little mountain policy statement
play

Little Mountain Policy Statement Presentation on Draft Urban - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Little Mountain Policy Statement Presentation on Draft Urban Design Policies April 3, 2012 littlemountain planning OVERVIEW program Holborn Concept Site Plan Four Perspectives 1. Context : Place in the city 2. Transition : Relationship to


  1. Little Mountain Policy Statement Presentation on Draft Urban Design Policies April 3, 2012

  2. littlemountain planning OVERVIEW program Holborn Concept Site Plan Four Perspectives 1. Context : Place in the city 2. Transition : Relationship to surrounding neighbourhood 3. Liveability: On and around the site 4. Sustainability & Memory: Mature Trees Group Discussion/Conclusions

  3. littlemountain planning BACKGROUND program Planning Process • Planning process underway since December 2009 • Stage 1: Policy Statement – Guides rezoning – Heights & density, uses, public benefits, sustainability, transportation, phasing • Stage 2: Rezoning

  4. littlemountain planning HOLBORN CONCEPT program Holborn Concept • Promising site plan • 1,834 housing units – 1,600 market – 234 social housing • Heights to 14 storeys • 1.8m square feet • Presented 2.8 FS R gross – 2.5 to 2.8 range

  5. Main Street R 2.8 FS HOLBORN CONCEPT – 37 th Ave littlemountain planning program

  6. HOLBORN CONCEPT – 2.8 FS R littlemountain planning HOLBORN CONCEPT – 2.8 FS R program Main Street 37 th Ave

  7. Site Plan

  8. littlemountain planning SITE PLAN: CONNECTED CENTRAL S TREET program

  9. littlemountain planning SITE PLAN: PROTECTION OF GREENWAYS program

  10. littlemountain planning SITE PLAN: PERMEABILITY program

  11. littlemountain planning SITE PLAN: PUBLIC S PACE FOCUS program

  12. littlemountain planning SITE PLAN: VILLAGE CENTRE program

  13. 1. Context: Place in the City

  14. Creek 3.8 False North Mountain 2.8 CONTEXT: PLACE IN THE CITY Little Village 2.6 Olympic Walk 1.9 Arbutus Mews 1.8 Shannon 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Gross FSR littlemountain planning program

  15. Main Street littlemountain RS-1 Single- planning BACKGROUND Neighbourhood Centre program family Homes 33 rd Ave. S econdary Arterial Canada Line ~1km Adjacent Area QUEEN LITTLE ELIZABETH PARK MOUNTAIN Main St. SITE Maj or Arterial Canada Line ~1km RS-1 Single- family Homes

  16. littlemountain planning GUIDING PRINCIPLE : VIEWS program

  17. littlemountain CONTEXT : RELATIONS HIP TO LITTLE MOUNTAIN redevelopment SUMMIT OF QE PARK LITTLE LITTLE MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN PROPOSAL

  18. littlemountain RECOMMENDATION : 12-S TOREY HEIGHT LIMIT redevelopment SUMMIT OF 12 STOREYS QE PARK LITTLE LITTLE MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN PROPOSAL

  19. APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS RECOMMENDATION: FOR HEIGHT

  20. UMMIT VIEW FROM LITTLE MOUNTAIN (QE PARK) S MT BAKER LITTLE MOUNTAIN PROPOSAL 12 STOREYS

  21. 2. Transition: Relationship to surrounding neighbourhood

  22. RELATIONSHIP TO NEIGHBOURHOOD TRANSITION:

  23. TRANS ITION TO NEIGHBOURHOOD 14 8 Existing Ontario Central Lane Quebec n’hood Street

  24. RECOMMENDATION : REDUCED HEIGHTS TO IMPROVE TRANS ITIONS RECOMMENDED REDUCTION RECOMMENDED REDUCTION Existing Ontario Central Lane Quebec n’hood street

  25. RECOMMENDATION : REDUCED HEIGHTS TO IMPROVE TRANS ITIONS IMPROVED AFFORDABILTY IMPROVED TRANSITION 12 6 Existing Ontario Central Lane Quebec n’hood street

  26. RECOMMENDATION: REDUCED HEIGHTS TO IMPROVE TRANSITIONS

  27. 3. Liveability: On and around the site

  28. CONSTRAINED SPACES LIVEABILITY:

  29. RECOMMENDATION : WIDER COURTYARDS , littlemountain planning program S HALLOWER BUILDINGS Improved liveability through wider courtyard and reduced building depth

  30. RECOMMENDATION: WIDER COURTYARDS, SHALLOWER BUILDINGS

  31. littlemountain planning GUIDING PRINCIPLE : S UN ON PUBLIC S PACES program

  32. LIVEABILITY: SHADOWS ON KEY PUBLIC SPACES CENTRAL STREET WEDGE PARK QE PARK 10:00 am shadows COMMUNITY September 21 SQUARE Equinox

  33. RECOMMENDATION: IMPROVED SUN THROUGH REDUCED HEIGHT ON KEY BUILDINGS

  34. RECOMMENDATION: IMPROVED SUN THROUGH REDUCED HEIGHT ON KEY BUILDINGS

  35. 4. Sustainability & Memory: Mature Trees

  36. littlemountain planning GUIDING PRINCIPLE : MATURE TREES program

  37. SUSTAINABILITY & MEMORY: Respect existing mature trees

  38. Recommended Changes Summary of

  39. AREAS OF CHANGE

  40. OF CHANGE AREAS littlemountain planning program

  41. HOLBORN 2.8 FSR PROPOSAL littlemountain planning program

  42. RECOMMENDED CHANGES littlemountain planning program

  43. NET RESULT littlemountain planning program

  44. HOLBORN 2.8 FSR PROPOSAL littlemountain planning program

  45. RECOMMENDED CHANGES littlemountain planning program

  46. NET RESULT littlemountain planning program

  47. littlemountain planning RECOMMENDED DENS ITY program 2.3 to 2.5 FSR Range 2.3 FSR • Approx. 1,150 units (+ 234 social housing units) • Economically viable proj ect • Delivers identified community amenities 2.5 FSR • Approx. 1,300 units (+ 234 social housing units) • Rezoning proposal assessed on performance • Possible to meet Guiding Principles with exceptional design

  48. littlemountain planning SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS program Density Range • 2.3 to 2.5 FS R gross over site Context • 12 storey height limit • Appropriate locations for height Transition • Reduced heights to improve transitions

  49. littlemountain planning SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS program Liveability • Wider courtyards, shallower buildings • S un on public spaces Sustainability & Memory • Respect existing mature trees

  50. littlemountain planning CONCLUS IONS program Group questions & comments Communicating Advisory Group position • Consensus (or not… ) • S ub-group to develop position

Recommend


More recommend