laser interferometry for gravitational wave observations
play

Laser Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Observations 1. Laser - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

July 25, 2019 TianQin Summer School 2019 @ Sun Yat-sen University Laser Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Observations 1. Laser Interferometers Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo Self Introduction Yuta Michimura


  1. July 25, 2019 TianQin Summer School 2019 @ Sun Yat-sen University Laser Interferometry for Gravitational Wave Observations 1. Laser Interferometers Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo

  2. Self Introduction • Yuta Michimura ( 道村 唯太 ) Department of Physics, University of Tokyo • Laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors - KAGRA - DECIGO • Fundamental physics with laser interferometry - Lorentz invariance test - Macroscopic quantum mechanics - Axion search etc… 2

  3. Aim of This Lecture • Learn how laser interferometric gravitational wave detector works and learn how to calculate quantum noise of the detector • You should be able to design your own interferometer after the lectures 3

  4. Contents 1. Laser Interferometers (July 25 PM) Michelson interferometer Fabry-Pérot interferometer 2. Quantum Noise (July 25 PM) Shot noise and radiation pressure noise Standard quantum limit 3. Sensitivity Design (July 26 AM) Force noise and displacement noise Inspiral range and time to merger Space interferometer design 4. Status of KAGRA (July 26 AM) Status of KAGRA detector in Japan 4 Future prospects

  5. Slides Available Online 1. Laser Interferometers (July 25 PM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-1 2. Quantum Noise (July 25 PM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-2 3. Sensitivity Design (July 26 AM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-3 4. Status of KAGRA (July 26 AM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-4 5

  6. Contents 1. Laser Interferometers (July 25 PM) Michelson interferometer Fabry-Pérot interferometer 2. Quantum Noise (July 25 PM) Shot noise and radiation pressure noise Standard quantum limit 3. Sensitivity Design (July 26 AM) Force noise and displacement noise Inspiral range and time to merger Space interferometer design 4. Status of KAGRA (July 26 AM) Status of KAGRA detector in Japan 6 Future prospects

  7. Gravitational Waves • Ripples in space-time • Stretches and squeezes length • Amplitude: fraction of length change (strain) • Plus (+) and cross (x) polarizations 7

  8. Detection of GWs • Most common detector: laser interferometer • Rai Weiss (MIT) proposed in 1960s Internal report (1972) 8 LIGO-P720002

  9. Laser Interferometric GW Detector • measure differential arm length change Top view Beam Laser source splitter Suspended mirror Constant Interference power when Photodiode no GW 9

  10. Laser Interferometric GW Detector • measure differential arm length change Top view Beam Laser source splitter Suspended mirror Power Interference changes Photodiode with GW 10

  11. Amplitude of GW is Tiny • For example, GW150914 had h ~ 10 -21 10 -18 m for 1 km arm 1 km Size of hydrogen atom: 10 -11 m Size of proton: 10 -15 m Laser 1 km 半透明鏡 source 吊るされた鏡 光の干渉 Photodiode 11

  12. Michelson Interferometer • Let’s look into how Michelson interferometer works Top view Beam Laser source splitter Suspended mirror Interference Photodiode 12

  13. Laser Beam • Electro-magnetic waves Speed of light: c Electric field: E Magnetic wavelength field • Electric field can be written as phase angular phase at amplitude frequency distance L of laser 13

  14. Photodiodes • Photodiodes (PDs) Convert photons into electrons Detects light power (square of amplitude) We can only detect power change Phase change cannot be detected directly 14

  15. Beam Splitter • Split beam in two • Half in power, 1/ √ 2 in amplitude • Sign flip in back reflection 15

  16. Output of Michelson Interferometer • What is the power detected at the photodiode? phase at distance L Laser Beam splitter Photodiode 16

  17. Output of Michelson Interferometer • What is the power detected at the photodiode? From Y-am From X-arm Input power Differential arm length 17

  18. Output of Michelson Interferometer • Power changes with differential arm length change (interference) Laser Bright fringe in every half wavelength change in differential arm length 18

  19. Output of Michelson Interferometer • Ratio between power change and length change Laser Differential arm length change can be detected from power change at the photodiode 19

  20. How to Further Enhance the Signal • Longer arms gives larger length change due to gravitational waves • But making arm length very long is tough (especially on Earth) • Use Fabry-Pérot cavity laser light go back-and-forth many times to effectively enhance the arm length 20

  21. Fabry-Pérot Cavity • Made from two parallel mirrors amplitude reflectivity, transmittance input mirror end mirror partially partially reflected transmitted 21 infinite times with reduced amplitude...

  22. Fabry-Pérot Cavity • Let’s calculate electric field inside the cavity amplitude reflectivity, transmittance input mirror end mirror partially partially reflected transmitted 22 infinite times with reduced amplitude...

  23. Intra-Cavity Field • Intra-cavity field can be expressed as infinite geometric series with input field a common ratio of 23

  24. Reflected Field • Reflected field can be expressed as infinite geometric series with a common ratio of 24

  25. Intra-Cavity Power • Power inside the cavity resonance Intra-cavity power can be much higher than input power on resonance constructive interference 25

  26. Intra-Cavity Power • Power inside the cavity anti-resonance Almost no intra-cavity power at anti-resonance destructive interference 26

  27. Finesse • Power inside the cavity Resonance Spacing Sharpness of the resonance can be evaluated with Spacing Full width half maximum FWHM Finesse Higher finesse for higher reflectivity 27

  28. Cavity Build-up • Power inside the cavity Intra-cavity power at resonance Resonance with r 1 ~1, r 2 =1 Cavity build-up 28

  29. Phase of Reflected light • Reflected field Phase of the reflected beam changes drastically at the resonance Cavity build-up 29

  30. Michelson and Fabry-Pérot • The phase of the reflected light is different by → FP is more sensitive to mirror displacement by (~ finesse) but linear range is smaller Laser Laser 30

  31. Fabry-Pérot-Michelson Interferometer • Displacement sensitivity higher by • Commonly used in ground-based gravitational wave detectors Laser 31

  32. High-Frequency Response • The effect of gravitational waves cancel at high frequencies Laser FPMI For a given frequency, Michelson there is a limit where longer arm length and higher finesse won’t help increasing the sensitivity 32

  33. Summary • Gravitational waves create differential arm length change in Michelson interferometer • Differential arm length change create power Finesse change at the output of the Michelson interferometer • The signal can be enhanced by a factor of by using Fabry-Pérot cavities • The sensitivity at low frequencies can be increased with longer arm length and higher finesse 33

  34. Slides Available Online 1. Laser Interferometers (July 25 PM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-1 2. Quantum Noise (July 25 PM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-2 3. Sensitivity Design (July 26 AM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-3 4. Status of KAGRA (July 26 AM) https://tinyurl.com/YM20190725-4 34

Recommend


More recommend