little mountain housing
play

Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

littlemountain Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January 2012 Open Houses Presentation to Little Mountain Community Advisory Group littlemountain Overview planning program Open house attendance 409 signed in


  1. littlemountain Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January 2012 Open Houses Presentation to Little Mountain Community Advisory Group

  2. littlemountain Overview planning program Open house attendance � 409 signed in � 600+ total Comment forms submitted � 326 paper (39 former residents) � 143 on-line (4 former residents) � Total: 469 responses � July 2011: 236 forms total

  3. Who Responded? littlemountain planning program

  4. Guiding Principles littlemountain planning program

  5. littlemountain Guiding Principles planning program 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood 44% 50% 35% 40% 30% 17% 20% 4% 10% 0% Meets Almost meets Does not Don’t know principle principle meet principle

  6. Guiding Principles littlemountain planning program

  7. littlemountain Guiding Principles planning program 2. Public Space Focus 43% 50% 32% 40% 22% 30% 20% 2% 10% 0% Meets Almost Does not Don’t know principle meets meet principle principle

  8. Guiding Principles littlemountain planning program

  9. littlemountain Guiding Principles planning program 3. Connections 46% 50% 40% 26% 24% 30% 20% 3% 10% 0% Meets Almost meets Does not Don’t know principle principle meet principle

  10. Guiding Principles littlemountain planning program

  11. littlemountain Guiding Principles planning program 4. Sun & Shadow 50% 39% 33% 40% 23% 30% 20% 5% 10% 0% Meets Almost meets Does not Don’t know principle principle meet principle

  12. Guiding Principles littlemountain planning program

  13. littlemountain Guiding Principles planning program 5. Building Variety 41% 50% 40% 29% 24% 30% 20% 6% 10% 0% Meets Almost meets Does not Don’t know principle principle meet principle

  14. Guiding Principles littlemountain planning program

  15. littlemountain Guiding Principles planning program 6. View s 50% 36% 36% 40% 22% 30% 20% 6% 10% 0% Meets Almost meets Does not Don’t know principle principle meet principle

  16. littlemountain planning Principles Summary program Performs Well � Public spaces � Connections through site � Building variety Split � Views Needs Work � Relationship to neighbourhood � Shadowing

  17. Open-ended Principles – littlemountain planning program

  18. littlemountain planning Principles – Open-ended program Positive Commentary � Praise for quality of site plan � Visibly-improved design � New residential opportunities � Good project overall

  19. littlemountain planning Principles – Open-ended program Negative Commentary � Too dense – inappropriate scale � Too much height � Transitions to surrounding area � Not enough green space � Not enough social/affordable housing � Holborn not listening to earlier input

  20. littlemountain Height & Density planning program Height 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 2-6 7-9 10-12 13-14 Not Enough Right Amount Too Many

  21. littlemountain Height & Density planning program Height 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 2-6 7-9 10-12 13-14 Not Enough Right Amount Too Many

  22. Height & Density littlemountain planning program

  23. littlemountain Height & Density planning program 8: Level of Density 42% 50% 31% 40% 30% 15% 20% 6% 5% 10% 0% Not Not Quite Just Right A Bit Too Too Much Enough Enough Much

  24. Open-ended Height & Density – littlemountain planning program

  25. littlemountain Height & Density – Open-ended planning program Positive Commentary � Appropriate scale for large site � Density right if designed well � Affordability – young people, 1 st time home buyers � Sustainability – accommodate growth � Increase vibrancy in area

  26. littlemountain Height & Density – Open-ended planning program Negative Commentary � Incompatible with single-family homes, Main Street character � Not downtown, not on rapid transit line � Sensitivity of QE Park � Too many new people in neighbourhood � Community facilities already overwhelmed � Traffic impacts

  27. Community Benefits 37% No 9. Level of Community Benefits 22% Almost 40% Yes littlemountain 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% planning program

  28. Community Benefits 37% No 9. Level of Community Benefits 22% Almost 40% Yes littlemountain 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% planning program

  29. littlemountain Community Benefits – Open ended planning program � Some support for proposed benefits � Additional childcare needed (>69 spaces) � Existing facilities (e.g., Hillcrest) at capacity � Additional affordable housing � 20%, 1/3, tenures (co-op, rental) � More local-serving retail & services � More green space and play space

  30. littlemountain Additional Comments planning program � “ Get on with it!” vs. “back to the drawing board!” � Attractive design � but too tall/dense � Opportunity for young families to live in area � More social/affordable housing � Too out-of-character � Height, density, design

  31. littlemountain Paper Forms vs. Online planning program � First time in process online forms used � Limited to one form per household � 30% of all responses on-line � Most responses from immediate area � 5%-15% difference between on-line and paper forms – Generally more critical of the concept

  32. littlemountain Paper Forms vs. Online planning program 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood 20% 14% 10% 1% 0% -3% 14% difference in on-line vs. -10% paper responses. -11% -20% Meets principle Almost meets Does not meet Don’t know principle principle

  33. littlemountain Paper Forms vs. Online planning program 3. Connections 20% 10% 5% 1% 0% 0% -5% -10% -20% Meets principle Almost meets Does not meet Don’t know principle principle

  34. littlemountain Paper Forms vs. Online planning program 8: Level of Density 20% 10% 10% 2% 2% -2% 0% -11% -10% -20% Not Enough Not Quite Just Right A Bit Too Too Much Enough Much

  35. littlemountain Anomalies – 2011 Example planning program 9. Transition to Neighbourhood # of Responses 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1.45 2.0 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 3.25 Density Concept Meets Principle Almost Meets Principle Does Not Meet Principle

  36. littlemountain Former Residents planning program 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood 100% 70% 75% 50% 13% 9% 9% 25% 0% Meets Almost Does not Don’t know principle meets meet principle principle Attended Open House or Submitted On-line (n=23)

  37. littlemountain Former Residents planning program 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood 100% 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% Meets Almost meets Does not Don’t know principle principle meet principle Submitted Independently (n=16)

  38. littlemountain Former Residents planning program 8: Level of Density 100% 75% 50% 50% 19% 19% 13% 25% 0% 0% Not Not Quite Just Right A Bit Too Too Much Enough Enough Much Attended Open House or Submitted On-line (n=23)

  39. littlemountain Former Residents planning program 8: Level of Density 100% 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Not Not Quite Just Right A Bit Too Too Much Enough Enough Much Submitted Independently (n=16)

  40. littlemountain Discussion planning program Questions & Comments Discussion Next Steps

Recommend


More recommend