link adaptation techniques for future terrestrial and
play

Link Adaptation Techniques for Future Terrestrial and Satellite - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 18, 2022 •150 likes •1.17k views

Link Adaptation Techniques for Future Terrestrial and Satellite Communications Anxo Tato Arias Supervised by Carlos Mosquera Nartallo atlanTTic Research Center, Universidade de Vigo December 13, 2019 Anxo Tato Arias 1 / 71 1. Motivation

  1. 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding Simulation Results SINR Absolute Error (Aggregated Results) Global margin [245 beams REAL Null.] 10 0 Comparison maximum SINR error 2.5 Nominal C/N Nominal C/N minus 3 dB 10 -1 2 10 -2 CCDF: P(error > x) Maximum SINR error (dB) 1.5 10 -3 1 10 -4 0.5 10 -5 Nominal C/N Nominal C/N minus 3 dB 10 -6 0 SYNC I/N -10 dB REAL Null. SYNC I/N -20 dB SYNC I/N -25 dB -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 SINR absolute error (dB) Averaging more pilots reduces the nullification threshold and the errors CCDF allows to obtain the margin for a given target FER Anxo Tato Arias 25 / 71

  2. 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding Simulation Results SINR Absolute Error at a Fixed Position Error much lower than the maximum in the vast majority of the positions Stationary behavior of SINR and SINR error Anxo Tato Arias 26 / 71

  3. 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding Simulation Results System Throughput and Back-off Margin Throughput comparison 100 Perfect CSIT Null. User margin Null. Beam margin Null. Global margin 95 90 Relative Throughput (%) 85 80 75 70 65 60 6 sectors per beam 4 sectors per beam No interbeam scheduling Global margin : 79 % throughput Margin per beam : 84 % throughput Margin per user : 94 % throughput Anxo Tato Arias 27 / 71

  4. 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding Simulation Results Nullification Countermeasure: Adaptive Margin per User [1] R. A. Delgado, K. Lau, R. Middleton, R. S. Karlsson, T. Wigren, and Y. Sun. Fast convergence outer loop link adaptation with infrequent updates in steady state . In 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall). Margin evolution 0.2 Simulations 0 Without fading -0.2 Rice fading K = 25 dB -0.4 -0.6 (terrestrial) -0.8 Rice fading K = 34 dB -1 (aeronautical) -1.2 Experimental FER -1.4 80-120 % of the target FER -1.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 Frame number 10 4 Anxo Tato Arias 28 / 71

  5. 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding Conclusions Conclusions The practical problem of the nullification in multibeam precoded systems was analyzed A solution based on a link adaptation algorithm was proposed The adaptive margin per user allows to meet the FER constraint with a small impact on the throughput of the system Anxo Tato Arias 29 / 71

  6. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Outline 1. Motivation 1 2. Mobile Satellite System: Field Trial Results 2 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding 3 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity 4 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization 5 6. Spatial Modulation Systems 6 7. Conclusions 7 Anxo Tato Arias 30 / 71

  7. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Chapter 4 Evaluation of the Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Publications Mobile Satellite Systems Fixed Satellite Future terrestrial Systems and satellite communication systems (submitted, under revision) Anxo Tato Arias 31 / 71

  8. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction What is Spatial Modulation? Spatial Multiplexing (SMux) Spatial Multiplexing N t Radio Frequency (RF) chains Max. spectral efficiency: η = N t log 2 M Anxo Tato Arias 32 / 71

  9. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction What is Spatial Modulation? Spatial Multiplexing (SMux) Spatial Modulation (SM) 0 Spatial Spatial Modulation Multiplexing 1 S2=0/1 One RF chain N t Radio Frequency (RF) chains Max. spectral efficiency: Max. spectral efficiency: η = log 2 N t + log 2 M η = N t log 2 M Anxo Tato Arias 32 / 71

  10. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction What is Spatial Modulation? Spatial Multiplexing (SMux) Spatial Modulation (SM) 0 Spatial Spatial Modulation Multiplexing 1 S2=0/1 One RF chain N t Radio Frequency (RF) chains Max. spectral efficiency: Max. spectral efficiency: η = log 2 N t + log 2 M η = N t log 2 M Generalized Spatial Modulation (GSM) Antenna selection R < N t RF chains bits Bit Channel splitter Max. spectral efficiency: M-QAM � N t � η = ⌊ log 2 ⌋ + log 2 M R RF switches Anxo Tato Arias 32 / 71

  11. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction Problem Formulation Maximum Capacity calculation achievable Channel rate Applications: Adaptation of transmission bit rate in adaptive (G)SM systems Theoretical performance evaluation of (G)SM systems Anxo Tato Arias 33 / 71

  12. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction Problem Formulation Maximum Capacity calculation achievable Channel rate Applications: Adaptation of transmission bit rate in adaptive (G)SM systems Theoretical performance evaluation of (G)SM systems Solutions in the literature: Expressions for obtaining the capacity with numerical integration Two analytical approximations of the SM capacity Comparison: Numerical integration: accurate but very time consuming Approximations: reduce notably the time calculation but less accurate Anxo Tato Arias 33 / 71

  13. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction Problem Formulation Maximum Capacity calculation achievable Channel rate Applications: Adaptation of transmission bit rate in adaptive (G)SM systems Theoretical performance evaluation of (G)SM systems Solutions in the literature: Expressions for obtaining the capacity with numerical integration Two analytical approximations of the SM capacity Comparison: Numerical integration: accurate but very time consuming Approximations: reduce notably the time calculation but less accurate Our proposal: Machine Learning (ML) based capacity calculation Anxo Tato Arias 33 / 71

  14. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction System Model SM: y = √ γ · H · x + w = √ γ · h l · s + w h l : Column of the channel matrix H , l = 1 , 2 , . . . , N t Anxo Tato Arias 34 / 71

  15. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction System Model SM: y = √ γ · H · x + w = √ γ · h l · s + w h l : Column of the channel matrix H , l = 1 , 2 , . . . , N t GSM: � � y = γ/ R · H · x + w = γ/ R · H · A l · 1 · s + w A l : Antenna activation pattern matrix from the set A T   1 0 0 0 0 0 A = 0 1 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 Set of L = |A| = 2 ⌊ log 2 ( Nt R ) ⌋ matrices � γ/ R · H · A l · 1 Sum of R columns of H : c l = Anxo Tato Arias 34 / 71

  16. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction Mutual Information and Capacity Expressions Mutual Information (MI) or constrained capacity of SM: � h l s − h l ′ s ′ + w 2   � �   � � √ γ + � w � 2 − γ  � �  1   � � � 2 � 2 I T = log 2 (2 M ) − � log 2 � l ′ =1 e l =1 E W  �  s ∈S s ′ ∈S 2 M       Capacity of GSM: � 1 � C GSM = − 1 � L � L � y CN ( 0 , Φ i ) log 2 j =1 CN ( 0 , Φ j ) d y − log 2 det( π eI N r ) i =1 L L 5 MI or contrained capacity (QPSK) 4.5 MI or contrained capacity (16QAM) Unconstrained capacity (Shannon) 4 3.5 3 (bpcu) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 SINR (dB) Anxo Tato Arias 35 / 71

  17. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Introduction Analytical Approximations to the SM MI Taylor approximation Jensen approximation Henarejos et al. Guo et al. Drawbacks of these approximations: Biased and limited accuracy Complexity scales with the square of the constellation size M and the number of antennas N t Calculation for a single constellation Anxo Tato Arias 36 / 71

  18. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Neural Network-based MI and Capacity Estimation Proposed Solution Spatial Modulation Neural network MI QPSK Features MI 8PSK Channel extraction MI 16QAM Anxo Tato Arias 37 / 71

  19. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Neural Network-based MI and Capacity Estimation Proposed Solution Spatial Modulation Neural network MI QPSK Features MI 8PSK Channel extraction MI 16QAM Generalized Spatial Modulation Neural network Unconstrained Features Channel capacity extraction Anxo Tato Arias 37 / 71

  20. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Neural Network-based MI and Capacity Estimation Proposed Solution Spatial Modulation Neural network MI QPSK Features MI 8PSK Channel extraction MI 16QAM Generalized Spatial Modulation Neural network Unconstrained Features Channel capacity extraction Anxo Tato Arias 37 / 71

  21. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Neural Network Features Selection Features selection for 2 × 2 SM � � h 1 � 2 D S � D L → D = {� h l s k − h l ′ s k ′ � 2 } = X = { h l · s k } − � h 2 � 2 D S D t L D L can be characterized with four real values: � h 1 � 2 , � h 2 � 2 and h H 1 h 2 � Θ H ∈ [0 , π/ 2] − → Hermitian angle h H 1 h 2 = � h 1 � · � h 2 � · cos Θ H · e i ϕ , ϕ ∈ [ − π, π ] → Kasner’s pseudoangle High SNR Moderate SNR Received symbols "real" SM-BPSK SNR = 10 dB Received symbols "real" SM-BPSK SNR = 15 dB 8 8 6 6 4 4 Non 2 2 Antenna 2 Antenna 2 0 0 orthogonal -2 -2 -4 -4 -6 -6 -8 -8 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 Antenna 1 Antenna 1 Received symbols "real" SM-BPSK SNR = 10 dB Received symbols "real" SM-BPSK SNR = 15 dB 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 Orthogonal Antenna 2 Antenna 2 0 0 -2 -2 -4 -4 -6 -6 -8 -8 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 Antenna 1 Antenna 1 Anxo Tato Arias 38 / 71

  22. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Neural Network Features Selection Generalization for More Antennas and GSM Features for GSM X = { H · A l · 1 · s k } � h l − → c l = γ/ R · H · A l · 1 Number of features # norms # pairs of angles # norms # pairs of angles � N t � SM N t SM 8 × 8 8 28 2 L = 2 ⌊ log 2 ( Nt R ) ⌋ GSM 8 × 8 , R = 2 16 L 2 = 120 � L GSM L 2 = � 2 Features reduction Characterize norms and angles distribution with Q quantiles, equispaced in [0,1] Example Q=5: Minimum, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, maximum Anxo Tato Arias 39 / 71

  23. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Simulations setup Supervised learning ML dataset 50 , 000 Rayleigh distributed random matrices h ij ∼ CN (0 , 1) SNR γ ∼ U( − 20 , 20) dB 70 % training, 15 % validation, 15 % testing Calculation reference values of MI and capacity Monte Carlo simulation with 5 , 000 realizations of the noise w Variance in the estimation ∼ 10 − 5 Learning algorithm Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) backpropagation algorithm MSE as cost function Random initialization of weights and margins Architecture One hidden layer of 10 or 20 neurons with sigmoid activation function Linear output Anxo Tato Arias 40 / 71

  24. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Simulation Results: MI of 2 × 2 SM Impact of different input features Option # Features Global MSE 6 . 98 · 10 − 4 i) Column norms and scalar product 4 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 ii) Column norms and angles 4 5 . 21 · 10 − 5 iii) Column norms and distances 6 4 . 96 · 10 − 5 iv) Column norms, distances and scalar product 8 2 . 97 · 10 − 5 v) Column norms, distances and angles 8 Anxo Tato Arias 41 / 71

  25. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Simulation Results: MI of 2 × 2 SM Impact of different input features Option # Features Global MSE 6 . 98 · 10 − 4 i) Column norms and scalar product 4 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 ii) Column norms and angles 4 5 . 21 · 10 − 5 iii) Column norms and distances 6 4 . 96 · 10 − 5 iv) Column norms, distances and scalar product 8 2 . 97 · 10 − 5 v) Column norms, distances and angles 8 Comparison with analytical approximations Anxo Tato Arias 41 / 71

  26. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Simulation Results: MI of 2 × 2 SM Impact of different input features Option # Features Global MSE 6 . 98 · 10 − 4 i) Column norms and scalar product 4 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 ii) Column norms and angles 4 5 . 21 · 10 − 5 iii) Column norms and distances 6 4 . 96 · 10 − 5 iv) Column norms, distances and scalar product 8 2 . 97 · 10 − 5 v) Column norms, distances and angles 8 Comparison with analytical approximations QPSK Global MSE 3 σ Max. error 1 . 87 · 10 − 2 Taylor approximation 0 . 330 0 . 523 1 . 21 · 10 − 2 Jensen based approximation 0 . 229 0 . 300 2 . 97 · 10 − 5 Neural network 0 . 016 0 . 067 Anxo Tato Arias 41 / 71

  27. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Simulation Results: MI of 2 × 2 SM Impact of different input features Option # Features Global MSE 6 . 98 · 10 − 4 i) Column norms and scalar product 4 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 ii) Column norms and angles 4 5 . 21 · 10 − 5 iii) Column norms and distances 6 4 . 96 · 10 − 5 iv) Column norms, distances and scalar product 8 2 . 97 · 10 − 5 v) Column norms, distances and angles 8 Comparison with analytical approximations QPSK Global MSE 3 σ Max. error 1 . 87 · 10 − 2 Taylor approximation 0 . 330 0 . 523 1 . 21 · 10 − 2 Jensen based approximation 0 . 229 0 . 300 2 . 97 · 10 − 5 Neural network 0 . 016 0 . 067 Computational complexity Taylor approx. Jensen approx. Neural network Real products 7 , 168 32 , 800 368 Non linear operations 784 1 , 347 20 Anxo Tato Arias 41 / 71

  28. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Generalization MI of SM with 4 and 8 antennas # features Global MSE 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 SM 2 × 2 option (ii) 4 2 . 40 · 10 − 4 SM 4 × 4 16 5 . 06 · 10 − 5 SM 8 × 8 (Q = 5) 18 Anxo Tato Arias 42 / 71

  29. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Generalization MI of SM with 4 and 8 antennas # features Global MSE 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 SM 2 × 2 option (ii) 4 2 . 40 · 10 − 4 SM 4 × 4 16 5 . 06 · 10 − 5 SM 8 × 8 (Q = 5) 18 Dual Polarization Mobile Satellite Channel: PMod Global MSE 7 . 40 · 10 − 5 Anxo Tato Arias 42 / 71

  30. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Generalization MI of SM with 4 and 8 antennas # features Global MSE 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 SM 2 × 2 option (ii) 4 2 . 40 · 10 − 4 SM 4 × 4 16 5 . 06 · 10 − 5 SM 8 × 8 (Q = 5) 18 Dual Polarization Mobile Satellite Channel: PMod Global MSE 7 . 40 · 10 − 5 Correlated channels Performance degrades with increasing correlation Anxo Tato Arias 42 / 71

  31. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Simulation Results Generalization MI of SM with 4 and 8 antennas # features Global MSE 3 . 36 · 10 − 4 SM 2 × 2 option (ii) 4 2 . 40 · 10 − 4 SM 4 × 4 16 5 . 06 · 10 − 5 SM 8 × 8 (Q = 5) 18 Dual Polarization Mobile Satellite Channel: PMod Global MSE 7 . 40 · 10 − 5 Correlated channels Performance degrades with increasing correlation Capacity of GSM Studied scenarios SM with 2, 4 and 8 antennas GSM with 6 and 8 antennas and 2 or 3 RF chains Results MSE ∼ 10 − 4 3 σ ∼ 0 . 05 Number of neural network inputs: 4 - 27 Anxo Tato Arias 42 / 71

  32. 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity Conclusions Conclusions A Machine Learning-based solution was proposed for obtaining the capacity of SM and GSM systems Simple neural networks outperform approximations of the literature both in terms of accuracy and complexity The fast and accurate calculation can find applications in adaptive SM systems Anxo Tato Arias 43 / 71

  33. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Outline 1. Motivation 1 2. Mobile Satellite System: Field Trial Results 2 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding 3 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity 4 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization 5 6. Spatial Modulation Systems 6 7. Conclusions 7 Anxo Tato Arias 44 / 71

  34. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Chapter 5 Link Adaptation in Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Publications Mobile Satellite Systems Fixed Satellite Future terrestrial Systems and satellite communication systems Anxo Tato Arias 45 / 71

  35. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Motivation Introduction User link Feeder link RHCP f (MHz) 1518 1626.5 1675 1559 Mobile Terminal (MT) Satcom Transceiver Gateway Anxo Tato Arias 46 / 71

  36. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Motivation Introduction User link Feeder link RHCP f (MHz) 1518 1626.5 1675 1559 LHCP Mobile Terminal (MT) DP Satcom Transceiver Gateway Link adaptation in... Mobile Satellite Communications with Dual Polarization (DP) L-band (1-2 GHz) and S-band (2-4 GHz) RHCP and LHCP as a 2 × 2 MIMO Several MIMO modes and MCS available Anxo Tato Arias 46 / 71

  37. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Four Available MIMO Modes SISO Anxo Tato Arias 47 / 71

  38. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Four Available MIMO Modes SISO Orthogonal Polarization-Time Block Code (OPTBC) ∼ Alamouti Polarization-time L codeword QPSK info bits Variable rate OPTBC channel encoder (Alamouti) r R 2 symbol periods Anxo Tato Arias 47 / 71

  39. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Four Available MIMO Modes SISO Orthogonal Polarization-Time Block Code (OPTBC) ∼ Alamouti Polarization-time L codeword QPSK info bits Variable rate OPTBC channel encoder (Alamouti) r R 2 symbol periods Polarized Modulation (PMod) ∼ Spatial Modulation (SM) L QPSK Variable rate channel encoder R info bits Bit splitter Polarization Variable rate mapper channel encoder Anxo Tato Arias 47 / 71

  40. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Four Available MIMO Modes SISO Orthogonal Polarization-Time Block Code (OPTBC) ∼ Alamouti Polarization-time L codeword QPSK info bits Variable rate OPTBC channel encoder (Alamouti) r R 2 symbol periods Polarized Modulation (PMod) ∼ Spatial Modulation (SM) L QPSK Variable rate channel encoder R info bits Bit splitter Polarization Variable rate mapper channel encoder Vertical-Bell Lab. Layered Space-Time (V-BLAST) ∼ Spatial Multiplexing QPSK L Variable rate Serial info bits channel encoder to Parallel r QPSK R Anxo Tato Arias 47 / 71

  41. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Modulation and Coding Schemes (MCS) QPSK constellation 9 coding rates for symbols bits (SISO, OPTBC, PMod, V-BLAST) 0.9 0.8 MCS Coding rate 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Effective SNR (dB) 9 coding rates for polarization bits of PMod Coding rate 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Anxo Tato Arias 48 / 71

  42. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Channel Generation M. Sellathurai et al., “Space-time coding in mobile satellite communications using dual-polarized channels”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Jan 2006 H = β e j φ K L + ξ e j φ K S + DK D Anxo Tato Arias 49 / 71

  43. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Physical Layer Abstraction 1 Channel generator: { H n , n = 1 , 2 , . . . , N } 10 5 0 Channel matrix coefficients (dB) -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 h 11 -30 h 22 h 12 -35 h 21 -40 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Time (s) 2 SINR calculation per received symbols Different equation for each MIMO mode 3 SINR compression 13 12 Channel matrix coefficients (dB) 11 10 9 8 7 h 11 6 h 22 h 12 5 h 21 4 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Anxo Tato Arias 50 / 71

  44. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Link Adaptation Algorithms MIMO mode selection Mode which maximizes spectral efficiency By the receiver MCS selection Using LUT with adaptive margins By the transmitter PMod : two LUTs (independent coding rates for symbols and polarization) Margin MCS adaptation frame i Inner loop Outer loop SISO, OPTBC, V-BLAST. PMod (symbols bits) Anxo Tato Arias 51 / 71

  45. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization System Model Link Adaptation Algorithms MIMO mode selection Mode which maximizes spectral efficiency By the receiver MCS selection Using LUT with adaptive margins By the transmitter PMod : two LUTs (independent coding rates for symbols and polarization) 0.9 0.8 Margin Margin Rate MCS adaptation adaptation frame i frame i 0.2 0.1 Inner loop Inner loop Outer loop Outer loop SISO, OPTBC, V-BLAST. PMod (symbols bits) PMod (polarization bits) Anxo Tato Arias 51 / 71

  46. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Simulation Results MIMO Mode Selected mode 100 OPTBC PMod V-BLAST 80 Frequency (%) 60 40 20 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SNR (dB) Very low SNRs: OPTBC ( ∼ Transmit diversity) Low SNRs: PMod Moderate and high SNRs: V-BLAST ( ∼ Spatial Multiplexing) Anxo Tato Arias 52 / 71

  47. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency 3.5 SISO 3 Spectral Efficiency (bps/Hz) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SNR (dB) Anxo Tato Arias 53 / 71

  48. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency 3.5 SISO OPTBC 3 Spectral Efficiency (bps/Hz) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SNR (dB) • Operation at lower SNRs and better spectral efficiency Anxo Tato Arias 53 / 71

  49. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency 3.5 SISO OPTBC 3 PMod Spectral Efficiency (bps/Hz) 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SNR (dB) • + 50 % spectral efficiency Anxo Tato Arias 53 / 71

  50. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency 3.5 SISO OPTBC 3 PMod Spectral Efficiency (bps/Hz) V-BLAST 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SNR (dB) • + 100 % spectral efficiency Anxo Tato Arias 53 / 71

  51. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency and Frame Error Rate 3.5 10 0 SISO SISO OPTBC + V-BLAST OPTBC + V-BLAST 3 OPTBC + V-BLAST + PMod OPTBC + V-BLAST + PMod 10 -1 Spectral Efficiency (bit/s/Hz) 2.5 10 -2 2 FER 1.5 10 -3 1 10 -4 0.5 0 10 -5 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SNR (dB) SNR (dB) Inclusion of PMod improves efficiency at low SNRs Target FER is satisfied Anxo Tato Arias 54 / 71

  52. 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization Conclusions Conclusions Higher rates can be achieved by exploiting both polarizations MIMO mode and MCS can be adjusted Polarized Modulation increases spectral efficiency at low SNRs Anxo Tato Arias 55 / 71

  53. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Outline 1. Motivation 1 2. Mobile Satellite System: Field Trial Results 2 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding 3 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity 4 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization 5 6. Spatial Modulation Systems 6 7. Conclusions 7 Anxo Tato Arias 56 / 71

  54. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Chapter 6 Deep Learning Assisted Rate Adaptation in Spatial Modulation Links Mobile Satellite Systems Publications Fixed Satellite Future terrestrial Systems and satellite communication systems Anxo Tato Arias 57 / 71

  55. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Introduction Introduction Spatial Modulation New modulation scheme for 5G and beyond 5G Multi-antenna: high spectral efficiency Low complexity: single RF chain Better energy efficiency Anxo Tato Arias 58 / 71

  56. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Introduction Introduction Spatial Modulation New modulation scheme for 5G and beyond 5G Multi-antenna: high spectral efficiency Low complexity: single RF chain Better energy efficiency Coding rate selection mechanism for adaptive SM systems Supervised learning Deep neural network Anxo Tato Arias 58 / 71

  57. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Introduction Introduction Spatial Modulation New modulation scheme for 5G and beyond 5G Multi-antenna: high spectral efficiency Low complexity: single RF chain Better energy efficiency Coding rate selection mechanism for adaptive SM systems Supervised learning Deep neural network SM rate adaptation problem maximize r log 2 ( N t M ) r (4) subject to r ∈ { r 1 , r 2 , . . . , r K } BER( γ ; r , H ) ≤ p 0 . Anxo Tato Arias 58 / 71

  58. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Introduction Block Diagram of an Adaptive SM System Adaptive SM Transmitter Antenna selection Variable rate Bit splitter channel encoder Information bits M-QAM modulator selected coding rate Feedback channel Neural Network SM Receiver aided coding rate selection Channel coding rate estimation in use Soft LLRs Channel detection decoding Information bits Figure 1: Block diagram of an adaptive SM system with variable coding rate. Anxo Tato Arias 59 / 71

  59. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Proposed Method DL-based Coding Rate Selection 1 Evaluation of the performance of the channel codes System level simulations BER( γ ; r , H ) Figure 2: The different channel codes performance must be evaluated for a large number of channel matrices. Anxo Tato Arias 60 / 71

  60. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Proposed Method DL-based Coding Rate Selection 2 Extraction of the SNR thresholds 3 2.5 Spectral efficiency (bits/s/Hz) 2 1.5 1 0.5 -5 0 5 10 15 Required SNR (dB) Figure 3: The minimum required SNR to guarantee a given BER p 0 with each coding rate for a set of 20 different channel matrices. Anxo Tato Arias 61 / 71

  61. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Proposed Method DL-based Coding Rate Selection 3 Building the dataset for Machine Learning Dataset X = { ( x i , y i ) , i = 1 , 2 , . . . , m } Neural network input features: � t γ � h 1 � 2 , γ � h 2 � 2 � � � x = g ( γ, H ) = sort , Θ H , ϕ Neural network output variable: y = r k (target coding rate) Anxo Tato Arias 62 / 71

  62. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Proposed Method DL-based Coding Rate Selection 3 Building the dataset for Machine Learning Dataset X = { ( x i , y i ) , i = 1 , 2 , . . . , m } Neural network input features: � t γ � h 1 � 2 , γ � h 2 � 2 � � � x = g ( γ, H ) = sort , Θ H , ϕ Neural network output variable: y = r k (target coding rate) 4 Neural network training Training (70 %) and validation (15 %) datasets Anxo Tato Arias 62 / 71

  63. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Proposed Method DL-based Coding Rate Selection 3 Building the dataset for Machine Learning Dataset X = { ( x i , y i ) , i = 1 , 2 , . . . , m } Neural network input features: � t γ � h 1 � 2 , γ � h 2 � 2 � � � x = g ( γ, H ) = sort , Θ H , ϕ Neural network output variable: y = r k (target coding rate) 4 Neural network training Training (70 %) and validation (15 %) datasets 5 Performance evaluation Testing dataset (15 %) Confussion matrix: accuracy, rate of under-selection, outage probability Anxo Tato Arias 62 / 71

  64. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Proposed Method DL-based Coding Rate Selection 3 Building the dataset for Machine Learning Dataset X = { ( x i , y i ) , i = 1 , 2 , . . . , m } Neural network input features: � t γ � h 1 � 2 , γ � h 2 � 2 � � � x = g ( γ, H ) = sort , Θ H , ϕ Neural network output variable: y = r k (target coding rate) 4 Neural network training Training (70 %) and validation (15 %) datasets 5 Performance evaluation Testing dataset (15 %) Confussion matrix: accuracy, rate of under-selection, outage probability 6 Operation phase Coding rate selection with fixed neural network parameters θ Anxo Tato Arias 62 / 71

  65. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Simulation Results Simulated System Parameters SM 2 × 2 with QPSK constellation and 9 coding rate options Paramter Value Transmit and receive antennas N t = 2, N r = 2 Constellation QPSK ( M = 4) Channel coding DVB-S2 codes (BCH + LDPC) Coding rate options 1/4, 1/3, 2/5, 1/2, 3/5, 2/3, 3/4, 5/6, 9/10 p 0 = 10 − 4 Target BER Channel matrices 1000 Rayleigh ditributed SNR range − 5 to 15 dB (0 . 5 dB steps) Neural network configuration • Three hidden layers: 20+15+10 neurons • Activation function: tangent hyperbolic • Output layer: linear Anxo Tato Arias 63 / 71

  66. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Simulation Results Classification Performance 1 10 Y=X Y=X Points Points 0.8 8 Calculated coding rate index Calculated coding rate 0.6 6 0.4 4 0.2 2 0 -0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 Target coding rate Target coding rate index Margin ∆ = 0 ∆ = 0 . 03 Mean accuracy 96 . 2 % 80 . 0 % Outage 2 . 0 % 0 % Underselection 1 . 7 % 19 . 8 % Anxo Tato Arias 64 / 71

  67. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Simulation Results SM Link Adaptation Fixed coding rate r = r k , for some fixed k . (5) MI-based coding rate selection � I T − ∆ � � � I T − ∆ � � r = Q = arg min − r k � , (6) � � 3 3 r k � DL-based coding rate selection y − ∆) = arg min r k | ˆ y − ∆ − r k | . r = Q (ˆ (7) Anxo Tato Arias 65 / 71

  68. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency 3 Genie-aided Fixed rate 1/4 Fixed rate 1/2 2.5 Spectral efficiency (bits/s/Hz) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 SNR (dB) Anxo Tato Arias 66 / 71

  69. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency 3 Genie-aided MI-based =0.80 Fixed rate 1/4 2.5 Fixed rate 1/2 Spectral efficiency (bits/s/Hz) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 SNR (dB) Anxo Tato Arias 66 / 71

  70. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency 3 Genie-aided Deep Learning based =0.03 MI-based =0.80 2.5 Fixed rate 1/4 Fixed rate 1/2 Spectral efficiency (bits/s/Hz) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -5 0 5 10 15 SNR (dB) Anxo Tato Arias 66 / 71

  71. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Simulation Results Spectral Efficiency and FER 10 0 3 Genie-aided Deep Learning based =0.03 MI-based =0.80 Deep Learning based =0.03 MI-based =0.80 Fixed rate 1/4 2.5 Fixed rate 1/2 Fixed rate 1/4 Fixed rate 1/2 Spectral efficiency (bits/s/Hz) 10 -1 2 Outage probability 1.5 10 -2 1 0.5 10 -3 0 -5 0 5 10 15 -5 0 5 10 15 SNR (dB) SNR (dB) Anxo Tato Arias 67 / 71

  72. 6. Spatial Modulation Systems Conclusions Conclusions and Future Work Conclusions Neural networks can be used to select the coding rate in adaptive SM systems The spectral efficiency is very close to the maximum achievable value Future work Extension to more general scenarios: more antennas and several constellations Online adaptation of the neural network during the operation Anxo Tato Arias 68 / 71

  73. 7. Conclusions Outline 1. Motivation 1 2. Mobile Satellite System: Field Trial Results 2 3. Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding 3 4. Spatial Modulation Transmission Capacity 4 5. Mobile Satellite Systems with Dual Polarization 5 6. Spatial Modulation Systems 6 7. Conclusions 7 Anxo Tato Arias 69 / 71

  74. 7. Conclusions Conclusions Future terrestrial and satellite communication systems Anxo Tato Arias 70 / 71

  75. 7. Conclusions Conclusions Future terrestrial and satellite communication systems Anxo Tato Arias 70 / 71

Recommend

Evaluation of New Link Adaptation Techniques for Mobile Satellite Channels Autor Anxo Tato

Evaluation of New Link Adaptation Techniques for Mobile Satellite Channels Autor Anxo Tato

Universidade de Vigo Escola de Enxeara de Telecomunicacin Proxecto de Fin de Carreira Evaluation of New Link Adaptation Techniques for Mobile Satellite Channels Autor Anxo Tato Arias Titor Carlos Mosquera Nartallo Titulacin

1.4k views • 119 slides
Meet the Amniotes: The great terrestrial adaptation Pterosauria Archaic archosaurs Dinosauria

Meet the Amniotes: The great terrestrial adaptation Pterosauria Archaic archosaurs Dinosauria

Meet the Amniotes: The great terrestrial adaptation Pterosauria Archaic archosaurs Dinosauria Crocodiles Lepidosaurs Anapsids Synapsids Most amphibians Most fishes Amniota Assorted jawless fish Tetrapoda Urochordata

599 views • 33 slides
Adaptation Techniques for Acoustic Adaptation Techniques for Acoustic Adaptation Techniques for

Adaptation Techniques for Acoustic Adaptation Techniques for Acoustic Adaptation Techniques for

Adaptation Techniques for Acoustic Adaptation Techniques for Acoustic Adaptation Techniques for Acoustic Models Models Models Jen- -Wei Wei Roger Roger Kuo Kuo Jen Speech Lab, CSIE, NTNU Speech Lab, CSIE, NTNU rogerkuo@csie.ntnu.edu.tw

2.07k views • 183 slides
Preserving Linked Data on the Semantic Web by the application of Link Integrity techniques from

Preserving Linked Data on the Semantic Web by the application of Link Integrity techniques from

Preserving Linked Data on the Semantic Web by the application of Link Integrity techniques from Hypermedia Rob Vesse, Wendy Hall and Les Carr {rav08r,wh,lac}@ecs.soton.ac.uk 27 April 2010 Link Integrity Aims to ensure that a Link is valid

430 views • 14 slides
activities on the terrestrial radio system/network designs toward the future Fumihide Kojima,

activities on the terrestrial radio system/network designs toward the future Fumihide Kojima,

2nd Visions for Future Communications Summit November 27, 2019 NICT's R&amp;D and Promotion activities on the terrestrial radio system/network designs toward the future Fumihide Kojima, Ph. D. Director of Wireless Systems Laboratory,

423 views • 13 slides
Competitiveness of Terrestrial Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Are They a Bridge to the Future? Ron

Competitiveness of Terrestrial Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Are They a Bridge to the Future? Ron

Competitiveness of Terrestrial Greenhouse Gas Offsets: Are They a Bridge to the Future? Ron Sands Joint Global Change Research Institute Battelle PNNL University of Maryland Bruce McCarl Texas A&amp;M University 10 th AIM

557 views • 18 slides
Generalised link-layer adaptation with higher-layer criteria for energy-constrained and

Generalised link-layer adaptation with higher-layer criteria for energy-constrained and

Link configuration: approaches and issues Generalised link configuration with higher-layer criteria Discussion and Recapitulation Supplementary material Generalised link-layer adaptation with higher-layer criteria for energy-constrained and

312 views • 19 slides
AGENDA Need for Proactive Adaptation Online Failure Prediction and Accuracy

AGENDA Need for Proactive Adaptation Online Failure Prediction and Accuracy

AGENDA Need for Proactive Adaptation Online Failure Prediction and Accuracy Experimental Assessment of Existing Techniques Observations &amp; Future Directions 2 Service oriented Systems About [Di Nitto et al. 2008] Service-

587 views • 24 slides
Adaptation solutions for BC and Metro Vancouver 1. What do adaptation measures look like?

Adaptation solutions for BC and Metro Vancouver 1. What do adaptation measures look like?

Adaptation solutions for BC and Metro Vancouver 1. What do adaptation measures look like? already happening future solutions 2. Resilience 3. Low-carbon attractive resilient communities Heat mapping data: Natural Resources Canada

784 views • 30 slides
Climate Change Adaptation for International Transport: Preparing for the Future 16 to 17 April

Climate Change Adaptation for International Transport: Preparing for the Future 16 to 17 April

Ad Hoc Expert Meeting on Climate Change Adaptation for International Transport: Preparing for the Future 16 to 17 April 2019 Adaptation: key issues and experiences, recent initiatives and developments Airports and Aviation Presentation by

639 views • 10 slides
What is DTT? DTT stands for digital terrestrial television (or digital terrestrial transmission).

What is DTT? DTT stands for digital terrestrial television (or digital terrestrial transmission).

What is DTT? DTT stands for digital terrestrial television (or digital terrestrial transmission). It refers to the broadcasting of terrestrial television in a digital format. Currently, terrestrial broadcasting in South Africa is broadcast in an

324 views • 28 slides
Link Adaptation and Carriers Detection Errors in Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding

Link Adaptation and Carriers Detection Errors in Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding

Link Adaptation and Carriers Detection Errors in Multibeam Satellite Systems with Linear Precoding Anxo Tato, Stefano Andrenacci, Symeon Chatzinotas, Carlos Mosquera atlanTTic Research Center, University of Vigo SnT, University of Luxembourg

538 views • 18 slides
Regional Climate Modelling Techniques: Impacts on Regional Climate Change Climate Adaptation

Regional Climate Modelling Techniques: Impacts on Regional Climate Change Climate Adaptation

Regional Climate Modelling Techniques: Impacts on Regional Climate Change Climate Adaptation Flagship Jack Katzfey, M. Chattopadhyay, J. McGregor, K. Nguyen and M. Thatcher CAWCR, CMAR, Aspendale GH2011 Outline Uncertainty and downscaling

637 views • 30 slides
Adding Safeness to Dynam ic Adaptation Techniques Betty H.C. Cheng Software Engineering and

Adding Safeness to Dynam ic Adaptation Techniques Betty H.C. Cheng Software Engineering and

Adding Safeness to Dynam ic Adaptation Techniques Betty H.C. Cheng Software Engineering and Network Systems Laboratory Michigan State University http: / / www.cse.msu.edu/ SENS Authors: J. Zhang, Z. Yang, B. H.C. Cheng, and P. K. McKinley

231 views • 22 slides
Climate Adaptation Intro and Workshop Overview Paul Moss MPCA Adaptation/Mitigation

Climate Adaptation Intro and Workshop Overview Paul Moss MPCA Adaptation/Mitigation

Climate Adaptation Intro and Workshop Overview Paul Moss MPCA Adaptation/Mitigation Adaptation: Mitigation: Addressing current Achieving &amp; future climate greenhouse gas impacts emissions reductions Risk management and

263 views • 8 slides
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy Acting now for a more resilient future Climate Change

Climate Change Adaptation Strategy Acting now for a more resilient future Climate Change

Climate Change Adaptation Strategy Acting now for a more resilient future Climate Change Adaptation Strategy Summer 2017 THE PREDICTION By 2050s, in the District: 1. Warmer average annual air temperatures 2. Changing precipitation 3.

669 views • 21 slides
Link Adaptation in Mobile Satellite Links: Field Trial Results Anxo Tato *, Carlos Mosquera * and

Link Adaptation in Mobile Satellite Links: Field Trial Results Anxo Tato *, Carlos Mosquera * and

Link Adaptation in Mobile Satellite Links: Field Trial Results Anxo Tato *, Carlos Mosquera * and Iago Gmez * Signal Processing in Communications Group Universidade de Vigo {anxotato, mosquera}@gts.uvigo.es GRADIANT (Centro Tecnolxico

500 views • 19 slides
Governing the future under climate change: contested visions of climate change adaptation Lauren

Governing the future under climate change: contested visions of climate change adaptation Lauren

VCCCAR Scenarios for Climate Adaptation Working Paper Lauren Rickards, Nov 2010 Governing the future under climate change: contested visions of climate change adaptation Lauren Rickards 1 Abstract Climate change adaptation is a Trojan horse of

560 views • 22 slides
Link Analysis Lecture 7 Link Analysis November 29, 2017 1 CS6220 Data Mining Techniques

Link Analysis Lecture 7 Link Analysis November 29, 2017 1 CS6220 Data Mining Techniques

CS6220 Data Mining Techniques Fall 2017 Derbinsky Link Analysis Lecture 7 Link Analysis November 29, 2017 1 CS6220 Data Mining Techniques Fall 2017 Derbinsky Outline 1. Lets Build a

950 views • 57 slides
Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) Applies to broadcasts that are land based (terrestrial)

Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) Applies to broadcasts that are land based (terrestrial)

Draft Framework for Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting in Trinidad and Tobago 15 15 th th Novemb ember er 2011 11 Ryan n James es Broa oadc dcast st Engine neer Telec lecommuni nication tions s Author ority ity of Trini

322 views • 17 slides
Verification of cryptographic protocols: techniques, tools and link to cryptanalysis Vronique

Verification of cryptographic protocols: techniques, tools and link to cryptanalysis Vronique

Verification of cryptographic protocols: techniques, tools and link to cryptanalysis Vronique Cortier INRIA project Cassis, Loria CNRS, Nancy, France French/Japanese Symposium on Computer Security - Sept. 6th, 2005 Verification of

605 views • 46 slides
Adaptation and Retrofitting Using green space to help cities become future ready Tom

Adaptation and Retrofitting Using green space to help cities become future ready Tom

Adaptation and Retrofitting Using green space to help cities become future ready Tom Butterworth Andy Follis At a glance Adaptation and Retrofitting Using green space to help cities become future ready Introductions

352 views • 18 slides
Coastal Adaptation Kellie Fisher FCERM Senior Advisor Why Adaptation? Adaptation to a

Coastal Adaptation Kellie Fisher FCERM Senior Advisor Why Adaptation? Adaptation to a

Coastal Adaptation Kellie Fisher FCERM Senior Advisor Why Adaptation? Adaptation to a changing environment. Coastal change is not new! Traditional defences are a form of adaptation too. Are they always appropriate? Property

516 views • 19 slides
MARE MARE in Milan in Milan Talk presented by Elena Ferri* E. Ferri*, C. Arnaboldi*, C.

MARE MARE in Milan in Milan Talk presented by Elena Ferri* E. Ferri*, C. Arnaboldi*, C.

The Future of Neutrino Mass Measurements: The Future of Neutrino Mass Measurements: Terrestrial, Astrophysical, and Cosmological Measurements Terrestrial, Astrophysical, and Cosmological Measurements in the Next Decade in the Next Decade

403 views • 16 slides

More recommend