ipm evaluation tools for fruit and field crops peter werts
play

IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project Assistant IPM Institute of North America NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM pwerts@ipminstitute.org 1 IPM Reduces Pesticide Risk and Exposure IPM is a


  1. IPM Evaluation Tools for Fruit and Field Crops Peter Werts Project Assistant IPM Institute of North America NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM pwerts@ipminstitute.org 1

  2. IPM Reduces Pesticide Risk and Exposure IPM is a systems-based approach:  – Reduces environmental, health and economic risks. – Implemented as an ongoing series of science-based, pest management evaluations, decisions and interventions. Conventional pesticide sales down 3% per year  between 1999 and 2006. (Crop Life, 2007) Bald eagle nesting pairs increase Long road ahead… from 417 to 5,748 after DDT ban. - Fish & Wildlife Service, 2003 94% of fish, 94% of surface water and 33% of  ground water samples collected from 1992 and 2001 showed contamination with one or more pesticides. (2006 U.S. Geological Survey) 2

  3. Presentation Overview  NRCS & IPM working group  IPM Tool background  Use in 595 Practice Standard  IPM Tool demo  Additional Resources  Questions? 3

  4. North Central Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM http://www.nrcs.ipm.msu.edu/  Funded by North Central IPM Center since 2006; additional support from Northeastern IPM Center for IPM CAPs work in 2009-2010.  128 members from within and outside of region.  Goal: Increase grower awareness and participation in NRCS programs including EQIP for IPM.  Outputs include:  Field crop, vegetable and fruit IPM guidelines;  Compiled EQIP financial assistance contract numbers;  http://www.nrcs.ipm.msu.edu/nrcs/state_resources  Mini-grants and outreach to engage NRCS and create new 595 options in: IN, OH, IA, KS and MN;  Networking, resource sharing other working groups and national NRCS staff. 4

  5. IPM Tool Background  NE Vegetable IPM Tool developed 2008 – Kathy Murray, Maine Department of Ag. – Alice Begin and Autumn Birt, NRCS.  Adapted to North Central Region, 2009. – Fruit and field crops. – Funded by North Central IPM Center.  Current revisions in-progress to adapt vegetable tool for North Central Region. 5

  6. Why IPM Tools?  Help IPM planning become: – Site specific; – Crop specific.  Catalogue of IPM practices  Compliment production guides 6

  7. How do they help NRCS?  Identify IPM Strategies for 595 Practice Standard: – PAMS (Prevention, Avoidance, Monitoring, Suppression).  Qualify producers for cost-share and technical assistance programs.  Assess and identify IPM and other conservation practices.  Identify practices with low adoption.  Template for local IPM Elements and Guidelines. 7

  8. IPM Planning for NRCS The foundation of all NRCS pest management planning is based on utilizing environmentally sensitive prevention , avoidance , monitoring and suppression (PAMS) strategies to manage weeds, insects, diseases, animals and other organisms that directly or indirectly cause damage or annoyance to agricultural crops. 8

  9. North Central IPM Tools Format  MS Word: – Fruit and field crops.  MS Excel with macros: – Fruit crop only.  Contents: – Guide Sheet; – PAMS strategies; – Resource list. 9

  10. 10 Field and Fruit Crop Tool: MS Word

  11. 11 Fruit Crop Tool: MS Excel Click Here

  12. Accessing the IPM Tools  Available for down from NRCS & IPM Working Group website: http://www.nrcs.ipm.msu.edu/ 12

  13. Additional Resources  Guide to IPM Elements and Guide lines – Tom Green, IPM Institute of North America and Curt Petzoldt, Cornell University, 2009. http://www.ipm.msu.edu/work- group/pdf/IPMElementsGuidelines09.pdf  Ohio IPM Elements and Guidelines – http://www.ipm.osu.edu/default.asp 13

  14. Thank You…Questions?  Thanks to:  North Central and North East IPM Centers  NRCS & IPM Working Group: Grower Incentives for IPM The following working group members provided comments  on the tools: Bill Kuenstler, Dave Epstein, Bryan Jensen, Tom Green, Kathy Murray. Additional comments: Patty McManus, UW Madison Plant  pathology. 14

Recommend


More recommend