IPv6 and Internet2 Update IPv6 and Internet2 Update Heather BOYLES <heather@internet2.edu> Heather BOYLES <heather@internet2.edu> and Matt ZEKAUSKAS <matt@internet2.edu> and Matt ZEKAUSKAS <matt@internet2.edu> From slides developed by From slides developed by Bill CERVENY <cerveny@internet2.edu> Bill CERVENY <cerveny@internet2.edu> 2005 IPv6 Summit in Taiwan 2005 IPv6 Summit in Taiwan August 23, 2005 August 23, 2005
Contents Contents • Internet2 and Abilene Overview • History • Participants and Connectors • Deployment • Addressing • Multicast • Measurement • Member Activities • Commitment 2
Internet2 Goals Internet2 Goals •Create a leading edge network capability for the national research community •Enable revolutionary Internet applications •Ensure the rapid transfer of new network services and applications to the broader Internet community. 3
Abilene Network Abilene Network • OC-192c over unprotected DWDM waves with SONET framing • Original design of current upgrade was as a dual stack IPv4/IPv6 network 4
Abilene Partners Abilene Partners • Indiana University • Juniper Networks • Nortel Networks • Qwest Communications • North Carolina, Ohio, San Diego and Texas ITECs 5
6 Abilene Backbone Abilene Backbone
Abilene Participation Abilene Participation May 2005 May 2005 •44 direct connections (OC-3c → 10 GigE) • 5 10-GigE connections (10 Gbps) • 6 OC-48c connections (2.5 Gbps) • 3 Gigabit Ethernet connections (1 Gbps) • 30 connections at OC-12c (622 Mbps) or smaller •235 participants – research universities & laboratories • All 50 states, District of Columbia & Puerto Rico •Expanded access • 125 sponsored participants • 34 state education networks •Active IPv6 participation at all levels 7
Abilene Peering Abilene Peering •Peering Methods • Exchange point • Direct peering to backbone router • Peering through GigaPoPs, through tunnels or BGP multihop •IPv6 and IP Multicast Peering Policy – open peering policy, with transit if desired – different from IPv4 8
Abilene Peering - Connectivity Abilene Peering - Connectivity • Connectivity to Exchange Points • MANLAN (Internet2/NYSERnet partnership) – 10 GigE • PacWave-Seattle – 10 GigE • PacWave-LA – 10 GigE • Starlight – 2 x 10 GigE • NGIX East – 10 GigE • NGIX West – 1 GigE in very near future • Palo Alto PAIX – 333Mbps • MCI MAE – OC-3 9
Last updated: May 2005 Abilene Federal/Research Peering Abilene Federal/Research Peering 10
Last updated: May 2005 Abilene International Peering Abilene International Peering 11
Abilene IPv6 History Abilene IPv6 History • Substantial input from the Internet2 IPv6 working group • Tunnel network deployed 2001 • Migration to native, dual stack implementation at end of 2001 (Cisco 12008) • Native dual stack was default for the upgrade (OC 192 + Juniper T640) • Early testing 12
IPv6 Participants and Connectors IPv6 Participants and Connectors • Participants: 56 • Connectors: 26 • Peers: 34 • 1 Corporate • 3 Federal • 26 International 13
Abilene IPv6 Growth Abilene IPv6 Growth IPv6 Participant/Connector/Peer Growth 60 50 40 Participants 30 Connectors Peer Netw orks 20 10 0 Dec-00 Mar-01 Jun-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Jun-02 Dec-02 Mar-03 Jun-03 Dec-03 Mar-04 Jun-04 Dec-04 Mar-05 Sep-00 Sep-01 Sep-02 Sep-03 Sep-04 Date 14
Additional IPv6 Deployment Additional IPv6 Deployment •Backbone unicast enabled • Routing – BGP and IS-IS •6 to 4 tunnel relays: • Indiana University • Pittsburgh Supercomputer Center 15
Deployment Issues Deployment Issues While Abilene and Gigapops are IPv6- enabled, a “last mile” problem persists as it relates to IPv6. Theories: • Hardware doesn’t support IPv6 • Application server time-outs • Difficulty convincing administrators of value • Ensuring security isn’t being compromised • Application protocols don’t support IPv6 Source: Joe Breen, University of Utah 16
IPv6 Security IPv6 Security • Abilene NOC activities: • Limiting the v6 prefixes connectors send us as we do for IPv4 • Limited filtering for peer networks • New v6-security e-mail list 17
Deployment Issues Deployment Issues • [This is an old slide, but unfortunately, its still true] • Many monitoring tools are missing, impacting security • Schools are reluctant to deploy fully because of potential for attacks • For example, difficulty in supporting access lists that monitor address/port number – extended header implementation problem 18
IPv6 Multicast IPv6 Multicast • Abilene is IPv6 Multicast enabled, but is not currently part of the global m6bone infrastructure • NYSERnet, New York’s research and education network, is configuring IPv6 Multicast across their backbone 19
20 IPv6 Traffic Map IPv6 Traffic Map
Abilene IPv4/IPv6 Abilene IPv4/IPv6 Measurement Measurement • Backbone measurements via IPv4 and IPv6: • BWCTL – Bandwidth Control • OWAMP – One Way Active Measurement Protocol • Measurements to and from Abilene backbone • http://e2epi.internet2.edu/pipes/ami/pmp-info.html • Difference between IPv6 and IPv4 performance on Abilene is indistinguishable 21
IPv4/IPv6 Comparative IPv4/IPv6 Comparative Performance Graphics Performance Graphics 22
IPv4/IPv6 Comparative IPv4/IPv6 Comparative Performance Review Performance Review • Reviewed Abilene backbone 180 TCP throughput (iperf) measurements for a specific period – May 12 around 13:00 UTC. • Measurement systems have 1GigE interfaces • Measurements averaged 980Mbps with IPv4 tests and 977Mbps with IPv6 tests • IPv6 lags IPv4 TCP throughput by about .1 - .3 percent for most measurements across same links. • Other than saying that IPv6 performance differences are insignificant, do these measurements say anything else? 23
Internet2 Member IPv6 Internet2 Member IPv6 Activities Activities • North Carolina State University and Centaur Labs -- IPv6 streaming audio feeds from radio stations WCPE and WZYC • IPv6 H.323 at Georgia Tech • NYSERnet experimenting with IPv6 Multicast via the international M6bone effort • IPv6 Multicast Demo at Fall Member Meeting in planning stages • Abilene IPv6-enabled hosts • http://ipv6.internet2.edu/ipv6hosts.shtml 24
Applications Applications • Currently monitoring applications like • VRVS (CalREN)– IPv6 support in development • Internet2 detective – detecting IPv6 • DVTS (Wide) • Preliminary interest in finding synergies with amateur radio community and IPv6 25
IPv6 Routing IPv6 Routing • Revising policies for IPv6 routing with international peers and commercial networks (via experimental, non-production peerings) • Some of revised policies may apply to IPv4 unicast and multicast • Feedback from Abilene connectors and international peer networks is being solicited • IPv6 Transit options from commercial IPv6 network provider under investigation 26
IPv6 Routing (continued) IPv6 Routing (continued) • Question: Should Abilene Network advertise routes received from Asian-Pacific peer networks to other Asian-Pacific Networks? • Policies being considered: • If peer network wishes to send Abilene both non- commercial and commercial routes, commercial routes should/must be tagged with a commercial community string • Routing policy should be symmetric between Abilene and peer network 27
Support for IPv6 Support for IPv6 •Tutorials • Two day workshops, hands-on experience • Descriptions and planning guides • http://ipv6.internet2.edu/workshops/index.shtml • http://ipv6.internet2.edu/workshops/setup/ • Alternate discussion/lecture with hands-on lab exercises • Slides are available • http://ipv6.internet2.edu/presentations/ 28
Internet2 Commitment Internet2 Commitment • Internet2 is committed to deploying an IPv6 native dual stack network for the research community. • Internet2 is committed to encouraging connectors, peers, and members to fully deploy IPv6 on their networks. • Internet2 will monitor IPv6 penetration in the future to provide guidance to the community. • Network penetration. • Availability of software and tools • Security Issues 29
For Further Information … For Further Information … •References • http://www.internet2.edu • http://abilene.internet2.edu • http://www.abilene.iu.edu • http://ipv6.internet2.edu 30
31
Recommend
More recommend