interpolated linear modeling
play

Interpolated Linear Modeling of the F16 Benchmark Maarten Schoukens - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 Workshop on Nonlinear System Identification Benchmarks Interpolated Linear Modeling of the F16 Benchmark Maarten Schoukens April 2017 Overview Global vs Local Nonlinear Behavior Interpolated Linear Modeling F16 Results Best Linear


  1. 2017 Workshop on Nonlinear System Identification Benchmarks Interpolated Linear Modeling of the F16 Benchmark Maarten Schoukens April 2017

  2. Overview Global vs Local Nonlinear Behavior Interpolated Linear Modeling F16 Results

  3. Best Linear Approximation

  4. Best Linear Approximation y s (t): non-coherent nonlinear contributions n y (t): output noise source

  5. Best Linear Approximation Only valid for a fixed input signal class Input class changes  BLA can change

  6. BLA: Shifting Resonances Increasing Amplitude: Shifting Resonances

  7. Global vs Local Nonlinear Behavior ‘Local’ Nonlinear Behavior Shifting BLA  ‘Global’ Nonlinear Behavior Model ‘Global’ Nonlinear Behavior using interpolated LTI models

  8. F16 Benchmark Data Multisine Data – Force to Acceleration Payload Frequency Range: 2-15 Hz 4 Estimation Amplitudes 3 Validation Amplitudes RMS: [12 24 36 61 74 86 98] N rms

  9. LTI Estimation

  10. LTI Estimation s-domain (continuous time) 12 poles, 12 zeros Start with lowest amplitude, initialize all the other based on lowest amplitude estimate.

  11. LTI Estimation

  12. LTI Estimation

  13. Interpolation Linear interpolation of the numerator and denominator coefficients Other choices possible: Interpolation of the pole & zero locations Interpolation of the pole-residue representation

  14. Results Interpolated model vs Model estimated on validation data

  15. Results: 24 N rms

  16. Results: 61 N rms

  17. Results: 86 N rms

  18. Results Interpolated model vs Model estimated on estimation data: lower level

  19. Results: 24 N rms

  20. Results: 61 N rms

  21. Results: 86 N rms

  22. Results 24 N rms 61 N rms 86 N rms Estimated 0.098 N rms 0.216 N rms 0.254 N rms Interpolated 0.103 N rms 0.338 N rms 0.263 N rms Level Lower 0.352 N rms 0.823 N rms 0.307 N rms Level Higher 0.262 N rms 0.287 N rms 0.330 N rms RMS error in excited frequency range

  23. Results 24 N rms 61 N rms 86 N rms Estimated 15,2 % 18,5 % 17,3 % Interpolated 16,0 % 29,0 % 17,9 % Level Lower 55,0 % 70,6 % 20,9 % Level Higher 40,9 % 24,6 % 22,4 % Relative error in excited frequency range

  24. Conclusion Global Nonlinear Behavior Interpolated LTI Models Good F16-Benchmark Results

  25. 2017 Workshop on Nonlinear System Identification Benchmarks Interpolated Linear Modeling of the F16 Benchmark Maarten Schoukens April 2017

Recommend


More recommend