in 2001 with 41% of Internet users • By 2003, dial up in permanent decline as broadband grows • Google becomes popular as a search engine • Video on demand (VOD) & Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) introduced • Industry first move to bundled packages 17 17
Recommend
More recommend