invincible colliery modification
play

Invincible Colliery Modification Planning Assessment Commission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Invincible Colliery Modification Planning Assessment Commission Briefing Clay Preshaw & Matthew Riley November 2017 Contents 1. Context 2. Proposed Modification 3. Engagement 4. Key Issues 5. Summary Context Existing Mining


  1. Invincible Colliery Modification Planning Assessment Commission Briefing Clay Preshaw & Matthew Riley November 2017

  2. Contents 1. Context 2. Proposed Modification 3. Engagement 4. Key Issues 5. Summary

  3. Context – Existing Mining Operations

  4. Context – Existing Mining Operations Cullen Bullen

  5. Context – Existing Mining Precinct

  6. Context – Ben Bullen State Forest

  7. Context – Coalpac Consolidation Project

  8. Context – Expansion Modifications

  9. Context – Proposed Modification

  10. Proposed Modification • Extending mine life by up to 8 years • Extracting 2.7 million tonnes of coal • Transporting coal to Shoalhaven Starches and Mount Piper Power Station • 50 ha of disturbance

  11. Comparison to Prior Applications Coalpac Expansion Southern Consolidation Modifications Extension Project Modification Disturbance 794 ha 152 ha 50 ha Open Cut mining within 300m of 456 ha 57 ha 6 ha pagodas Highwall mining within 300m of 269 ha 163 ha 0 ha pagodas

  12. Engagement • 2 Interagency Site Visits • Several Interagency Meetings • Submissions - 856 in total - 299 Objections - 12 from residents of Cullen Bullen, all of which support the proposal

  13. Key Issues 1. Landscape 2. Biodiversity 3. Water Resources 4. Economic 5. Traffic 6. Other

  14. Invincible – Key Issues Landscape Impacts – Landscape Values • Pagodas form part of an internationally significant landscape • The pagoda complex includes the formations, gullies, and the wooded slopes below the pagodas. • Recommended 300 m buffer from these features. • Highest and best use of the site is for conservation purposes

  15. Invincible – Key Issues Landscape Impacts – Key Impacts and Risks • Blasting Impacts • Final landform slope instability • Visual impacts from exposed mining areas and rehabilitation

  16. Invincible – Key Issues Landscape Impacts - Mitigation Measures 4 options: • Reduce slopes to a maximum of 20 degrees • Retain a highwall • Avoid steepest section of the site (i.e. 30 degrees) • Avoid all steep slopes 16

  17. Key Issues – Landscape Values

  18. Key Issues – Landscape Values

  19. Key Issues – Landscape Values

  20. Key Issues – Landscape Values

  21. Key Issues – Landscape Values

  22. Key Issues – Landscape Values

  23. Key Issues – Landscape Values

  24. Cross Sections 24

  25. Invincible – Key Issues Biodiversity • Removal of 50 ha of native vegetation • Impacts to Capertee Stringybark, Squirrel Glider and Broad-headed Snake • 368 ha land based offset • Supplementary Measures for Broad-headed Snake 25

  26. Invincible – Key Issues Water Resources • Dewatering approximately 701 ML • Storage of water within old Underground workings • Continued discharge in accordance with an EPL and strict discharge criteria • Small amount of groundwater inflow and migration of water to Baal Bone 26

  27. Invincible – Key Issues Economic • Economic benefits of up to $80 million • Employment of up to 35 employees • Supply to Shoalhaven Starches and Mount Piper Power Station 27

  28. Invincible – Key Issues Traffic • Ongoing transport to Mount Piper Power Station • Small amount of truck movements to Shoalhaven Starches • Conditions to limit haulage movements and avoid school bus times. 28

  29. Summary The project should only be approved subject to restricting mining from being undertaken on steep sloped areas. Other impacts are able to be managed, mitigated, or offset. 29

Recommend


More recommend