knowledge engineering pitfalls knowledge engineering
play

Knowledge Engineering Pitfalls Knowledge Engineering Pitfalls Which - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Knowledge Engineering Pitfalls Knowledge Engineering Pitfalls Which one is better to represent Pizza margherita ? (A) Pizza ( x ) Margherita ( x ) (B) Pizza ( x ) y . ( hasType ( x , y ) PizzaMargherita ( y )) Which one is


  1. Knowledge Engineering Pitfalls

  2. Knowledge Engineering Pitfalls Which one is better to represent “Pizza margherita” ? (A) Pizza ( x ) ∧ Margherita ( x ) (B) Pizza ( x ) ∧∃ y . ( hasType ( x , y ) ∧ PizzaMargherita ( y ))

  3. Which one is better? (A) ThinkPad ( TSeries ) (B) ∀ x . TSeries ( x ) → ThinkPadModel ( x ) ∀ x . ThinkPad ( x ) ∧ ∃ y . ( hasModel ( x , y ) ∧ ThinkPadModel ( y ))

  4. Which one is better? (A) ∀ x . DiskDrive ( x ) → ComputerPart ( x ) ∀ x . Memory ( x ) → ComputerPart ( x ) ∀ x . Computer ( x ) ∧ ∃ y . ( hasPart ( x , y ) ∧ ComputerPart ( y )) (B) ∀ x . DiskPart ( x ) → ComputerPart ( x ) ∀ x . MemoryPart ( x ) → ComputerPart ( x ) ∀ x . DiskPart ( x ) → DiskDrive ( x ) ∀ x . MemoryPart ( x ) → Memory ( x ) ∀ x . Computer ( x ) ∧ ∃ y . ( hasPart ( x , y ) ∧ ComputerPart ( y ))

  5. Instantiation Pitfalls ◮ Does this ontology mean that “My ThinkPad is a ThinkPad Model”? T 21 ( mythinkpad 123 ) ∀ x . T 21 ( x ) → ThinkPadModel ( x ) ◮ Question: What ThinkPad models do you sell? ◮ Answer should NOT include My ThinkPad – nor yours. K | = ThinkPadModel ( mythinkpad 123 )

  6. Instantiation Pitfalls (cont.) ◮ Corrected version NotebookComputer ( mythinkpad 123 ) hasModel ( mythinkpad 123 , T 21 ) TSeries ( T 21 ) ∀ x . TSeries ( x ) → ThinkPadModel ( x )

  7. Composition Pitfalls ∀ x . MicroDrive ( x ) → DiskDrive ( x ) ∀ x . DiskDrive ( x ) → Computer ( x ) ∀ x . Memory ( x ) → Computer ( x ) ◮ Question: What Computers do you sell? ◮ Answer should NOT include Disk Drives or Memory

  8. Composition Pitfalls (cont.) ◮ Corrected version ∀ x . MicroDrive ( x ) → DiskDrive ( x ) ∀ x . DiskDrive ( x ) ∧ ∃ y . ( partOf ( x , y ) ∧ Computer ( y )) ∀ x . Memory ( x ) ∧ ∃ y . ( partOf ( x , y ) ∧ Computer ( y ))

  9. Disjunction Pitfalls ◮ Unintended model: flashcard110 is a computer-part hasPart ( camera 15 , flashcard 110 ) Memory ( flashcard 110 ) ∀ x . Computer ( x ) ∧ ∀ y . ( hasPart ( x , y ) → ComputerPart ( y )) ∀ x . Memory ( x ) → ComputerPart ( x ) ∀ x . DiskDrive ( x ) → ComputerPart ( x )

  10. Disjunction Pitfalls (cont.) ◮ Corrected version hasPart ( camera 15 , flashcard 110 ) FlashMemory ( flashcard 110 ) Camera ( camera 15 ) ∀ x . Camera ( x ) → ¬ Computer ( x ) ∀ x . Computer ( x ) ∧ ∀ y . ( hasPart ( x , y ) → ComputerPart ( y )) ∀ x . ComputerPart ( x ) ↔ ( MemoryPart ( x ) ∨ DiskPart ( x ) ∨ . . . )

  11. Polysem Pitfalls ∀ x . Book ( x ) → PhysicalObject ( x ) ∀ x . Book ( x ) → AbstractEntity ( x ) Book ( b 1 ) , . . . , Book ( b 5000 ) ◮ Question: How many books do you have on Hemingway? ◮ Answer: 5,000

  12. Polysem Pitfalls (cont.) ◮ Corrected version ∀ x . BookSense 1 ( x ) → PhysicalObject ( x ) ∀ x . BookSense 2 ( x ) → AbstractEntity ( x ) BookSense 2 ( b 1 ) , . . . , BookSense 2 ( b 5000 )

  13. Constitution Pitfalls (WordNet) ∀ x . Metal ( x ) → AmountOfMatter ( x ) ∀ x . Clay ( x ) → AmountOfMatter ( x ) ∀ x . Computer ( x ) → PhysicalObject ( x ) ∀ x . PhysicalObject ( x ) → AmountOfMatter ( x ) ∀ x . AmountOfMatter ( x ) → Entity ( x ) ◮ Question: What types of matter will conduct electricity? ◮ Answer should NOT include computers.

  14. Constitution Pitfalls (cont.) ◮ Corrected version ∀ x . Metal ( x ) → AmountOfMatter ( x ) ∀ x . Clay ( x ) → AmountOfMatter ( x ) ∀ x . Computer ( x ) → PhysicalObject ( x ) ∀ x . PhysicalObject ( x ) ∧ ∃ y . ( constitutedBy ( x , y ) ∧ AmountOfMatter ( y )) ∀ x . AmountOfMatter ( x ) → Entity ( x ) ∀ x . PhysicalObject ( x ) → Entity ( x )

  15. Temporality Pitfalls 1963 ( chris ) ∀ x . 1963 ( x ) → 1960 s ( x ) ∀ x . 1964 ( x ) → 1960 s ( x )

  16. Temporality Pitfalls (cont.) ◮ Corrected version 1963 Births ( chris ) ∀ x . 1963 Births ( x ) → 1960 sBirths ( x ) ∀ x . 1964 Births ( x ) → 1960 sBirths ( x )

  17. Temporality Pitfalls (cont.) Person ( chris ) , bornIn ( chris , 1963 ) Year ( 1963 ) , Year ( 1964 ) contains ( 1960 s , 1963 ) , contains ( 1960 s , 1964 ) Decade ( 1960 s )

  18. Spatial/Containment Pitfalls ∀ x . AlsaceRegion ( x ) → FrenchRegion ( x ) ∀ x . LoireRegion ( x ) → FrenchRegion ( x ) Corrected . . . Region ( alsace ) , Region ( loire ) contains ( france , alsace ) , contains ( france , loire ) Country ( france )

  19. About Instances ◮ For every class, think about what an instance of it is ◮ What is an instance of “Loire Region”? ◮ Classes do not describe their subclasses ◮ “Regions by Country” is a class of classes ◮ Criteria for individuation must remain constant within a taxonomy ◮ Instance of a class is also an instance of every superclass ◮ Thus “Chris” is not an instance of “1963 births” ◮ Explore the “boundary conditions” ◮ E.g. Changes in existence, distinctions with similar classes ◮ “Leaf Nodes” of a hierarchy have no special significance ◮ Don’t switch to instances ◮ Think of an instance as the keyvalue of a record in a database, while of a class as the schema (signature) of a relational table

  20. Common Pitfalls ◮ Composition (part of) ◮ ∀ x . Arm ( x ) → ) Body ( x ) ◮ Constitution ◮ ∀ x . Statue ( x ) → Marble ( x ) ◮ Disjunction ◮ ∀ x . Car ( x ) → ( ∀ y . hasPart ( x , y ) ∧ CarPart ( y )) ◮ ∀ x . Engine ( x ) → CarPart ( x ) ◮ ∀ x . Tire ( x ) → CarPart ( x ) ◮ Spatial ◮ ∀ x . NewYork ( x ) → US ( x ) ◮ Polysemy ◮ ∀ x . Book ( x ) → PhysicalObject ( x ) ◮ ∀ x . Book ( x ) → ConceptualCreation ( x ) ◮ Arbitrary organisational nodes ◮ ∀ x . FictionalBookbyLatinAmericanAuthor ( x ) → FictionalBook ( x ) ◮ Instance ◮ Grape ( pinotnoir ) ◮ Temporality ◮ Elvis ( YoungElvis )

  21. Linguistic Tests ◮ If P subclass Q , you should be able to say “ P is a kind of Q ” ◮ If a instanceOf P ’, you should be able to say, “a is a P” ◮ If a instanceOf P subClassOf Q , you should be able to say “a is a Q” ◮ For every instance, there should be a class it is (rigidly) an instance of that is its natural label ◮ You should not find it natural to say, if P subclassOf Q , “ P has Q ”, “ P might be Q ”, “ P was Q ”, “ P is in Q ”, “ P is part of Q ”

  22. What’s in a name ◮ Don’t argue about what specific terms mean ◮ Common software architecture argument: “What is a bridge?” ◮ Try and find the distinctions that matter ◮ Assign them labels later ◮ Avoid “ish”, “-thing” & “other-” classes ◮ Find good names that will avoid meaning creep ◮ Other- classes create a maintenance nightmare ◮ Classes describe their instances ◮ Remember the linguistic tests ◮ The superclass is not part of the name ◮ So don’t assume it is (e.g. Best_Practices subClassOf Document)

Recommend


More recommend