interaction among agents that plan
play

Interaction among agents that plan Felipe Meneguzzi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interaction among agents that plan Felipe Meneguzzi felipe.meneguzzi@kcl.ac.uk Michael Luck michael.luck@kcl.ac.uk 1 Department of Computer Science Kings College London From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation AAMAS 2008 Estoril,


  1. Interaction among agents that plan Felipe Meneguzzi felipe.meneguzzi@kcl.ac.uk Michael Luck michael.luck@kcl.ac.uk 1 Department of Computer Science King’s College London From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation AAMAS 2008 – Estoril, Portugal . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 1 / 11

  2. . . . Background 1 . . . AgentSpeak(PL) 2 . . . Communication and Cooperation 3 . . . Conclusions and Questions 4 . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 2 / 11

  3. AgentSpeak(L) Procedural agent language Based on the BDI model Designer specifies plans in a library ◮ Plans encode procedures ◮ Plans are characterised by trigger and context condition ◮ Goals are implicit in the plans . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 3 / 11

  4. Planning in AgentSpeak(PL) AgentSpeak(L) + Planning ◮ Standard AgentSpeak(L) language ◮ Planner invoked through an atomic action In principle, any state-space planner can be used . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 4 / 11

  5. Speech-act based communication Popular model of communication in agent languages Used in languages like KQML and FIPA In our paper, we need the following speech acts: ◮ ask – to request information from others ◮ tell – to supply information to others ◮ achieve – to request another agent to achieve a procedural goal . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 5 / 11

  6. Plan Patterns Patterns here are plan rewrite rules Take as input one or more plans Create new plans based on the original plans . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 6 / 11

  7. Communication . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 7 / 11

  8. Simplified Example Randall Dante +!watchTV : at(randall,home) <− +watchingTV. +!open(store) : at(randall,store) <− ...; +!open(store) : at(dante,store) +open(store). <− ...; +open(store). +!remoteOpen(store) : at(dante,store) & ready(dante) +!requestOpen(store) : at(dante,store) <− .send(dante,achieve,open(store)); <− !open(store); .wait(done(open(store)); .send(randall,tell,done(open(store)). +open(store). +!goal_conj([watchingTV, open(store)]) : at(randall,home) <− !watchTV; !remoteOpen(store). . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 8 / 11

  9. Conclusions We show a simple, yet effective cooperation mechanism System generates speech-act dialogs (in a way) Allows a minimum specification for agents to communicate and distribute control Two outstanding issues (foreseen as modules): ◮ Distribution ◮ Reliability . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 9 / 11

  10. Session Questions What is important about the task/problem addressed? ◮ Gap in agent languages regarding support for the multi part of MAS In what way(s) did the the adopted theory/the implementation framework help/hinder you with solving your problem? ◮ Jason has a plan library with KQML communication ◮ Lacks proper reflection ◮ Plan patterns not very flexible . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 10 / 11

  11. More Session Questions In what interesting ways is the realised system (over-/under-)determined? I.e., ”how satisfied” are you with the degree and quality of control achieved? ◮ Planning changes AgentSpeak(L) reasoning cycle . . . . . . F. Meneguzzi and M. Luck (KCL) Interaction among agents that plan AT2AI 11 / 11

Recommend


More recommend