Integ egrating w workflows to strea eamline t the research l - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Integ egrating w workflows to strea eamline t the research l lifec ecycle w e with OS OSF Nici Pfeiffer nici@cos.io Director of Product Sara Bowman, sara@cos.io Product Manager

Mission Increase openness, integrity and reproducibility of research Non-profit, 501(c)3, open source, free for researchers

Culture Change

Culture Change

What W We W Wor ork O On TRAINING COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DISSEMINATING FOSTERING CONNECTION BUILDING TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE TO ENACT AND INCLUSION TO TO ENABLE CHANGE. CHANGE SPREAD CHANGE POLICY METASCIENCE PROVIDING REASONS TO ACQUIRING EVIDENCE TO EMBRACE CHANGE ENCOURAGE CHANGE.

Meet R Resear earchers w whe here t they a are Make it Requir Build Policies ed Make it Build Incentives rewarding Make it Build Communities Normative Make it Easy Build Integrations Make it Possible Build Infrastructure

What do users need?

Registration Submission Redesign

To improve quality and transparency What is it? of research Why should I do it? Some funders require preregistration of studies How do I do it? Before data collection or before Preregistration: analysis of data Which form do I choose? User Confusion Create an immutable, time stamped version of research design, hypothesis and pre-analysis plan How do I fill out this form? OSF offers 8 registration templates, Are there any examples to 4 for preregistration help me? IMPROVE THIS! Did I do it?

Registration System Accelerate Adoption Technical User Constraints Complaints Future User Needs Experience

Improve UI

Improve UX • Guide user through selection of form, or skip to jump to form • Prepopulate new project metadata or choose an existing OSF project to register • Enter registration metadata, progress bar • Validation on completed registration form responses, indicate missing information • Register immediately or embargo

Help Me Choose

Empathize Define Ideate UX Redesign Validate Iterate Ideate Process Prototype Implement Evaluate

I nvestigate indicators of trust and credibility of preprints Survey to assess the research Preprint communities’ beliefs about what information would help them Credibility make credibility decisions about preprint Study Development of a number of icons and indicators for preprint services, which will be informed from the survey results and open source The survey is open through the end Input from members of many of June, and all those who are preprint services and related interested in taking the survey or stakeholders such as ASAPBio, helping share it can find the survey MetaArXiv, PeerJ, LISSA, Chemxiv, Funded by Alfred P. Sloan at: Foundation PaleorXiv, PLoS, and arXiv. https://virginia.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe /form/SV_3kFU2er17VY5uLP Materials and survey data open on OSF: https://osf.io/6kz2j/

Evolution and impact • Adding ~200 new users/day • >25,000 new Public Projects expected in 2019 (24,435 in 2018) • >800,841 Public Files expected in 2019 (672,814 in 2018) • >2,454,574 new Files expected in 2019 (2,019,124 in 2018) • >18,292,169 File Views expected in 2019 (13,648,291 in 2018) • >7,467,287 File Downloads expected in 2019 (6,573,008 in 2018)

We build in the open

Than Thank y you! ou! Nici Pfeiffer nici@cos.io Director of Product Sara Bowman, sara@cos.io Product Manager